This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Oops! I CSDed it; sorry. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
I raised some concerns about the quality of this article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Could you please help me so I can update the AllegroGraph entry for another review.
It appears I need to get some release from the original user that removed the article but there doesn't appear to be any response from my post to their page. Thanks.
Cnorvell (talk) 15:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I've made a number of references that I believe bring relevancy to light. The product is being used by the DBPedia in Germany, this is the Semantic Web version of the Wikipedia. In addition I'm referencing a paper about its use in the US Intelligence community. Other references as well. I think these are the types of facts that are relevant and interesting.
Certainly as credible as any of these references.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontotext
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenLink_Software
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontoprise
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lispworks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_logic —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnorvell (talk • contribs) 15:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Not sure if there's something that you need to do to make the magic happen, but just thought I'd leave you a note that Arbitron has rolled over to the Spring 2010 surveys now. I've updated the two templates, but the tool is still looking for the Winter 2010 survey information and, logically, not finding it. Mlaffs (talk) 00:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan,
You were very quick in marking "Hawke scout hall" for quick deletion. So fast that I had not had time to put any content on it.
The article is about the building not the group itself.
If you have the time I would be really grateful if you could now look again at the page. It is nowhere near complete but the material should give you an indication of the theme and historical significance of the building's history
As you can see the early history is well researched and referenced.
There are a number of local historians who will provide more material but they will be disinclined to spend time working on it whilst it is marked for speedy deletion.
thanks for your time
Craig —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tirotai (talk • contribs) 00:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Sorry in message about Hawke scout hall I forgot to add signature Tirotai (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure you understood my comment. The updates I have are referencing third party publications covering the topics I noted - DBPedia, US Intelligence, as well as other publications. How do I make the updates to the page so they are shown to be relevant? Thanks for your help. Cnorvell (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Dom4182* (talk) 03:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Under what criteria is my article on Sayvinyl not meeting
But it does meet for inclusion they have been on the daily habit on fuel tv performed two songs Your new hobby and love at first sight so their qualifies as a article meeting guidelines. Dom4182* (talk) 04:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
They Have been on interviews with fuel TV they played the daily habit and if you even read the wiki you'd see they did the Etnies Grounded project which was on FuelTV and you'd know that this was broadcast nationally as they performed they music for the whole movie for this Etnies project which is more than an hour and thirty minutes long and they aren't a garage band cause they played the Warped Tours and played multiple highly known shows the even had songs played on video games do all the research like i did they are just not that famous they recorded thier own album thats why they aren't under a label which means they got at least some what famous without the label meaning they dont need it meaning they aren't a garageband as you intentionally acclaimed them as which they obviously aren't please read the wiki and check links and read the information before you add these to pages and yes they have won major awards which is seen as the Myspace Featured Artist Award Seen on the list of their Awards and under the references you can see that they did win it. Please read before you post these.Dom4182* (talk) 18:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
She is a protagonist/prominent character in the series. I understand the article needs work, but I think this character can have its own article. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 02:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I reverted your revision to Natalie Kabra because the character is a major character in the novel series The 39 Clues. If you disagree, please discuss it at the article's talk page or at the 39 Clues Task Force General Forum. Thank you, mono 18:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I noticed you placed a disputed fair use rationale tag on this image. I looked it over and see that it has the book license which isn't entirely accurate (since as you pointed out, it isn't just books), and a non-free media rationale which appears to apply to all parts of the image. Are you saying that the image actually isn't fair use for some reason or that it isn't explained well enough (e.g., explanation of the product packaging as well as the book covers)? Any feedback would be appreciated. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
You're funny. You're telling me you have enough time in THREE MINUTES to review the topic I just posted on? I appreciate folks looking for spam, but three minutes?! Did you follow the ref? Maybe someone can help put a proper stub tag on this? I will continue working on this post but I'm not going to delve into the byzantine peer review hierarchies involved. Put a Speedy on it if you so desire. Wikipedia has changed A LOT since I started posting. jk (talk) 03:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC) (late and grumpy)
Ok, so I asked over at WP:IMAGEHELP and the one response was that it's not a good picture, but probably ok as fair use. Do you have any objection to it staying around if I improve on the free-use rationale and find a better non-free license to use? VernoWhitney (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Some dude just added 5 essays, so if you're really interested in some sort of a quality screen, you better get back to the template talk page and help the discussion move from "brainstorming" to "consensus." ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 12:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
If you google committee for Melbourne you will see over 43,000 entries. Look objectively at the organisation and you will see that for over 25 years it has made a huge difference to a major city which is enough to warrant an article.
Its junior baby organisation, Committee for Geelong has an article..
Can you take a little more care while prodding articles. You prodded Grand Army Plaza (Manhattan) within a minute of its creation. And that too when the creator had added a book as a reference. why such haste? Taking a minute or two to search for sources would reduce errors like this --Sodabottle (talk) 20:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
On second look, I agree with you on this one. Bearian (talk) 00:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
No. Google it if you think if you think the article does not meet the notability guidelines for companies and organizations. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 11:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello Sir
But I can't get my article because it is deleted, so please let me know the article!!
Summitsingh Thakur —Preceding unsigned comment added by Summitsc (talk • contribs) 12:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Good Morning to you, i see you intervent on my article, and there are the refences, sorry my bad english, and please help this article♥, in the next future iput him photo dof the Fair, can help me to improve the article? Sorry my Bad English♥--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 12:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I have left a comment at the above AfD which I would be grateful if you would respond to -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
are anything that will serve as a ref, even if listed as an external link. See another eds. comments for Robert Thalheim. DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Global Film and Music Festival has been removed. It was removed by 128.239.170.186 with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 128.239.170.186 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 12:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
In 2007 you started Leon Kromer. It turns out that he is also Major General Leon B. Kromer (1876-1966, retired 1938) [3]. He was the penultimate Chief of U.S. Cavalry, succeeded by John K. Herr who drove the service into oblivion (I'm writing a piece on him now). Would you mind if I (eventually) remove football infobox from Leon Kromer, as football is clearly distant second to his military service? More on Kromer in:
Regards, East of Borschov (talk) 16:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan. I'm just dropping you a line to let you know that I have declined the speedy deletion of Lawrence Children's Choir, a page you tagged for speedy deletion as an article about a company, corporation, organization, or group that did not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject, as it made the credible assertation that the subject is a world class choir that has toured internationally, which is an indication of significance. I also very easily found significant coverage in reliable sources that indicates that the subject meets primary inclusion criterion. Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Why have you tagged My Tarnished Reputation for speedy deletion? It is an article on a music album, I added an infobox. There is no reason for the article to be deleted.--DrAgubua (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan,
I just added the reference to the ISAF site on the Windglider page. You were just a little quicker than me:-) Can I take the reference tag away?NED33 (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi , I am crerating article Firstsource, along with proper citations that's why placed underconstruction & you nominated it for speedy deletion. Please assist( Abu Torsam 18:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC))
Hi, Been offline for a while and only just managed to get back on now, my article about Irish band, Distributor, was deleted on the 16th of April. I am aware of the past reasons for the deletion of the page, but since then they have received more reviews of their album "depth of perception" and have also appeared on Ireland's national tv station RTE 1 on a programme called "An Cór". As i understood it, this give the needed notability for the creation of the page. Thanks, Stroopy Stroopy (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Been offline for a while and only just managed to get back on now, my article about Irish band, Distributor, was deleted on the 16th of April. I am aware of the past reasons for the deletion of the page, but since then they have received more reviews of their album "depth of perception" and have also appeared on Ireland's national tv station RTE 1 on a programme called "An Cór". As i understood it, this give the needed notability for the creation of the page. Thanks, Stroopy Stroopy (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan. An entry in a major reference work like The Canadian Encyclopedia does demonstrate significant coverage. If it has an entry in the CE than it is notable. I am surprised that this is not immediately obvious to you. Please see the first pillar at Wikipedia:Five pillars.4meter4 (talk) 21:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Elevator-magazine.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
((bots|deny=DASHBot))
to your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
hi there. i am the editor of the article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YEAGER
can you tell me in depth why you marked this for deletion? i have been adding some more details and facts but am not sure what to do else. our company will release the new version of the existing oktopus system under a new name (yeager) within the next month...
best, markus Karlton303 (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to be of inconvenience to you, I was trying to create a page for this football player. I don't really understand what I have done wrong. Could you give me some pointers please (this is my first article). Thankyou, Iamjemappelle
Iamjemappelle (talk) 17:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Damon Cromartie-Smith
dont delete of the bradley lott page becuase its a real star and a real person and he his talking to you now
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Alternative Media Access Center (AMAC). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Alternative Media Access Center. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Alternative Media Access Center - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon))
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. RadioFan (talk) 15:01, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Just a quick note to let you know that I've removed the prod from this article as the creator had added a hangon tag so the prod is obviously contested. Dpmuk (talk) 21:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Just a heads up that I've declined your request for speedy deletion of UKK Bosna, based on the assertion that they won a 2003 European championship. I've asked, on Talk:UKK Bosna, for better references (in English wherever possible) for the club. IMO, the article should get a couple of weeks incubation time, and if there's still weak sourcing then, nominate it for AfD. I am watching the article to see how it develops. —C.Fred (talk) 22:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Dance, Dance Chicago has been removed. It was removed by 207.237.55.137 with the following edit summary '(Undid revision 358441977 by RadioFan (talk))'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 207.237.55.137 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 08:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Адіш Агарвала. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Adish Agarwal. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Adish Agarwal - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon))
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:16, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
I finished with the page Bench memorandum, thanks for your help earlier on. Any comments on my mistakes (I'm sure there are mistakes) are welcome. Cheers! WikiTome Talk 14:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Template:Better source has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. - sorry, but I just don't think this is a good idea.
has limited criteria, and can only be used for very short articles giving no idea of what the actual subject it, not long rambling essays like Explain why there was a succession crisis in scotland between 1286-1292 . There is no speedy criterion for these, so it's necessary to use prod. Just a reminder DGG ( talk ) 20:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
For [[Walter Chappell] .But you simultaneously added a unsourced BLP tag and a close paraphrase tag.-- and you listed the source for the paraphrase on the talk p. Don;t you see that the two tags are incompatible? How can an article for which you found a source--albeit a source that gives copyright problems, also be an unsourced BLP.? The paraphrase is indeed a problem that will have to be dealt with DGG ( talk ) 20:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC)