Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dragons' Den, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presenter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Change it 👍👍 Strugglehouse (talk) 20:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Jarvis Johnson YouTube Profile Picture.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:08, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Please familiarize yourself with the BRD process. It's BOLD-Revert-Discuss, not BOLD-Revert-Revert-Discuss. My edit (diff) was a revert of a BOLD edit (diff) which upended a guideline-based consensus that dates back to February (talk page) to not include every channel on Ludwig Ahgren. Kindly self-revert to the status quo ante, which was my revert. Thanks. Pilaz (talk) 22:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Strugglehouse!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Doric Loon (talk) 11:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
|
Thank you so much for putting Charli D’Amelio’s middle name because every time I put her middle name in, they keep undoing my edit. Abal126 (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Pilaz (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I watched the video but I can't see the part at 29:02 where he shows Amanda's last name. I just see a picture of them together. — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 03:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi Strugglehouse! I noticed at Alan Davies that you seem to be under the impression (e.g. here) that references are needed after every sentence, or perhaps needed every sentence for certain types of content, like when BLP applies. This isn't a requirement at any level. For instance, WP:CITETYPE suggests that a reference at the end of a sentence or paragraph is generally clear. In some cases, a single citation at the end of a section might even be enough.
What matters is that a reader can identify which source(s) verify which content, such as a single citation placed after three sentences that verifies all of the content. As long as it's relatively clear, it's up to editor preference and there's no need to switch from one variant to another. Let me know if you have any questions! — Bilorv (talk) 21:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mrwhosetheboss YouTube Profile Picture.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
((Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>))
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:"Wake Up & It's Over" album cover, by Lovejoy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 13:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Can't Catch Harry.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lovejoy (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dork.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Apologies for the revert, I must've hit rollback by accident. Yeeno (talk) 07:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nihachu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
The article Nihachu you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Nihachu for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 08:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
@Strugglehouse:Dear Strugglehouse, please forgive me for undoing your cropping of the photo at the top of our article about Einstein! That particular photo happens to be one that the Wikipedia community as a whole regards as one of the best that we have, and I think that we owe it to the photographer who created it to publish it in the way that he would have wished. I apologize if my reverting your edit has hurt your feelings. If you still think that your cropped version is better than the photographer's original, by all means revert my reversion—I won't undo your contribution a second time. Best wishes. Niggle1892 (talk) 00:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Citation Barnstar |
For your amazing work on Ricky Montgomery. Thank you! SWinxy (talk) 22:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dream SMP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Insider.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the cropped version, but the point of the picture is to show the sword and the "magic" apparatus that went on Miranda's neck for the sword through the neck bit. The projection behind shows that Miranda is talking about how this boosts her "self isteam". Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Hey man, I just wanna commend you and say keep up the fantastic work! I enjoy the way we've been discussing things on Twitter, and I like your persistence. I simply want to say that even though we have different opinions, you have gained my respect 👍🏼. The Man Without Fear 🦇 13:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters. "Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization". Many publications use capital letters, including Companies House, but we strive for consistency and have therefore adopted this wikipedia guideline. Dormskirk (talk) 22:06, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. As I have just shown with my last edit summary, the Government website specifically states "Companies House does not verify the accuracy of the information filed" (gov.uk.). But what is even more conclusive it that the M&S source you provided as "evidence" actually, contrary to what you claim, states "plc". Technopat (talk) 20:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Please have a look at WP:BLP and WP:RSP, where you can get a better understanding of sources that should and should not be used in BLPs. See this edit where you introduced three poor sources to the BLP of a child. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 08:12, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
What do you mean here that the image was used in the article "for a year before this"? If it was previously removed, could you point me to that edit? My reason for removing the image was WP:BLPIMAGE: you need to re-read the sentence, This is particularly important for police booking photographs (mugshots), or situations where the subject did not expect to be photographed.
I quoted the part that applied, situations where the subject did not expect to be photographed
, as the photo is obviously not a mugshot, and obviously taken without Fox's knowledge at an unflattering moment. — Bilorv (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Strugglehouse. I noticed that you used therichest.com as a reference for biographical information in Jamie Oliver. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nihachu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sparkltalk 13:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:BLPNAME, there's no good reason to identify non-notable family members by name. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You are experienced enough here that I am sure you would not appreciate me dropping a template on your page, but all the same, I am just drawing your attention to WP:3RR and your edits at Prudential plc. You have made an edit and 3 reverts now in 24 hours. The talk page would be the best option. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Whitbread. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Adding content like this to articles requires multiple strong reliable sources. Please discuss on the talk page before attempting to add again. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Why don't you make some useful contributions rather than making pointless edits to URLs? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 11:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Strugglehouse - noticed your edits to the infobox website links as some are on my watchlist. Just wanted to drop by and thank you for your work in making what's shown neater and tidier. Revised a couple myself recently. Do think it's worthwhile and an improvement. Note also that where need be you've added a link to the official website e.g. Oxfordshire. Good work. Commend your zeal! All the best. Rupples (talk) 17:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Per our WP:BLPNAME policy, there needs to be a good reason to include personal details of non-notable family members. In this case, there's no compelling reason to discuss Fosh's sister's professional life with sources that don't even mention Max Fosh. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
You have been tagged to this conversation because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views.
𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 06:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)