Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Material flow because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Galamore. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. jp×g🗯️ 06:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Galamore!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Thanks for your contributions to Holmes Place. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Galamore, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, GoTo (Israeli company), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoTo (Israeli company).
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|TheLongTone))
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
TheLongTone (talk) 15:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Galamore, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place ((Help me))
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Marokwitz (talk) 10:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Jesse Lyu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justiyaya 13:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on JFrog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TLA (talk) 06:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. jp×g🗯️ 03:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
Galamore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The accusation is ridiculous and false. If there is anyone on Wikipedia that I can be exposed to with my name. Let him talk to me and understand that there is no way that I receive money from any company for my edits. I want to keep writing, And I want to keep writing about high-tech companies. Hope someone will read this and help me. Galamore (talk) 06:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There's enough red flags here for me to not disagree with the blocking admin- but even if I did disagree, you are editing so promotionally that it's no different than if you were working for the subjects of your edits. Right now you can't be trusted to edit about companies- if there are other topics that you want to edit about, please tell what those might be; once you do that for awhile and learn more about Wikipedia guidelines, that can be revisited, but I decline to unblock you to edit about companies. 331dot (talk) 08:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Is it okay to write about people? I can also write about technologies... And be careful not to write about technologies unique to the company so that it won't be advertising...
I read Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody And I understood why you were so suspicious of me. I don't know how to prove that I'm not related to them. For me, delete the articles I wrote. each and every one of them. I have no sentimental connection and I don't care about the companies themselves. Right, I'm new. But in the last few weeks I read and learned a lot here. I want to continue to be a part. Galamore (talk) 06:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
I have read this page and the section about you on an an administrator's noticeboard, and checked your editing history, and here are some of my thoughts on the matter.
I don't know whether you are an undisclosed paid editor or not, but there is nowhere near enough evidence to have persuaded me to block you from editing for that reason. On the other hand, I do think that the promotional character of your editing is enough to justify a block. As far as I know, that promotional character could be because you are being paid to use Wikipedia for advertising, but it could alternatively be simply because, being new to editing Wikipedia, you simply didn't realise that Wikipedia style is to write in a neutral way, without expressing approval or admiration of what one is writing about. What I am about to write is based on the assumption that the second of those two possibilities is true.
Creating new articles is probably the most difficult thing for new editors to do, because there are so many ways in which to fall foul of Wikipedia's policies, guidelines, and generally accepted style, which a new editor is unlikely to be aware of. Many new editors who try to launch straight into creating articles therefore have a frustrating and disheartening experience. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. It is also a mistake to try to get round the restriction on new editors creating articles by making trivial edits to get autoconfirmed, for at least two reasons. The more important of those reasons is that the block on new editors from creating new articles was introduced to help those editors to avoid problems, by stopping them from rushing in without knowing enough to avoid encountering problems, such as those you have experienced. Evading that block therefore exposes you to the problems it is intended to protect you from.
Assuming that you are a genuine good-faith new editor, not editing for pay, and that you are still interested in contributing to Wikipedia, my advice is to make a new unblock request in which you undertake not to try to create new articles, whether directly or via drafts, for a significant time, perhaps six months. It may also be a good idea to undertake not to write about businesses, but it is important to realise that the question of whether your editing is promotional or not is a totally different matter from the question of what topic you are writing about; promotion of a person, an opinion, or anything else is just as unacceptable as promotion of a business. JBW (talk) 18:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Galamore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay, I took some time to think. At this time I also saw that the article I created perplexity.ai had over 10,000 views, which made me realize that what I am doing here is significant. I think I have a lot to contribute, and I ask that you unblock me. If you decide that I am not allowed to write new entries concerning companies, I will respect that. I will start by improving existing articles about technologies, technology companies and people who deal with technology.Galamore (talk) 07:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Galamore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ok, I promise not to deal with commercial companies or anything related to that, I will only edit articles related to education and education in Israel, maybe also about people from Israel's history Galamore (talk) 09:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Accept reason:
You have been kept waiting for long enough, and I think in fairness to you this needs to be settled. JPxG has made hundreds of edits since the first time Deepfriedokra pinged them, and dozens since the second time, but has not responded here, so I assume they have nothing to say. On the basis of the assurances you have given about your future editing intentions, I'm willing to unblock to give you another chance. I hope you will now have a successful time contributing to Wikipedia. 🙂 JBW (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perplexity.ai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Stuartyeates (talk) 09:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Streams Method in the Israeli education, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Galamore, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Remsense))
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Remsense诉 15:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kfar HaRoeh Yeshiva, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)