This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. There were several suggestions that the article should be merged. Joyous (talk) July 4, 2005 02:23 (UTC)
What is the point of this page? Thai immigrants in US are relatively SMALL number compared to other nationals. If you want to talk about In-Chan, then creat a page about them. There is no Thai official record about Mr. He Thien whom the author claimed to be the first student to immigrate from Thailand. The number of Thai immigrants to US that the author provided does not have any reference. If you want to put this page on, you have to do more in-depth with reliable FACTS, not something you guess. And again, what is the point of talking about Thai immigrants in US which are relatively VERY SMALL number compared to other nationals. Dhanakorn 00:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 30 June 2005 04:54 (UTC)
For the record, he WAS the creator of COPS. He WAS the creator of "World's Wildest Police Chases too along with Narco and was a 20/20 segment producer." Also, filmographer in Natual Born Killers with Woody Harilson...
It's sad this person fell off a cliff and died, but that doesn't establish notability. Gentgeen 00:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was the result of this debate is delete, even with all of the sockpuppets. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 20:22 (UTC)
This article doesn't contain useful facts of any kinds, it's just a disguised ad. Please refrain to make a wiki entry for every asian site around. If it's about subculture write an article about it. -Oink- People don't start signing others comment with fictious names, or I'll have to register (the history shows your IP anyway mmmkl, you dimwit )82.231.37.93 06:43, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.231.37.93 (talk • contribs) 11:01, 2005 Jun 22
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 30 June 2005 04:58 (UTC)
video game instructions Denni☯ 01:05, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 30 June 2005 05:03 (UTC)
Delete- vanity page MakeRocketGoNow 01:31, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 20:26 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic stub explaining an acronym used on the Internet. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, especially not an Internet slang dictionary. — Ливай | ☺ 01:49, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 20:33 (UTC)
No content, just obscure vanity. I tried to speedy delete this, calling it vanity. It was rejected as not speediable, but I can't imagine that this wouldn't fall into that category. What could I label it to pass muster as a speedy?Atomiktoaster 01:31, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Speedy delete (performed by Filiocht). Deathphoenix 13:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity - see edit history. Denni☯ 02:06, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 20:35 (UTC)
Not notable and therefore unverifiable. 0 Google hits for Jim Luckman "unknown show" -- JamesTeterenko 02:18, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 20:31 (UTC)
Self promotion of non-notable company incorporated this month. Also see Votes for deletion/Brendan Farr-Gaynor for the VfD of its Director of Services -- JamesTeterenko 02:31, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 20:38 (UTC)
Delete. Band vanity, fails WP:MUSIC. I quote: the jesters have never performed live, nor do they play any actual instruments, they have released one album [...] and only 6 coppies were distributed. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 02:22, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 23:58 (UTC)
Delete. This is absolute nonsense, and I tagged it for speedy, but I guess it might be too long and appear to be too coherent to really qualify. Not funny enough for BJAODN, either. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 03:10, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
Excuse me, another book to be released soon :) — (Unsigned comment by 67.128.60.1; user's 6th edit.)
Sorry, didn't know about signing. I'm new at this. -- 68.116.215.116
Keep it!
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 23:56 (UTC)
Non notable. Too few relevant Google hits. Seems to be a one-time joke on a television show. Borders on vandalism because it's twice been nominated for speedy deletion, and the person who started the article has twice removed it.CanadianCaesar 03:11, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 2, 2005 00:00 (UTC)
This is a vanity page created by anon IPs, likely its subject. Non-notable, no third-party sources. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:30, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:33 (UTC)
Dictdef at best Gblaz 03:42, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect. This has been done. Joyous (talk) July 4, 2005 02:29 (UTC)
Nonsense. From the person who brought you the first version of Hooley - see above. -- RHaworth 06:06, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect to Vineyard. Done. Joyous (talk) July 4, 2005 02:36 (UTC)
I can't find any evidence that they have put out an album. Please correct me if I'm mistaken This link is Broken 03:46, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:35 (UTC)
nonverifiable dicdef Pburka 04:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:37 (UTC)
High school band that played a few shows a broke up, Delete--nixie 04:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 00:25 (UTC)
Originally created as a misdirected link due to the fact that someone put a comma in the two square brackets hence creating a link to this very misnamed page. Besides the fact that it serves no purpose as February 16 already exists, I don't know what to do with the information. It doesn't really seem important enough to justify putting it on the February 16 article in my opinion so I say just delete it Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 04:50, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus, so keep --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 00:29 (UTC)
Souds like most internet communities - unencyclopedic, delete --nixie 04:51, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 00:31 (UTC)
Wikispam for the said organisation. Delete --nixie 04:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:39 (UTC)
Wikispam for a messageboard of no note, delete--nixie 04:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Cutler (patent nonsense). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Nonsense. -- RHaworth 05:00, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:41 (UTC)
Webcomic with an alexa rating 800000+, delete --nixie 05:05, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:44 (UTC)
Were a high school band in 2002, delete--nixie 05:06, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:46 (UTC)
Seems to have written an article for the bureau of treasurys newsletter Financial Connection [4] (also where he works), delete as vanity and self promotion. --nixie 05:10, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:50 (UTC)
Personal weblog, no Alexa rating, delete--nixie 05:18, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:52 (UTC)
Business neologism coined in 2005, delete--nixie 05:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:54 (UTC)
Band from wales, have made 2 demos [5] delete --nixie 05:24, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 09:55 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 00:36 (UTC)
Stand up comedian, I'm usure if there are criteria for this kind of performer, but this guy does not seem notable, delete --nixie 05:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 00:39 (UTC)
Potential to become very large, not all that interesting, poorly laid out. Delete --SPUI (talk) 06:11, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete (Count was 4 delete, 1 keep, 3 votes by new accounts, and 14 anonymous votes) --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 00:48 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 13:49 (UTC)
Deletion Nomination Suspected of advertising/original research due to pervasive POV throughout article coupled with vanity nature of page and lack of reference for information that includes multiple quotes attributed to band members. (Listed link to fansite www.mute-print.com is now a browser redirect to the band's official website, the other listed link.) The Literate Engineer 07:04, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Tony Sidaway (gibberish). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neologism. Hits on google seem to refer to people named Machaela rather than the word. Delete. Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 07:13, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 00:52 (UTC)
Vanity page, not notable. Apparently self-promotion by the owner of the Global Language Monitor who wants more links to his site. DELETE. Macrakis 07:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The author me [[User:PJJP|PJJP] who is definitely not anonymous and created a PJJP some time ago.
As for the number of words in the English Language: this is applauded by serious linguists who are tired of the games that are played over words; the number of which can never be cited for the reasons you cite. However academics in other disciplines fail to understand how scientists can estimate the number of stars, galaxies and even atomic particles in the Universe, the number of neurons in a human brain, the number of people on the planet, but cannot provide even a rough estimate of the number of words in the language. The estimate is used worldover as a starting point for discussions. If you feel you must delete, then sobeit; I've had my say. PJJP
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 6 July 2005 23:50 (UTC)
Vanity page, not notable. All substantive edits from the same anonymous IP address as other pages related to Payack: WordClock, Global Language Monitor, etc. Payack's main activity on Wikipedia appears to be generating pointers to his Web site. The books referenced in the article are all published by vanity presses (iUniverse). Googling "Mythomania Payack" finds only Wikipedia mirrors. Contemporary Authors, which he cites, publishes authors' self-descriptions. DELETE. Macrakis 08:11, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 30 June 2005 09:13 (UTC)
Blatant, first person advertising by a non-notable company. -- RHaworth 08:43, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with GameFAQs message boards. Merge notice attached to article. Joyous (talk) July 7, 2005 21:47 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. --W(t) 08:51, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 01:37 (UTC)
I hate to do this, given that I'm a school-inclusionist, but this one is a problem. Technically, it could possibly be speedied - no context at all (where is this school?) - but by listing it here at least there's a chance that someone will be able to do something to stop it being consigned to the viod. Grutness...wha? 09:09, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
*Delete unless it can be expanded upon.--
Cyberjunkie TALK 09:14, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 01:41 (UTC)
This was speedied last time I spotted it, but it has been re-added. It is now more comprehensive, but it remains un-encyclopædic and it seems to be an advert. So, delete Cyberjunkie TALK 09:11, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was ambiguous.
I count 10 "deletes", 7 "keeps" and one too ambiguous to call. I'll add my own vote that I do not believe he meets the recommended criteria for inclusion of biographies.
However, even with my own opinion, this fails to rise to the level of concensus necessary for deletion. I am going to close this as a "no concensus" decision. Rossami (talk) 8 July 2005 00:36 (UTC)
This apparently is the principal of a school in Singapore. No further evidence of notability. Aecis 09:18, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 01:44 (UTC)
Character from a Flash comic that has no Wikipedia article (which itself doesn't seem particularly notable). Only 6 displayed hits for "Welding Man" "burnt face man". If kept, it should be moved back to Welding Man, since there doesn't seem to be a need for disambiguation, and it doesn't seem to have anything to do with television. Niteowlneils 09:15, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Blankfaze (no context). Master Thief GarrettTalk 11:39, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. smoddy 09:39, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:02 (UTC)
Non-notable band that hasn't produced an album (just two demos), and based on their website hasn't played any gigs other than a couple dozen last summer in the greater Seattle area. Only 5 displayed hits for "The droids" "twenty cart pileup".D'oh, wrong "The Droids"--Zero hits for"The droids" "adam Nadeau". No allmusic listing. Doesn't seem to meet Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines. Niteowlneils 09:43, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:04 (UTC)
Blatant vanity. Would loved to have speedied it, but I can't. :( Delete. - Mgm|(talk) 09:51, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete all articles - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 16:59 (UTC)
Includes (but isn't limited) to the following: Bad Neighbors (Zillions game), Bubbles (Zillions game), Bubbles II, Bump (Zillions game), Butterflies (Zillions game), Cat & Mouse II, Cat & Mouse III, Cleanup (Zillions game), Cleanup II, Cleanup III, Clingon (redirected), Clingon III, Crisscross (Zillions game), Domina 4, Domino Puzzles (Zillions game), Doors III, Doughnuts (Zillions game), Drop (Zillions game), Dropmania, Fruit (Zillions game), Fruit Basket (Zillions game), Fruit II, Harry (Zillions game), Hearts (Zillions game), Jugs (Zillions game), Jugs II, Liars (Zillions game), Marbles (Zillions game), Marbles II, Marbles III, Matchsticks (Zillions game), Matchsticks II, Max Solver, Mem (Zillions game), Mem II, Nutts Solver, Pancakes (Zillions game), Pento Solver, Quadrilles (Zillions game), Rabbits (Zillions game), Row (Zillions game), Saltwater (Zillions game), Spaghetti (Zillions game), Tetrasticks (Zillions game), Triki, and Unplay Chess.
Were mass tagged by User:-Ril- as a speedy for advertising, but doesn't qualify by the criteria. I think that at least th e variants of the same game need to go. Still, not every game is notable in itself. Delete the lot. An article about the collection as a whole is IMO acceptable. -- Mgm|(talk) 10:08, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
User:Karlscherer3 has created literally hundreds of articles which can be seen as spam advertising his website. N.b. apart from the 40 or so listed above there are at least 104 articles of this form. This is a place to consider deletion of all of them as a collection. The list is available at Category:Alleged spam by Karl Scherer
By the way, Zillions games are without violence, blood splatter, horror,etc, but thinking, intelligence games without time pressure and stress. They represent a much more healthy way to enjoy games that the point-and-shoot arcade games etc. Yes, they deserve more publication because they can help people increase their mind power and teach cids better skill than shooting well. I hope you can see these aspects and appreciate them. Let us foster the good! Karlscherer3 13:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) (sorry for not signing properly last time);I dont talk much usually; use my time more for creative work. Karlscherer3 13:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge with Eugene Scott. - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:10 (UTC)
High school sweatheart of television evangelist. Delete. (see below) - Mgm|(talk) 10:12, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 1 July 2005 11:55 (UTC)
Article reads in full: This is a person of a double ethnic minority as a member of the travelling community and of dark skin. So for a start, it looks like a dicdef. However, searching Google for both "blikey" and any one of "traveller", "travelling", "traveler", and "traveling" brings no evidence whatever that it is so used. Hoax or neologism; delete. -- Hoary 10:47, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:07 (UTC)
Advertising for website. WP is not a web directory. -- Hoary 10:56, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. mikka (t) 30 June 2005 01:04 (UTC)
No real content other than the list of chapters which cannot possibly be each described as a section given time. Also it arguably falls under What Wikipedia is not since it's akin to a list of facts or links. But even without the TOC list, the book does not seem especially noteworthy (~5000 Googles). Master Thief GarrettTalk 10:46, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:10 (UTC)
Reason why the page should be deleted
unsourced, zero google-hits.--Fenice 11:29, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:12 (UTC)
Not enough information to justify an article, non-notable, delete if not expanded Proto 11:43, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP NSR 1 July 2005 11:45 (UTC)
Dicdef. Couldn't really be expanded, I don't think. smoddy 12:01, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 6 July 2005 10:33 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a place to put comparison tables of cable services, even in User:. smoddy 12:03, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 01:48 (UTC)
Marketing for Woolworths in Australia. A very odd article, perhaps it is an in-company review page? I couldn't find a copyvio, though it does feel like one. smoddy 12:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I'm Australian, the word "wovle" isn't used at all, reads like an advertising screed.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:16 (UTC)
Tagged for speedy, and I will grant that this is a one-sentence substub. But there is one piece of information in the article: Levocetirizine is an antihistamine. Remember, we keep articles of the type "xxx is a village in yyy" without blinking. No vote. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:18 (UTC)
A co-host of a local talkshow. This must have been written by a great fan. Delete even though Jill Pike is a ravishing goddess. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 13:58 (UTC)
This article is redundant. Foreskin already covers the topic.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:00 (UTC)
Delete - Vanity page. Hardly anything on Google. In any case, badly written and POV MyNameIsClare talk 12:51, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete and then redirect → Lap dance --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 01:52 (UTC)
Lap Dancer is a solo noise project originally from America, but currently operating out of Ibaraki,Japan. Uh-huh. Ibaraki is also spelled Ibaragi; Google gives as the total number of hits for the string "lap dancer" together with either "ibaraki" or "ibaragi": zero. Unverifiable. Some more googling around for "lap dancer" together with such buzzphrases as "solo noise project" (which I think means "guy with a laptop") takes us here, which tells us that "Lap Dancer is the solo project of Jamie Grefe" and also seems to say that he has a grand total of zero albums so far. Doesn't appear to follow Notability and Music Guidelines; delete. -- Hoary 13:33, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 01:55 (UTC)
Well, google tells me that lege and "Irish slang" gets 2 hits, which seem unconnected, and as far as I can tell this is either someone's private term or in very limited usage. Also there is some question as to whether it is even encyclopedic. Delete Scimitar 13:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Cutler (patent nonsense). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:25, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The article itself is clearly rubbish/vanity and the link is broken. Although there are a fair number of google/yahoo hits, I couldn't really establish any notability. Deleti-the-pago ? Bobbis 14:31, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:13 (UTC)
The subject of a seemingly endless revert war, is this really worth keeping? Smileyrepublic 14:46, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 13:35 (UTC)
Delete vanity page, or if not,certainly non-notable. Also includes three 'band members' pages created at same time which should enjoy the same fate. Naturenet 14:58, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 13:38 (UTC)
(+ Redirect pages which point to it.) This seems like an advertisement for a non-notable small business. Delete Scimitar 15:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:03 (UTC)
phonebook entry Fingers-of-Pyrex 15:43, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Cutler (patent nonsense). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:26, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neologisms describing the same sort of thing, all by the same author. 0 relevant Google hits. --Xcali 15:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:13 (UTC)
I beleive this is a fake article. Google search returns no entries. Jgritz 16:11, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
So you think she is fake? She is real, she is simply forgotten by the Spanish, she was a woman, and the Spanish didn't know in a strange way and weird circumcances she was a Sapa Inca, this is a way to get her in the history books...
I'm sorry, what means VfD?
VfD = Votes For Deletion. You'll have to come up with some evidence of this person to enable this article to remain. I checked my copy of "Conquest of the Inca" last night, and found no mention of this person. "Inti" is quechuan for sun god. There is also a festival called Inti Raymi, but no Amaja Inti. Maybe create an account and put this on your user page people can read your opinions, as opposed to an article. Jgritz 08:03, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Alright I will make a account, tomorrow, because today I'm really busy.
I think this article is real, if he/she would make a fake article he/she woulden't bother to answer on this page again... and let him/her edit the article again to detailled article ? and a lot of people are forgotten ... (unsigned comment by Muzz, user's first edit)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:07 (UTC)
Vanity, a student project, I'm assuming from the same ones who brought us Doctor cowie. --Etacar11 16:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
DELETE - reads as nonsense. Zosodada 16:02, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:11 (UTC)
Not notable, most of the google hits are mirrors. Leithp 16:02, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Xezbeth. Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
No evidence of notablity, probably vanity. You (Talk) 16:22, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Cutler (patent nonsense). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neologism You (Talk) 16:24, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:14 (UTC)
Tagged on May 4 but never listed on VfD. No vote.--Nabla 16:36, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus defaulting to keep. Joyous (talk) July 7, 2005 21:53 (UTC)
Stub about a family name without evidence of notability. --Lee Hunter 17:07, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:17 (UTC)
All lists of Universities seem to be done by country, see List of universities in South Africa as an example. I don't think this page is going to go anywhere as individual lists exist elsewhere so delete. Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 17:07, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus, so keep. --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 02:00 (UTC)
Completing VfD process. Currently no vote. Wikibofh 17:14, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete all. – ABCD 7 July 2005 00:01 (UTC)
This and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/You Scared the Lovin' Outta Me were tagged on Jun 15 but not listed on VfD.
The same reasoning would certainly apply for nominating the other similar articles on songs of the same album: Comin' Round the Mountain, Smokey, If You Got Funk, You Got Style, and Adolescent Funk. So I nominate this other 4 articles too. No vote here.--Nabla 17:30, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
Same articles as the nominated also deletion candidates:
Atmosphere (song), Baby I Owe You Something Good, Balance (song), Be My Beach, Better by the Pound, Cholly (Funk Getting Ready to Roll), Field Maneuvers, Foot Soldiers (Star Spangled Funky), Freak of the Week, Get off Your Ass and Jam, Good to Your Earhole, Grooveallegiance, Holly Wants to Go to California, I'm Never Gonna Tell It, Into You, Lunchmeatophobia (Think!...It Ain't Illegal Yet!), No Head No Backstage Pass, (Not Just) Knee Deep, One Nation Under a Groove (song), Stuffs And Things, Take Your Dead Ass Home! (Say Som'n Nasty), The Song Is Familiar, Uncle Jam, Who Says a Funk Band Can't Play Rock?
This page was created nearly three years ago and has had no substantial updates since then. It is incomplete, does not conform to Wikipedia standards, and contains little useful information. It should be deleted.
DanMS 02:59, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Your lack of understanding on a given subject or cultural matter need not result in deletion or change. A vote of NO needs to be placed here until you can accept that you are not at all familiar with the art of George Clinton.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep/merge. Joyous (talk) July 7, 2005 21:56 (UTC)
Strong Keep. Singulair was first marketed as a preventative asthma medication, and after some time doctors began prescribing it for generic allergy prevention, and is now being marketed as such. Also, some patients have found it to reduce the severity of eczema. Genetic research has also begun to find evidence that all three of these conditions are linked, and oftentimes inherited together. If necessary the article could be changed to the title of montelukast sodium, which is the actual chemical name of Singulair.
I added some information on the drug from notes I took from my doctor's visit and what is on the information packet included with the drug. (I have excercise induced Asthma, and so I take it regularly, to boost the effect of Albuterol)
*Keep very very notable, just needs a lot of cleanup. Falphin 00:57, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Deleted by RedWolf as copyvio --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:20 (UTC)
Advertisement. KFP 19:02, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
It's not an advertisement any more than the listing for IBM or Hewlett-Packard. It's just an intro about a company. It doesn't even contain links to the company's web site. JTC 19:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:24 (UTC) The result of the debate was no consensus --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 2 July 2005 15:41 (UTC)
This article has had nothing in it since December. Delete. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 19:11, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:26 (UTC)
Autobiography. No encyclopedic content. Delete. Poli 19:31, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:28 (UTC)
Vanity. smoddy 19:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 05:08 (UTC)
This page has been in dispute for a long time. It does nothing to constitue what 'right-wing' actually is in terms of publication and lumps together Conservative journals with BNP ones. Other on the talk page have suggested deletion. --Mrclarke 19:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, this just isn't encyclopaedic (two entries on Google). It's also poorly written. Phlogistomania 20:15, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETION
This article utterly fell into the category of speedy deletion (total content was "this website shows people how kerry sucks"). I speedied it. DJ Clayworth 20:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Utter POV, not encyclopaedic. Phlogistomania 20:20, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 05:01 (UTC)
This user insists on repeatedly removing all uses of the term "American" to refer to individuals or organizations resident in the United States. This article is an example of WP:POINT in his pursuit of this goal. The term is a non-notable neologism; it is mentioned on Alternative words for American, and doesn't need an article of its own. I'm going to open a WP:RFC on User:Heegoop if his behavior in this regard continues. Firebug 20:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Stewartadcock (content was: '((deletebecause|Blanked by author, former content was garbage/text dump))'). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Not sure what to make of this, could be an attempt at a real article but contents is certainly not encyclopaedic. Could be cleanup or copyvio. Dunno Cutler 20:41, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Incomprehensible, and the title's spelled wrong anyway. Deb 20:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy deleted as recreation of a deleted article --cesarb 04:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Total lack of content fails to show why this topic is worthy of notice. Probably topic is of interest limited to a small group of sport fans. Iani 20:45, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Speedy - no content. Naturenet 20:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Joyous (talk) July 7, 2005 22:02 (UTC)
There is no way this person is real (and even if she were it should still go I think). OK admittedly she is real, but should it be on Wikipedia? Much as there are 190,000 Google hits they certainly don't seem to refer to the same person (some say Asian some British for example). I refer back to my previous opinion that she is not a real person but rather a popular pseudonym. Nevertheless it had a few edits so I didn't give it a speedy. Will => talk 20:52, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:41 (UTC)
Delete - I believe this article is fictitous. it is certainly unverifiable. Naturenet 20:51, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was default to keep as no concensus could be reached. (7 keep, 8 delete, 3 merge, 1 other, and 20 discounted) - Mgm|(talk) July 6, 2005 12:30 (UTC)
Adamn 1 July 2005 12:39 (UTC)
Looks non-notable: it only nets 16 distinct hits on Google. chocolateboy 20:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Lol stop changing all the votes to keep, these shoe-sniffing waterheads will revert all my choice witticismz. Warning: this radio show is the work of GNAA members who will likely come to its defense. Please watch out for any sock-puppet votes, vandalism and fallacious arguments. Most of the keep votes are from GNAA members who came to vote after a rallying call in their IRC channel. They also seem to be insulting any delete voters.
BULLSHIT This radio show is created by an independent entity, me (l0de). The gnaa calls in to the show, this is the extent of their participation. All equipment, music, etc is provided by me. Most insults to delete voters are from me, because these people need to unclamp their teeth from their pillows and get on with life. This wikipedia entry was created by a fan of the show, and is a fitting homage to the spirit of the l0de radio hour. Grave repercussions await its deletion. I am personally issuing a challenge to any one voting for delete, I will duel you, to the death, in international waters. If you so strongly wish to have this deleted, you must back up your words with your life, else they shall be considered inconsquential, and those urging its deletion forevermore relegated to the ranks of shunned cowardice.
KEEP!
This is feerie - i'm absolutely not a "Sockpuppet" or whatever ridiculous terminology you simpering pro-censorship Moderator/Dictators use to dismiss the legitimate support this entry has. As I stated before, get the green logs of butt mud out of your mouth for more than 1 second and realize that A) people like the show and that B) its notoriety grants it a space in your bloated blog. Thank you, good night. --Feerie 2 July 2005 05:17 (UTC)
.
This page has been deleted.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy deleted as a clone of existing content by User:Tony Sidaway. Kappa 00:57, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The article was created as Durham Elementary grammar school and was merged into the Durham, Maine article with comments and a pointer to WP:SCH. It was recreated under the proper name with the same information which is a duplicate of what is in the city article. No reason was provided as to why the city article, which actually says where the school is, was not a good place for the information on this school. Vegaswikian 21:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:36 (UTC)
looks like advert/ copyvio Cutler 21:15, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 7 July 2005 00:02 (UTC)
Neologism You (Talk) 21:28, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was transwiki to Wikisource. Will submit to the transwiki queue. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:00, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or move to wikisource? Copy-paste text widely available but not ((copyvio)) since well outside copyright. By way of being open: I originally marked this as copyvio but that was overzealous - the author got quite upset with me and reported me to vandalism in progress, but that was quashed very quickly and I apologised for my overzealocity(sic). The same applies to Second Treatise of the Great Seth, which I'm about to VfD. -Splash 21:31, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was transwiki to Wikisource. Will submit article to transwiki queue. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:02, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or maybe wikisource? Copy-paste text widely available but not ((copyvio)) since well outside copyright. By way of being open: I originally marked this as copyvio but that was overzealous - the author got quite upset with me and reported me to vandalism in progress, but that was quashed very quickly and I apologised for my overzealocity(sic). The same applies to The Devil's Walk, which I just VfD'd.-Splash 21:34, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
Take a hike Splash your a jerk and you know it. The Second Treatise was written in 200AD and was translated into English before 50 years ago so it is not copyright protected. You only confirm your ignorance by these cheap tactics. You should be banned or at the very least have any powers given to you by the Wiki stripped !!
Please keep this entry. I note it is very valuable to have source material within Wikipedia, even if not yet in the form of a formal entry. I hope this treatise will remain.
Delete, doesn't belong here. Paul 05:20, 14 August 2005 (UTC) Delete or transwiki. / Peter Isotalo 22:31, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:34 (UTC)
Neologism, non-notable party/ideology, and generally unencyclopaedic. Uppland 21:49, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:33 (UTC)
I think this is someone's joke and not a real league Smith03 16:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I've been searching for a page about something like this. This is definitely a real league. A freind of my brother used to play with the Austin Comets. And I've been to a Skyriders game. However this page needs to be updated...(preceding unsigned comment by 67.173.218.243 01:52, Jun 23, 2005) - Mgm|(talk) 07:25, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 14:35 (UTC)
see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Apply Football League Smith03 16:29, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:31 (UTC)
Advertisement. Text from http://www.mycarpaltunnel.com , which is a site selling treatments. Jeeves 22:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:30 (UTC)
Nonnotable. Karol 22:11, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Speedy delete by Cutler as ppatent nonsense - affirmation of a trivial (un-)truth --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:54 (UTC)
Delete based on WP:WIN#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball, item 2: individual items from a predetermined list or a systematic pattern of names, preassigned to future events or discoveries, are not suitable article topics --Tabor 22:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Speedy delete by Cutler as patent nonsense --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:53 (UTC)
The external link goes nowhere and the OGG file is simply a pronunciation of the word. There doesn't seem to be any content worth keeping here. Epolk 23:26, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
Already voted for speedy delete, but it's back up. Double delete and watch for it to return. :) RJH 22:05, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 7 July 2005 00:07 (UTC)
Notable band, but the article contains essentially no information beyond "M&M's is a song by blink-182. They made a video for it."
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:28 (UTC)
Delete what seems to be just an ad. Google returns possibly no hits, or at most 26 unique ones. Most of these appear to be a reference to a member of some site or other. This could possibly be a speedy candidate. -Splash 23:52, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Advertising. -- Natalinasmpf 23:57, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 11:26 (UTC)
Improper titling. Information is already discussed at Parmenides. --Tothebarricades 00:43, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:26 (UTC)
Delete. Non-encyclopedic prose. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 01:04, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Speedy, deleted by Zzyzx11 as recreated deleted content. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 22:40, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable, possibly self-promotional. 15 unique Googles for "stacey castro media". AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 01:05, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:22 (UTC)
Looks like an ad, definitely not NPOV
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 10:20 (UTC)
Delete non-notable band. I get no relevant Google hits for their name (though it's a difficult word to filter) and no hits for their members, either with or without their 'middle' names.-Splash 01:36, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)