This is Trinitresque's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Note: I prefer that if I start a discussion at your talk page, that you continue that discussion at your talk page, and vice versa, but if you respond here to a discussion I start on your talk page, then I will follow that pattern.
If my count is accurate (or close), the article is 169 characters short of the minimum length of prose text for a DYK article. Infobox and references do not count. I suggest you add a little more content to the text so no question is raised. I have not commented on the DYK nominations page. Donner60 (talk) 04:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
On 29 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Presseurop, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the European Commission-funded news portal Presseurop translates and publishes news articles from over two hundred sources into ten European languages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Presseurop. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for adding that past-tense warning to Allen West's page. I was the first incorrect edit, and in my zeal I neglected to realize that he won't leave office for a few weeks yet. Your edit-viewable warning was appropriate. Facts matter. Ollie Garkey (talk) 16:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Trinitresque! Your reason for nominating "PSY" for speedy deletion was: "it is an unnecessary redirect that was created when an editor changed the capitalization from all caps to 'Psy', which was later reversed". The page is clearly not an unnecessary redirect as it redirects to a live article (that is, one that has not been deleted). – Zntrip 05:28, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
If you want to move "PSY (entertainer)" to "PSY", deleting the target article will not help. Deleting a redirect is not part of moving a page. – Zntrip 06:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
My apologies, I now see what you were trying to do. – Zntrip 07:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gangnam Style, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
I have closed the requested move discussion and the page "2012 constitution of Egypt" has been moved to "Constitution of Egypt". Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for making these sort of edits which fixed my userboxes. I'd been wondering what made them tall!
Rcsprinter (orate) @ 00:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
Your edit summaries quote MOS, "Trademarks rendered without any capitals are always capitalized." But "infoMania" contains a capital "M" and is therefore camelCase, which MOS:TM calls a "judgment call." Can we keep the intercaps to maintain consistency with general usage? Blackguard 21:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Please, when you change map colors in Commons you should also change legend colors in all wikis where file is used. --GreenZeb (talk) 23:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up with this—I will delete the section now and keep the policy in mind for future editing.--Soulparadox (talk) 02:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
This page disambiguates three extant Wikipedia pages: the primary topic and two others. The point of the tag is that we don't need a disambiguation page when we have just two pages with the same name and when one of those pages is clearly more important than the other. Imagine that the primary topic for this page suddenly ceased to exist, leaving us with just the album and the less-famous song. We'd still need a disambiguation page for them, since they have the same title and since neither is primary; the only difference is that we'd move the page to get rid of (disambiguation). It wouldn't be helpful to get rid of an appropriate page just because a third, more-famous, topic has the same name. Nyttend (talk) 03:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. The more I think about it, the more sympathetic I am to your view that that sentence in the lead was, given the lead's shortness, problematic. I think expanding the lead is the better solution than just removing it. I have added a few items I think help summarize her career, and mentioned she gets criticism from the right as well (E.g., O'Reilly on the radiation comment) which I think helps balance it. μηδείς (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
That article is a quaternary source; I simply took information from other Wiki articles (mainly future years) and gathered them together to be more accessible. So if you had problems with the lack of sources on that page, then blame the people who wrote them in the year articles. Serendipodous 10:05, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
File:World-cannabis-laws.png map should color in dark red the use of capital punishment against the cannabis trade (Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore and People's Republic of China). What do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.188.45.192 (talk) 14:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Cannabis is illegal ir Algeria: http://www.smokedepot.net/2010/11/22/marijuana-in-algeria-cephas/ http://wikileaks.vicepresidencia.gob.bo/DRUG-TRAFFICKING-IN-ALGERIA http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5g-ZFQyxxT4mjiOuhPgdFifOZZhbA?docId=CNG.0956340c838e90da81b27c415c96819a.401
Cannabis is illegal in Tunisia: http://books.google.com/books?id=k2By-NdV93AC&pg=PP60&lpg=PP60&dq=tunisia+cannabis&source=bl&ots=ikv8iqKBlo&sig=zRFVvXtq6pluOcyDIIpnhijh4FE&hl=lv&sa=X&ei=CsUeUcj-EMSmtAaiwIC4Dw&ved=0CDgQ6AEwATgK http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100725/local/tunisia-accuses-missing-maltese-of-smuggling-cannabis.319346
For other information read: http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Can_Afr_EN_09_11_07.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.188.53.60 (talk) 23:38, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi again! Maybe you could update cannabis map with some new information.
Cannabis is illegal in Namibia, Mauritius, Seychelles. In Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo it is illegal but often unforced.
In Botswana cannabis seems like also illegal but not unforced, see: http://www.issafrica.org/cdct/mainpages/pdf/Organised%20Crime/Legislation/Botswana/Botswana%20Drugs%20and%20Related%20Substances%20Act%2018%20of%201992%20.pdf http://www.sundaystandard.info/print_article.php?NewsID=13507 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.188.44.73 (talk) 20:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Nice picture! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:41, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
You and I seem to be having a problem with the definition of 2013 Sequestration. I think the first boldface words should be "2013 Sequestration", including the date (2013) and the capitalzation of Sequestration. This is because the article title is "2013 Sequestration" and that's what we should be defining first. There are redirects from 2013 Sequester, Sequestration of 2013 and a whole bunch of others.
You seem to prefer "sequester or sequestration". Why is that better than or more descriptive than "2013 sequestration or sequester"? (I've read your editing note and I'm still unclear.) If you leave out the date, you could be defining the Gramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget Act (or any acts containing a sequestration that was never implemented). I used sequestration rather than sequester because I found the term sequestation was more widely used as an article title in Wikipedia (see Sequestration and Budget sequestration). And why specify sequester ahead of sequestration? I concede that I could have named the article "2013 sequestration", with the lower case "s", but that is another discussion (which I'm perfectly willing to have).
I'll be watching your talk page here for any reply. I do hope we can resolve this, rather than put it up to consensus on the article's talk page. --RoyGoldsmith (talk) 08:45, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ana Kasparian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear, Trinitresque, I ran across your undoing edit of Salon.com which took out the labeling it as a Liberal website. I'm aware that the labeling of entites is controversial on wikipedia but I agree with the origianl editor: the fact that the AJR labels it as "the best [sic] online journal" but also labels it as Liberal IS important. The omission of this label while selectively choosing the best parts of the article is dishonest. Label it as the source labels it, then let the chips fall where they may. 151.207.250.11 (talk) 13:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
OK, then let's have the discussion. It was 4 days ago, and no one has made a single substantive point yet... how long am I supposed to wait while people revert but don't discuss? WP:BRD has 3 steps, not two...Peregrine981 (talk) 15:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Trinitresque, One of the images you seem to maintain (this image) seems to have incorrect information for New Jersey (or at least contradictory to what other pages say). I described the issue on its talk page and would appreciate it if you could fix it. Thanks. --Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) (Report a Vandal) 22:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey Trinitresque. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Hey. It's been 2 years since your comment. I have been too busy to be on the Wikipedia much in that time. Sorry. I was hanging around today. I ran across some dialog that we had about the Constitution of Egypt back then. The Arab spring was progressing then. I don't know if this is the appropriate use of the Wikipedia to ask you on your talk page, but I was wondering what you thought about the current article. I'm quite torn about what is NPOV here. I think it is horribly POV as it stands but I'm afriad of my own POV. I'd love to have an honest and frank conversation with someone about how to correctly cover a 'constitution' without bias. THIS IS VERY HARD. (sorry about the yell, but I'm sure you understand). Feel free to message me on my talk page. Happy editing & best wishes, Jeff Carr (talk) 10:31, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of Clair Cameron Patterson.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. I believe the file Clair Cameron Patterson.jpg is equivalent. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
((di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>))
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Taketa (talk) 17:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bai Brands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton, New Jersey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilhan Omar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilhan Omar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ilhan Omar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KSTP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for putting a page together on Ilhan Omar. And for defending it from deletion. Important figure, important page. Mauramauramaura (talk) 16:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Okey dokey artichokey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genericscreen (talk • contribs) 19:10, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Trinitresque. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Trinitresque. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Trinitresque. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Salon screenshot - May 18, 2012.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)