New messages will appear at the bottom of this page. |
Hello, TitanSymphony, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Eyer contact 21:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Why Illggd (talk) 21:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Because TitanSymphony (talk) 21:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Define because Illggd (talk) 21:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Please stop wasting my time. It's not funny. TitanSymphony (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Sorry Illggd (talk) 21:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
What's the board on Wikipedia for reporting vandalism to admins? In my 10 or so years of absence, I have forgotten its name.
TitanSymphony (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! TitanSymphony (talk) 09:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi User:TitanSymphony, thanks for reporting users to WP:AIV. I would encourage you to refresh yourself with Wikipedia:Vandalism#How_to_respond_to_vandalism when you have a chance. Some of the users you reported recently haven't vandalized since receiving a warning, and that falls under Step 5 of the above: "While not strictly required, administrators there are most likely to respond rapidly to requests which include at least two warnings, culminating in the level-four "last chance" template." Consider waiting to see if a user continues vandalism after a warning before reporting, rather than reporting if they stop their disruption after receiving a warning. Best, SpencerT•C 09:54, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Good day!
I dropped by to seek your help in preventing vandalisms on the page Ang Probinsyano perpetrated by User:Kazu parungao. I'd like to point out that the edits he makes is moot and academic considering that those points he is raising is adequately addressed in the notes attached to the characters which the user is editing. The fact that the information is obvious if the user only took the time to read the attached note makes the mootness of his edits all the more glaring. The fact that the user persists in doing so, in my view, warrants him or her to be sanctioned.
Warmest regards. Gardo Versace (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
My brother is Steve Kazor. He has asked me to remove certain info from his page that is either too personal, too specific, or erroneous. I made 10 edits today... Slowly and methodically to ensure the correct GENERAL information is appearing. With one swipe somehow you undid everything i worked on!! Please stop reverting the back back! Kaliena22 (talk) 21:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Just a FYI, once your account becomes "confirmed" (required 4 days and some minimal amount of edits that you have already surpassed), you will trip a lot fewer edit filters. Sasquatch t|c 22:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, I can live with that. I've only got one more day though. TitanSymphony (talk) 02:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Why is MY edit, to Alistair Brownlee, listed as a possible BLP violation? TitanSymphony (talk) 12:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi TitanSymphony, It would be best if you warned the vandals after each revert. You can use Twinkle to make it easier and faster.
Cheers, --BoothSiftTalks 01:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi TitanSymphony! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
What do you mean my accidental mistake was a common problem Illggd (talk) 00:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~))
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.A tag has been placed on Category:Hungarian folk songs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:16, 23 June 2020 (UTC)