The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Student council. (non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:32, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Stuco → Stuart Scott  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This was created in 2007 as a stub for "student council", blanked and redirected to students' union, then retargetted in 2008 to Stuart Scott. (I don't know why.) A quick look at Google News shows that the abbreviation for "student council" is more commonly stylised as "STUCO" or "StuCo" rather than "Stuco". The incoming links are all misspellings of the word "stucco". I tentatively suggest retargeting to student council with a hatnote to stucco. Cheers, gnu57 21:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to student council per nom and add a hatnote to the new target. I also notified CastAStone (who retargeted the redirect to Stuart Scott) and PC78 for more input. --im temtem • hOI!! • fsfdfg • alt account of pandakekok9 02:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to either student council or (as a typo) to stucco. Leaning towards the latter given the incoming links and the fact that the abbreviation is not mentioned in the student council article, but no strong feelings either way. PC78 (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget, preferably to Stucco per PC78, but Student council is fine as a second preference provided the hatnote is added. Thryduulf (talk) 17:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to student council. Senator2029 “Talk” 16:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Phu Bai (disambiguation) → Phú Bài  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target page Phú Bài is not a disambiguation page nor an SIA or some other dab-like page. I tried tagging the redirect for G14 speedy deletion, but KAP03 removed the G14 tag because (s)he thinks that G14 does not apply to redirects, so now I have no choice but to consider an RfD. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete. Clearcut WP:G14. I must have speedied a couple of dozen similar redirects with no problem. Which bit of 'G14 also applies to orphaned "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects that target pages that are not disambiguation pages or pages that perform a disambiguation-like function' did KAP03 not understand? Narky Blert (talk) 17:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. In it's current state, this is obviously speedyable under WP:G14, but I think there should be a disambiguation for this term. Phu Bai International Airport is at least as noteworthy as the ward, if not the primary topic and Phu Bai Combat Base would also be a valid entry. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Phu Bai Combat Base should be merged into Phu Bai International Airport since they are obviously about the same object. Everything about the combat base should be considered the history of the current airport, so I don't see any reason why another article should be created. 30ChuaPhaiLaTet (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Negroid, Caucasoid, Mongoloid & sometimes Australoid → Historical race concepts  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a very unlikely search term. The target is dubious, it might be Historical race concepts, but it might as well be History of anthropometry (in fact, I just changed it from Anthropometry, which was a total misfit). The title is not easily understood without some explanation (Mankind was divided into three races, sometimes into four), Negroid, Caucasoid, and Mongoloid all have their own articles, and Australoid is a redirect to Australo-Melanesian. Rsk6400 (talk) 16:05, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. WP:XY is as good a reason as any. Highly implausible search term; "sometimes", indeed. Narky Blert (talk) 17:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is just a leftover from a long-ago page move. I moved it (to the much better Races of physical anthropology (it's had a couple-few names since)), and this apparently put me in as the creator of Negroid, Caucasoid, Mongoloid & sometimes Australoid which I then got blamed for. =/ So get rid of it plz. Herostratus (talk) 01:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Implausible search term --im temtem • hOI!! • fsfdfg • alt account of pandakekok9 02:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to WP:XY policies and per im temtem. Captain Galaxy (talk) 19:12, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 10.2989 → Informa  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The National Inquiry Services Center is the registrant, not Informa. Informa was previously listed as the DOI registrant, but that got updated recently. Not sure if because this was inaccurate, or because the ownership of the DOI prefix got transferred.

Either way, it's currently a misleading redirect. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Who searches for a company based on the beginning of its DOIs? In what circumstance would you have the beginning of a DOI, but you wouldn't have the full thing, AND you were attempting to look up the publisher? Occasionally I've needed to look up the base of a DOI, but this is when I'm looking for a common string for which to search a site (using Blackboard's equivalent to Special:LinkSearch), and in this situation I've already got a bunch of DOIs. I'm also questioning the tie to Informa, since at least their Taylor and Francis subsidiary doesn't use this prefix. I'm finding others, e.g. Cheese Rheology and Texture (imprint CRC Press) is http://www.doi.org/10.1201/9781420031942, Cheese Factories on the Moon (imprint Routledge) is http://www.doi.org/10.4324/9781315635590, and same for Psychology Press and Apple Academic Press, but I'm not seeing any 10.2989 DOIs in my institution's T&F collection. Nyttend (talk) 23:53, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to 22 Short Films About Springfield#"Steamed Hams". (non-admin closure) feminist | freedom isn't free 18:01, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Steamed hams → Steamed cheeseburger  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While this target was chosen in a RfD (with little participation), it is erroneous. Cheeseburgers, steamed or otherwise, are not called "steamed hams" except in reference to the Simpsons gag and subsequent internet meme. Since a more recent RfD affirmed that the variant Steamed Hams should point to 22 Short Films About Springfield#"Steamed Hams", I propose that this one do too. Yes, WP:DIFFCAPS says we could give them different targets, but this remains nonsensical given that the term does not independently refer to real burgers. --BDD (talk) 15:53, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. No reason at all why the 'h' and 'H' variants should point to different places. Narky Blert (talk) 17:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Despite my recent nomination of "Steamed Hams", I'm actually not quite opinionated on the target for "steamed (h)ams". You'd also think, that as an editor who lives like 10+ minutes away from the the origin of steamed cheeseburgers in Connecticut (and is active in WP:CONN), I'd have any clue if people actually call them steamed hams, but I don't. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Wait, it just dawned on me that other places don't actually have steamed cheeseburgers. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom and for the same reasons as at the previous RfD. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Sosospider → Soso (search engine)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Term does not appear in target article. A Google search suggests that this seems to be an alternative name used for the search engine, but still very few pageviews overall. CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete if not mentioned. This is some crawler thing for Soso. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no navigational purpose. While Tencent may have used a spider (web-crawler) among their many text and data input methods, I did not find specific info on it. If they did, in was undoubtedly proprietary to them (or the result of industrial espionage) and kept quiet. --Bejnar (talk) 04:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The help desk of the search engine confirms that sosospider is their web crawler. Sure, the pageview is relatively low for this redirect, but I think this could still be useful. One scenario could be a curious webmaster wondering where sosospider is coming from, and searches Wikipedia for it. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 11:57, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not mentioned in the article, therefore a reader following the link will find no information about it. Narky Blert (talk) 17:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, as something obviously related. If you come across Sosospider, and you're taken to Soso, then you know it's a search engine spider from Soso. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:12, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Pandakekok9, it's harmles as nothing else can relate to it. Captain Galaxy (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thnuder strom → Thunderstorm  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible misspelling. Hardly any pageviews for the last six months and very few overall. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 08:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the nominator. Glades12 (talk) 09:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Implausible double misspelling. Narky Blert (talk) 10:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. This isn't the first redirect I've seen with this spelling mistake but with little evidence for why it exists. Strom is already a German word and there is one error in each word which is quite unlikely. Captain Galaxy (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Several Hankisons are mentioned on Wikipedia, none with any real significant coverage. The search results are considered the best option in the absence of a specific logical target. ~ mazca ^talk 12:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hankison → Death of Breonna Taylor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure the surname of one of the policemen involved in this death is a useful redirect, especially when a handful of other articles mention people named Hankison. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or retarget - Keep or retarget. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Jax 0677: It is not helpful nor useful to leave a comment without any explanation. If you think it should be retargeted, you need to at least say where. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reply - If there is no suitable target, then keep the redirect, as it seems to be the only target for this term. I did not see other people named Hankison on Wikipedia, although "Hankinson" may be a plausible target. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There are a few people with the last name Hankison on Wikipedia, and this one is not any more noteworthy than any others. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Link to Hankison mentions for convenience. — J947 ^[cont] 04:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Thoroughly inappropriate to redirect from a surname to an article about someone else. Let the search tool do its job. We have no article on anyone called Hankison. If we ever do, this will be needed as a ((R from surname)) page, Narky Blert (talk) 09:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Narky Blert. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 10:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Is this Hankison more notable than the one mentioned in Corby (UK Parliament constituency)? I'm not sure. As Narky Blert said, let the search tool do its job. See also WP:TENYEARTEST. —Granger (talk · contribs) 21:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to National Assembly (South Korea)#Members. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• list of members of the National Assembly (South Korea), 2016–present → list of members of the National Assembly (South Korea), 2016–2020  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• list of members of the National Assembly (South Korea), 2016-present → list of members of the National Assembly (South Korea), 2016–2020  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These redirects are false information. List of members of the National Assembly (South Korea), 2016–2020 is not the present list. These should be deleted. Sawol (talk) 10:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. When 2020 (the present year, to be fair) ends, it won't be relevant to redirect this title there, since the present is constantly changing. Regards, SONIC678 14:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Template:National Assembly (South Korea). These are redirects resulting from page moves and were accurate for about four years. There is no benefit to deleting these redirects when we can instead redirect them to the index template so that anyone following old links (internal or external) can select which period they are interested in. Thryduulf (talk) 11:17, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Template:National Assembly (South Korea) per Thryduulf. There's no point in risking breakage of old links. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 10:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC) Striking my comment as there's a better option im temtem • hOI!! • fsfdfg • alt account of pandakekok9 02:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose retargeting to Template:National Assembly (South Korea). There is absolutely no need to create a CNR here. From the context "2016-present", it is clear that this is referring to the list of members for the legislation election of 2016, so the current target is the correct one. Any links that currently exist would be for the current target as well, especially since this was the title of the current target for four years. I see the logic in deleting, but I think it might be a bit premature. I would prefer deletion over retargeting though. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• I assumed List of members of the National Assembly (South Korea) would be a potential retarget option, but it doesn't exist. National Assembly (South Korea)#Members would accomplish much the same thing—maybe my redlink should redirect there too? --BDD (talk) 19:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would support that. I tried something similar and finding a redlink suggested the template, but if people have an objection to pointing readers to a reader-facing template then I've got no issues with pointing the nominated redirect there too. Thryduulf (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This seems like a better option. I had thought about making that redlink a dab page which lists all national assembly lists, but since there's already National Assembly (South Korea)#Members which lists the same exact thing, I guess a dab page would be redundant. So yeah, let's retarget this redirect and the redlink to National Assembly (South Korea)#Members. --im temtem • hOI!! • fsfdfg • alt account of pandakekok9 02:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Will use Pandakekok9's dab to start. (non-admin closure) buidhe 04:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Spanish music → Music of Spain  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

French music and English music are disambiguation pages listing Music of France and Music of England, as well as various musical traditions in those respective languages. I don't see why Spanish music should be treated any differently, particularly where there are substantial genres of music in the Spanish language that are not from Spain (e.g., most Latin music), and music from Spain that is instrumental, and therefore not in a specific language. BD2412 T 18:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I guess Spanish music may not necessarily refers only to music of Spain, but Music of Latin America and Latin music are not exactly the same as Spanish music given that they include Portuguese and Brazilian music. It is possible to turn it into a disambiguation page, but we need to be careful with explaining the entries in the page. Hzh (talk) 11:40, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I fixed many links clearly intending music of Spain, but most of what is left are American radio stations whose genre is identified as "Spanish music"; it is highly doubtful that these stations are actually focused on "music of Spain", so these were already errors arising from the ambiguity of the link, and needing to be fixed. BD2412 T 18:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I had started a draft of the dab page at User:Pandakekok9/Spanish music. Feel free to edit as needed. Pandakekok9 (talk) 11:17, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Convert to disambiguation page per BD2412. Pandakekok9's draft looks like a good start. —Granger (talk · contribs) 21:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. While technically correct as the name of a location in the episode, the lack of actual information pertaining to it means most participants consider the redirect not helpful to the reader. ~ mazca ^talk 12:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Tantalus V. Observatory → Roger Ebert Should Lay Off the Fatty Foods  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - As the name of the fictional planetarium in the episode. The planetarium is named Tantalus V. Observatory. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 01:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Neither Tantalus or observatories are mentioned at the target page. Readers using this redirect will not find any information about "Tantalus V. Observatory". Not a very active user (talk) 16:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not mentioned in the target, so a reader following the link will find no information at all. Narky Blert (talk) 10:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A planetarium is mentioned in the article, but not named. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to French of France. (non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy (talk) 11:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Metropolitan French → Standard French  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the article. I suggest retargeting it to French of France. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support redirect the suggested target is an improvement, and its existence suggests that having it pointed at the current target conveys inaccurate information. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Metropolitan France is essentially France-in-Europe, so the proposal makes logical sense. Narky Blert (talk) 10:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom and Narky Blert. Thryduulf (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• End-of-sale (disambiguation) → End-of-life  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Only one possible phrase, End-of-life (product), which is where I just retargeted End-of-sale to. Disambiguation is not needed DannyS712 (talk) 04:27, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I agree that disambiguation is not needed here. BD2412 T 15:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (creator, so eligible for speedy WP:G7) looks like I didn't verify the validity of the existing End-of-sale redirect to the dab when I created the matching nommed redirect. However, now I have, there is actually a potential second meaning Closing down sale / Closeout (sale) so I've added a redirect hatnote at End-of-life (product), which should be OK per WP:TWODABS. Widefox; talk 12:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:32, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Binod Pandey → Jharkhand Mukti Morcha  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The subject of the article is merely a secretary (there are 10 such posts and also it does not seems to be a significant and stable post, see at https://jharkhandmuktimorcha.org/state-leadership.html) of a state party Jharkhand Mukti Morcha.Does not holds any political office in the government. Zoodino (talk) 04:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I wanted to have this deleted under WP:A7 but redirected instead as I figured that the subject could have a credible claim of significance. However, I agree with the nom that this is not notable. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 05:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Ʇxǝʇ uʍop-ǝpısd∩, keep the others. The original nominated redirect is considered sufficiently unlikely and silly by almost all participants, it makes heavy use of obscure special characters and has very few mentions on the internet. The other two were added mid-discussion and most following participants consider them more reasonable. ~ mazca ^talk 12:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ʇxǝʇ uʍop-ǝpısd∩ → Transformation of text#Upside-down text  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Uʍop ǝpısdn → Transformation of text#Upside-down text  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Umop apisdn → Transformation of text#Upside-down text  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Just plain silly. No one is going to type this. Spicy (talk) 03:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC) Added some redirects from Alphius. im temtem • hOI!! • fsfdfg • alt account of pandakekok9 02:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unlikely search term --DannyS712 (talk) 04:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 08:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Narky Blert (talk) 10:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I originally made it a long time ago, and I agree that it doesn't actually have much use. The same also seems to go for both Uʍop ǝpısdn and Umop apisdn, which I found today upon looking at what other pages link to Transformation of text. Alphius (talk) 20:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as it I doubt anybody would have the knowledge to search this. Also per Alphius. Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I added the redirects Umop apisdn and Uʍop ǝpısdn which Alphius linked here. They should be deleted as well for the same rationale. Keep them per Gobonobo. Still delete Ʇxǝʇ uʍop-ǝpısd∩ which only has 1 relevant result in DuckDuckGo. im temtem • hOI!! • fsfdfg • alt account of pandakekok9 02:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC) Edited at 05:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. If there ever was a place we'd could upside down text be a relevant redirect, it'd be here. I just think it's cool [I fully understand I am the only one who feels this way]. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• dǝǝʞ ˙ǝʇᴉllǝʇɐS pɹᴉqɹɐʇS lɐʇsʎɹƆ puɐ ǝɔɐlԀ ʎɐʍɐɹɐℲ ʇsǝɹɐǝN ǝɥ┴ ƃuᴉpnlɔuᴉ 'sʞooq ǝldᴉʇlnɯ uᴉ pǝsn ǝɹɐ suoᴉʇɐlnɯɹoɟ ǝsǝɥʇ 'ǝɹoɯɹǝɥʇɹnℲ ˙sʍǝN lɐqolפ puɐ ʇuǝpuǝdǝpuI ǝɥ┴ sɐ ɥɔns sǝɔɹnos uᴉ punoɟ ǝq uɐɔ ʇᴉ puɐ ˙,,umop apisdn,, ɹoɟ sʇlnsǝɹ 00Ɛ'Ɩㄣ puɐ ,,uʍop ǝpısdn,, ɹoɟ sʇlnsǝɹ 000'ㄥƐƖ suɹnʇǝɹ ǝlƃooפ ˙,,uʍop ǝpᴉsdn,, 'ʎlƃuᴉʇʇᴉɟ 'sᴉ ʇxǝʇ pǝddᴉlɟ ʎluoɯɯoɔ ʇsoɯ ǝɥ┴ ˙ʇᴉ ɹǝɥdᴉɔǝp oʇ ɐᴉpǝdᴉʞᴉM oʇ ƃuᴉɯoɔ sɹǝpɐǝɹ ǝʇɐdᴉɔᴉʇuɐ oʇ ǝlqɐuosɐǝɹun ʇou sᴉ ʇᴉ puɐ sʇxǝʇuoɔ ʇuǝɹǝɟɟᴉp ʎuɐɯ uᴉ ǝuᴉluo punoɟ ǝq uɐɔ ʇxǝʇ uʍop-ǝpᴉsd∩ .dɐǝɥɔ ǝɹɐ sʇɔǝɹᴉpǝɹ 'sǝpᴉsǝq ˙ϛ#ԀƎƎʞ#pℲɹ:ԀM ʇǝǝɯ ǝsǝɥʇ ǝʌǝᴉlǝq I oqouoqoƃ ^{+ c} 04:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Non-rotated version:

Keep I believe these meet WP:RFD#KEEP#5. besides, redirects are cheap. Upside-down text can be found online in many different contexts and it is not reasonable to anticipate readers coming to Wikipedia to decipher it. The most commonly flipped text is, fittingly, “uʍop ǝpᴉsdn”. Google returns 137,000 results for “uʍop ǝpᴉsdn” and 41,300 results for “umop apisdn”. and it can be found in sources such as The Independent and Global News. Furthermore, these formations are used in multiple books, including The Nearest Faraway Place and Crystal Starbird Satellite. gobonobo ^{+ c} 04:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

--Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Ʇxǝʇ uʍop-ǝpısd∩, as it is plain silly. Keep the rest, as they aren't silly. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete at least Ʇxǝʇ uʍop-ǝpısd∩ and Uʍop ǝpısdn, as there is minimal value to redirects containing special characters not found on the keyboard. Leaning delete as to Umop apisdn, as a rather unlikely search term. BD2412 T 13:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Ʇxǝʇ uʍop-ǝpısd∩, keep the otherCrazyBoy826 20:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.