Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Interviews does not count for notability. While other cited sources seems to be PRish type.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prateik Chaudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 09:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Systumm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 09:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neal Taparia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Systumm,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Matthias Mende for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 03:06, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Systumm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the ((edit COI)) template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please share IG Umar Ali Haque (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dont use Instagram, you may please share what is it that you want here on my talk page I will surely try to help if I can. Systumm (talk) 12:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Systumm. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Systumm. The template ((Paid)) can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: ((paid|user=Systumm|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName)). If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 20:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yes it was conflict of interest bit I have not been paid, person I published about was friend I’m trying to get him an article within Wikipedia guidelines, I was about express about COI but before that within 72 hours it got deleted but are drafted. Systumm (talk) 21:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. That particular friend has engaged in some blackhat SEO and paid to have gushing articles about himself published on sites run by those spammers. Since you're not interested in developing unsourced biographical articles in draft, that kind of material will be deleted on sight in the future, especially if it includes personal information about relatives and promotional claims. I can see that you've engaged in similar activities for other "friends". Please act with more transparency in the future, and mark existing articles that you've created or modified with a COI. Also, please do not upload images without verifying that the image is released under a free license; I can see several point-black copyright violations in your additions. Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:25, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, but where do I disclose COI edits, I have made COI edits for few articles. Systumm (talk) 09:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Systumm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Darshan Somashekar, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: ((proposed deletion/dated...))
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|SunDawn)). And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll leave it for the reviewers. Thanks Systumm (talk) 09:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noted that you edited the Patrick Treacy‎ article, which has often been a target of CoI editors. While I don't take issue with your edit specifically, I see that you have been warned repeatedly about CoI regarding other articles. This is a worrisome pattern that tends to incriminate you as a undeclared paid editor. I remind you that you have a legal obligation to divulge your conflict of interest regardless of whether you are paid or not. If too many editors notice this pattern, you will likely be blocked and cut off from further paid editing, as any attempt to return to Wikipedia under a new account will be considered socking. I don't think you want that, so honesty is the only policy. If you have questions, please ask. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, yes it was COI should I mention it on it’s talk page? I have only added infobox. No other edits were made since they were already been removed numerous times. Systumm (talk) 09:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PAID says "You must make that disclosure in at least one of the following ways: a statement on your user page, a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions." I used ((UserboxCOI)) on my user page for my CoI, for example. If you are a paid editor you need to disclose not only the article but also the firm that paid you and the client who hired the firm. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have disclosed it, but I have not been paid for it, it was only made Because I know him personally He asked me to add Infobox with image. Systumm (talk) 13:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bar Greenzaid, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Systumm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place ((Help me)) on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Xegma(talk) 10:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Systumm, I realize you're just trying to make money, but you cannot take shortcuts on sourcing and promotional material. I've moved your article Bar Greenzaid to the draft space. You've again used black-hat SEO sources, paid advertorials, and sources that do not appear to support the claims at all. Please consider this a final warning - disclosing your paid relationship does not give you permission to add spam for your clients. Sam Kuru (talk) 15:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]