Hello, I want to make 3 articles, please review.
Hi. You might remember that last week I added a piece of information to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabrizio_Cerina which is accurate and substantiated by various sources (please indicate whether you would like to see them again). I also edited the page in the hope to make its chronology more organic; but I brought no substantial changes to it. A COI was published short after "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject...". As a professional journalist I would not like to be perceived having conflicts with anyone, which indeed I have not. I'm kindly asking whether after a week of inactivity is there a way to remove such note. I read that "you may simply remove the maintenance template; it will not be removed automatically" but I do not want to be intrusive. Naturally, if you consider that the issue isn't reasonably resolved I will follow further indications. I would appreciate your help. Thank you.David T Cohen (talk) 20:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
I find your remark offensive and unfair. I'm NOT PAID BY ANYONE TO DO THIS. I HAVE ZERO INTEREST IN THIS EXCEPT MY REPUTATION IN RELATION TO MY JOB. I'm new to Wikipedia and you know that. In fact the news platform I work for (newsgateny.com) wrote in the past weeks about this subject and other 9. I did part of the job and based on what I had learned I thought (stupid me!) a good idea to give my free contribution which is in NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST and which brings ZERO ADVANTAGE to me. Never again! I realize now what kind of mess I put myself in. I would just like to clear the remarks about me. Can you please explain exactly what you don't like and why you move such harsh accusations? Please note that I merely added ONE piece of information (with sources) to an EXISTING PAGE (plus and other minor changes). Please note that this can be damaging my job. I would like to get things straight and get out of this.David T Cohen (talk) 11:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
I did NOT write a promotional article. You are seriously getting it wrong. And I'm really sorry about it as I'm sure you are in good faith. I AM NOT PAID to do this. I do not even know the subject and frankly I don't care. My employer, days ago, published a piece about a bank the subject chairs. I would like to stress that it was NOT a promotional piece. Completely documented and taken from major newspapers like the Financial Time. And IT WAS NOT ME who wrote such piece. I learned news which wasn't on Wiki and believing to do good, I added it to the page. ONE piece of info, that's it. You are talking to me like I wrote the entire page. THE ARTICLE WAS THERE ALREADY. I just added ONE paragraph (with sources). Anyhow, all I care now is to clear MY name and not to damage anyone. I'm going to search for objective sources and trying my best. What is COIN? (Conflict?)David T Cohen (talk) 14:58, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
OK. The news was about a new hotel in Milan, Italy. I just re-read what I had added. The tone was not encyclopedic, I agree. Sorry. But it was indeed well sourced: https://milano.repubblica.it/cronaca/2020/01/06/news/cipriani_ristoranti_milano_palazzo_bernasconi-245072068/ and https://forbes.it/2020/01/07/il-gruppo-cipriani-sbarca-a-milano-a-palazzo-bernasconi/ and http://creditdesalpes.com/index.php/cipriani-milan/ What am I supposed to do now? I'd like to defend my position. I imagine it is my rightDavid T Cohen (talk) 16:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
I just wrote to Cabayi and I'm adding you. I wouldn't know where else to publish this. Please consider carefully my words. This is a very unfair story. I'VE ZERO CONFLICT! NOBODY PAID ME!! I did not and I do not know the subjects personally. But the platform I was freelancing with took your accusations seriously and CANCELED my contract! Do you understand what that means? And you are still joking about that? It is shameful to accuse people just like this. I wanted to hear about Wikipedia never again. But today I was informed that my position has dramatically worsened. The platform is claiming that some editorinvolved also them in this matter. Is it true? Why??? They are saying I caused this and are coming after ME for damages. What did you do exactly? What do they have to do with this? I need to urgently know as I might soon find myself in Court and the lawyer needs to be prepared. This could be a tragedy for me and my family. I've been accused of all kind of wrongdoings because of a stupid edit I thought was of interest as the people involved are well known. Please answer about the platform as per above. I need to prepare myselfDavid T Cohen (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, you have changed the article you declined.
I have changed the Draft:Bhamatsar article, please review the article.
As you suggested to translate Draft:Sumit Godara article into English, you can translate it. So let me tell you that I am new on Wikipedia, I have not yet been given the facility to translate the page into English. And you said biography and career are lacking. So let me tell you, I added as much information as I had. If anyone has more information, it will add more. I also placed the stub in the External Links section. If you ask any page reviewer, then this page will tell you correctly. I am not telling you wrong by saying this. You have a good knowledge of Wikipedia. Only then you are a good page reviewer. I don't mean to say that, this article should be on Wikipedia. I feel sorry for anything you said to me. Please approve. Thank you
I have removed the section "About" "Caste" "Education" in the article in Draft:Bhamatsar. Please review Mr Tejal (talk) 06:44, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
You are welcome.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 05:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to leave you a note to explain my thinking on that one. COIN and the wiki is overrun with COI/paid editors. Lately I have tried to focus on what good can be wrought from their work. In the case of the $46 million dollar banker article, the subject seems notable so I cleaned it up. The editor seemed to make a good faith declaration that they were just "doing it on their coffee break". In the absence of other evidence, I am willing to take that at face value. In the end it is enormously time-consuming to chase down these paid/COI editors. If we can get rid of them easily, I will be the first to file an SPI/ANI or whatever report is required. But in this case it looked like too much work to be worth it. Finally, I'm not sure if their "lost my job" statement is real, but if it is it means COI is no longer an issue. Thanks.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tropical Storm Diane (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tatupiplu'talk 02:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I edited the article Harsh Beniwal. As far as I think I have rightly edited it. And then put the submission. But after some time, a reviewer declines. Please see the article Draft:Harsh Beniwal once and tell me what was wrong with the article. Please describe. I am waiting for your reply. Help me create an article Draft:Harsh Beniwal. Mr Tejal (talk) 09:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
I do not have much knowledge of English language, so I probably make mistakes in writing articles. I request you to edit the article Draft:Harsh Beniwal. Please edit. I hope so from you. Mr Tejal (talk) 10:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Mr Tejal (talk) 11:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Are you free Because I want to make you a Harsh Beniwal article. If you are not free, how long will it be. And when will Harsh Beniwal start writing the article? Mr Tejal (talk) 08:50, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
So I make the article back and you edit it. Mr Tejal (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
So what should i do? Mr Tejal (talk) 09:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
And I did not make this, I just edited. Mr Tejal (talk) 09:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I asked you for help in creating this article. But you are back telling me to prepare it in the sandbox. Mr Tejal (talk) 10:58, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
It is good if this article helps. But I have prepared and wrote Draft:Amit Bhadana (youtuber). Please review and help improve rather than decline. Thank you Mr Tejal (talk) 11:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I request you to edit it. Please please please Mr Tejal (talk) 11:11, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. Please do it now, otherwise any other page reviewer will decline the article. Mr Tejal (talk) 11:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for you comments. A lot has changed, I look forward to you thoughts.Mgrodzins (talk) 19:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your help!Mgrodzins (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
I accepted the article. Even in the version that you saw, the context was clear enough to anyone who would be likely to be interested in the article. There are many fields I do not understand--probably including the fields for at least 3/4 of the articles submitted to WP--and I try not to review articles in them DGG ( talk ) 00:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
It genuinely isn't vandalism though. Look it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dababyhamster (talk • contribs) 20:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
hy --Itz.abdullah393 (talk) 15:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi umhhh is is possible to get arrested for false editing or false information ? --Sli mode M (talk) 15:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
My Name is Syed Abdullah . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itz.abdullah393 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 00:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey Java, My name is Bobby. I’m attempting to create a page/topic about my favorite gaming team. They have over 1,000,000 followers on YouTube and I think many people would contribute to said page. I’m having issues creating a clean and accurate layout any help would be much appreciated. --BobbyWillemsen (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
"clean and accurate layout"miss the point. Where are your sources and what do they say? Write in your own words what they convey and that will drive your text. You might maybe write two or three sentences to the effect of "NeebsGaming is a channel on YouTube that posts content about various video games." You would do better to expand the subject to that group of guys, including the podcast, Doraleus and Associates, and their other projects but even then I don't see you making a claim of notability. Instead of trying to write a new article, just go improve articles about a topic you know. In five years you might have gained enough experience and sources to write about Neebs. If you're not prepared to grind away doing maintenance tasks for five years, then just quit Wikipedia now and blog about your ideas somewhere else, instead. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! How can I insert the citation for the change I made to a name in a table please? Thanks! --Nastassiarcaribbean (talk) 18:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, JavaHurricane. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vombatkere v. Union of India".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you Java Hurricane for helping others. You are amazing.
Please do not remove posts from my talk page because you think that the post is spam or that the poster is a spammer or a sockpuppet. If you think that the poster is a sockpuppet, file a sockpuppet report. Maybe you already did that. I can handle the removal of junk from my talk page, and it only makes it a little harder if I have to track the disappearance of junk. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
for that pointer. Cabayi (talk) 13:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi,can I create a new pages for who are searching for new things --Ajadirakta indika (talk) 13:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Я хочу добавить материал в тему: КЛИНИЧЕСКАЯ СМЕРТЬ. Как мне это сделать? --Владимир Михайлович Образцов (talk) 00:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you --SonjaDeca (talk) 06:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jubal Fulks, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubal Fulks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
POLITICAL --AFTAB ALAM FARUQUI BLY (talk) 20:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
This article was re-submitted after a lengthy discussion with other editors that established notability of the piece and its sources. Please see here for complete details of this conversation. I don't want to have to loop in the other editors into this thread to review what has already been discussed at length regarding the notability of this piece and the conversation around its "promotional" text. I use quotations here because it is inaccurate to state the text is promotional.
Please provide examples of how this article is a promotional piece. I have continuously asked for this feedback from editors, but none are able to provide adequate examples of such. This goes back to my prior comments in the referenced link that editors need to be fair arbiters of fact vs. promotion. There is no promotional language here (i.e. highlighting the company's benefits/advantages over its competitors, promoting the company's business), it is all facts on the company's history, technology, and current projects. You need to be able to apply a fair standard of review, otherwise you are detracting from the value of Wikipedia. Please, provide examples of promotional language in the piece. If you have none, that's fine, but then don't call it a promotional piece for convenience sake because you have no other critiques.
This article needs to be reviewed under fair assessment, but those who can differentiate between promotion and fact. Please, can you provide examples of promotional text in this draft? Even after it was agreed by the other editors that the article should be resubmitted for review, there is no ability to provide further details on promotional/advert. language by *any* editor.
Reviewers/editors need to provide a consistent standard of review across draft articles, otherwise they are detracting from the value of Wikipedia's authenticity. (Jacobariel91 (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC))
331dot "(i.e. highlighting the company's benefits/advantages over its competitors, promoting the company's business)" This is NOT what the text has - this is an example of promotional text which the draft text does *NOT* have. I was giving you an example of what would constitute promotional text and that the draft text does NOT have this. Please read more carefully. I will restate in a different, clearer way:
331dot how is this draft text an advertisement of the company's benefits, advantages, highlights over competitors (it's not, because none of this appears in the article)? How is it an advertisement if it states the company has higher costs than its competitors - why would anyone want to advertise that?
JavaHurricane You need to be an unbiased arbiter of fact vs. promotion. If you can't, then you are devaluing from Wikipeida's merits. Please provide examples of how this text is being promotional, when it is just describing facts, challenges, and the history of the company. Please provide examples. (Jacobariel91 (talk) 09:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC))
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
hi, I would like to create a biography of a famous businessman in my country. how can I do that --Brand Boss Zambia (talk) 08:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm curious about WP policy on what form article titles have to be. I have seen a few cases where articles have been mangled because editors are blindly sticking to the rule that articles must be a definite thing that you can refer to with "a" or "the" or a person. It's kind of frustrating, because it seems that if the person understood the concept, they would realize that it's nicer to title the article that way. People don't like it when articles titles are gerunds or concepts or mass nouns, even though in cryptography/math that oftentimes makes sense. Do you know which WP guideline enforces this? Do you know where I could go complain about it? --A40585 (talk) 21:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I've just come across this Draft:Namrata Sapkota at AfC, and thought I'd ask what you make of it, given that you rejected it some months ago. I don't see anything there to indicate notability, but I do note that the draft reads quite differently now from the rejected version. I'm thinking of at least declining this, possibly even rejecting again, unless you have other suggestions? Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 00:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey Java,
It's a pleasure to have you as my mentor. I have no questions but I'd just like to share my appreciation for your interests to contribute to such a platform. Although, I've only just opened an account I've been using it and have been following it's mission for years.
I look forward adding as many contributions as you.
Sincerely, Visafug --Visaufg (talk) 18:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry about the late delivery of this newsletter. Within the newsletter was material about an ongoing vote, which closes in under 20 hours.
Please share the information links with interested users: Project Overview • Universal Code of Conduct • Enforcement guidelines (proposed) • Voting • Voter information • Voting link
Xeno (WMF) (talk) 04:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 5, January 2022Read the full newsletter
Welcome to the fifth issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News (formerly known as Universal Code of Conduct News)! This revamped newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the Movement Charter, Universal Code of Conduct, Movement Strategy Implementation grants, Board elections and other relevant MSG topics.
This Newsletter will be distributed quarterly, while more frequent Updates will also be delivered weekly or bi-weekly to subscribers. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive these updates.
Xeno (WMF) (talk) 04:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
♠❓ --দুষ্টু ছেলে বাবু (talk) 01:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, JavaHurricane, I personally believe you can give your comments regarding Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#WikiProject Tropical Cyclones Discord. I would like your opinion on the case as a former WPTC member who quit the server and the project in mid-2021. MarioJump83! 03:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 6, April 2022Read the full newsletter
Welcome to the sixth issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News! This revamped newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the Movement Charter, Universal Code of Conduct, Movement Strategy Implementation grants, Board of trustees elections and other relevant MSG topics.
This Newsletter will be distributed quarterly, while the more frequent Updates will also be delivered weekly. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive future issues of this newsletter.
Thanks for reading. Xeno (WMF) 02:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I'm Ed6767, the original creator of RedWarn, now one of the most popular tools on the English Wikipedia that's been used by over 1,000 Wikimedians to make over 300,000 edits since mid-2020 that's been praised for its user friendliness and ease of use, but criticised for its limited functionality. I'm leaving this message as I think it may be of interest here - I left the RedWarn project in November to develop Teyora, my successor to RedWarn (alongside Chlod's UltraViolet). It's a new in development web app that uses some of the latest web technologies to create a highly extendable all in one editing tool with a focus on administration, counter vandalism and general patrolling - not to mention, it'll work on every Wikimedia project without any prior configuration and can be used by any user with at least auto-confirmed rights*. Now, I'm ready to give the Wikimedia community a first look at what I've been doing over the past six months and what to expect going forward.
You can check out the 20 minute first look at the in development version on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzlpnzXdLP4.
There's lots more to expect too! Why not read the full details page at meta:Teyora and leave any feedback, comments or wishes at meta:Talk:Teyora (please leave any correspondence there to keep discussion centralised). If you're interested, you can leave your signature
*with basic features, advanced features require configuration. To prevent abuse, auto-confirmed users will be in a restricted mode until approved by an admin or via rollback rights.
All the best, ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 23:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello JavaHurricane,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 800 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 855 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing ((subst:NPR invite))
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 20:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello JavaHurricane,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
There is a new template available, ((NPP backlog))
, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 12887 articles, as of 02:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
((subst:NPR invite))on their talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
I was hoping to create a simple biography page, and have pasted a template in my sandbox. However, I can't work out how to change the template contents for my subject. Can you help? Thanks --PeterNimmo (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Which portion seems like doing promotion? Please show me Draft: Nituparna RajbongshiBaruahranuj 13:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
From which point of view , you tell that I'm linked with the person? Any proof ? I'm contributing as a volunteer. Otherwise I would work in other companiesBaruahranuj 09:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm bored to deal with the reviewer like you who can't co-operate with new editors. If the article was like promotional, then why you didn't try to correct them ? Bye bye enwiki .. i didn't get a good environment of writing here. Often I was marked as doing promotions by some reviewers Mind that I'm not trying to post only one article. I want that article of notable (no need to tell me on notability criteria of wiki) people should be in wikipedia. Whatever it be, bye bye. Baruahranuj 10:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 7, July-September 2022Read the full newsletter
Welcome to the 7th issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News! The newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the implementation of Wikimedia's Movement Strategy recommendations, other relevant topics regarding Movement governance, as well as different projects and activities supported by the Movement Strategy and Governance (MSG) team of the Wikimedia Foundation.
The MSG Newsletter is delivered quarterly, while the more frequent Movement Strategy Weekly will be delivered weekly. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive future issues of this newsletter.
RamzyM (WMF) 01:39, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello JavaHurricane,
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
((subst:NPR invite))on their talk page.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi JavaHurricane,
For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi JavaHurricane,
I have been wanting to translate an article from french to english but I am not as advanced as an editor on my english Wiki profile as I am on the french profile. Is there any way I can get an experienced english editor to help me translate it? --Etcheparebordav (talk) 11:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi @JavaHurricane. A new volunteer of DCW is facing range block on this wiki. Commons username is Khuddukhail. Since you are an account creator, would it be possible for you to create a local account for that username? They are not able to login anyway. Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
((adminhelp))
on your own Talk page or go to WP:AN.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, there! I'm a new editor (at least, new to serious edits), and your name was added to my user page as a possible mentor. I've just submitted my first new article for review—Draft:Guns_into_Plowshares—and I was wondering if you might be willing to give me some feedback on it. I do have COI on the article, unfortunately, which I've disclosed on the talk page. But I'm hoping I managed to maintain neutrality. Thanks for any help! --Brian Hamilton (talk) 18:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
A few days ago, new page patrollers got the backlog to zero. Due to the unprecedented success of the backlog drive, it will be ending early—at the end of 24 October, or in approximately two hours.
Barnstars will be awarded as soon as the coords can tally the results. Streak awards will be allocated based on the first three weeks of the drive, with the last three days being counted as part of week three.
Great work everyone! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
This award is given to JavaHurricane for collecting more than 10 points doing reviews and re-reviews, in the October NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 08:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC) |
How do I add sub-headings and headings --Naval History Nerd (talk) 18:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello JavaHurricane,
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.
Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.
Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.
Suggestions:
Backlog:
Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I want to discuss a few things about editing Wikipedia articles. --MarkJustice54 (talk) 14:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, currently I am doing easy edits, kindly guide me through how the changes should be made in order to avoid mistakes and a better productivity. --MarkJustice54 (talk) 12:51, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Dear Java, I saw your edit. Please check this edit request. It's been 2 weeks I've asked for edit request. So I discussed with members in WP:Help Desk.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk#Semi_protected_page_edit_request
If you can do you do, otherwise let them do. 103.154.37.38 (talk) 14:47, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Introduction of august comte --Shruti bandral (talk) 13:20, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
I want to add some articles regarding bengali music. How do I do that? --Celestialdust (talk) 07:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Right @ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy. Thank you@JavaHurricane Celestialdust (talk) 07:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 20:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
hello, i just wanted to ask how do i write an entirely new page --Razar123 (talk) 22:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
hello i want to add a biography of myself --Zn9alifestyle (talk) 18:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello JavaHurricane,
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js
to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
Hello How to edit table --Afin von Vattiyoorkavu (talk) 10:49, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi there!
The Upload a Non-Free file button in this page is redirecting me to the same page.
I wanted to upload an image of Carl Kent for identification under fair use policy. Can you please help me with that?
Mistakenly, before finding this page, I uploaded it to Commons here (sorry) --Shubjt 12:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi , I wanna ask a question, can I add Wikipedia articles ? I mean new ones. --Feman-Deku (talk) 19:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey Panini. Tried to log in on the editor page by using the same account as my membership username and password. The page did not let me log in because the password was invalid, but i can use it on the membership page. When i then tried to use that user name to create a new password the page let me know that there was allready such user. I'm not sure, but could one membership user name be the same as another user from a different country chapter? --WikiLärare (talk) 08:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
You thanked me for editing my own user page. It was an insignificant edit too. I'm a little confused. Blitzfan51 (talk) 17:08, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello --Pruhwonda13 (talk) 21:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
If you could assist me with the content format to be submitted, please tell me how to create a new business page. --Asimkhaninc (talk) 09:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
hello --Doglover41 (talk) 02:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
hi, how can i publish my article? --Smmama (talk) 13:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there
Brand new to this. Is it possible to share an existing article to a friend please ? --Lucy Sidebottom (talk) 23:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
hello! How can we start to edit an article? --Ashfaq22ahamed (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Bonjour Je souhaite avoir mon wikipédia afin de me faire connaître davantage auprès des personnes qui aiment mon Art, qui me cherchent et pour me prouver que j'existe encore ... Je suis Artiste Peintre Sculpteur --BebeRoseEvane (talk) 21:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 20:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Bonjour Je n'arrive pas à retrouver ma page...pour la continuer ! Merci --BebeRoseEvane (talk) 22:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Bonjour J'avais éditer une page et je suis incapable de la retrouver ... --BebeRoseEvane (talk) 22:15, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
hello i want speak about application --Malekalkhatee (talk) 11:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Javahurricane. I was wondering how I add more info for the bibliography if the page is already fully written. Sometimes, as you know, Wikipedia needs more information on where the information actually came from. --Dracques (talk) 20:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
This award is given to JavaHurricane for collecting more than 20 points doing redirect reviews, in the May 2023 NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you for your help in bringing down the backlog. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:40, 5 June 2023 (UTC) |
Hello, I want to EDIT articles meant for FUOYE. --TopzeeJaga (talk) 12:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Payment for btc bonus --Tracylynn71 (talk) 10:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, JavaHurricane. How do I create a new Wikipedia page? --Dracques (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello JavaHurricane,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
Hello Javahurricane. How do I add a source for my info. --Dracques (talk) 23:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello JavaHurricane,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Reminders:
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 20:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed that you reverted some vandalism on my talk page. Thank you very much. This doesn't happen very often so I'm a bit worried. Would you know if there's any reason to believe that the anon was targetting me specifically? Some of my edits are a wee contentious. :S Anyway, whether or not you have more insight, I really wanted to thank you for the revert. Yours, Batongmalake (talk) 03:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm creating a profile page, please don't delete it. I would appreciate it if you could. Make it private while I create and edit.
Thank you sir --There is so much more. (talk) 22:35, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 21:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
What is the requirement to edit protected articles? I have some experience editing but I wasn't sure if it's based on account age or edits made, or maybe a combination of either. --Five Month Old Infant Male (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 21:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm looking around for someone with the right skillset. Could you take on ticket:2023082710000507 please? Cabayi (talk) 06:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Good day
Thanks for being here, I published an article but it was rejected. I don't know what changes to make so it will be accepted. Can you help look through it and guide me please --Bossman blessing (talk) 17:13, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
When I say that randomly deleting birth/death dates from a page without first checking the linked bio for a source to copy over, I mean it is covered in the vandalism policy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#Subtle_vandalism "Vandalism that is harder to spot, or that otherwise circumvents detection, including ... reverting legitimate edits with the intent of hindering the improvement of pages." It wastes other people's time who have to come by later to find out what was deleted and re-add it when there was an easily copyable source in the bio already. Especially because if it's not caught quickly then it's "harder to spot." So it qualifies as sneaky vandalism, actively making the date pages worse by cutting content that is factually accurate and relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.143.192.237 (talk) 20:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I myself isn't a editor, but i'm a social media influencer trying to get articles on me to expand my influence.
"𝐈 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐬. 𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐦𝐞, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬." - 𝐗𝐳𝐢𝐮𝐭𝐨 --Xziuto (talk) 19:11, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
pride kashita --PRIDE KASHITA (talk) 23:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
i want to write a biography of one legend person who was a great man of his village but due to lack of social networking there ,,,,no one knows him so how can i start --WikiSaurabhIN (talk) 11:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
What are the requirements to edit protected articles and such? I know I already asked this but I couldn't find an answer online anywhere. --Jaeyming (talk) 15:36, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello JavaHurricane,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, JavaHurricane. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
|
TolBot (talk) 21:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Can you assist me with deleting this draft? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aleksandar_Visnjic Thanks. --Avisnjicc (talk) 11:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Psikoloji --Edonnr (talk) 13:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
The are few ways I know in which this crisis can be solved --Yololwam (talk) 12:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
other related articles to this one --Yololwam (talk) 12:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
How much experience do u have in this industry --Yololwam (talk) 12:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello JavaHurricane:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Hello how are you? I was wondering what would be the steps to create a business page on wikipedia? Thanks Mary-Queenie --LuckyDodo (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
مرحبا مرشدي الايقونات كثيرة في صفحة تعديل المقالات اي الايقونات توصلني لتعديل مقال او نشر مقال جديد؟ --Lawyerkrim (talk) 07:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
How do I add images --Dylan McCleary Music (talk) 01:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)