Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Calgary Transit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Between the Lines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Frze. I'm the one who was trying to update and condense the three sections you've reverted. First, could you tell me where I went wrong with the citations? I made a point of transferring each one into the new copy at the relevant sentence. Second, do you not think that my edited-down version was an improvement? Thanks. Valetude (talk) 11:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
@Valetude:: Hello, Valetude. First: Please take a look at the bottom of the site. I am the one who has to clean all the errors. See my contributions. Best wishes.
I think, you can't remove all the editwork by many wikipedian autors. Best wishes --Frze (talk) 11:46, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Greetings Frze. Thanks for fixing that ref. at Jim Richardson - I took for granted that the article already had a reflist... and didn't preview. Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the referencing tip on Hilton College (South Africa). I have rectified it. Mattpbarry (talk) 20:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello Frze, Some nut case came along and vandalized (I think this is the right term for what s/he did) the entire p. and you seemed to undo all crazy stuff. Am I right that you returned everything back to normal? If so, out of curiosity, how did you do it? Or, what exactly happened. EVerything is fine now. Thanks in advance for explaining.--Classicfilmbuff (talk) 23:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Frze, I realize that you were probably trying to be helpful, but when you corrected the refs in this article just now, you caused an edit conflict, which basically meant that I lost my last hour of work. Very frustrating, as you can well imagine. I promise, I was in the middle of fixing it. Please--make sure an editor is finished what they're doing and moved on before you step in like that. I appreciate your enthusiasm, really, but thought you'd like to know what happened. I'll let you know when I'm finished improving the article so you can review it for its FAC, if you'd like. Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 20:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
It appears that, for some reason, I can't connect to Wikipedia through my usual ISP. I tried going through an anonymizer, and it appears that it cannot abide http/https. Please revert all my edits which have damaged Wikipedia since about 3 am (UTC) 30 May 2013. I'll stop editing until I can figure out how to fix the problem. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
FRZE - Thanks for looking at the ref issue I had with the Guns of the Timberland. I saw that there were no footnotes showing up on the article after I did the final save and was working on fixing it. It took a bit to figure it out--I thought that since there was a "==references==" included the footnotes would have appeared but I needed the tag that you added. I am curious, how did you find out about my problem so quickly?
I am having a hard time finding sufficient documentation for the <ref>. . .</ref> tag that can be used in Wikipedia. Trying to deduce what <ref name="test">[http://www.example.org Link text], additional text.</ref> will produce in practice is a bit obscure to me. Currently I am looking at previous articles and sort of deduce what is needed and what can be done. Could you tell me where I could find a more complete documentation for how to create a Reference tag?
Thanks osomite — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osomite (talk • contribs) 08:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing this for me... it was some kind of visual editor error, but I was travelling and lost my internet connection midway through so couldn't fix it myself! cheers, -- phoebe / (talk to me) 14:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing that....I was mainly editing it to 'fix and update' the ISBNs (the article was in an error cat I've been working) but I run the advisor script while I am at it, and since that article had so many dashes I ran 'find' on all three types and looked at the context to get which type was which right. I'm guessing I just didn't notice that that 'phrase' was the ref name, and not the title. :/
Mostly, thanks for actually 'fixing' it instead of just reverting me....recalculating all the ISBNs in an article that big was quite a pain.
Lesson learned...don't trust the 'rendering' in the WikEd "show changes below" (the one that gives the red-and-green differences) to catch breaking a ref name. :P Revent (talk) 08:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
I think your edit summary is too generous. To me, any edit by an anonymous editor which causes damage is in the first place vandalism. It is very tedious to report vandalism officially, but I certainly include that on the edit summary. (Or use something like Twinkle which says it for me.) I'm a little more lenient with signed-in editors, and give them the benefit of the doubt. John of Cromer (talk) mytime= Sat 12:56, wikitime= 11:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Ich denke, Ihre edit-Zusammenfassung ist zu großzügig. Für mich ist jegliche Bearbeitetung von einem anonymen Editor, der Schaden verursacht, in erster Linie Vandalismus. Es ist sehr mühsam, Vandalismus offiziell berichten. Aber ich vermerke das in der edit-Zusammenfassung. (Oder ich nutze so etwas wie Twinkle, die das für mich tut.) Ich bin ein wenig nachsichtig mit angemeldeten Redakteuren, und gebe ihnen den Vorteil des Zweifels.
Please remember to notify the article-creator User:Laith-algharagholy for the article you tagged for speedy-deletion...it's his first attempt at editing, so it's possible he's having trouble getting started. DMacks (talk) 19:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
@DMacks:: You are right - Thanks and Good night - --Frze (talk) 19:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
view history I would also like to thank you for the changes you've made on my article Tallinn town hall. You are very kind! Mailaxxx (talk) 17:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing your reflinks but when you make unexplained deletions it is not for me to "watch what I do" it is for you to explain via edit summary or talk page. Yours, Quis separabit? 15:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Your reversion to my recent edit on Rawla Mandi, i.e. headquarters→headquarter is not much helpful, or correct. There is no headquarter in a noun, only headquarters, be it singular or plural. See for yourself Oxford dictionary, if you are British user, or Merriam-Webster, if you would prefer American. Chhandama (talk) 12:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
@Chhandama::I reverted your edit because of this <nowiki> ||</nowiki> OBC Rawla Mandi <nowiki>|| 100525 || ORBC100525 || Example</nowiki>. You destroyed <ref>http://www.indiapost.gov.in/Pin/pinsearch.aspx?Pin_On=335707</ref>. See difference. Best wishes --Frze (talk) 12:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Frze, I note that you have reverted an official Wikimedia Foundation DMCA takedown on the article Sport in Australia, citing issues with the references. Under no circumstances may takedowns that are issued through the Legal Department to be reverted. Doing so places the Foundation (and thus, the projects) at extreme legal risk. I have reverted you. Please don't do this again - doing so will likely result in a block. For more information see WP:OFFICE. I'm certain you were unaware of the gravity of that action, so I'm not taking further action today, but please do familiarize yourself with the contents of that page so that you can avoid this situation in the future. Now, regarding the references errors - the easiest thing would simply have been to fix the problems. I'm doing so now. Thank you. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
I cited Steen twice in Homer Davenport, there was a formatting error where I used quotation marks in the ref name= tag in one place but not the other. So instead of commenting out the source, you could have fixed the formatting error with a simple word search. Or, if you were too lazy to do that, then put a note at talk stating that there appeared to be an error. Your "fix" was not helpful and did not actually identify the problem that required fixing. Next time, don't do drive-by edits unless you understand what is going on. Montanabw(talk) 18:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
@Montanabw: If you write <ref>Steen 2012, p. 46</ref> instead of <ref name="Steen"/> - you are wrong, not me. You made twice the error! Don't write such things as And restore Steen... (will the drive by editor please read the f***ing article and fix the syntax instead of commenting out source? Sheesh). You have to read and to notice, that there are again and again:
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Steen" is not used in the content (see the help page).
--Frze > talk 19:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Can you please explain to me your reasons for allowing Frze to rollback my warning to him to not conduct his edit-waring argument in the article The Bill on the actual article page. I told him that the correct place to do this was on the talk page. What he did defaced the article with large amounts of BOLD RED TYPE in the very first sentence of the introduction. I hasten to add that what he was arguing about was another editors changing of 'is' to 'was' a 'police procedural' TV series. I had no argument with his rationale (in fact I wholeheartedly agreed with the context ) but objected to him arguing on the actual article page. Please explain. The Dart (talk) 20:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Seeing as how Dart brought this to my attention, I'll just note for the record (don't need any action at this time, just an FYI only, FWIW) that Frze commented out a source I inserted in the Homer Davenport article that WAS being used for inline footnotes, but there were typos in the formatting (I left out some quotation marks) that created the appearance of a source that was not used in the article body text. When I undid his changes, with a snippy remark, I admit, he reverted me with a lecture about proper formatting. Then I got really snippy with Frze about it because it made more work for me to clean up - and because Wehwalt and I are prepping the piece for GA, and it's lot of work, I was particularly short-fused about a drive-by edit like that and took it to Frze's talk. But he has backed down, and appears to be exhibiting good will, so as far as I am concerned, that issue is settled, but if you're wondering, that's what happened. Some of this may well be related to a language issue, but I cannot say for sure. Not a big deal at this point, though I wish he would have dropped the stick after the first revert. Montanabw(talk) 18:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar! And thanks for posting the issue to the WP:VPT! It looks like it's been added to Special:AbuseFilter/345, which will tag matching edits with "Extraneous formatting" and give the editor this warning.
I found it by inputting each of the html tags into Google, one-by-one, and looking through first page of results, until I found something that looked relevant. The string that turned up useful results was "google-src-text". Sophus Bie (talk) 03:15, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) --Frze > talk 14:01, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
copied this from Wikipedia:Help desk --Frze > talk 11:31, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
How is it possible to produce such errors? Which button was used?
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
Thanks. --Frze > talk 05:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
This appears to happen if you let Google Translate to translate you a Wikipedia page, and then edit the page from the translated text out. Try and error ... --Frze > talk 09:51, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Tried and errored: It is impossible to edit the page from the translated text out directly in Google translator. Only by COPY AND PASTE from Google translator.
What I do is clearing up as little "Wiki Janitor" a lot (thousands) of petty minor ref-errors of other editors, pages with missing references list or incorrect ref-formating. I checked such errors and simply reverted (by <undo> or <rollback>), but User:Acalamari told me not to do so. They are good-faith accidents and should have been reverted with a proper explanation.
Now we know the cause of this errors. There is no need for action in my opinion. Is it very difficult to detect such errors automatically?? It's going to keep on happening. But if a filter can be programmed to detect: <span class="notranslate" onmouseover= and stop saving (like website spam filter) instead saying: Do not use Google Translator text. It causes errors. - it would be helpfull. Wikipedially Yours Frze > talk 11:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Sorry for my limited language skills.
Hello Sophus Bie - I noticed that you are a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit. Please take a look at Woody's Chicago Style, the useless link and compare with revision of this page, as edited by GoingBatty at 2 August 2012. The contributions of User:Norman1938 and his photos seem to me as strong vandalism. Please revert his edits and warn or block him. MbG (Mit besten Grüßen) - Herzlich Frze > talk 12:31, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I just noticed I had two messages on my talk page, and not just one! It looks like you've solved the issue. Cheers! Sophus Bie (talk) 10:06, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out. Once you've verified that the info is citable to the 17th edition, you can fix the cross-ref link by simply changing "e16" to "e17". However, you probably shouldn't leave the name "e16" if you link to the current edition, as here.[11] That's currently the 17th but will update to the 18th in a couple years. If you haven't verified that the info is still found in the 17th, and that their opinion hasn't changed, then you should probably either leave it broken (though that's no guarantee that the next person along won't do the same thing) or link to the archive of the 16th edition. — kwami (talk) 07:30, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
You could try to get it added to Template:Backlog status. People at Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check may also be able to help. Superm401 - Talk 09:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Frze, I'm responding to the note your left for me regarding fixing the pages with citation errors. I was going to suggest contacting the citation cleanup WikiProject, but it looks like you already have. That's probably your best bet as far as I know. Take care and good luck, --momoricks 01:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello - some editors fight off the vandal hordes, as I do repairing pages with citation errors. If I didn't - there would be a large backlog in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting and in Category:Pages with missing references list as in Category:Pages with broken reference names (more than 1500 yesterday). But it is impossible to work it alone. Do you know how to do a "Blitz" (excuse the comparision) to find willing editors to work on it. It is much more easier to repair references if you do it one hour, one day or one week ago after the errors were made instead of months and years after the error was done. Very, very difficult to find these errors.
Only with WikiBlame Search it is possible to find and repair such errors.
Best wishes --Frze > talk 08:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
((User:TheJJJunk/Backlog))
, a template I made: Category | Current status |
---|---|
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() |
which determines if the category is empty or not. I also use ARA, a script that I developed, to help fix citation errors. I haven't used WikiBlame before. — JJJ (say hello) 16:01, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
I believe Wikipedia:WikiProject Citation cleanup might be a good place to find other editors interested in fixing pages with citation errors. Through that project, you could organize a backlog elimination drive as a sort of "blitz". The backlog elimination drives done by WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors or those done by WikiProject Wikify are good examples of how backlog elimination drives are organized.
I'd be glad to make a barnstar if you need one. Otherwise, there is the Citation Barnstar, which might suit your purposes. Sophus Bie (talk) 07:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
P.S. Just so you know, I will be out of town for a couple of weeks, so I'll be slow in replying to messages.
Hello,I'm sorry for my mistake. Excuse me, please. Cordially. Gtaf (talk) 15:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
In der en.WP gibt es keine Sichtung wie in der de.WP. Z. B. bei Vandalismus gibt es die Möglichkeit des "Rollback" ohne jegliche Zugriffsmöglichkeit bzw. nur mit umständlicher Einsichtnahme in ältere Versionen und Show Changes, wenn ein Benutzer in mehreren Schritten vandaliert hat.
Meine Frage: Undo kann man nur jeweils eine Version. Gibt es irgendwie eine simple Variante des Undo 2 or more Versions (wie es in der de.WP über Sichtung aufheben möglich ist)? Vielen Dank und schönes WE --Frze > talk 07:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, that comment was four years ago and I don't remember it. I still can't find any evidence that the book really exists. Art LaPella — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.173.74 (talk) 04:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Just a short note to thank you for the heads-up on the URL missing from the citation I recently added to the above articles. Rushed copy-pasting seems to been at fault. I've sorted it out now. Ansbaradigeidfran (talk) 10:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Why? It was a properly referenced addition to the list, and your edit summary from Twinkle was uninformative. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
No, you didn't read that article: it says Clerk "was elected to the presidency, void by the death of Dr. Edward Browne. On 13 September 1708, he was re-elected at the general election of officers on the 30th of the same month." This is confirmed in the updated version, the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, behind a paywall: Clerk "elected to the presidentship, void by the death of Dr Edward Browne, on 13 September 1708, being re-elected at the general election of officers on the 30th of the same month. Clerk ‘being indisposed by many bodyly infirmityes, and also aged’, was unable to act; he accordingly resigned on 18 December, and Charles Goodall was appointed on 23 December 1708." So he was President for two or three months. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
This is fixed now [12] thanks for your attention. Lesion (talk) 04:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Yes I saw you removed it. Well done Greco22 (talk) 16:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
sorry I reverted your edits - Files doesn't exist. --Frze > talk 10:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
If you had explained what was going on in the edit summary in the first place, I would have understood your revert. -- Alarics (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Don't know how long transfer to Commons takes. Might be a while. Since the file's been up since 2002, I'd like to keep the history. — kwami (talk) 06:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Appropriate to add warning (maybe ((subst:uw-vandalism1))) to User_talk:MUFADDAL_A_SHAKIR ? MUFADDAL's edits include 1) added what looks like unreferenced trivia about an alleged vulture in Suklihenda Valley such as this edit, 2) 2nd major edit adding link to conservationindia.org (that doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia article), 3) re-adding vulture in Suklihenda text that KylieTastic removed for being "text copied from an article about a specific bird" 4) adding red-link images to Cinereous_Vulture article. --EarthFurst (talk) 11:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
I looked at the changes that you made on the Gashole page. I still don't fully understand what to look for when clicking on "cur" and "prev", but it looks like you put the Gashole user ratings from the Internet Movie Database into the references section. That is not a reference, and it is already in the external links section. It also looks like you took the link to Fuel Economy of the Gas Engine out of the reference section, but it is a reference, even though there is not a superscript next to it in the body of the article. I am not finished yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruvensky (talk • contribs) 05:15, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
You indicated that the book Fuel Economy of the Gas Engine was a reference to events that occured in El Paso, Texas. The book says nothing about it. I did rewrite the first paragraph of the original synopsis, which was completely innacurate, but other than that I am not editing and am writing the plot of the movie into the Wiki page, which is a lot of work. There is nothing wrong with showing people things, but I feel that you are telling me what to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruvensky (talk • contribs) 01:18, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
Thanks and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 08:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Frze, nothing serious! In fact, you might have simply pasted in a fairly raw copy of a translation of Ahamad Javeed Ahwar to start the article. I've been cleaning up some overlinking with a script and discovered "writer" linked. (Only one? Normally I don't bother in those cases!). So it's a false alarm.
Thanks for your message. Tony (talk) 12:44, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with this article, I saw you changed the format and was trying to restore it back to the original with the refs in the reflist and not in the article, please take care. MilborneOne (talk) 18:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the message. Was this in relation to a particular edit? Hack (talk) 00:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
As you have already noticed, that I have fixed the issue. I included the bare link initially (with ref) and used reflinks to pull the data & formating but later forgot to remove ref tags which caused the issue. I'm really sorry for the mess it caused due to simple ovelook (that too twice). Thanks for bearing with me.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 08:20, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey guy could you please refrain from doing this within the first ten minutes of a page being created, while I'm actually uploading the images linked to from the new article? It's been driving me nuts tonight, I just undid the third one... doesn't it show in your notifications? PhnomPencil (talk) 12:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Does the best job at rescuing orphaned cites -- I find it much better than trying to do so manually (the Villatte article). Cheers. Collect (talk) 12:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You removed the link to the file Abalone-molecular-modelling-300.png from the page Abalone (molecular mechanics). I see that the file is really gone. However, it is not clear what happened. This file has been here for the years. Is on Wiki some mechanism that shows which files were removed and why? P99am (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Frze,
Thank you for fixing the edit and cleaning up after me. Have a good day! :)
--Qwerty Binary (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey, Why did you revert it? I worked really hard on the article and have provided sources. Now its reverted and its full of mistakes and sentences that stop half way through. I undid the edit. Just wanted to let you know. Thanks. PS if you have any comments to make my Wikipedia skills better please tell me :) User:Lailasamadi 12:09, 21 January 2014
@Lailasamadi Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Aryana Sayeed. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. —Josh3580talk/hist 23:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Aryana Sayeed. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Josh3580talk/hist 23:30, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Aryana Sayeed shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Frze > talk 12:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thank you dear i want to change my username to "Saul" again thanks goodbye. --شاول (talk) 19:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for catching that error. I think its corrected now. Let me know if there are further issues. --Rehsjntdz (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi please stop deleting my pictures they are perfectly fine.
Interesting. Something is not right on the article Open Europe. Either there is a cabal of very committed users uninterested in other topics, or there's some sockpuppeting going on. Hopefully, more constructive engagement will be forthcoming, but I'd appreciate your experienced hand in keeping an eye on it. I'm not quite sure how to proceee. Peregrine981 (talk) 15:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
—Josh3580talk/hist 15:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Chris19231: File:Open Europe's London Office.jpg is not his own as he wrote but File:FaithHouseTuftonStreet.jpeg. File:William Hague Open Europe.jpg and File:George Osborne Open Europe speech.jpg are not his own but copyright violation. I added the source of this images in commons and requested speedy deletion. This images were always deleted see [18] [19]. It seems to me me that Chris19231 should be warned and / or blocked. Thanks --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Frze (talk • contribs) 15:01, 22 January 2014
Hello Frze, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted John Clifton Wright (author,sailor), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Cindy(talk) 11:06, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello there! Could you please head over to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Donald_W._Thomas -- so we can discuss the revert a little bit? Thanks in advance! Yours, 24.212.76.4 (talk) 16:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Your blanket revert intervention [20] is not helpful, and disregards the process of revising that page. Please explain at the article's Talk page, or simply undo. Qexigator (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Is it too much to ask you to explain what is the relevance of some users have been working hard on Category:Pages with citation errors, and why that can allow disregard of the work of others mentioned by MrBill3. You evidently made a knee-jerk revert without bothering to consider the current discussion and proposals on the article's Talk page. That was not helpful. I guess others such as MrBill could have resolved the problem in a jiffy. Had you allowed for that? Qexigator (talk) 08:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Would you mind dealing with the red image in In vitro meat? I left a message for the editor who reverted me and I do not want to get into an edit war. Also, I hope you're following any developments at Wikipedia:Bot requests#MissingFilesBot > see Category:Articles with missing files. Thanks for your help! - tucoxn\talk 05:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Done
The edits were made to this page because of the defintion of 'sandbox.' the grand theft auto titles are by definition not sandbox games and should be characterized accordingly. --Swagger9000 (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, That picture that you removed was giving me trouble and I left it up in hopes that someone would know how to fix it. The picture appears on the Italian version of the page but I could not get it to appear on the english version. Do you know how to fix it? --66.212.71.78 (talk) 02:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Beach at Adventure Landing without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! GoneIn60 (talk) 07:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Why are you repeatedly restoring the wrong date of the Emergency proclamation?!—indopug (talk) 08:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
I would be grateful if you could stop removing my factually correct edit of Leanne Brown (Musician) and undo you recent edit. There is no copyright violation of me including text onto Wikipedia that I as her legal representative have written. I am the copyright owner of all my own works and the information is factually accurate and authorised by the individual concerned. Simply replacing this to a link for one of her projects is not a true representation of the artist and neglects her other works. Leanne is an individual in her own right and you have no right denying a true representation of her achievements. I will look forward to your amendments. Please feel free to contact me directly if you want to discuss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andington (talk • contribs) 13:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
I figured someone would revert my changes without actually reading them or did you? Sure enough, you did not bother to leave a reason on the talk page of the game director's page whom I edited. Pay attention in the future. Too many lazy people on wikipedia.
Majinsnake (talk) 15:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)