Hello, HENDAWG229! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 22:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Gray Civic Center has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tv0kJqBQIls// (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Gospel Live.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! EricEnfermero ^Howdy! 09:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/About Last Night (2014 film).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 01:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! HENDAWG229, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

About Last Night... (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to About Last Night

Stomp the Yard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William Packer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected the article for About Last Night (2014 film) to the parent article for the play that the original film was based on. The thing about the upcoming film is that it doesn't currently pass notability standards for unreleased films. Notability is hard enough to pass in general for films, but it's especially hard to pass for unreleased films because they have to be exceptionally notable. None of the sources show that the film passes WP:NFILM and some of them wouldn't really be considered to be sources that Wikipedia considers to be reliable or extend notability. Here's a rundown of the sources:

1. [1] This isn't the type of source that Wikipedia would consider to be reliable. It also doesn't help that it comes from another source (Deadline) that just says routine "so and so will direct" type of talk. The Deadline source would be usable, but there's sort of a catch about instances where the sources are only about hiring people to star in or create the film. More on that later.
2. [2] This is a good source and it could help contribute towards notability, but the thing about this sort of source (and the Deadline source) is that this just sort of sets the groundwork for the film. They don't say that filming has commenced or completed and the thing about anything in the entertainment world is that a film can get started, even begin some filming, but never actually get completed. Sometimes such films can become notable, but it's very, very rare. If all you have are sources that say that such and such a person has been signed in some aspect, that's not enough to show notability for a film.
3. [3] This gives a release date, but the thing is that release dates can and do get changed all the time. Sometimes it's just to take advantage of a good release date, other times it's due to conflicts with the film that cause it to not be ready for its projected time of release. For this reason release dates cannot guarantee a film's release or give notability. In any case, BOM would be seen as a trivial source and trivial sources cannot show notability.
4. [4] This is another source that just says someone is joining the cast.
5. [5] This is one of those sites that seems to be so much like a blog that it might not be usable as a RS per Wikipedia's rules for reliable sourcing. Because it runs that fine line, it's the type of thing I'd recommend avoiding using as a reliable source. The thing about RS is that even if a site looks good, has been around for a while, and has a fan following, that doesn't necessarily mean that it's considered to be a reliable source. It's the type of thing I'd run through the reliable sources noticeboard before using.

Basically put, there isn't enough notability to show that this film passes notability guidelines at this point in time. I can't even find evidence that this movie has started or completed principal photography, which is one of the big requirements for an unreleased film. Because of this, I've redirected the page once again. Please do not unredirect it. If you want to push the point then we can always run it through AfD, but odds are high that it'll just get deleted (or incubated at best) and the page once again redirected to the entry for the play. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:45, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Again, please stop deleting the redirects. This film is not yet notable and if you do this again, I'll be forced to take this to AfD where this article will be deleted because it does not pass notability guidelines. I'd much rather keep the article history intact and redirect rather than drag this through the AfD process. I'm not trying to threaten, rather just let you know the reality of the situation is that this does not pass notability guidelines and will not survive an AfD process. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article About Last Night (2014 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/About Last Night (2014 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alpha Man: The Brotherhood Of MLK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First hand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Albany Civic Center may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rob Hardy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages TBS and Bones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Albany Civic Center logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stomp The Yard: Homecoming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Gospel Live, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/About Last Night (2014 film), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:15, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HENDAWG229. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The Gospel Live".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)) or ((db-g13)) code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: ((subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Gospel Live)), paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HENDAWG229. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "About Last Night (2014 film)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)) or ((db-g13)) code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: ((subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/About Last Night (2014 film))), paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:No Good Deed (2014 film) movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:51, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Original N.W.A members with actors from the "Straight Outta Compton" film.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to D'Vontrey Richardson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *Holds the record for longest rushing touchdown by a FSU quarterback (55 yards vs. [[Chattanooga Mocs football|UTC]] ([[2008 Florida State Seminoles football team#

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:22, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kurt Quarterman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {Infobox NFL player
• |highschool=[[Westover Comprehensive High School|Westover Patriots {Albany, GA)]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:12, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dope (2015 film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://musicmadame.com/2015/01/22/watch-aap-rocky-in-trailer-for-debut-film-dope/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't assume that people are knowledgeable about everything that is covered by WP. Membership of the band N.W.A includes Arabian Prince, and that is what the sentence in the introductory paragraph says. Removing this piece of information, which is not known to "everyone," contrary to your claim, is against WP:NPOV and could be interpreted as WP:EW. Cheers. esse quam videri - to be rather than to seem (talk) 12:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not about the group N.W.A but about the film "Straight Outta Compton", which from press releases and promotional material, focuses on Eazy-E, Dr. Dre and Ice Cube. MC Ren and DJ Yella are even afterthoughts. Arabian Prince hasn't been mentioned as a major character in the film. People who want to become knowledgeable about the history of the group should visit the N.W.A page. I think that myself, Universal Pictures (the distributors of the film and source of most of the intro) and others who have reverted your edits, don't feel Arabian Prince's contribution to the group is significantly covered in this film.