Wikipedia:Pools
Closed pools
Half-million pool
666,666th pool
Million pool
Two-million pool
Four-million pool
Five-million pool (1)
Five-million pool (2)
Six-million pool
6,666,666th pool
Millionth topic
Two-millionth topic
Three-millionth topic
Five-millionth topic
Six-millionth topic
300-million edits
Billionth edit
Five-thousandth FA (1)
Five-thousandth FA (2)
1000th Wikimedia wiki
Closed for voting
Seven-million pool
Eight-million pool
Open for voting
7,500,000th pool
Nine-million pool
Ten-million pool
Eleven-million pool
Twelve-million pool
Thirteen-million pool
Fifteen-million pool
Twenty-million pool
Fifty-million pool
Hundred-million pool
Billion pool
Eleventy-billion pool
Trillion pool
Quadrillion pool
100-million page pool
Seven-millionth topic
Eight-millionth topic
Nine-millionth topic
Ten-millionth topic
Eleven-millionth topic
Twelve-millionth topic
Thirteen-millionth topic
Fifteen-millionth topic
Last topic
1.5-billionth edit
Two-billionth edit
Last edit
Ten thousandth FA
500th language

This is a pool for guessing what the topic of the last article created on Wikipedia may be. Other topic pools exist for certain milestones (see one millionth and two-millionth topic pools and Wikipedia:500th language pool), but none are as important as the last topic created. You may be wondering why something might be the last article. Well,

But just like there was a first article, there should undoubtedly be a last. This is the pool for that eventuality! Everyone is allowed a maximum of three votes. Voting ends when the ten-thousandth-to-last article is created. And by the way, someone should probably periodically archive this page, because when we need it to check and see who's won, it may not be around any longer.

Instructions for voting: Add the article name to the appropriate section and sign it with four tildes. If the section doesn't exist yet, make it.

Other[edit]

ianGrig. (t) 04:31, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Religion[edit]

Update: In hopes of preventing this eventuality, the Administrator Cabal has indefinitely protected this one... ☻☻☻Sithman VIII !!☻☻☻ 23:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhh, but no mere page-protection will halt the messiah. WP:Requests_for_adminship/Jesus will be a bluelink someday, with the mother of all wheel-wars the inevitable consequence. Thus, there is only one thing which *might* just halt the destruction of the earth! Who knew the cabal ran so deep? 47.222.203.135 (talk) 12:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
close enough Noah 💬 20:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Culture[edit]

Wouldn't we need an index to search through i^ω? That would be i^(ω + 1), and so on. And thus, we see the usefulness of ordinals in real life.
But actually, we can't possibly need more indexes than the amount of data, right? So perhaps this really is i^n, where n is no greater than the total amount of bits of information in the database. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 12:08, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why would you ever index a list of indices? If you have to index an index then you didn't have a very good index in the first place. .froth. (talk) 18:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of lists. List of lists of lists. Asmeurer (talkcontribs) 02:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
which is either 1, -1, i, or -i. 24.14.73.183 (talk) 19:48, 19 December 2011

-EvanJM42

I beg to differ. The UserboxerComplain/ubx 16:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All numbers, or just integers? The latter list is of size alef_null, the former of size C (not to be confused with c, the speed of light) which may or may not be alef_1 (indeed, this point may or may not be decidable) :-) 193.122.47.162 18:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

But spring is going to end! Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 13:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
At least one user seems to think that agressive monkeys would be an improvement. SpinningSpark 19:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It probably would be --Rockstonetalk to me! 14:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot to mention England winning the World Cup and the Ashes. 193.122.47.162 18:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I dunno bout the Hell one being so ulikely, it's already started snowing. ;-) Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 15:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, the Cubs won the world series. 73.65.226.228 (talk) 00:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And there are actual places in California, Norway etc. actually called Hell. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Politics[edit]

Somehow that seems unlikely now... 68.39.174.238 06:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics[edit]

Science[edit]

we pretty much have that with our description of the gun type U-235 weapon. fortunetly our instructions on how to isolate the U-235 are less simple to follow.Geni 03:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nope. Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/how to delete the entire internet in one simple keystroke. ^_^ --24.123.0.130 (talk) 15:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On thinking about it, solar expansion would no doubt be a featured article...first hand experience!--Keycard (talk) 09:14, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If it's first hand experience, it'll be original research. Ergo, delete. Jon Harald Søby 19:45, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Then it'll double as the last article deleted (by a human). Twice the winner. Wipe 23:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Won't this article be a redirect from (or to) Angels and Demons? :-) 193.122.47.162 18:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Which one? (There's going to be two in 2100 - an annular one in March, and a total one in September.)
Not even Wikipedia can defeat Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, sadly. PT (talk) 17:01, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Computers[edit]

Pop culture[edit]

From Chinese Democracy: Chinese Democracy is the sixth studio album by American rock band Guns N' Roses. It was released on November 23, 2008, worldwide, except in the United Kingdom on November 24, 2008. As you were saying. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 13:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then he lives happily ever after, the end.--Editor510 (talk) 14:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Law[edit]

Wouldn't that be RIAA v. Wikimedia Foundation? -- Tckma 15:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neither of the above would be, if WMF wins (iff there ever will be any of the above legal cases). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't I see that on BJAODN?
Thankfully, I'm in the United States our version is the Freedom from Thought Act --Rockstonetalk to me! 14:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sport[edit]

Chess

Football

Mega super editorman (talk) 22:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball

Go

Self-reference[edit]

How about the Last article of Wikipedia ON WHEELS BJAODN Silly Things? — Rickyrab | Talk 22:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This gets my vote. -Sarregouset (Talk) 15:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Army1987 wins! Mathmo 18:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy[edit]

Also thus proving that unless Wikipedia starts thinking it is unable to exist. —Keakealani 22:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! Dragon798 (talk) 16:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geography[edit]

"The following is a comprehensive List of puddles in the World
  1. The one outside my house
  2. The big on to the East of the USA") 193.210.228.191 (talk)

People[edit]

  • The two guys who are left - Only one of them likes to edit Wikipedia and clearly isn't very good at it, as is evidenced by his poorly titled articles.
  • I killed the other guy - "take that Jerry, I'm goin outside. This is ghey." - verbatim of the last article created. -- Chickenmonkey X  sign?  08:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The last guy died - Written by a rampant bot, before crashing the entire system. --24.14.73.183 (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Food[edit]

Unknown[edit]

The last topic obviously got corrupted due to technical difficulties experinced during the demise of Wikipedia. Smartech 05:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know the question!!

Silly, we already have the answer ('42'). Now we just need the question. --Spook (my talk | my contribs) 07:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, the question is either "What is 6 times 9?" or the question and answer cannot be known simultaneously in the same universe, depending on which book in the series is considered to trump the others... -Preposterous 03:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NO, the Question is not "What is 6 times 9?". Please see above. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 20:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No,the question is 'what is 40+2' or 'what is 2+40'
I think someone here doesn't get it. Blue Mirage 12:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uh-oh, it seems that I've created it...--Gp75motorsports (talk) 17:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
More literary, how to use the Deplorable Word. JoshuaZ 05:02, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, that's my birthday.

Failure of Wikipedia to pay electric bill Ace-o-aces 19:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't this just make WP:WEB a lot more difficult to succeed?

Will Smith's elbow's joint's 118,385th atom's nucleus's down quark | For if Wikipedia gathers all human knowledge, witch it won't by the way. Cortex128 (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But which elbow? How do we number the atoms? Alfa-ketosav (talk) 19:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Business[edit]

Never[edit]

A bot writes a article on every particle in the universe, resulting in Wikipedia being the universe. The user who made the bot makes a physical law stating Wikipedia to be indestructible completely.

Wikipedia is infinitly expanding, And nobody will stop it from expanding, Somebody will rule Wikipedia someday, but Jimbo Wales proves that Wikipedia is completely indestructable. Downgrader (talk) 17:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree per Downgrader. Wikipedia is kinda like the universe in the sense that it keeps expanding. Resetti 4 Prez (talk) 00:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never. How do you calculate which is the ten-thousandth-to-last article? 2679D (talk) 03:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Never say never. Jakub Skrzypczak 16:55 24.05.2016 Poland.

Category-less[edit]

Wiki News[edit]


[18:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)] 2605:6000:8D47:5800:9C23:1FDE:8524:AE4A (talk): The 1381329385th page is the last. Click here!

This is silly, Another Wiki User the 2nd (talk) 00:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Species[edit]

Music[edit]

No kidding. Eh, maybe a new System of a Down album instead.

Nothing[edit]

Wikipedia won't end, atleast I hope not -Wikipedia's funeral article?

Wikipedia[edit]

The last edit will be on this very page to announce the winner of the last topic pool. Plankhouse0 (talk) 21:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]