The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. No one else opined on reverting the move at Crossfire (Grampian current affairs) so there's not really a consensus for it, however there's nothing stopping anyone from doing so in the spirit of WP:BRD. Legoktm (talk) 02:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Crossfire (UK TV series) → Crossfire (2022 British TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Crossfire (British TV programme) → Crossfire (Grampian current affairs)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These redirects should point to the same target and, likely be disambiguated using hatnotes. I'm unfamiliar with the topics, and would appreciate editors' assessments of which is primary. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep both. WP:NCTV#Television programming disagrees with the nominator's claim since one topic is considered a "series" and the other is considered a "programme". Probably best to hatnote each article (and possibly give Crossfire (Grampian current affairs) a name that's more in line with WP:NCTV in general.) Steel1943 (talk) 01:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Rosguill: Do you have a comment on this argument against the nomination? Jay 💬 11:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Honestly, I'd never heard of the programme/series distinction before--not sure if that's because I don't watch much TV or if it's an English-variant thing. I still think that it's potentially a bit confusing to have the two terms side-by-side, pointing to different targets (whereas the NCTV guidance is more about the naming of individual pages, not handling cases of disambiguation between multiple pages), but am ok with deferring to others if they think it's fine, and I agree that the hatnote would help address the potential for confusion if the status quo or something similar to it is kept. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Move Crossfire (Grampian current affairs) to Crossfire (British TV programme), reverting an undiscussed move and bringing the title back in accordance with naming conventions. Keep Crossfire (UK TV series) per Steel1943. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• YWH (disambiguation) → HWJ  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Neither of the entries at HWJ appear to have ever been known as YWH, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Our Province → Gallia Narbonensis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While one of its Latin names, Provincia Nostra, does literally mean "Our Province", I think it is extremely unlikely that anyone would be likely to search for it by that English name. Based on Google Scholar results, "Our Province" appears to be the name of a potentially-notable essay by John Strachan; as it's not mentioned there in detail, deletion seems like the most appropriate option. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I genuinely thought it was one of its English names, I think I've seen it somewhere, other than Caesar's De Bello Gallico. But sure, as you want. Parapleppo (talk) 23:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Richard Dawkins bibliography and add hatnote to Geraniol. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Gerin oil → Richard Dawkins  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Geriniol → Richard Dawkins  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

(along with Geriniol)

Obviously does have relevance to the article subject ([1], [2]), but is not mentioned in the actual article and so is unhelpful to most readers. QueenofBithynia (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I added tags and bundled Geriniol into this RfDTartarTorte 20:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment without a mention, Geriniol is potentially WP:R#ASTONISHing given it's a plausible misspelling for Geraniol and related compounds like Geranial. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Gerin oil yes, Geriniol, no, because of Geraniol. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 21:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget Gerin oil to Richard Dawkins bibliography and tag as ((R from work)). Retarget Geriniol to Geraniol and tag as ((R from typo)). Jay 💬 07:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Retarget and hatnote Geriniol per Tamzin. Jay 💬 08:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget both to bibliography, per Jay's argument regarding the former. A correct usage is generally the primary topic over a typo, so instead hatnote to Geraniol. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 07:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Tamzin: Note the spelling Geriniol, which from the beginning is a typo. It is not Gerinoil, which would have matched your argument. Geriniol is a closer match to Geraniol than to Gerin oil. Jay 💬 08:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Jay: "Gerin Oil" begins Gerin Oil (or Geriniol, to give it its scientific name). -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 08:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  OK, did not know that. Jay 💬 08:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Penisylvania → Pennsylvania  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Pennsylvania is definitely commonly misspelled in a number of ways, but it's not pronounced this way and this seems like a pretty unlikely misspelling. It alternatively, I am guessing is a derogatory but unused, nickname for Pennsylvania given the substring made by the first 5 characters. TartarTorte 19:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Might be disruptive based on the first 5 letter alone. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 20:13, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Looks like a joke creation. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 08:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:27, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sugar Maple Coast → Expansion packs for The Sims 3#Pets  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A minor place in this game. Not mentioned in article and reliable sources don’t mention this place. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 18:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove because not mentioned at the target. Also WP:FANCRUFT applies

Roostery123 (talk) 03:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:27, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• University Life → Expansion packs for The Sims 3#University Life  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a generic term. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 18:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Note that unambiguous redirects to that section are already in place at The Sims 3: University Life, The Sims 3 University Life, and Sims 3: University Life. - Eureka Lott 21:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 08:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm saddened that there is no article such as Student life at college or something, where this could've redirected. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 08:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• No one good target for this. Considered retargeting to Student, but especially with this capitalization... Delete. 193.37.240.128 (talk) 10:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:27, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• World Adventures → Expansion packs for The Sims 3#World Adventures  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I think this is a generic term. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 18:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:26, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Nintendo GameCube Game Disc and Wii Optical Disc → Nintendo optical discs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Nintendo GameCube Game Disc & Wii Optical Disc → Nintendo optical discs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Weird redirect, seems unlikely someone would search for this RPI2026F1 (talk) 16:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both of these were created from moves (I'm not sure why I didn't add ((R from move))). But I agree that these redirects aren't super useful now, since the article covers Wii U discs too. --Pokechu22 (talk) 18:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. No WP:XY issue here: Both of these topics are covered in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 00:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: There is no WP:XY issue. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Roger Davies (fictional character) → List of Harry Potter characters#D  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Roger Davies (Harry Potter) → List of Harry Potter characters#D  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Roger Davies (Harry Potter character) → List of Harry Potter characters#D  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not covered in the target article or anywhere else in the project as far as I can tell. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or restore the article in the history of Roger Davies (fictional character). The article existed about 3 months though is unreferenced. Of course this can be kept if the character is added back to the target (if justified). A7V2 (talk) 02:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm fairly pro-restoration in cases with old articles, but I don't think Special:Permalink/11111495 would stand a snowball's chance in Hell of surviving AfD, so we should avoid bureaucracy and delete. Noting I've bundled Roger Davies (Harry Potter character); I'll preëmptively say I don't think that bundling necessitates a relist, given how close the title is to the ones already listed. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There have been no changes in the target since the nomination, and no opinion whether adding back is justified.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 08:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Fn@f → Five Nights at Freddy's  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• FN@F → Five Nights at Freddy's  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Implausible. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:37, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete it makes logical sense, but I think it is just a bit too implausible for Wikipedia. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  16:58, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Its not entirely implausible that someone would search this instead of just "FNAF" since they might assume FNAF would go to a disambiguation or some other acronym.★Trekker (talk) 15:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two weak opinions have been presented-relisting for further consideration.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 13:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - between the two, only 100 combined views since creation. Evidently not an acronym that's in use, regardless of whether it is a plausible one ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 15:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep it is a common abbreviation for this game [3] -- 65.92.244.114 (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Clyde!_Franklin! 14:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Redirects are cheap and it is not ambiguous.

Roostery123 (talk) 03:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per 65. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Research#Research ethics. Without prejudice to having a standalone article / disambiguation / broad concept article / list at this title. Jay 💬 11:14, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Questionable research practices → Category:Ethically disputed research practices  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Cross-namespece redirect that should point to an article or be deleted to make way for one. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:56, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• We have Research#Research ethics, Research integrity, Scientific misconduct, Fabrication of data, and several articles in the category. The first might make a good target given that it links to the other specific articles I mention, but the others wouldn't. I think an article/dab/disambig/broad concept that lists these as examples of things that are questionable research practices would be the best option here. Thryduulf (talk) 09:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Covert to article: May I remind you about list of unusual deaths? If we have reliable sources (which we most likely have) then we can create an article explaining different types of questionable research practices. I’m also not opposed to deletion either. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Listify: This could absolutely be a list. It would require some relatively vigilant eyes on it for vandalism because I can imagine this would attract some sort of vandalism. TartarTorte 19:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Research#Research ethics per Thryduulf seems like a suitable solution for now, without prejudice to the drafting of more substantial content at this title. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:26, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 14:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• McDonald Islands (Heard Island and McDonald Islands) → McDonald Islands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely "typo", unhelpful as a search term, and I'm not aware of any other islands that might make this an ambiguous term. Lithopsian (talk) 14:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP and McDonald Islands was once disambiguated. Also, this is not a typo. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Per WP:NCAUST, it's not unexpected to have a disambiguation by the name of the territory, and it is unambiguous. Keep per WP:CHEAP. TartarTorte 20:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. Having a disambiguation in the redirect doesn’t mean it is implausible plus it is cheap. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 20:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The Sims HomeCrafter → The Sims (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems to be a program used for this game. Not mentioned in the article and no WP:RS mentions this program. History indicates that this article was BLARed. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 13:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Another case of a quick-draw BLAR when PROD or Afd is the proper action. Very unlikely an Afd would lead to anything besides deletion, so delete per WP:SNOWBALL. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Object limiter → The Sims (video game)#Console versions  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article. Could also be a generic term. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:54, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the above. – QueenofBithynia (talk) 20:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Though the history says this was the result of a merge, this was really a WP:BLAR. I think an Afd of the blanked content would end in delete (WP:SNOWBALL). No other uses on enwiki. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Pool ladder accident → The Sims (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A way to get rid of your Sims. Not mentioned in article and no reliable sources mention it. The history indicates that this was once an article. Restoring/merging is unlikely due to the old article being a game guide. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note this was merged into the current target in 2006 per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pool_ladder_accident, with the merged content apparently removed eventually. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:13, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was send to AfD. Legoktm (talk) 02:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Chiki bar → Chickee  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Term is not mentioned in the target article, leaving it unclear what connection the subject of the redirect has with the subject of the target article. In addition, this redirect is a ((R with history)) that had content for about 2 years before it was WP:BLARed in December 2007. Steel1943 (talk) 19:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore and sent it to AFD: As it is not mentioned in the article and it is tagged with R from history Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 20:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Chikki. Although the word bar is not mentioned, it does say that the preparation may come in a square shape. Jay 💬 17:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Striking off per Mdewman. Jay 💬 08:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:27, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Clyde!_Franklin! 10:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore and send to Afd. Seems like a non-notable play on Tiki bar (given that Chiki doesn't even mention it as a possible (mis)spelling for Chickee) with an unsourced stub in the page history, but let's err on the side of figuring this out at Afd. I think Jay's suggestion of a retarget is way too far of a stretch, given that Chikki bar doesn't exist and itself would be a bit of an unlikely search term, not to mention astonishing for anyone seeking content about a place beverages are consumed rather than a snack. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since there's no information about this term anywhere on Enwiki. Also, the stub that appears in the page history is pretty minimal and wouldn't be worth restoring in my opinion, let alone survive an AfD. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, this seems like a WP:SNOW case, as the pre-existing article is unreferenced and appears to conflate multiple different unrelated terms into one. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, retarget to Wind spirit. Legoktm (talk) 02:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wind Sprites → Super Mario Sunshine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A minor enemy in this game (though this is actually misspelled and is actually Wind Spirits not Wind Sprites). Not mentioned in article and no reliable sources to warrant a mention. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Google results tell me that there is something called a Wind Sprite in the Final Fantasy games, but it isn't mentioned in any of our articles on that. There are two passing mentions in articles that indicate a wind sprite is a more generic thing or possibly more than one generic thing (Heimdall (character)#Fictional character biography, Kaze no Matasaburo#Plot), however with no content about it/them there is nowhere to point this. Thryduulf (talk) 14:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Mr Guye below. We do have relevant content but I couldn't find it, pointing this redirect there will make others failing to find what they are looking for less likely. Thryduulf (talk) 23:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Wind spirit. "Wind sprite" could refer to a plethora of folkloric creatures associated with the wind, better to just send readers to a page that lists many of them. Besides, 'sprite' and 'spirit' are somewhat similarly spelled. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  17:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete to favour search results. Wind Sprites are also compositions by Tobias Matthay as well as William Baines. With the plural and uppercased Sprites, the suggested dab target which doesn't mention sprite or the compositions will be an incorrect target. Jay 💬 16:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete to favor search results per Jay. This is an example where too much editing gets in the way of information. Jontesta (talk) 23:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Clyde!_Franklin! 10:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Wind spirit. Sprite is an alternative term for Spirit. [4]

Roostery123 (talk) 03:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - it's more correct to say that sprites are related to spirits etymologically, but the terms aren't reducible to each other and it seems highly unlikely that a reader would be looking for Wind spirit. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Satellaview broadcasts#Broadcast game list. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• BS Super Mario Bros 3 → Super Mario Bros. 3#Remakes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a version of this game but on the SNES add on called the Satellaview. No mention in article and no reliable sources to warrant a mention. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of Satellaview broadcasts#Broadcast game list, and unlink and unpipe there. It is piped as BS Super Mario Collection. If the BS Super Mario Bros 3 title is not relevant in that list, then delete the redirect, unlink and retain BS Super Mario Collection, as text and not a redlink. Jay 💬 14:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Clyde!_Franklin! 10:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of Satellaview broadcasts#Broadcast game list and remove the link from that page. It looks like the actual title was BS Super Mario Collection (which should probably also redirect there), which (according to MarioWiki) featured Super Mario Bros. 3 on days 2 and 3. --Pokechu22 (talk) 22:11, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was restore article without prejudice against AfD. Courtesy ping Onel5969 as BLAR-er. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Non-load bearing wall → Infill wall  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is badly misleading, as most of the time, this refers to an interior stick-framed partition wall, and not a masonry wall. There is a load-bearing wall article, which this could lead to as an ((R from antonym)), or it could be a disambiguation page for various types of non-load-bearing walls (something akin to the removed [5] version) -- 65.92.244.114 (talk) 03:40, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. Johnsoniensis (talk) 06:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I mean... 'non-load-bearing-walls' exist, of course, but it's such a general concept. It's like saying 'concrete-that-isn't-colored-grey', 'fence-above-shoulder-height', or 'road-without-turning-lane'. Deletion seems best to me. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore and send to Afd. A set index was created over the redirect; the proper venue to discuss this page is therefore Afd. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Revert per Mdewman6 or retarget as a ((r from antonym)) per nom. The current target isn't ideal. - Eureka Lott 15:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Shine Get! → Super Mario Sunshine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Shine get → Super Mario Sunshine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

A minor trivial quote from this game when you get a Shine Sprite. Not mentioned in article and no reliable sources to warrant a mention. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for being meaningless to English speakers (the phrase does not appear in the English version of the game, only the Japanese version). — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak retarget to Power-up#Origins of the term where it's mentioned as an explanatory example. Jay 💬 16:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  No relevance to the target, however (shine sprites are not powerups). — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Striking off my weak vote per others. Didn't expect this would go for two relists. Jay 💬 08:00, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 03:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No new !votes since 1st relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Clyde!_Franklin! 03:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - this phrasing is a bit of a meme (Minecraft used "Achievement Get!" for a long time, for instance). This does also have a mention in a WP:VG/RS, here. --Pokechu22 (talk) 22:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not mentioned is not mentioned is not mentioned. Readers looking up this term will find nothing, and thus are not helped by this redirect existing: Wikipedia isn't a site for unmentioned easter eggs. Also, per Mellohi!'s response to Jay, this redirect should not be retargeted to Power-up#Origins of the term since "shines" are not "power-ups", the section just says something is similar to "Shine Get!" without explaining what "Shine Get!" is or what it means, and since I'm rather confident that is not what readers are looking for if they search this term. Steel1943 (talk) 01:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Mellohi and Steel. No clear definition of the term anywhere on Enwiki. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Celebrity Jeopardy! (2022 TV series). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Triple Jeopardy! → Jeopardy!#Gameplay  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Was created as a redirect to Celebrity Jeopardy! (2022 TV series), but shortly thereafter retargeted to the current target by 123.51.107.94, referencing their comment (as 175.39.61.121):

Shouldn't they redirect to Jeopardy!#Gameplay? Because the second part of the game is "Double Jeopardy", I've often heard the first part called "Single Jeopardy", and it's reasonable that someone would think of Final Jeopardy as "Triple Jeopardy". Double Jeopardy! already redirects to Jeopardy!#Gameplay. The proposed target is definitely not a good target for these redirects.

I disagree with that logic. Triple Jeopardy! is a thing on Celebrity Jeopardy!, whereas on regular Jeopardy! it could only refer to a misnomer for Final Jeopardy! Even if that's a misnomer that comes up at all (and no evidence has been presented that it is), a correct usage should almost always trump an incorrect usage. Revert to the original target. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 02:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Tamzin- even if it is a misnomer for the regular syndicated show, the actual 'Triple Jeopardy' round is in the new primetime spinoff, so I believe it should be a revert to original target (being Celebrity Jeopardy! (2022 TV series), possibly even to either the 'Format' or 'Gameplay' section within that article). Magitroopa (talk) 03:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: both are listed at Triple Jeopardy (disambiguation)#Sports and games. — Qwerfjkltalk 06:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the entry for Final Jeopardy! per MOS:DABMENTION. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 02:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Celebrity Jeopardy! (2022 TV series): I don't really see "Triple Jeopardy!" as a common misnomer for final jeopardy for two reasons: (1) "Triple jeopardy" does not seem to be itself that common of a misnomer for jeopardy (2) the likelihood of someone specifically searching for Jeopardy! versus Jeopardy but calling Final Jeopardy! by the name "Triple Jeopardy!" seems quite implausible to me as it shows both familiarity with the topic in spelling it with !, but a lack of familiarity in using a misnomer. Essentially, my arguments are "triple jeopardy" is not a common misnomer for Final Jeopardy and even so WP:DIFFPUNCT is useful here. TartarTorte 19:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Celebrity Jeopardy! (2022 TV series). Triple Jeopardy! is a format created specifically for the primetime Celebrity Jeopardy! this year. Unless it is also introduced to regular Jeopardy!, there is no good reason to point it to that article. InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @InfiniteNexus: Did you post this prematurely? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Tamzin: Yeah, that was another one of those glitches. Thanks for letting me know! InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Macedonia naming dispute. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Slavomacedonia → North Macedonia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Slavo-Macedonia → North Macedonia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These were proposed names for the country that is now known as North Macedonia, however neither term is mentioned at that article. They are mentioned (once each) at Macedonia naming dispute#Albanian position and Macedonia naming dispute#Stalemate respectively. Macedonia (terminology) uses the unhyphenated form in several places and the hyphenated form in quote in a note referenced seven times. I think therefore that one of those articles would be a better target, but I'm not sure which. Both "Salvomacedonian" and "Slavo-Macedonian" have been used in reference to the Macedonian language and Macedonians (ethnic group) but the -ia forms have not (and it would be unusual for such forms to refer to either) so I oppose retargetting there. I'll leave a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject North Macedonia about this discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 01:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Clyde!_Franklin! 01:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Macedonia naming dispute or create a Names of North Macedonia article and point it there; similar to Names of France/Names of the United States etc articles -- 65.92.244.114 (talk) 21:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Macedonia naming dispute but without an anchor, since the term is mentioned several times in the article. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget without refining per Cyclone. Jay 💬 07:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sims 2 University:Zombies → Expansion packs for The Sims 2#University  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Despite zombies being added to the university pack, I doubt this is a plausible search term due to the : in the title. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 00:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete ... and no space after the colon. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Laganaphyllis Simnovorii → Expansion packs for The Sims 2#University  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A minor plant in the game. Not mentioned in article and no reliable sources to warrant a mention in the article. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 00:15, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. A7V2 (talk) 06:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 09:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Yggur → Ian Irvine#Three Worlds Cycle series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm pretty sure everyone knows the drill by now. Another split-off from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 19#Three Worlds cycle plot points that is not mentioned at the target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This fictional individual appears to be obscure even within the specific context of the franchise. Wouldn't be worth mentioning in detail in the article linked. I agree. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:40, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Jal-Nish → Ian Irvine#Three Worlds Cycle series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm pretty sure everyone knows the drill by now. Another split-off from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 19#Three Worlds cycle plot points that is not mentioned at the target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I suppose the mention at God emperor (disambiguation) should be removed? J947 † ^edits 00:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Yup. It's failed WP:DABMENTION ever since I redirected The Song of the Tears a few months ago following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Three Worlds Cycle * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Fyn-Mah → Ian Irvine#Three Worlds Cycle series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm pretty sure everyone knows the drill by now. Another split-off from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 19#Three Worlds cycle plot points that is not mentioned at the target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not mentioned at the target and no plausible retargets after quick duck.com search

Roostery123 (talk) 04:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was replace with page currently at Haani (film). -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Haani → Ian Irvine#Three Worlds Cycle series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm pretty sure everyone knows the drill by now. Another split-off from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 19#Three Worlds cycle plot points that is not mentioned at the target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Round robin move Haani (film) to Haani. J947 † ^edits 00:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  No need for a round-robin, just delete the redirect and move the target over it. But wow, a three worlds cycle plot point hiding a disambiguated film is somewhat surprising. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.