I will usually reply on this page only.
Archives:
Hello User:Geschichte, as you deleted the article Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf, i request you to please move this page to draft so that i may add more reliable sources and make the article better, Thank You.Indimpdd (talk) 12:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sérgio Trindade. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Pesqara (talk) 14:55, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Can you please delete The Soulmate Project article? That show was cancelled too because of the pandemic. Thanks! -152.32.113.251 (talk) 06:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Surprised you removed the CSD tag, this user page mostly has links to porn. Liz Read! Talk! 01:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Can user:Bengemen please be blocked ASAP. CLCStudent (talk) 20:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
The article Magnus Midtbø has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 17jiangz1 (talk) 17:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi Geschichte, I have removed your PROD's on these two players as they have both made appearances for teams in notable leagues under WP:NRU. Regards. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
hello. please delete this page again. Best--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 16:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, can you please contact the article creator when you nominate an article for AfD? It seems as if I created this (in my very early days, it isn't even on my watchlist apparetly), and it looks as if you didn't drop me a note about it. Fram (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, You recently removed the G4/speedy delete tag I had added with the edit summary as "the discussion was so long ago, please take to new AFD." It was deleted after a full discussion just last year (2019). Did you per chance, misread the date? RevelationDirect (talk) 00:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi :) I was a bit surprised to see that you'd removed the notability tag and speedy request from Paulo Gali, without explaining why (the edit note merely says 'cleanup'). If you thought the speedy was heavy-handed, by all means object, but please at least give your reason so others (myself included) can learn from you. As for notability, I still think that's borderline at best: I don't know if any of the (few) matches this chap has appeared in satisfy the FIFA 'Tier 1' requirement in WP:NFOOTY, but even if they do, that surely doesn't guarantee notability, only creates presumption in favour of it. The sources aren't entirely convincing, either - they don't even agree on his birth date - so I'm really not sure from where in your view the notability derives so clearly. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello - can you please think about stopping your mass nominations of Australian female footballers for deletion? It is becoming annoying and looks like you have something against there being any articles. Why not think about improving some articles instead? Deus et lex (talk) 12:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:Norwegian Nobel Committee has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello User:Geschichte, I am not quite sure why the page Chinonso Offor was moved to draft. I wouldn't mind some clarification! Chinonso has played in European competitions. Why does he need to have played a game in the MLS to qualify for a Wiki page? Hazelnike (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)(talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi Geschichte, you recently thanked me for creating a couple of articles on Norwegian actors and this made me wonder, were they articles that you had planned to create yourself? I am merely curious to know if you had any interest in those particular topics, that's all :) Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Hallo, you participated in this discussion in its early stages. Therefore, I would take the liberty to ask you if you would like to review 2014–15 FC Winterthur season again. In the meantime, I have added texts and citations. Perhaps you would like to add a new comment, and perhaps with a couple of suggestions, to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 FC Winterthur season discussion page. Your opinion would be appreciated. Thank you very much for your participation and please feel free to delete this message from your page, if you so wish. Thanks again and kindest greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 22:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Excuse me, but what's this supposed to mean, exactly? The use of parentheses is currently deprecated for this type of article. Avilich (talk) 02:28, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Good spot on the Aidan Barlow/Stoke City news. However, it looks like it was only a trial - Stoke referred to a trialist in the Leeds United U23 match, for example. See: [2]. I can't find anything to suggest he was signed, either. RPSwp (talk) 00:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
I don't know what you are trying to insinuate with that comment at my AFD. I have a problem with people trying to promote the subject with sentences like "he has an accomplished international career in space, with more than three decades of combined work experience". I have a problem with people using Facebook as a source for a non-notable award. That article is more of a glorified CV than an encyclopedia entry. As a Wikipedia editor, you should look at the article history and check which editor's only edits were to promote the subject and not which editor is trying to keep the encyclopedia free of PR junk. Teemu.cod (talk) 06:39, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Andreas Roth (runner) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
signed, Rosguill talk 22:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello friend.
Can we do anything about last speedy deletions of three articles (see in my talk page), please? And also the files of Loukas Barlos and Dimitris Melissanidis also in my talk page.
Also if you want any help about Greek football and articles let me know please.
Thanks a lot. GRanemos1 (talk) 19:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Look this. Thank you. --З.Вукобрат (talk) 20:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. I often come across articles about footballers created by you. Good work! There's one thing I noticed: you seem to frequently use weltfussball.de which is a good source. worldfootball.net is the same thing in English so it's probably the better choice for the English Wikipedia. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Geschichte,
You recently tagged a lot of New York stub articles to be proded. In the future, could you follow the PROD instructions that "You should notify the article's creator or other significant contributors by adding the ((subst:Proposed deletion notify|Name of page)) tag or other appropriate text to contributor talk pages."
. It's a courtesy to inform the page creator when you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD or AFD) in case they have questions about the tagging and to let them know what has happened to pages they have created. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 19:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Derrick Shapande has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Leagues played in are not fully professional per WP:NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~RAM (talk) 22:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The consensus was for redirect and that is what you have done...but your AFD closing comment is 'delete'. Please can you clarify? GiantSnowman 11:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
I think you can remove the deletion nomination from Basswood Pond. It will be improved further too. Most of the ones youve been nominating for deletion, I planned on adding all the info but never got around to it. Also please work with me and notify me when you add this to a page ive been a main author to. Thanks -420Traveler (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Tomi Markovski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Football player and manager who fails GNG and NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 12:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomi Markovski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
BlameRuiner (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Activist (talk) 04:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Geschichte,
I see you are PRODding a lot of marginal articles but for some reason, you are not posting notices on the talk page of the page creator informing them. Twinkle should do this automatically whenever you use it to tag a page for deletion. It makes the process very easy. I think it's a nice courtesy to notify a page creator when an article they have created has been tagged for deletion. I know you are very experienced but perhaps you could make this part of your tagging process. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Przemysław Zabawski. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 30#Przemysław Zabawski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. SFB 19:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Guðbjörn Tryggvason has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 22:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Thomas Jordan (sprinter) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 20:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I found the articles should be merged, but I don't know how to find the consensus. Can you help me? I request Manuel Carrascalão House massacre should be merge into Manuel Carrascalão. The reason is too short and unreferenced. Thank you. --Tensa Februari (talk) 08:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Henning Bue Aamodt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY, no evidence of WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Aanesland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Knut Aga, Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:FOOTY, no evidence of WP:GNG coverage
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shåresh Ahmadi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Aleksander Akerjordet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Pål Henning Albertsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY, no evidence of WP:GNG-level non-routine coverage
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Aligo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Jan Tore Amundsen (footballer, born 1968) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Stein Amundsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Arild Andersen (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nils Petter Andersen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Carl Axel Andreassen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Eivind Andreassen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Andreassen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Svein Are Andreassen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Helge Aune has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ruben Bakke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornelius Bencsik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Per WP:FPL the Norwegian men's top flight is only listed as 'fully professional' from 2001. Although I suspect this is quite generous and the actual cut-off should be later - do you happen to know the relevant date? If so you could add it (with evidence) to the discussion. Thanks, Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helge Aune until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksander Akerjordet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksander Akerjordet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pål Henning Albertsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knut Aga, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Tore Amundsen (footballer, born 1968) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stein Amundsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arild Andersen (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Axel Andreassen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruben Bakke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
There was a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues#Norway, after which it became apparent that the Eliteserien only became fully pro in 2001. If you have evidence to the contrary then please present it there. As it stands any player who appeared in the league before that date fails NFOOTBALL... GiantSnowman 19:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ørjan Berg Johansen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Stein Berg Johansen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:FOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Arild Berg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Bjerk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Trond Bjørndal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Even Blakstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ingve Bøe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Arne Bonde (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Philip Borgen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arild Berg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ousseynou Boye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svein Tore Brandshaug until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ståle Bratseth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG, doesn't inherit notability from his illustrious brother
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Dag Petter Breivik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Hrcka Brøndberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Tom Buer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ulf Camitz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elias Dahlberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Berstad, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Berstad (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Buer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stein Berg Johansen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Øystein Drillestad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ola Dybwad-Olsen, Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable: fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Dag Eidsvik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christoffer Eliassen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Christer Ellefsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Svein Enersen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG failure
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Stig Engen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Morten Kjær Enger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG (unless he's done anything notable in his day job as a lawyer)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Andreas Evjen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as all his top division appearances came before the Norwegian men's league was supposed to be "fully professional". More importantly fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rino Falk Larsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Hallgeir Finbråten has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ole Petter Fjørtoft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Kjell Rune Flo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Tom Fodstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY fail
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Knut Erik Folland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Caleb Francis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG as a football player, there is also insufficient evidence of any notability as a commentator
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frode Fredriksen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Henning Friise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Furseth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Rolf Furuly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Vidar Geitle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable, fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Espen Granli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable, fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Tor Andre Grenersen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Lars Grevskott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Tommy Grønvold has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Roar Gulliksen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Sindre Gundersen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Gestur Gylfason has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Tor Arild Haddal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joakim Hagabakken until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Stian Hagelund has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Knut Helge Hagen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Petter Hagen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Espen Hagh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Norwegian people of Macedonian descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm seeing a lot of lakes, mountains, etc especially in New York and elsewhere in the USA with PROD from you. In most of these cases the entity is recognized and named tracked by the USGS thus instead of deletions they should be redirected to articles and lists for the region according to WP:GEOLAND. These all should be suggested to merge for consolidation rather than proposing deletions as that fits more with the Gazetteer and the objectives of the respective geographic Wikiprojects. I've systematically been tagging the articles for visibility in their respective feature and region WikiProjects projects to bring better attention to their existence to start and working on a strategy for WikiProject Lakes which could be replicated in other features, but I need to write this up for sharing. What do you think about shifting from PROD to merge? Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Mauritian emigrants to Norway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:People from Gjemnes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Espen Hagh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roar Gulliksen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eivind Andreassen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Evjen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Johan Hammarström has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Bjørn Tore Hansen (footballer, born 1975) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Waage Hansen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Tommy Hansen (footballer, born 1967) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Tommy Hansen (footballer, born 1971) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Trond Vidar Hansen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Raymond Hardy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Glenn Hartmann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Bernt Haugen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Andreas Hauger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Peter Hedman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Asbjørn Helgeland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:FOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Trond Helgesen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Hella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobias Henanger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Børge Hernes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Berg Hestad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Trond Hjelle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Lars Hjorth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Jørn Holmen (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:FOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Stein Holsvik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 00:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Göran Holter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Cato Holtet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ervin Horn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truls Hovland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Hummervoll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article John Erik Indrebø has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Stein Arne Ingelstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Krister Isaksen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ole Gunnar Iversen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Tom Helge Jacobsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Erik Johannessen (footballer, born 1971) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Gaute Johannessen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Geir Johansen (footballer, born 1968) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Truls Nordby Johansen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ove Jørstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Kalsaas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kjetil Kalve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Jørn Karlsrud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Anders Kiel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Morten Kihle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Trond Kindervåg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torbjørn Kjerrgård until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Klemensson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Sven Kloster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Jan Kokkim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Sigbjørn Kollnes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mats Holt, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mats Holt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Børge Hernes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ove Jørstad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Ronny Kristensen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krister Isaksen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Gabriela König has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Loafiewa (talk) 05:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asbjørn Helgeland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Hjorth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaute Johannessen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Juro Kuvicek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Stian Larsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Tor Åge Larsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Steinar Lein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Are Lervik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Kim Løkke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Rune Lothe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Tore Løvland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Bjørn Ludvigsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kjetil Lundebakken until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Odd Petter Lyngstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odd Petter Lyngstad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rune Lothe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Løkke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
On 4 March 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Zlatko Kranjčar, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:People from Eide requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Helen Østervold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello User:Geschichte, as you deleted the article RDM (film director), i request you to please move this page to draft so that i may add more reliable sources and make the article better, Thank You.User:Jitheshtony (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear Geschichte, I hope this finds you well. Apologies that I couldn't properly support you last year about the Turkish football clubs as you mentioned. But, any other questions, please let me know. I'll kindly ask you help for goalkeeper Nedim Kaleçi to be moved to Nedim Kaleci without any redirection, or deleting the article with letter "ç", please. It was created with absolute good faith but contains a spelling mistake. Correct surname is definitely Kaleci, as it means "goalkeeper" in Turkish language. You may also confirm the identity as per TFF records [3]. Many thanks in advance. Isik (talk) 19:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello. How come you removed Category:France youth international footballers from Daniel Solas? He clearly played for the France U21 team. Paul Vaurie (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
I have removed the ((proposed deletion/dated))
tag from Ludvig Johansson, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add ((proposed deletion))
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!. /Julle (talk) 00:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Geschichte,
I was going through some of the geographic articles you PROD'd and noticed that you don't post notifications of your tagging on the talk page of the article creator which is typically a part of every deletion page tagging. Did this editor ask that you not notify them? Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Weng (surname) and related are hoax. Without any references and without any reliable sources. Destroy all "Weng" and related. 116.206.12.54 (talk) 01:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Grorud IL.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 14:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Why did you delete my draft? Thank you. Paul Vaurie (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Geschichte,
Would you be able to explain your reasoning for your closure as redirect on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Montoya? The nom and one other participant advocated for deletion, and the other participant said effectively delete or merge with Juan Pablo Montoya. I could therefore understand closing as "merge", but now we are left with a redirect to an article with no mention of Sebastian Montoya.
Thanks. A7V2 (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Geschichte,
Please do not add nonexistent, red link categories to pages as you did on Category:US Chaouia managers and other categories. According to WP:REDNO, there should be no red link categories unless you are going to immediately create that category (A page in any Wikipedia namespace should never be left in a red-linked category. Either the category should be created, or else the non-existent category link should be removed or changed to one that exists.
}. Adding red link categories to a page just requires other editors to then go and remove them. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
These are the top goalscorer lists of the Beta Ethniki from 1983 to 1993 and it's up to you to help me with the players:
1983/84
Dimitris Tsembtibis (Edessa) ............... 21 Anagnostou (Pierikos) ...................... 16 Mesimerlis (Edessaikos) .................... 15 Apostolis Drakopoulos (Panachaiki) ......... 14 Mitrakos (Atromitos) ....................... 14
1984/85
Paraskevopoulos (Almopos) .................. 19 Vakoufaris (Agrotikos A.) .................. 16 Ioannis Papadopoulos (Edessaikos) .......... 16 Ioannis Gambetas (Trikala) ................. 16 Gyftakis (Xanthi) .......................... 15 Kopanidis (Proodeftiki) .................... 15
1985/86
Panagiotidis (Naousa) ...................... 21 Vellios (Edessaikos) ....................... 17 Vakoufaris (Veria) ......................... 16 Ioannis Gambetas (Trikala) ................. 16 Kostas Kottakis (Ionikos) .................. 15 Mitrakos (Atromitos Ath.) .................. 15 Moschos (Kavala) ........................... 15 Vassilis Tzalakostas (Athinaikos) .......... 15
1986/87
Kostas Kottakis (Ionikos) .................. 20 Nikos Kriezis (Xanthi) ..................... 18 Apostolis Drakopoulos (Panachaiki) ......... 16 Dimitris Koutas (Levadiakos) ............... 14 Tsakouridis (Makedonikos) .................. 14 Zisis Tsekos (Panserraikos) ................ 14
1987/88
Kostas Kottakis (Ionikos) .................. 18 Dimitris Nolis (Kastoria) .................. 17 Ioannis Gambetas (Doxa D.) ................. 15 Krasonis (Athinaikos) ...................... 15 Zvetkov (Doxa D.) .......................... 14 Karanikas (Apollonas) ...................... 14
1988/89
Adamopoulos (Xanthi) ....................... 30 Keramidas (PAS Giannina) ................... 17 Velitchkov (Panserraikos) .................. 15 Vaggelis Kalogeropulos (Panserraikos) ...... 15 Basbanas (Pierikos) ........................ 14
1989/90
Alekos Alexandris (Veria) .................. 21 Georgios Vaitsis (Panachaiki) .............. 17 Manolis Chandapakis (Niki) ................. 17 Sofianos (Charavgiakos) .................... 14 Michalis Alexiadis (Naousa) ................ 12 Papanikolaou (PAS Giannina) ................ 12
1990/91
Alekos Alexandris (Veria) .................. 16 Nikos Tsoleridis (Ap. Kalamaria) ........... 16 Kostas Konstantinidis (Atromitos) .......... 15 Sofianos (Ethnikos) ........................ 14 Vainas (Pierikos) .......................... 12 Bambas (Ethnikos ........................... 12
1991/92
Dimitris Nolis (Ap. Kalamaria) ............. 21 Michalis Alexiadis (Naousa) ................ 13 Vassilis Tsiartas (Naousa) ................. 13 Baxevanoglou (Kavala) ...................... 12 Michalis Ziogas (Ionikos) .................. 12 Papadopoulos (Argos) ....................... 12
1992/93
Vassilis Tsanas (Levadiakos) ............... 14 Zifkovic (Naousa) .......................... 13 Predrag Mitic (EAR) ........................ 12 Petrunov (Panserraikos) .................... 12 Michalis Alexiadis (Naousa) ................ 11 Jurisic (Atromitos) ........................ 11 Koic (Levadiakos) .......................... 11 Michailovic (Giannitsa) .................... 11 Tsalkintzis (Giannitsa) .................... 11 Imre Bonda (Olympiakos V.) ................. 11 Panchev (Panserraikos) ..................... 11
Jolicnikola (talk) 08:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, June 2, KOAD-LP was nominated for deletion. On June 24, it was closed as a Keep and immediately listed at DRV (that was a mess of a nightmare). So, with a 3-1 Keep !vote, it was relisted at AfD, two more Keep !votes have been added since it's relisting. It's clear, at this point, this is a SNOW Keep.
So, as an admittedly involved editor, I am asking a randomly-chosen and uninvolved admin to, please, close this AfD, which has been up for more than a month. If you'd like it to run a little longer, I'm fine with that too. Thank you for your time. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 21:34, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Expatriate sportspeople in Palestine by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:42, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
of course, leading marks are not records, you are right. BUT in the word "records", you can put a lot of meanings, including leading marks.--Arorae (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Portuguese expatriate sportspeople in Colombia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henri Schoeman (judoka) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Boleyn (talk) 16:32, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Cameroonian expatriate sportspeople in Armenia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Geschichte,
I noticed you recently deleted some empty categories. Could you instead tag them as CSD C1 empty categories instead of deleting them straight-away? I don't know the situation with these particular categories but often categories are temporarily empty. I'd say of the empty categories I tag each day, 5-10% are not still empty a week later, they need to be untagged and aren't deleted. Of course, if these are page creations of a vandal or blocked editor, take action. But otherwise, it doesn't hurt the categories to sit for a week just in case they don't stay empty. Thank you very much! Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian expatriate sportspeople in Qatar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Rwandan expatriate sportspeople in North Macedonia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 17:10, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian expatriate sportspeople in Qatar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Geschichte (talk · contribs), as per your comment i have requested at undeletion and i have mentioned the details below, DMacks suggested me to contact you so can you move this to draft please. Indimpdd (talk) 07:17, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
I want to work on this article, can someone move this deleted article to draft so that i can add reliable independent sources and make person more notable by adding important references. —Indimpdd (talk) 16:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Im making green edits and you are making red edits, which is fine. But instead of trying to sneak them through, could you at least ping me so maybe I can fix them? Thanks and keep up the good work.-420Traveler (talk) 14:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello! :) This is regarding the recently deleted article Sequenceome (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sequenceome). You closed this discussion, and that's why I'm contacting you. Is there any way that you could add the article to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia? The article existed since 2007 and I'm pretty sure it was a hoax article. wizzito | say hello! 18:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Ivorian emigrants to England indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Please review the page that was marked for speedy deletion and then deleted by you Kiddaan. Kiddaan is one of the digital platforms of the Punjabi film industry. Many pages need its reference and that is why I have created that page like other ones. Name of Kiddaan is requested in every page of Punjabi digital media platforms and website categories. I hope you will help to increase the data of Punjabi film industry by restoring deleted page. LedgeDigital (talk) 13:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
I added https://distance-educator.com/virtual-u-20-released-as-free-download/ as a reference, which is sort of a review. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:42, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi! You forgot to delete the article. I had hoped anyone could and so someone else would, but it looks like they think you're the best person to do it. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Geschichte (talk · contribs), I just came to know that this page that I created before, has been deleted. I would be more than happy to provide evidence if something is missing to support the article, can you please help me understand how we can back the page live. Thank you!
The article Ruhan Işım has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:23, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi there. WP:STUBSPACING states: "Leave two blank lines between the first stub template and whatever precedes it." I've restored the two blank lines at Nikos Tsoumanis. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Nizar Khanfir, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
FYI, I've started a general discussion about assistant manager positions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Assistant positions in infoboxes. And it wasn't a "blatant misuse of rollback"- I was going to partial self revert to add back the good part of the content anyway, but was easier for me to revert all then re-add the good bits back (because the infoboxes are fiddly). I believe there is consensus against adding assistant manager roles (but we'll see the outcome of the discussion), and nevertheless the years added were wrong, as he was appointed in December 2019. Please don't assume bad faith. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello - you have deleted "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dorset_%26_Wilts_2_Central" which I created recently. The reason given is that it doesn't have sources / references but there is a hyperlink on the page to the RFU Results website which shows this league exists and the teams involved etc. The only began in September so it is new - there are no previous winners or other third party information sources - this is community rugby in England, it doesn't get articles on well known websites or media attention. I don't know how else to prove it's genuine. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_rugby_union_system page includes dozens of pages identical to this one, the only difference is most leagues have been in existence for some time. I would appreciate it if the page could be reinstated. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxPower2017 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Can you move this back to the draft page so I can add reliable sources to the article? I'm having a hard time getting reliable sources that can be accepted by Wikipedia's guidelines. But because of your discussion on the deletion of the article, I will expand more my research and find suitable articles that could back up my claim as Ryan to be a notable person. 14:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azumi121 (talk • contribs)
Sorry I don’t understand what !vote means. Can you please explain what you mean by it and how that is different to vote. Andrewgprout (talk) 08:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Template:EC Judo Open has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Deancarmeli (talk) 11:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
I don't see how G. A. Campbell (disambiguation) qualifies as a G14 CSD. There were three entries on the page. One had been deleted at AFD and became a redlink, but that still left two valid bluelinks. It's true that the page could be turned into redirect+hatnote but that wasn't done and still does not require a deletion. SpinningSpark 15:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of G. A. Campbell (disambiguation). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. SpinningSpark 21:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)