I noticed that you correctly tagged this page as a copyright violation, but just wanted to give you two tips.
Thanks for watching out for copyright violations! Stifle 23:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Showing the figures of Mohammed is disturbing muslims. And it is a insult to Islam. In Islam making and also looking the figures of Mohammed is forbidden.That is raping the holy things of Islam.And it is not about "freedom".PLEASE get back your sıgnature.Thanks.--Erdemsenol 01:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
All islamic rules are determined by 3 sources.
First one is Koran itself.
Second one is the Sunnah that is how our prophet lived and what he said and adviced about islam. Sunnah is very reliable for us because our prophet lived how God ordered him to(Like other prophets)
Third one is "icma and kıyas". Icma and kiyas are applied when there is certainly not a clear definition about that matter in Koran and sunnah. Icma means that based on sunnah and koran, islamic scholars agree on something that is not specified in koran obviously. Kıyas is comparison. When there is a problem about something which is also not very obvious in kuran or sunnah, the origin and reason of the problem are found. Other similar problems which are caused by this reason and mentioned in Koran or sunnah are investigated and the decision about this matter is made by scholars.
Please note that icma and kiyas never produce something new but clarifies what is not easily noticable and it is done by scholars with great care.
In the light of above mentioned rules, I have some questions.
Are you a muslim? I am pretty sure u r not. So how can you come up with a nonsense idea about something you even dont have any idea about?
Have you ever read koran? I bet you probably heard it from someone else.
eating pork is strictly forbidden in Koran. It doesnt mention about a sausage or salami made of pork? Can anyone claim koran only forbids eating pork meat itself but it is nothing to do with salami.
Or what if a new animal is hybridized from pork and sheep by scientists(lets assume that it was succeeded). We will be pretty sure we muslims cannot eat it judging from icma and kıyas. Can you claim it is not mentioned in koran?
Who are those important islamic figures I dont know? Please give names. As a knowledgable person about islam, Why dont I know these islamic figures who broke such a basic rule?
Last but not least, Dont call islamic rules as taboos.
To the admins of wikipedia, I unterstand your reluctance about this discussion but this post I wrote is an informative post to preclude misunderstanding and misallegations about islam more than an argument. So please let it stay here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolverinex2 (talk • contribs)
You reverted my edit moving the image of the cartoons down, saying that the consensus was to keep the image. I did not delete the image, I just moved it "below the fold", so observant Muslims who might be offended by the image can choose not to see it, and others, who wish to see the image, can. Can you tell me why you insist on keeping the image at the top of the article? -- The Anome 13:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
On my "talk" page, you wrote:
Actually, the "original research" sentence was the other sentence I removed, so that was my mistake. Yours was just plain badly written (and in non-idiomatic English), plus unsourced so far as I can tell. If you can find a reference for it, it can go back in, but will have to be re-written (it's obviously written by a non-native English speaker). --ILike2BeAnonymous 23:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Don't forget to mark the redirect page created by the move as a DB page. Hpuppet 22:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
It would be great to list the current amusement park and geographical location of the ride in the infobox. --G1076 16:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi!
FrankB 22:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 05:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Please follow the instructions at the bottom of WP:AfD for articles you want to AfD. --W(t) 21:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I saw you welcomed the user above, but your ((helpme)) turned into the full template, putting this user on the [[Category:Wikipedians looking for help]]. I changed your <code> tag into a <nowiki> tag. Please check your welcome to see that it doesn't happen again. Thanks. Jfingers88 01:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
When I stopped by Wikipedia:Wikiproject/List of proposed projects recently, I noticed that you suggested a WikiProject for roller coasters a few weeks ago. There already is a WikiProject for roller coasters at Wikipedia:WikiProject Roller Coasters. I wasn't sure if you knew about that one. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 23:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, sorry you can't log in:neither can I. I've left AmiDaniel a message as VP suddenly quit just after I'd updated the user list, so I'm not sure whether all those who I added will have problems, or whether everyone is having problems, or just us 2! So I'll let you know when I have more news, although let me apologise if it's me who's caused htis problem (somehow) but I'm sure we'll get it sorted out very quickly. Let me know if you mangage to log in, or not, as the case may be. --Wisden17 22:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I don't know by what process a Danish high school student sets himself up as an expert on William Rufus King, but I assure you that the information I added to his article is all perfectly factual. I attended an afternoon-long lecture in the William Rufus King room at the Alabama State Historical Archive. These facts have also been referred to in various journals.
Incidentally, the room contains many beautiful pieces of porcelain he acquired during his time at the court of Louis Philip. Do drop by sometime; perhaps you may learn something about this great Alabamian, for whom I am named.
John King Carter Birmingham, Alabama johnkingcarter@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.175.139.50 (talk • contribs)
Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team
You recently added a cleanup tag to the Scientology controversy article. I would appreciate it if you would outline the reasons for this on the article's talk page. There are many editors willing to help fix the article and clean it up, and we are willing to discuss the issue on the talk page. But if we aren't provided with the specific reasons for you insertion of the tag it makes it almost impossible that we will be able to fix the article and remove your tag in a reasonable time frame. Also, in the future you should use the ((cleanup-date|April 2006)) tag for any articles that need cleanup. The tag you used is not to be used anymore. Vivaldi (talk) 02:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Snailwalker, are you claiming the $10 reward? Kaldari 05:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Business Name: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (The recipient of this payment is Verified) Total Amount: $10.00 USD Item Title: One time donation Comment: on behalf of Snailwalker for writing an article about the Tennessee State Museum Time: 09:18:56 PDT Status: Completed
I am not sure I understand. I work for Lombardi Software and we would like to put up a description of our company on Wikipedia. I see many companies who do it such as Business Objects (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Objects_%28company%29) or many others. What is the process for publishing our company information without you removing it?
Thanks
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tasumner (talk • contribs)
Posted by Pruneau 21:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team
Posted by Pruneau 18:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:EK-32009.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hawaiian717 22:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
See my response at User talk:Treebark/Table. Carmelapple 22:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
You had signed up to write a Danish report at User:Treebark/Table. It's not due for another month but are you still doing it? Sugarpinet 15:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
The article Carbon nanotube you nominated as a good article has failed , see Talk:Carbon nanotube for reason why the nomination failed. If or when this points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said artile. If you oppose this decission, you may ask for a review. →AzaToth 16:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello Snailwalker! I noticed that you recently rated Electron diffraction. I've done some work on this article, and if you have some input on how the article can be improved I'd really appreciate it! O. Prytz 14:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you've changed the format of the Featured Article section of Portal:Physics so that it points to a different page each week. While I have no major objections to having it set up like this, I'm a bit concerned that the section will be broken if no-one creates the page for a Featured Article for future weeks, especially bearing in mind how infrequently it's been updated over the last year or so. What are your thoughts on this? Mike Peel 12:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello again. I've just gone through Timeline of carbon nanotubes (was History of carbon nanotubes) sorting out the formatting and references, and have flagged a number of facts that need references. As you created the original article, I was hoping that you be able to provide some of them? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Roger D. Kornberg.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 01:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)