This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:08 (UTC)
non-notable band, no mention on allmusic, little on google, own website doesn't work (for me anyways!). delete also nominating articles about the band members and redirecting to this nomination -- pcrtalk 00:01, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:10 (UTC)
Guy's a voice actor under 20, currently studying etc. Can't be found from IMDB; no Google hits that I can find except his own website. (His friend, Robin Sharp, has a similar status and they apparently work/study together; I'll post a separate VfD about that one, too.) Seems to be vanity. Captain Disdain 00:01, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:09 (UTC)
Delete - appears to be an ad for a vanity publication. The title and the author both return 0 hits on Google. The website does not appear to be associated with any publishing house. Finally, the book has not even been published yet. -- Rlandmann 00:01, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:13 (UTC)
At best, this is original research. No relevant Google hits for this phrase. Eric119 00:03, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus, so keep. --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:15 (UTC)
nn band vanity You (Talk) 00:06, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:14 (UTC)
This page was marked for speedy deletion for "vanity and non-notability", neither of which is a reason for speedy deletion so I am moving it here. Abstain. JeremyA 00:37, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no concensus. - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:18 (UTC)
This album has not yet been titled (although Souvenir of Sadness was previously the working title) making the article name false. MrHate 00:37, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:15 (UTC)
nn forum You (Talk) 00:42, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:19 (UTC)
A bunch of articles created by the same anon editor, seemingly for the promotion of a dating service. Delete all of them. JeremyA 01:37, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:16 (UTC)
No vote tagged on June 2, but never linked to VfD page. --Nabla 02:05, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
found in orphaned pages, no hits in google for rat, (rat), or "Ben D. Cooper" + electronic music - suspected vanity. StopTheFiling 23:23, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
Agree with above opinion; look at year of birth: 1986. CurdledMeowMix 21:54, 3 June 2005.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Metroid Prime - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:21 (UTC)
Videogamecruft. What wil this be worth in ten years (assuming it's worth anything now?) Denni☯ 02:36, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:17 (UTC)
Unverifiable bandcruft, much sounds like a hoax (bandmembers going to prison *and* forming a reunion concert?) FCYTravis 03:01, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:25 (UTC)
Original research. Interesting original research, but nonetheless... Denni☯ 03:07, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:22 (UTC)
Non-notable beverage Denni☯ 03:11, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
Hey look... fuck you guys... Two rules, you guys suck... so get on your knees. He's just trying to further the community and you guys put him down. Suck. It.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:18 (UTC)
Delete silliness about a 20-year-old pool hall manager in Quebec. Joyous 03:48, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge to Lincoln, Nebraska. Grue 6 July 2005 19:26 (UTC)
Pretty much every major city has a summer jazz festival. This is just another non-notable one. Denni☯ 03:50, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 3 July 2005 09:57 (UTC)
Instructions for an educational videogame. Denni☯ 04:07, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 3 July 2005 09:56 (UTC)
Instructions for an educational videogame. Denni☯ 04:10, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:32 (UTC)
This is a non-notable internet game (approx. 800 google hits), possibly created as advertising. This article was created in response to the VFD discussion of Roflcopter, which see for background information. Xoloz 05:58, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 11:20 (UTC)
Article is obscenely short with no real content.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:24 (UTC)
Seems to be vanity, at least not a group warranting an article. kmccoy (talk) 06:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:21 (UTC)
Seems to be a vanity page kmccoy (talk) 06:56, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:22 (UTC)
Seems to be a vanity page kmccoy (talk) 06:58, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Grue 6 July 2005 19:30 (UTC)
Delete - Booger is not the scientific name for this. If this is to be discussed at all then it should be discussed under a scientific name.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Grue 6 July 2005 19:37 (UTC)
This subject is already treated fairly well in Sumo. Recommend redirect to Sumo -Tadanisakari 08:18, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 11:18 (UTC)
This seems to be vanity: a text in Portuguese about a college student and his food & music preferences. Sietse 08:23, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:25 (UTC)
Spam and blatant vanity. (And the advertised site has no Alexa rank.) Delete. - Mike Rosoft 08:47, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:26 (UTC)
Spam and blatant vanity. Affiliate marketing scheme (Vstore); no Google hits. Ambi 09:12, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:27 (UTC)
This article has previously been through VfD and deleted without problems. It has popped up again under a new name, and is deletable band vanity. The band has no albums, no chart success, and apparently no money. Delete. Harro5 09:25, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:28 (UTC)
Vanity. Dunc|☺ 09:45, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Maybe i'll die in a helicopter accident too? then will i be noteable :) (Matthew Harding) unsigned edit by 220.240.241.178 (talk · contribs)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:29 (UTC)
Non-notable to-be guru; only web presence are his own pages. This is a vanity page, should be deleted. Bambaiah 09:48, 2005 Jun 22 (according to edit history. I also fixed the nomination. Uncle G 10:40, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC))
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:30 (UTC)
0 Google hits for "Vincent Hermany". 2 for "Vincent L. Hermany", no demonstration of notability (wrestled for his university), and some other guy (possibly his father) who died recently [7] Dunc|☺ 09:54, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Duncharris (nonsense). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:50, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Student vanity. Apparent author of books Origami Astrophysics Guide and The meaning of Theoretical Physics and founder of the "Association of Paperclips and their effect on the sub-conscious mind", might qualify for nonsense. Dunc|☺ 09:59, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:33 (UTC)
Schoolkid vanity. No imbd entry. Dunc|☺
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:34 (UTC)
Not only is there no evidence to show that this amatuer hard rock band passes WP:MUSIC, its website is also being hosted on FreeWebs.com. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 11:46, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Sjakkalle (Check!) 4 July 2005 13:06 (UTC)
This article seems to be about a new toy line that was just announced by the Takara toy company a few days ago. The problem is that it will not actually debut until September and thus makes this article violate Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 12:06, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:24 (UTC)
Blatant advertisement for Monofibre (I've removed that stupid registered sign). While the Monofibre article is salvageable because of the small amount of content, I see no practical way to make this article read as anything other than advertising. Delete. — JIP | Talk 12:37, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 11:16 (UTC)
Spam advertising of non-notable company Djbrianuk 12:45, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Geogre (Speedy deleting for the THIRD TIME). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Advertising. Small non-notable mailing list. " It's been suggested that we don't discuss as much motorcyclecentric topics, which is entirely true. The reasoning for this fact is that we have already talked about it. 43 times." is complete non-information. Delete. - Mgm|(talk) 12:48, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect. Grue 6 July 2005 19:43 (UTC)
All information in this article is already contained in the individual pages for the characters: Himura Kenshin, Kamiya Kaoru, Myojin Yahiko, Sagara Sanosuke and Takani Megumi. Links should go to the individual character pages, and be provided on the main Rurouni Kenshin article. Delete- Js2756 13:37, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Duncharris ("Phenominal basketball player who plays for Craigmont High School."). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete: Vanity. --Durin 13:45, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:35 (UTC)
I first nominated this for speedy deletion, but it doesn't meet the criteria for a speedy, so I hereby nominate this article for deletion. Possible vanity article about a non-notable production company that hasn't produced any movies. Aecis 13:59, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:36 (UTC)
Dictdef. (Previous vfd of same title with different content here) --W(t) 14:20, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete. Hedley 3 July 2005 17:47 (UTC)
A web forum. No Alexa data, and while it has 217 inbound links, if you search through them, all but one are either from the site itself or from allrpg.com. Wikipedia is not a web guide. --Cryptic (talk) 14:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Response: As the author of the article, I do not intend the article to be an advertisement for the forum or an entry in a "web guide.' Rather, I was perusing Wikipedia, and I noticed several entries regarding play-by-post gaming and online roleplaying games. However, there were few entries which described an example of the operating systems behind such a forum. As such, I felt it necessary to describe one such system in some degree of detail, so as to provide a more comprehensive knowledge of the topic.
I have also edited the article to more clearly reflect its intent. I read the entire rulebook before posting the article, too, and I see nothing to disallow articles which enhance the depth and breadth of knowledge on particular subjects. It may be, however, that a better method is just to hyperlink for examples in the external links section, or provide a generic "example" within the context of other articles. If that is the case, feel free to say so.
Response: AllRPG.com is the parent site of Althanas, and due to their usage of sidebars and XHTML, there is a direct link to Althanas every viewable page. "Spiders" that are meant to make Internet searches more thorough and complete have indexed every single page of AllRPG and every page of Althanas (which both have forums), making it seem as though our entry is JUST a web forum. A regular google search shows 3,840 total links. Google filters out many of the "Spiders," and as you can see, there are many unique inbound links to Althanas. This should prove that Althanas is both a fantasy world and a unique gaming system comparable to existing entries on Wikipedia such as "Play By Post" and "Alleria."
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:25 (UTC)
Losing minor party candidate in last November's Congressional election - and no edits since last November. Not notable. Delete. -- BD2412 talk 14:33, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:39 (UTC)
Neologism. The page says the word is only used by "a small group of Boston College alumni". MysteryDog 14:33, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:37 (UTC)
One of several vanity pages created by anonymous user. Madchester 14:48, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:38 (UTC)
One of several vanity pages created by an anonymous user. --Madchester 14:51, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
Just because some stupid kids are ruining other pages using Darren Wogman's name dosn't make this page any less reliable. i think it is unfair to 'punish' the creator of this page, and also Darren Wogman himself on the stupid antics or random anon users who are on a vandalism spree. definatly keep the page! it is one of the only places with relevent useful information on Darren Wogman. people may need it for research. (--Mod5, 22 June 2005)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:27 (UTC)
Delete. Non notable organization. Advertising. Zeimusu | (Talk page) 23:36, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:40 (UTC)
Tagged on May 26 but not listed on VfD. Delete.--Nabla 15:09, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
Is this article really worthy of staying on Wikipedia? Maybe this small section can be added to the GameFAQs article (with major editing, of course): KOS users are users from the site of GameFAQs. These users are KOSed (or Killed On Sight) by repeated violations on multiple accounts. KOS is the worst form of punishment one can receive. Many people chide these "infamous" celebrities on GameFAQs for not following rules. → JarlaxleArtemis 04:25, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:41 (UTC)
Tagged on May 26 but not listed on VfD. No vote here.
See also the redirect listing at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_deletion#May_30. --Nabla 15:25, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
same case as Hans Nusslein
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus, so keep. --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:46 (UTC)
I'm doing this anonymously 'cos I can't be bothered signing up to wikipedia. :-D - (anon comment by 212.101.70.221)
Edwinx2 18:43, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) [NB - This user's only Wiki contributions relate to this vfd] - User's second vote, struck through.
I feel that I must clarify that I have no previous knowledge of any of the subjects of the article in question; I just found the entry compelling, and created my account to introduce research advocating the inclusion of an interesting, though possibly only of local interest, historical footnote. My decision to wade into public Wiki mediation is based solely on my reaction to the pathos of this poor kid's brief little life-- to survive through all that and affect (indirectly, I suppose it could be argued) major legislation-- only to get killed in a motorcycle accident. It seemed to me that no one was willing to look deeper than what a cursory Google returned, and a potentially important (beginning) of an article was to be dismissed without adequate research consideration.
Apologies for accidentally voting twice; that was not my intent. I suppose I should have read the instructions more thouroughly; I thought noting that the summary provided was an update would be sufficient. I suppose it is not outrageous to assume that I have some personal interest in this issue, based solely on the fact that it is my first foray into wikipedia research advocacy, but, again, the first I heard of any of this was reading through the delete comments on this entry. I don't even know anyone who has been affected by a similar tragedy, nor do I have personal experience with any of the issues involved.
I have no problem with the article being deleted based on the merits of the facts of the story as exposed by research, but I have read no response addressing the four linear links which provide documentary context in the above summary. If the local nature of the story makes it inappropriate, then delete away... I suppose it is not inappropriate to scrutinize the motives of someone who posts emotional pleas or pure opinion in defense of an article. It is, however, inappropriate to ignore clear research in favor of speculation about the motivation and character of the researcher. Edwinx2 01:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hade was the victim of a grisly attack in 1989 that made national headlines... Legislators cited the case in adopting the nation's first state law to allow indefinite civil confinement of sexual predators...
In 1989, Governor Gardner established a task force on community protection following a trilogy of events: the murder of a young Seattle woman by an offender on work release; the brutal assault of a young Tacoma boy and the murders of two small boys in Clark County. The task force conducted a series of public hearings across the State to discover what citizens believed were major flaws in our State laws regarding sexual and violent offenders. Following extensive research and study, the task force made three key recommendations: significant increases in offender control and treatment, community prevention and protection services, and victim services. As a result of the task force work, Washington State was the first state in the country to pass a community protection law (the Community Protection Act of 1990). [23]
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 18:03 (UTC)
This is too narrow a article. A Union School District is (?) a type of School District that is unified with greater independence per school. (nominated by User:70.185.179.4)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Geogre (Prank with libel). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I am not wholly sure what this article is about. It is nonsense, vanity, a spam page, or unencyclopedic. I'm just not sure which. smoddy 15:54, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was ambiguous.
I count 10 "delete" votes, 6 "keep" votes, 5 "merge" or "redirect" and one apparent abstention.
There is a clear majority arguing that this should not remain as an independent article. The largest vote was for deletion but it did not achieve the overwhelming majority necessary to show concensus for deletion. I am going to call this one a "no concensus".
In my capacity as an ordinary editor, I will now turn this into a redirect. (I didn't see anything worth merging but if you do, please recover it from the page history.) Rossami (talk) 7 July 2005 23:28 (UTC)
This article passed a VfU because it was speedy deleted (possibly out of process). No vote Deathphoenix 15:56, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:41 (UTC)
Hate to do this to a fellow captain, obviously, but vanity is vanity. This guy is not notable. The fan group he's a part of has already been deleted once, though it's now been recreated; I'm putting that one in for speedy deletion -- wish we could do the same with fairly obvious nonsense like this, but I guess this one wouldn't fly over there... -- Captain Disdain 15:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus but I tagged for suggested merge. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 04:11 (UTC)
Video game trivia (a setting in the Mortal Kombat series). Gazpacho 16:15, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 03:47 (UTC)
No vote. Tagged at May 15 by User:SchmuckyTheCat, but never listed on VfD. Looks like a leftover temp page from an old copyvio notice--Nabla 16:48, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Anonymizer and redirect both to Anonymous proxy. – ABCD 8 July 2005 19:28 (UTC)
Sure looks a lot like advertising to me. If the product is notable -- it gets a lot of Google hits, as can be expected from a product of this type, but I have no idea if it's something that deserves an article of its own. As it is, though, this doesn't establish notability or anything else -- like i said, sure looks a lot like advertising to me. -- Captain Disdain 16:50, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
It mentions a commercial product but that's not unique for Wikipedia. In fact, it references competing products that are also listed in Wikipedia- specifically the 'Anonymizer'. If this page comes down, would the Anonymizer page come down as well to keep editorial consistency? Why hasn't the Anonymizer been deleted previously if mentioning a product is reason for deleting a page? The editorial standard has already been set for this issue, and the mere mention of a product doesn't mean that the page must come down.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 11:14 (UTC)
Delete. Looks like band vanity - no indicia of notability. Their own website suggests that they've done nothing since last October. -- BD2412 talk 17:13, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 11:12 (UTC)
Delete. Apparent band vanity - no indicia of notability. Google search turns up fewer than 20 relevant hits. -- BD2412 talk 17:17, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 04:03 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable members of a now-defunct band (Clay Sun Union) that was, at most, marginally notable (probably should be deleted as well). -- BD2412 talk 17:21, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:42 (UTC)
This article was tagged for Speedy deletion but it does not quite qualify. This article seems to be about a student activist at Dartmouth College. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 17:32, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:44 (UTC)
This article was tagged as ((db)) for being a "dicdef of neologism," but that does not quite qualify for speedy deletion so I moved it over here. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 17:38, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
ChercherEccles 18:04, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 1, 2005 23:00 (UTC)
Delete. Band vanity. -- BD2412 talk 17:39, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 1, 2005 23:02 (UTC)
Um, so user "Kindie" placed the "vfd" tag on this article on the 29th of May, but he or she failed to follow the rest of the proceedure outlined on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. Kindie's edit summary was "Candidate for deletion, reads like a pr release, possible advertising". Laconic 17:42, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:43 (UTC)
Yet another non-notable band. You know the drill. 39 Google hits for "Vandolah" + "Mark Hutchins". They seem to be legit, and actually getting their name out there, which is a nice change from pure B.S., but still not WP:MUSIC. jglc | t | c 17:44, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 04:12 (UTC)
Non-notable. Doesn't even have a single Google hit. — Elembis 17:53, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge and has been so marked. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 04:13 (UTC)
I doubt the relativity and encyclopicity of this, delete' Frenchman113 17:55, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
Keep - It's not much at the moment, but if we mark it as a stub, maybe it will get fixed up. With examples, typical structure, responsibilities, charter items, and such it could make a useful article. Gary D Robson 18:03, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted at 18:13, 22 Jun 2005 by MacGyverMagic. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 18:14, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a storybook. smoddy 18:02, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:45 (UTC)
Vanity. smoddy 18:05, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was...:
--Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. smoddy 18:08, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirected to Catatonia. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 04:48 (UTC)
I admit, the source I used to stubbify this is of dubious quality, but from the number of hits I got on Google, I assumed it was a notable place. Anyway, I don't think it's speediably, so I'll bring it here. - Mgm|(talk) 18:09, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 08:07 (UTC)
A search for one his works and his last name yields no google results. TO my knowledge there is a composer named Bernstein, but that's either Charles or Richard. This person has no IMDB entry and I'm having a hard time verifying. Anon creator recently created a vandal page at Bangbangjin (now deleted). Please remove entry from 2002 if this is deleted. I'm voting delete for being unverifiable, but please don't shoot me if I'm wrong. - Mgm|(talk) 18:38, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedied as substub. Feel free to write a full article on this person. - Mgm|(talk) 19:54, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
Single sentence stub was put up for speedy deletion as patent nonsense, which isn't accurate. Subject has a bunch of google hits, so I'm just throwing this article out there. Nominator Abstains Scimitar 18:54, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus.FCYTravis 7 July 2005 04:22 (UTC)
Not suitable for Wikipedia; likely vanity page. FOo 19:00, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:46 (UTC)
This appears to be a hoax. There are no Google hits for "Democratic Labour Party of Canada", "Democratic Labour Front Party", "Democratic Labor Party of Canada", or "Democratic Labor Front Party". The article was created by Winterhaze13, a new user with a history of vandalism/hoax creation (see his contributions). Unless some information on the "Democratic Labour Party of Canada" is found, delete this article, along with Democratic Labour party of Canada and Canada - Democratic Labour Party (two redirects). — Bcat (talk | email) 19:13, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:48 (UTC)
You're right. But I dont think that is against the rules? (Unsigned comment made by User:170.115.184.10 --Jyril)
Seems to be someone's own language. Only Google hits are misspelled Lebanese. Jyril 19:19, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 04:20 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 11:10 (UTC)
Orphan VfD nomination by User:Dennis Valeev, resubmitted by me. Could be a hoax, anon author has a history of questionable contributions, see especially the article's talk page where he is talking to himself. Zero Google hits when not counting WP mirrors. jni 19:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
i too think that this is a hoax, but number1fan i can confirm is not related. number1fan seems to be the person who made the Darren Wogman page and too seems to be the person that was on the board that went to find his 'lost' research i can also confim that from the information i have gathered most of the document on Darren Wogman is correct, some of it i could not confirm such as the information on barney spiro
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 11:07 (UTC)
Non-notable band vanity. Jyril 19:25, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
How is this band vanity? It's information about a band that has a meaning and a direction, not just nonsense music. The reason there's nothing in allmusic about Happy Spastics might be because they are Anti-Corporation. Try Googling them. And get your heads out of the clouds and listen to the message they spread, because they're right.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 1, 2005 22:58 (UTC)
~25 Google hits for "Danny Fratina" and they are all guestbook entries and forum posts. I'd put this in the vantiy category; he isn't notable yet. --Xcali 19:32, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:52 (UTC)
Orphaned VfD nomination by User:Dennis Valeev. Could be a hoax related to articles Louis Farhad, Darren Wogman and Barney spiro (all in VfD). Zero Google hits. Some anon is repeatedly removing the VfD notice from the article. No vote yet. jni 19:39, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:50 (UTC)
Delete as vanity verging on nonsense. FreplySpang (talk) 19:47, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:40 (UTC)
Hoax page, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Darren Wogman and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Barney spiro Jyril 19:53, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:54 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a soapbox. smoddy 20:11, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted --cesarb 23:43, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Also see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/GameTalk. Has Alexa rank 53965. I believe this article is not different enough from the VFDed one, but I'm not comfortable with speedying it yet. Abstain. - Mgm|(talk) 20:10, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 04:40 (UTC)
Would appear to be a minor character in a Star Wars spinoff. smoddy 20:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:55 (UTC)
Since when does imprisonment for robbery of an armored truck make someone a political prisioner? Searching for ("Judith Clark" robbery) gives under 200 hits. Searching "Judith Alice Clark" yields only wikimirrors. Not notable. Just another criminal. --Xcali 20:35, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 1, 2005 22:56 (UTC)
According to the discussion page, it has already been transwikied to Wiktionary Bornyesterday 20:44, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:55 (UTC)
Vanity page. I have no idea who the person is that he's allegedly related to, but given he's "medieval" he's likely to have hundreds if not thousands of living descendants. Leithp 20:58, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 7 July 2005 23:13 (UTC)
Totally insignificant piece of software—Wahoofive (talk) 20:59, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
EDIT: For a detailed anallysis (sp?) of the help file, pleas read the articles discussion page. I will post it in their. Thanks. --Admiral Roo 10:57, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Wikitionaried. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 19:41 (UTC)
Delete: foreign language dicdef. Russ Blau (talk) 22:03, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete ignoring anons. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 04:15 (UTC)
Delete- looks like a joke article, especially with the poorly photoshopped "bronze relief" image. Also, googling "IRRADIA PAU, IRRADIA LLUM" turns up the phrase is part of the lyrics to an Andorran Eurovision song. MakeRocketGoNow 23:56, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. There were several suggestions that the article should be merged. Joyous (talk) July 4, 2005 02:23 (UTC)
What is the point of this page? Thai immigrants in US are relatively SMALL number compared to other nationals. If you want to talk about In-Chan, then creat a page about them. There is no Thai official record about Mr. He Thien whom the author claimed to be the first student to immigrate from Thailand. The number of Thai immigrants to US that the author provided does not have any reference. If you want to put this page on, you have to do more in-depth with reliable FACTS, not something you guess. And again, what is the point of talking about Thai immigrants in US which are relatively VERY SMALL number compared to other nationals. Dhanakorn 00:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 29 June 2005 07:57 (UTC)
I quote: "Vanguards of Serenity is a Community/Clan started by *VaS*Buffy in the Game Star Wars: Jedi Outcast 2 and has moved on to Star Wars: Jedi Academy 3(www.lucasarts.com). The previous name of this community was Vampire Slayers." In other words, vanity/advertising; there may be some gaming clans or communities notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia, but this, I'm afraid, is not one of them. -- Captain Disdain 12:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
How is it vanity/advertising? I removed all links towards it. Also why would some gaming clans or communities be notable and others not? How do you rate that?
I was simply giving out information about this community I don't see the issue with it.
*VaS*Buffy
I just don't get how things like feces is important yet a pretty succesfull community isn't? That is very how would you call it... discriminating? I removed all advertising and all that its plane information about a community now. If you don't agree then edit it until you think it is.
*VaS*Buffy
-Harmil 12:42, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Just wait and see over 20 years when i started my own company for the community. I'm already making 60 dollar a month with it.
Beside an Encyclopedia like this should contain all information of the planet not the onces you think is important to you.
but like i said you just wait and see. *VaS*Buffy
I dont think it harms anyone... and if its not, why should we delete it? some people might find this useful... u find it insulting? i dont think so.... if somebody will search for it here - it means this info WAS useful (and that is what WP is all about, right?), and if its not useful - nobody will see it anyway, because they wont be interested in this... so just pass on it
Maurox
Vanguards of Serenity" has a great influence in the Jedi Academy 3 community, I believe this is valid information - not just for the people playing this game, this shows that it is possible to actually earn money by running a game clan, and who knows, maybe in a year or more she'll be able to make a living from those money.
Ok this should stay on Wikipedia cause the information is not harming anyone in any shape or form. I have seen the website and have have noted that this is a growing community. Does anyone gain from deleting this...no. Wikipedia gets more clicks, thats more people coming to this site and possibly giving you guys a donation. You wont be doing yourselves any favours by deleting this. This information is relevant. Your site 'Wikipedia' is all about the gaining of infomation, if you delete this, like I said you wont be helping anyone. The course of information and data has changed regularly and decisivly over the years. Even in this site! this is a quote from Captain Disdain 12:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) "In other words, vanity/advertising; there may be some gaming clans or communities notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia, but this, I'm afraid, is not one of them." This is not vanity my friend, nor advertising. This gaming clan is a 'standalone' in the JK:A community. Nearly everyone who has played the game has heard about *VaS*. Ive spoken to random people in the Jedi Academy community and 95% have heard about *VaS*. This is an outstanding accomplishment by *VaS*Buffy ; to be well known in only two years, to get to a point in the gaming community that is highly respected and accomplished. So all up im voting for this to STAY!
--Luke 05:48, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)