This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Talk page archives Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3 Archive 4 • Archive 5 • Archive 6 Archive 7 • Archive 8 • Archive 9 Archive 10 • Archive 11 • Archive 12 Archive 13 • Archive 14 • Archive 15 Archive 16 • Archive 17 • Archive 18 Archive 19 • Archive 20 • Archive 21 Archive 22 • Archive 23 • Archive 24 Archive 25 • Archive 26 • Archive 27 Archive 28 • Archive 29 • Archive 30 Archive 31 • Archive 32 • Archive 33 Archive 34 • Archive 35 • Archive 36 Archive 37 • Archive 38 • Archive 39 Archive 40 • Archive 41 • Archive 42 Archive 43 • Archive 44 • Archive 45 Archive 46 • Archive 47 • Archive 48 Archive 49 • Archive 50 • Archive 51 Archive 52 • Archive 53 • Archive 54 |
When people are blocked—even for a day or two—inaccurate system messages often say that they can post to others' talk pages when, in fact, they can only post to their OWN talk page. If you, as you so proudly advertise, refuse to condescend to visit others' talk pages, then how can people raise their concerns and have them addressed? That seems rather short-sighted to me . . .
50.128.184.140 (talk) 21:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
We edit-conflicted here as I was unblocking. Remember, "Bob at Chevrolet" is an acceptable username, so is "Vorobieva IQ" if their name is Vorobieva. However, I've dropped ((coiq)) there because there were perhaps some other elements lacking the panda ₯’ 19:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
If you were unaware of the ANI discussion, how did you become aware of our problem at Oathkeeper? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 01:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Nyttend, regarding some of your recent MFD deletions, first let me say I have no objection to your speedy deletions! It is customary to not !vote and close the same discussion; if you want to speedy delete and XFD, please close it with your speedy deletion comment, that way it is marked done for everyone. An example is here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dranthonyalsayed. Thank you, and Happy Editing! — xaosflux Talk 01:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
((subst:mfdtop|'''Action'''. Your reason. ~~~~))
((subst:mfdbottom))
Hello. I am very new at this and I do not even know if I am supposed to be writing here. But you recently deleted the Climate Change in Lebanon page for copyright infringement (G12) because it was copied from a page on this website: climatechange.moe.gov.lb/energy. This website belongs to us, the people writing the page, we are the Climate Change team at the Lebanese Ministry of Environment and UNDP. This is the first time writing on Wikipedia, and we do not know the procedures so much. Could you please guide us to repost the page with the proper referencing? Thank you.
And editor renominated a file for speedy that you had declined. I uploaded it; he had been the original nominator too. [2]. Thanks, Nyttend! John from Idegon (talk) 07:13, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
See my answer at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:195.150.224.186 also read talk page of article and also read history of editing, that ip user attacked me numerous times in past. I started answering in same manner he/she did. Did you warn her/him too? I hope so. 195.150.224.186 (talk) 21:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC) I replied on my talk page. Thank you for contact. I hope we can work together to make wikipedia a better place. Best wishes. 195.150.224.186 (talk) 15:01, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Baroness Emma Orczy by Bassano.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
I got the nomination form for the Carithers Store Building today; unfortunately, the building is definitely gone. It was located at 40°21′58″N 90°25′32″W / 40.366096°N 90.4255°W, in what's now the empty space along US 136 in front of the medical building. (The space where the medical building itself is used to be an Odd Fellows building, and wasn't part of the Carithers Store Building's plot.) TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 20:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Also that IP is also BCD.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Shuffle 329. Thank you.
Can you reduce full protection to no more than one or two years? Indefinite time on this article implies a possible breakdown of community in Wikipedia. --George Ho (talk) 23:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
And can you add Iran Air Flight 655 to the "See also" section? Supersaiyen312 (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Please unprotect this page; the protection is more disruptive than whatever editwarring was occurring. My full request/rationale is on the article talk page. Thanks. 9kat (talk) 00:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Posting an edit-warring warning on my talk page 22:15, when my last edit was at 10:45 is ludicrous. The ludicrosity is enhanced still when said edit concerned removal of certified WP:FRINGE material. Please refrain from such actions, they are not productive. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 00:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Kleuske's been edit-warring against multiple users, and protecting right now would have the result of rewarding Kleuske. I've issued a warning for edit-warring and will enforce it with a block if this continues.
I was not the only one who thought it fishy. Dutch CU just confirmed 82.157.236.177, 192.87.139.165 and 84.85.238.54 as Rolf1981 socks, 90.20.171.182 as a "probable" sock. See here. HTH, HAND. Kleuske (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thanks for taking the decision to fully protect the article about the aeroplane crash. I'm glad there are still sysops that are willing to make tough decisions in the face of a mob. RGloucester — ☎ 05:09, 20 July 2014 (UTC) |
My best wishes with your move to Pennsylvania. Thank you for your work with Wikipedia.RFD (talk) 20:03, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. A while ago, you suggested I should be an admin. If you're offering to nominate, I would accept . —[AlanM1(talk)]— 02:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I've left a comment for you at Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/AlanM1#General_comments. Commentators are picking up on the candidate's lack of involvement and experience, which appears to be at odds with what is implied in your nomination statement with your remarks on long editing history. On examination AlanM1 appears to have only been active since 2012 - prior to that the edits were fairly infrequent, amounting to only a few days per year. SilkTork ✔Tea time 20:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
It might be another demolished site, but I checked the photo in HARGIS, and it doesn't match File:Paxton First Schoolhouse.jpg (which looks like a modern house to me). TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 07:18, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding this edit, there is a better way to get someone out of the unblock cat.
Under the dropdown menu for "Administrator use only" there is a prefilled template for ((Unblock on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=unblock reason | 3=Your signature)).
This puts the user in the sparsly populated Category:Unblock_on_hold without giving the false sense of declining. I use it often when I need to consult with the blocking admin before unblocking. Chillum 02:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
I have resubmitted the Climate Change in Lebanon page after I rewrote it in my own words. Could you please inform me if it is now ok for posting? Please this is urgent. Thank you
Hi Nyttend, Rhode Island Red again wants to destroy my article about Helmut Diez, the same way he or she tried it about two years ago. What can I do against his or her vandalism? Sincerely --Hans-Jürgen Hübner (talk) 11:21, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
In WP:AN you linked it to day. Do you expect the vandal to understand? Robert McClenon (talk) 19:03, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.16.108 (talk) 22:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
I saw on another talk page that you had noted that nobody was doing anything on KY. I am not physically there, BUT if I can help, let me know..PleaseCoal town guy (talk) 23:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar! I've detected possible vandalism on the 2014 Ebola outbreak page by user 154.66.3.35. Not sure if there is a way to block the numbers so they are not constantly changed back (new to Wikipedia editing, still figuring out how things work). Thanks again for your encouragements, really made me want to continue contributing to the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.216.227.161 (talk) 15:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for showing me this feature. I had been under the impression that usernames with "anonymous" were discouraged the same as ones with "vanished user" are, but I see that this is not the case. - Hoops gza (talk) 19:23, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
...How do I get those cool box things on my user page? Like the one that says you have no Tv set.TheElderFox (talk) 03:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks man! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheElderFox (talk • contribs) 05:52, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
I can't actually give you a cookie for helping me so this will have to do until someone finds a way to send food thru a computer! TheElderFox (talk) 06:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, I just noticed that File talk:Ben Johnson House.jpg was deleted with the explanation "Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page". However, the file is not deleted or nonexistent. It is a file related to the Louisville area and was thus included in WP:Lou. Even though the page is a shadow of what is on Commons, it is still a real page in the English Wikipedia. Wikipedia:CSD#G8 doesn't seem to apply. Is there something I'm missing? A response here is fine, as I will monitor. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 21:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Just a heads-up to let you know that I manually reverted your recent AE>BE changes to the Instant film article, and then some. Your ENGVAR policing arrived way too late in the game and simply — presumably, unwittingly — served to reward the offenders. The article, about a US product line, began in AE and so remained for several years. Then a short section with a couple of "colours" was added. Later came several big chunks of text with more of them. Then someone decided to "correct" the unbearable Yankee orthography in some other places. Finally, your edit "cured" the last remaining instances of the original spelling. I have been accused of being linguistically Anglophile, with an unconscious tendency to diphthongize words like "new" and to write "traveler" and "jewelry" with a double "l", but my WP experiences to date are rapidly curing me of any such tendencies. Whether it is done stealthily and piecemeal or boldly and in plain sight, I find the crusading of some Brits to impose a BE spelling as the only true and correct one breathtakingly arrogant and increasingly offensive. If I am correctly informed, half of the world's native English speakers are Yanks. The upstart colonies are independent now, chaps, and the empire is all gone. Get used to it. 66.81.240.114 (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Seeing as the IP was blocked for the edits you're restoring, I wonder if perhaps it would make sense to see how the ANI sorts out before you continue. JohnInDC (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey Nyttend, whoever has named these neighborhoods of Gary is whole sale incorrect. They were unincorporated entities in totum and as they were mined out, people assumed incorrectly, they were "neighborhoods" of Gsry...which I find ironic as Gary is on the edge of becoming a ghost town itself...went there in May of this year. Would you find it OK, to change these to unincorporated communities of their own, and I can remove the "neighborhood" claim. I have found no actual documented source that states, oh yes, Elbert is a neighborhood of Gary. I would of course leave these as unincorporated places. I will of course follow any suggestion given.....Coal town guy (talk) 22:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
You proposed that the article History of the Jews in Nepal be renamed to Judaism in Nepal. An RFC was then opened asking for consensus. I have closed the RFC with the conclusion that consensus supports the move. I have not moved the article because a proper move also requires that the lede be rewritten. Either you or the poster of the RFC can revise the lede and move the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
BECAUSE you take time to explain things patiently, even remote coal towns in West Virginia, you are awarded this Coal town guy (talk) 02:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC) |
If you drop a request at WP:POLAND, I am sure somebody could stub it for you. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
In this edit note, you wrote: " "CDC" means something else in this part of the world" explaining a change you made in the section on "initial outbreak in Guinea". What is the antecedent of "this", and what other meaning does CDC have there? just curious. thanks! Jytdog (talk) 00:08, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Can you please just delete that battleground argument as disruptive? Please?
As of today, the dispute/argument ended, but the fighting did not.
You're literally the only admin who commented on that at all. Please put an end to it and make the user leave me alone. I don't want anything to do with him at all. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 04:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
OK, it's resolved now. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 04:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
BAD situation happening with repeated racial slurs and vandalism at Ferguson, Missouri page..NEEDS to be locked, it appears to be one new user...Coal town guy (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 August 16#File:Hearts XP.png. Thanks. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
You m:wrong versioned it up when another nationalist editor came in to change everything about. Could you restore Metal.lunchbox's version of the article as per my talk page request? It seems yet another nationalist editor has appeared to make it known that Wikipedia was wrong for calling the country "Taiwan".—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 14:44, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Quick question. Does your full protection now override your previous semi-protection's expiry such that when the full protection expires the article will no longer be semi-protected?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:42, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
What about other templates that I nominated? --George Ho (talk) 03:49, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't really agree that the church is the primary topic in this case. With most similar examples of "St. Somebody Church and Rectory" or "St. Somebody Church and Cemetery", the other sites were built for the church and its congregation, so it makes sense to consider the church the primary building. In the case of Buckhorn, both buildings were built for the preexisting Witherspoon College, and the gymnasium was built before the church was. The nomination doesn't really explain what the gym's being used for now, so it might be a church building now (and you've been there and I haven't, so you'd know better than I would), but it wasn't really considered one historically. Witherspoon College might be the appropriate page title here, since both buildings are significant for being part of the college, but it doesn't make historical sense to cut the gymnasium out of the title. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Firstly I do not disagree with the deletion, however I would like the opportunity to re write this page according to the correct Wikipedia guidelines. As the page is protected from creation, therefore only administrators like yourself can create it.
I would to contribute a page for your consideration.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidatamigo (talk • contribs) 09:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Category:Mid-Ohio Valley geography stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Nyttend,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Markham-suburbs aerial-edit2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 6, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-09-06. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:11, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Kudos to you, sir, for the outstanding photo you took and added to the Scotch Ridge, Ohio article! The Chouse really glows in pictures taken during the golden hour, and you captured it perfectly! — Kralizec! (talk) 16:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
You mentioned a CiteVar issue on this diff. I still see the same citation style being used. Also, EEng was altering the citations again in the text and BGwhite did an undo. On a couple of issues, I think a problem has been compounded. The shy template offers a browser break for words, but how do these possibly work on invisible comments which by definition, only render when in editing mode? Same as to why nbsp and other templates would be placed into an invisible comment. Much of the invisible comments are not something I have an issue with, but cite templates are not supposed to have those templates within them because they mess up the data. That was not my change or even something I really wanted to cross into, but on a more content matter - EEng's sources cited frequently do not line up with the text said and he does flip and change them around significantly. One would also think that working with the main source, Macmillan, and co-authoring papers and performing OR and placing it on Wikipedia would at least be well... WP:OR and WP:COI. The map of Cavendish, Vermont that EEng made is not in the book as marked or even discussed. Also, EEng knows that the town had changed in those years, yet is pointing out the houses of Gage and Harlow despite it not being in the text. There is quite a few issues in play with Macmillan 2000 and the sources on Gage's death - one being entirely non-existent! Much of the attacks on other Gage scholars has been removed, but EEng and Macmillan are not the only two scholars on Gage. I understand great work has been done by Macmillan, but this article has several issues that are factually inaccurate and EEng knows this. After consulting the sources and spending probably 40-50 hours working on the matter, I am quite concerned about a significant portion of the article. Though that is a content matter. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
The WP:NRHP Fall 2014 Photo Contest will kick off at midnight eastern time on Monday September 1! This is an opportunity for all folks with a camera (or a sketchpad and scanner, doncha know) and an interest in the National Register of Historic Places to just have some low-key fun and maybe get some barnstars. Come submit some photos or pose a challenge to your fellow editors. And maybe, just maybe, along the line we'll improve the encyclopedia... (Note that while this contest is intentionally concurrent with Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 and the Wikipedia Summer of Monuments, there ain't gonna be no cash prizes or press releases here. But compete in 'em all if you like - we won't be jealous.) — Ipoellet (talk) 22:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Nyttend. Ygm. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 04:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi again. I just sent the second. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:16, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:44, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
I sent another one. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 08:13, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
And another. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 08:24, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
I fully support what you're doing with removal. Feel free to link to this comment, or refer anyone complaining to me. WormTT(talk) 10:38, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
With this edit you mentioned a naming convention. To which naming convention are you referring? -- PBS (talk) 20:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
If no one else responds to my reply on Wikipedia:Gadget/proposals, who can I contact about redirect URL if that's a place to add an option of not updating? It seems to me MediaWiki wants to make things harder.A Great Catholic Person (talk) 17:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
You commented on a discussion about the "Speedy Delete" redirect in 2011 (Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 September 13#Speedy Delete). The redirect has been nominated at RfD again today, and you are invited to contribute to this discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 September 9#Speedy Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:20, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Move War at History of the Jews in Nepal, and RFC review that concerns you because you were recently involved with one or more of the related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the Jews in Nepal, Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 June 30 (History of the Jews in Nepal), Talk:History of the Jews in Nepal#RfC: Should we change article name to 'Judaism in Nepal'?. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 08:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Nyttend. Thanks for your help. As for what to do now with the articles on Munda people/ language/ kingdom/ history, I wonder if I should stay out of it as much as possible, as I am already being accused of a personal grudge/ vendetta/ editing out of rage etc. Whoever now tackles these articles seriously will need to peel off two or three layers of 'sources building sources', each crediting the earlier one, with for example where one says the Mbunda migrated from a "notherly directtion" (Achim von Oppen, pg 103), the next one changes that to say they come from the Sudan. Also, from lack of skill or deliberately, the same sources are cited numerous times in the reference section on the same page - Papstein cited 10 times here and 16 times here. And for the record, this is the book "published by Cheke Cha Mbunda Cultural and Writers Association", of which he is the chairperson as it says here, and which is made up of a collection of interviews with mbunda elders. Best regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 17:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
I requested a nomination form for the Arlington Avenue Historic District after our discussion a few days ago, and while I didn't get it I may have learned some interesting information. Apparently the NPS is moving their nomination forms offsite, and they specifically said that forms from "Arkansas, North Carolina, Texas, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Missouri, Michigan, Virginia, Ohio, Massachusetts and New York" won't be available until early October, as well as forms from 2008-12. I can't say for sure, but I've got my fingers crossed that this means the NPS is finally digitizing the Ohio forms (along with a few other states). TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 00:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
I noticed that around a week ago you removed some material added by an IP user in the State Bar of California page. The user and I had been in a dispute and so far us two have been the only people part of the discussion regarding their material that they added and whether its sources were reliable and whether a criticism section I added was reliable. I am just trying to get more people into the discussion or else it will just go on and on between myself and them and there will be no conflict resolution. Most of the discussion takes place on their current talk page and their previous IP talk page. I appreciate your contributions to wikipedia and I hope you can contribute to this discussion. SantiLak (talk) 21:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Nyttend - As you probably recall, I was in correspondence with you as the oversighter who suppressed a bunch of edits/pages you deleted. Real-world circumstances have changed with respect to the subject of those edits, and the bulk of them don't qualify under the oversight policy any longer, so I am going to be reversing many if not all of my suppressions. With the exceptions of the AfD and deletion review, I'm going to leave it to you to decide whether or not you prefer to undelete; I feel uncomfortable in unilaterally reversing administrative actions you have made in good faith without at least consulting with you first. However, because the AfD and deletion review are probably relevant to other discussions that will or are likely to take place on the site, I'm going to undelete them, unless you can let me know fairly quickly if you have a problem with this. I'll be watching your page, as well as my email address and the relevant OTRS oversight queue if you'd like to discuss. Thanks, Risker (talk) 00:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Could you take a look at my comment to Red Slash here regarding recent moves and redirects? I'm concerned that Red Slash is offline now and I don't feel confident unravelling the moves and redirects involved. I have also asked DGG to take a look, but xhe appears to be busy wrangling G13s. Thanks for taking a look - cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 03:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Ny,
I was unable to get out to Centre County recently, so any pix you have there you should include! I will be going out there in a couple of weeks, but doubt that I'll have the time to get anything - well maybe one.
I also had hoped to go through Harrisburg and get a few there, but that doesn't look possible anytime soon.
I'll try to send a personal e-mail sometime today.
Sincerely,
Smallbones(smalltalk) 11:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Nyyttend, could you explain me how Bernardo Tule is notable according to Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Boxing)? Thank you, - --José Gnudista (talk) 02:00, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 05:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
I drove around and around Altoona and couldn't find J.L. Noble School! Not wonder it WAS. Thanks--Pubdog (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
I do photograph places that are no longer there, like this one, but mainly when there is some evidence of their previous existence, or when I've got some indication I've got the right hole in the ground. I talked to the owner of this one after he saw me drive by three times looking for it. I'll fill in the armory sites in a week or two if no one else has done it.
I've been looking at the Squirrel Hill Site as well, but the old road looks gone on the overhead and birds eye views. Plus, the nom form is marked not for publication, and the copy I found has the location information redacted. We should probably mark this entry as Address restricted? Finding the PA nom forms is a lot easier since I lucked into finding that the PHMC database is good at looking up a site by name, and gives the key number that ask regis text search can find. I've had spotty results searching crgis by name. Generic1139 (talk) 04:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First Lutheran Church (Dayton, Ohio), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rustication. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)