Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent and reliable sources. The only one sourced (repeated three times) is an advert.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beat Hazard 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beat Hazard 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   10:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rikieboy1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  Velella  Velella Talk   10:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need better video game reliable sources, like ones from WP:VG/RS. Do not cite Wikipedia articles as references. Do not cite PC Gaming Wiki or unknown sites such as launchpartygaming.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beat Hazard 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beat Hazard 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:56, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rikieboy1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beat Hazard 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rikieboy1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beat Hazard 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot link to videos of music that is not uploaded in accordance to copyright law. The video you linked to does not appear to be uploaded by its copyright holder and I had to remove it per WP:LINKVIO. Also, you should not remove maintenance templates until they are actually addressed. the ((primary source inline)) is not changed by adding yet another reference. It should be removed if a better reference is found. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

if you wish on cleaning up the page i recommend removing all other sources of copyrighted videos and adding substitute sources instead of just mine :) Rikieboy1 (talk) 20:49, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Posting links to lyrics pages

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you can't do that? i can't link the song and i can't link the lyrics even though others have done the exact same thing on the article, what am i supposed to put as a source then? also it's not a spam link Rikieboy1 (talk) 21:18, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if a level three warning was warrented, but no, you cannot use user-generated content as a source. You know what, you have not been supplied with a good set of tools. Aside from WP:RS you'll need the following. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Rikieboy1!

Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it's the song where he talks about this information? inappropriate? Rikieboy1 (talk) 17:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That material is already sourced. We don't need additional links to lyrics or mp3 sharing sites. You won't be warned again. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Yes, inappropriate. A song is just that, a song. I may be biographical, it may be pure fiction. Do you think that

The Beach Boys get around

Paul McKartney has a mother Mary

Britney Spears did it again

Katy Perry kissed a girl and she liked it

I could go on, but you see the problem. Rapers are well know to exaggerate escapades. Please read WP:RS to see what constitutes a reliable source, particularly for biographic information about a subject.

I also tried to explain that above and to point to the reliable sources page there as well. You do not seem to want to relent in your addition of that copyright violation as a source. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Biagio Gramaticopolo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 22:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biagio Gramaticopolo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biagio Gramaticopolo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Adamtt9 (talk) 11:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Fataho Nerie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 08:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Eddie Roberts (boxer), is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. While he appears notable, there are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Onel5969:

all of my information on this page is cited, i think your confusion lies with the fact that a big portion of the professional career part comes from BoxRec and thus I didn't bother adding the BoxRec source again and again after each paragraph but seeing this now i can understand that this might cause some confusion, this issue is fixed now. Concerning the rest of the article, these parts are cited using newspapers.

Hope you recheck this and sorry for the confusion.

Rikieboy1, Rikieboy1 (talk) 18:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hello, Sailors (1934) Eddie Roberts.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Expectant Father 1934 Eddie Roberts.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Good Bad Man (1933) Eddie Roberts.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]