|
A tag has been placed on Category:Henry Hope Reed Award Laurates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:44, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Herrikez (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC) Okay, do it.
Hi, I had a look at your draft:Rafael Manzano Prize following our conversation on New Classical Architecture and tweaked the intro a bit. However in the English Wikipedia "Articles require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject": see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Reviewing_instructions#Step_2:_Notability_and_verifiability. As all the references about the award are to the award website, I think you will need to find several additional reliable independent sources to get through Articles for creation review. Also Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves says that "the great majority of any article must be drawn from independent sources." I am happy to (try to) answer any questions or you could also try the Wikipedia:Help desk. TSventon (talk) 15:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Herrikez (talk) 15:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Hey hello! Thanks, I didn't know that, first time creating a page. I can easily get external sources but they are most probably going to be in Portuguese or Spanish. Let's see if that is not a problem. Cheers.
Herrikez (talk) 16:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Thanks, I already changed the article to have many news sources, couldn't find anything in English, but in Portuguese and Spanish there is plenty. Fingers crossed. Thanks and take care!
Are you hoping to add articles for some of the winners? Until then it would be possible to add interlanguage links like Ignacio Medina y Fernández de CórdobaTSventon (talk) 20:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
.Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Urban Renaissance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hammamet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I don't want to derail the conversation at WikiProject Architecture so I am posting on your talkpage instead. You are putting in a lot of work into finding sources for "New Classical architecture", so I strongly recommend reading Wikipedia:Neutral point of view to focus your work. It is fairly short and one of Wikipedia's three "core policies". (The other two, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Verifiability are also useful.)
For example the section on Due and undue weight, WP:UNDUE, is relevant to whether we should use Robert Stern's book "Modern Classicism" as a template for the article. The section says "If a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts".
The section on Explanation of the neutral point of view, WP:WIKIVOICE, is relevant to using Demetri Porphyrios' book, "Classicism is not a Style" as a source.
The section on article names, WP:POVNAMING, links to Wikipedia:Article titles which is essential reading when discussing article names.
My interest in the article is to see how it can improved, which means applying the three core policies. TSventon (talk) 13:43, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy (talk) 15:00, 20 April 2020 (UTC)I don't think adding the category 'bibliography articles without infoboxes' to Jaquelin Robertson is controversial. i find it a convenient way to mark articles that do not have the template 'infobox architect' yet. Can you explain why you rejected the change? Thanks Fred (talk) 23:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
P.S. Maybe you are interested in the wiki project for architecture [[1]].
Hi Herrikez! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing!
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Pueblo Revival architecture into Indigenous architecture. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 17:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Apollo1203. Your recent edit(s) to the page Swaminarayan Akshardham (New Delhi) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The edit regarding Vikram Lall as the architect is not referenced in the sources used. Please ensure proper sources are being used when making such claims/edits. Apollo1203 (talk) 02:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
"Say where you read it" follows the practice in academic writing of citing sources directly only if you have read the source yourself. If your knowledge of the source is secondhand—that is, if you have read Jones (2010), who cited Smith (2009), and you want to use what Smith (2009) said—make clear that your knowledge of Smith is based on your reading of Jones.
When citing the source, write the following (this formatting is just an example):
John Smith (2009). Name of Book I Haven't Seen, Cambridge University Press, p. 99, cited in Paul Jones (2010). Name of Encyclopedia I Have Seen, Oxford University Press, p. 29.
Or if you are using short citations:
Smith (2009), p. 99, cited in Jones (2010), p. 29.
What about secondary sources? Herrikez (talk) 18:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Architecture of Colombia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boyacá (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Abdel Wahed El-Wakil buildings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Herrikez,
Please do not remove all of the contents of a category and then blank it. This is called emptying categories "out of process" and is extremely discouraged. If you believe a category should be deleted, renamed or merged, please make a proposal at Categories for Discussion and state your reasons for your opinion there where they can be seen by other interested editors. Please do this in the future. It is easy to make a proposal using Twinkle, a popular editing tool or you can find information at WP:CFD. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page New Classical architecture, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)