This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
I just came out of retirement after I got a phone call from Wendy Starland herself regarding her article. It went from a well-sourced and fleshed-out article to a nanostub. I have reverted your change for the time being and with all due respect and if you feel it's necessary to retrim the article, please let me know. I'll be glad to return to the project long enough to help reshape it if you wish. My talk page is locked down due to insane vandalism, so if you'd like to answer, please do so here and I'll respond as necessary. Again, thanks for your diligence. Best, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
This isn't a cool move, since you are the one who started the thread. With everyone in agreement that the thread was unnecessary drama, it is best that you put the hat back on and drop the stick. Oh and "move along, nothing to see here" is an old Irish cop line, plus it has been used all over TV and Film. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:29, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Christopher. I am new to Wikipedia, so please bear with me. I work for JCoSS and I am trying to edit some of the things you have put on about JCoSS. We definitely don't want a link to JFS as they are a competitive school, so I would really like this to be removed. Some the text needs looking at too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcoss (talk • contribs) 17:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Christopher. I am new to Wikipedia, so please bear with me. I work for JCoSS and I am trying to edit some of the things you have put on about JCoSS. We definitely don't want a link to JFS as they are a competitive school, so I would really like this to be removed. Some the text needs looking at too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcoss (talk • contribs) 17:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
If you are happy to, please could you edit the text as follows, as to be honest, I'm really not sure how to. Also, out of interest, what is your interst in JCoSS and how come you put something on there about the school?
The two sentences as follows should be removed as the wording is slightly incorrect - 'seven places each year are allocated to autistic children' and 'The disability services at the school are being delivered by Norwood' .
It could be replaced with the following paragraph 'The Pears Special Resource Provision (PSRP) is incorporated within JCoSS, offering up to fifty places (seven per year) for pupils with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD). Norwood is the lead partner in establishing the PSRP, and has helped JCoSS to recruit its head, advise on curriculum, pastoral and support issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcoss (talk • contribs) 18:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Sorry - like I said, this is my first time on Wikipedia and I have no idea how to use it. I didn't realise that I was vandalising. I would be very grateful if you could remove the link to JFS. Although they are a Jewish school, our ethos is very different. Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcoss (talk • contribs) 18:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Contains personal attack |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello Chris, please participate in my random poll be bolding one of the two answer choices I provide at the end of the upcoming question. Ready? Here goes! Question: Have you stopped your anti-Semitic editing? Answer: YES / NO 76.21.250.12 (talk) 03:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
|
Hello Christopher, your continuing edits to articles regarding Jewish topics contain, from my POV, a high amount of subtle antisemitism that alarms me. Would you mind commenting on whether my perception of your edits are accurate? I have noticed you have been warned, blocked, and topic-banned about this before, and would like to know if you are continuing to try to uphold to that earlier discussion. 96.255.64.62 (talk) 04:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
We have misunderstandings here. First, Christopher was not topic-banned in the ANI discussion which you link. He was earlier blocked from editing (I believe twice) for some repeated bad editing decisions that an overwhelming concensus of editors found offensive. Some of these edits concerned material considered to be racist.
Christopher's edit at the section of the anti-semitism article concerning Sweden, was to remove the section, based on what he said in the edit summary was a copyright violation or plagiarism issue. In my opinion, he should also have specified in the edit summary, at least some details of the work plagiarised. However, no-one chose to revert him, so there was no opportunity or requirement for further discussion. (That is a large part of how we work here - someone boldly changes something, someone else reverts it, and then we move to discussion about it, to find a way forward.)
I've just reviewed the last six weeks of Christopher's edits, and I don't see great cause for alarm. If there are edits by Christopher where he is repeatedly engaging in inappropriate behaviour, then I imagine it would not be hard to find a concensus at WP:ANI for imposing a topic ban, given the discussions that have happened previously. However, I am just not seeing clear evidence for such a pattern of behaviour at the moment (with the Sweden edit or anywhere else), so ideally you need to make a list of diffs showing and explaining the problem. Such a list would have a number of potential uses, but let's try it here first.
Also ideally, Christopher should give his opinions on this. Something he's been reluctant to do in the past, and I don't know why. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:29, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
@IP. As Demiurge1000 points out, there was no consensus for a topic ban. Also, the block (one in number) wasn't because of my articlespace edits, but because of the content of some of the essays I wrote, which the editors at ANI considered offensive and provocative (not so much antisemitic). There's been no repeat of the behaviour that lead to the block. I find it strange that you are troubled by my removal of the Sweden section of the antisemitism article because it's a fairly innocent edit. (The section has since been restored but not by any of the regular editors at that page.) I don't know what you mean by "attempt to allow/encourage people to trivialize the Holocaust through misinformation"; I think you need to provide evidence for the relevancy of that comment. Overall, I think your perceptions are wrong, and if you look through my edits, you'll see that most of them don't get reverted. Also, your first comment here suggests your motives are less than pure.
Demiurge1000, you're welcome to ask your friend to comment on my edits. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Christopher, why are you so fixated on topics like Criminal black man stereotype. Once again your racist POV pushing is really alarming. Why, for example, are you deliberately inserting unrelated data into that article? Your agenda is both alarming and scary. I can assure you that your edits are being reviewed on multiple fronts. Your unwillingness to be frank and upfront about any affiliations you have with hate-organizations is most concerning. Are you a member of a neo-nazi organization? 96.255.64.62 (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Universe is expanding This was edited by William M. Connolley , Adamrce and me 7 time and finalised. Please state your reason behind the removal. Mention it in the discussion before editing again lot ohard work there please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tauhidaerospace (talk • contribs) 16:06, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
What made you reverse my every edit? I would have appreciated had you had made improvements to my select edits, which according to you, were uncalled for.
Please help me understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammad Sirajuddin (talk • contribs) 08:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
First thing i wrote the truth,its present in history books you can check that and secondly there was a lot of content in that article that was hurting and painfull for muslim like saying our Prophet was unkind with others and using many harsh words like severe and a sence is created in the article that he was bad and treared jews badly — Preceding unsigned comment added by AhsenSaleem (talk • contribs) 09:58, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Christopher Connor (talk) 02:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Check out the edit war on this page, Armburst strikes again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.203.254.1 (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
You left the following post on the AfD:
Questions:
I am under the impression that comments by reviewers are to facilitate correcting the article so that the article is in full conformance to Wiki policies and guidelines. It would be very helpful if the reviews were to explicitly state the concern, link to the Wiki policy to which the item does not conform, and recommend the corrective action to be taken which would satisfy the reviewer. We are all in this together and I think we are all conscientious of doing a beneficial and good job.
Note: We have removed links we thought the reviewers deemed in non conformance. We are in the process or reintroducing links that directly support the article statements and attest to Mr. Julian's notability. Your feedback would be much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ann12h (talk • contribs) 17:59, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
A comment was added on Articles for deletion/Mr. Julian regarding independent coverage or recognition. Thanks in advance for your attention. Ann12h (talk) 01:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
On 22 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Death of Michael Gilbert, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Michael Gilbert was kept as a slave and regularly beaten by a family who eventually murdered him? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 00:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
I have made some copy editing at Tummalapalle Uranium Mine article and also added one ALT1 for hook. kindly have a look, Thanks for reviewing.-- . Shlok talk . 05:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, extra information has been added to the article in order to demonstrate notability, I hope that's OK, take care.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanbircdq (talk • contribs)
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#How_to_deal_with_tendentious_editing.3F. You are not named - just a courtesy note since it mentions a thread at Talk:Kurmi in which you have had some involvement. - Sitush (talk) 17:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello there, could I ask why you removed the (sourced) mango and rug material from British Pakistanis? Also, I initially removed the tag beacuse all book references now have appropriate page numbers (unless I have missed some). --Sansonic (talk) 17:54, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
I've declined your hook at Suicide by hanging. I'm sorry, but the use of the word 'recommended', as well as the general 'how-to' nature of the article, makes it unsuitable for a front page space. The Cavalry (Message me) 21:54, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Now at AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide by hanging. Christopher Connor (talk) 22:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
On 15 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Suicide on the London Underground, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that drainage pits under London Underground tracks help reduce the number of suicides? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Suicide on the London Underground.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
My computer is acting really strange right now. Please wait so i can give a proper response. And please do not defend comical edits such as this. Thanks. Pass a Method talk 17:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Your defense of the mosque built in India is the equivalent of saying that man landed on the moon in the stone age. Or like saying that Christianity reached the Amazonian jungle before it reached the outskirt of Jerusalem. Your defense of an Indian mosque in 629 is mind-boggingly unintelligent, and i hope you're joking when you're defending this claim. How the **** could there have been a mosque in India when a mosque has not even been built in Mecca, the holiest site in islam?! Please stop wasting time with this nonsensical tirade. If you really want to continue this debate then lets take it to WP:RSN so you can embaress yourself some more. Pass a Method talk 20:16, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on English Defence League. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.--Snowded TALK 01:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
On 26 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Death of Mi Gao Huang Chen, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mi Gao Huang Chen was beaten to death in 2005 by a large group of youths outside the Chinese takeaway he owned in Scholes, Greater Manchester? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Death of Mi Gao Huang Chen.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
I dont see why you want to add the sentence "which frequemtly result in violence"' to the edl lede. The lede already says that edl clashes with counter-demonstrators, so isn't that enough? Your sentence would be superfluous. As for the part about "EDL views islam as a threat to English culture". Thats untrue. The EDL official site says it is only against extremist islam, not islam in general. Pass a Method talk 18:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
On 14 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Louise Casey, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Louise Casey, a British civil servant known for being outspoken, once said that "doing things sober is no way to get things done"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Louise Casey.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
In my experience, people as anti-semitic as you seem to know many nazis. I am curious, how many nazis do you know? Thanks, Danny. 72.75.100.190 (talk) 05:25, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Template:Criticism of Islam sidebar has been nominated for merging with Template:Criticism of religion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Thanks for the try, but I'm already searching the sources. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 19:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Black people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Pass a Method talk 20:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Black people, you may be blocked from editing. Pass a Method talk 20:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Christopher,
I would like to know why you removed the spread betting strategies section from the spread betting page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SB Beginner (talk • contribs) 09:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia states, "Islamophobia is prejudice against, hatred or irrational fear of Islam or Muslims." What in the world convinced you that Islamophobia does not belong in the hate category? Your edits on ethnicity and religious topics concerns me. This combined with your recent block as a result of your using excessive Nazi imagery paints a very troubling trend of your history as a Wikipedia editor. I would strongly suggest that you not edit topics that appear to consistently get you into trouble. This kind of bigotry and hatred has no place in Wikipedia, or in its editors. JamaUtil (talk) 02:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you edited this page] in 2010. Since then something went wrong. In particular, the footnote attached to the name "Marc Mauer" was changed. I was wondering who the heck was Marc Mayer (ie why his opinion is important here). Unfortunately the pdf file of Quillian & Pager you linked if dead link now, so I cannot see for myself. Can you please figure it out (confirm/revert the footnote change)? Staszek Lem (talk) 03:12, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I've restarted the article Press Play on Tape. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)