< August 28
August 30 >

August 29

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 29, 2019.

Wikipedia:GOTPAID

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting deletion; these redirects point to a nonexistent section that failed this talk page proposal. While the creator is indef blocked/banned, none of their listed sockpuppets were blocked when this redirect was created, so speedy deletion criteria G5 doesn't apply. –Sonicwave talk 00:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kate Donnelly

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 19:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect needs to be deleted for the following reasons: The last name of the individual is de Remero, and Donnelly is vastly different from that, which causes confusion; Kate de Remero is not called Kate Donnelly at all anymore and it causes confusion; and also the presence of the redirect article makes it more difficult to find the actual Kate de Remero that people will look for. 108.51.195.71 (talk) 23:35, 29 August 2019

Fixed errors with the nomination –Sonicwave talk 23:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Delete:


I strongly advise that the Kate Donnelly Redirect Page be deleted for the following reasons: Since there are many other Kate Donnelly's in the world and Kate de Remero does not go by Kate Donnelly anymore, I think the presence of the redirect page makes for extra confusion; since, as noted, she uses the last name De Remero, it makes her description much more complicated and difficult to understand; the presence of the redirect article makes it more difficult to find the actual Kate de Remero that people will look for; and because it is noted on the Kate De Remero page that she was born as Kathleen Donnelly, making it even more confusing to add in the Kate Donnelly.

Thank you so much for your time and I pray that this redirect page will be deleted. 108.51.195.71 (talk) 14:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Delete: Kate De Remero is known as Dona Kate and also Kate Remero; she was born as Kathleen Donnelly. With all of these names, it is extremely confusing to have the existence of the Kate Donnelly redirect page. 108.51.195.71 (talk) 01:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:BADFAITHONOM

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting deletion – I considered retargeting this broken section redirect to Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Arguments to the person, but the typo (BADFAITHONOM) might make this unlikely to be used. –Sonicwave talk 22:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Worthless with the typo, and not helpful even without it: I don't find any such redirect as WP:BADFAITHNOM. -- MelanieN (talk) 23:30, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Move to WP:BADFAITHNOM and retarget to Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Arguments to the person per WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP.--Launchballer 16:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Aboriginal language

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 19#Aboriginal language

Tiffin boy'

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible misspelling (note the final apostrophe). gnu57 19:31, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kind boy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Created as a tracklist of Ashley Tisdale songs back in 2009, but Tisdale has never released a song with this title. gnu57 18:43, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rockland r

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All of these ambiguous or implausible redirects were created by the same now-blocked editor. I suggest deleting all gnu57 17:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These pages were created in July 2013, and the first block on one of this user's accounts (also blocked for sockpuppetry) was in December 2013. G5 is not applicable. ComplexRational (talk) 18:59, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:IDONTLIKETHENOMINATOR

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Arguments to the person. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing about nominators is mentioned in the current target. When I found this redirect, I expected that it would lead to Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Arguments to the person, where the fallacy of arguing against the nominator is described in detail. ComplexRational (talk) 17:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Very stable genius

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Stable Genius Act. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 18:27, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This phrase, which refers to Trump's description of himself in a January 2018 tweet, isn't mentioned in the target and doesn't appear to have ever been. The only articles where the phrase is mentioned in the body are Dump Trump (statue) and Fire and Fury; the latter might be a viable target, as might Stable Genius Act, though that article doesn't use the precise phrase. We could find somewhere to add a mention, but I don't think deleting these would be a great loss to the encyclopaedia. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that Donald Trump on social media is broken and doesn't contain any info about the term is a fault of that article, not of the redirect.
In fact this phrase should have its own article. I have seen it used scores of times in various contexts, in highly notable publications, and it continues to be so and probably will be for years. Because of this, an article of several paragraphs could easily be constructed. There's no question that people studying this highly important period of American history will coming across this quote and be be looking to find out more about it decades and probably centuries from now.
To give these people nothing beyond a "not found" error message is not helpful to the reader. However, any attempt to make a proper article where the reader can be pointed to the original tweet, various examples of it being invoked, some analysis perhaps of the context (it was in response to someone's earlier statement I believe) and so on is out of the question -- I've tried stuff like this, and the deletionists won't have it, period.
I can't help that, but there's no need to make the situation worse by destroying even redirects to where there at any rate should be useful information is not helpful to the reader. Herostratus (talk) 18:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Stable Genius Act. This can serve as the redirect for any "stable genius" phrases. Luckovich's book can be added as a media response. It looks like the Stable Genius Act was created in response to the Trump tweets so "very stable genius" would be appropriate as background. [2] The article should also have a section for reaction to the phrase, as well as redirecting Stable Genius and STABLE GENIUS Act. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the article Stable Genius Act does use that very phrase. Right there in the lead. I will add additional examples. -- MelanieN (talk) 21:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is now a paragraph on the subject at Stable Genius Act. -- MelanieN (talk) 20:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

KB!

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, an internet search didn't turn up anything illuminating. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:21, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Found this after some searching: https://www.f-r-i.com/glock/FAQ/FAQ-kb.htm . A pointless redirect, not encyclopaedic, delete. Anastrophe (talk) 18:20, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Have you seen this boy?

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commonly used phrase, not specific to the terminator film. Either delete or perhaps retarget to Missing person. gnu57 16:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ATWAS

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget the first to All the world's a stage, delete the others. --BDD (talk) 15:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While reviewing the discussions below (The Real Ronaldo, White boy music) I came across these other questionable creations by the same user. Reviewing, but probably leaning delete unless there's any evidence of use. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Real Ronaldo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-neutral redirect apparently inspired by a sports rivalry, might apply to any person named Ronaldo. gnu57 15:19, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Viele1v.JPG.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, housekeeping. CptViraj (📧) 15:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bearbeastnotpussy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per criterion WP:G3 or WP:G10. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:08, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect gnu57 15:08, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Virgin Screwdriver

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 19#Virgin Screwdriver

Might See TV

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. gnu57 14:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Zoe Dog

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect gnu57 14:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

How Kid boy got his name

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect, I guess? I have no idea what this means. gnu57 14:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jumping box

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Plyometrics. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 18:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently this term is used to refer to a television in one episode of the cartoon series The Simpsons. I propose retargetting to Plyometrics (exercises involving jumping on platforms/boxes). gnu57 14:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

São Paulo (cidade)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 19#São Paulo (cidade)

Chuckwallis E. Cheese

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. gnu57 14:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

10 to 25 people desperate for attention agree to live with each other for 60 to 130 days in order to gain fame or a cash prize

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely that anyone would ever type this long string to find the target article. gnu57 14:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kid boy chow

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. gnu57 14:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bate and switch

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bait-and-switch. Consensus is clear that this is plausible and should be kept; this retarget is solely to avoid a double redirect as pointed out. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 18:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Created after a semi-coherent request at WP:HD. It is either an implausible typo or, well, something else entirely: NSFW text link. In the latter case, I do not think it can be turned into an article (WP:NOTDICTIONARY and lack of RS, at a first glance). TigraanClick here to contact me 13:16, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

White boy music

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:05, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a general term for mopey alt-rock rather than a nickname for Muse specifically. Cheers, gnu57 13:16, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Visible light (disambiguation)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 19#Visible light (disambiguation)

QIA

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 18:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No way on earth is the current target the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC - should at least be a disambiguation page or better redirect to Qatar Investment Authority. Launchballer 12:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Queen cake

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 19#Queen cake

All the languages spoken in india

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have any comprehensive list of languages of India. – Uanfala (talk) 11:24, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Indian languages and resources

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have any article that lists both Indian languages and resources (whatever that may mean). – Uanfala (talk) 11:21, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vietnamese language (dialect)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 12#Vietnamese language (dialect)

C32H52O15

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical formula changed in article from C32H52O15 to C34H50O16. I have not found another molecule in enWiki with formula C32H52O15. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 10:33, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bali boy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per criterion G3 (pure vandalism) although G5 (block evasion) would also apply. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Bali boy" was created as a redirect to "Gigolo" in 2010 by one sockpuppetteer, and retargetted to "Lucas" in 2013 by another, who also created "Bali beach boy" as another "Lucas" redirect. I did find this source[7] to justify retargetting to "Male prostitution", but the term has seen more use as a news moniker for two different minors accused of delinquency in Bali, e.g., [8][9][10]. I propose deletion of both as unlikely and misleading redirects. gnu57 02:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More