The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Internet top-level domains#S. No consensus for deletion, but there is some agreement for retargeting to one of the targets proposed by the nom. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:55, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• .sex → .xxx  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:REDYES. The top-level domain .sex does exist,^[1] but it is not the same as .xxx, nor is it mentioned at .xxx's article. It is mentioned a bit at .gay. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 23:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Comment as nom: It could also be retargeted to List of Internet top-level domains § S or an anchor placed at .sex's entry, but there is not much information there. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 23:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Comment as nom: This has just opened up a huge rabbit hole of top-level domain redirects. Some target List of Internet top-level domains, some target Generic top-level domain (which I don't think they should since they're not even mentioned there), and some (like everyone's favorite domain name .xn--vermgensberatung-pwb) have no redirect. What do you all think? Should any of these exist? If so, where should they all target? Should I list them all at RfD? –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 00:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget to List of Internet top-level domains#S. Generally, I think if the redirect exists, where no clear target exists, then that's where it should go. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Archery at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Athletics at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Karate at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Weightlifting at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Tennis at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Judo at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Swimming at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Rugby sevens at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Bodybuilding at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Field hockey at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Volleyball at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Netball at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Rugby league nines at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Taekwondo at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Diving at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Touch rugby at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Powerlifting at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Sailing at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Outrigger canoeing at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Table tennis at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Golf at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Triathlon at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Beach volleyball at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete; WP:SELFRED Yoblyblob (talk) 23:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete I don't find the WP:SELFRED argument convincing, but there simply isn't enough substance there to warrant any of these redirects, as the target includes nothing more than a bare list of sports. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per above. The subjects only get a passing mention. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 00:35, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete as not helpful - note that have just added another 15. KylieTastic (talk) 14:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @KylieTastic is there a way to quickly list them instead of individually going through each one? Yoblyblob (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Yoblyblob, the best way to find them that I can think of is a WhatLinksHere search with no transclusions or links - this. I think all but the opening and closing ceremony links are in this group, so 19 in total. KylieTastic (talk) 16:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @KylieTastic I can find them all, just looking for a way to quickly add them to redirects for discussion, this page. Yoblyblob (talk) 16:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Yoblyblob - I've added to the list - is that what you wanted? KylieTastic (talk) 16:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @KylieTastic Yes thank you! How did you do it without category headers? Yoblyblob (talk) 16:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Yoblyblob, I took the search results then used a text editor (Notepad++) to do two simple search-replaces on the prefix and suffix to get them into the format

  ((subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=Tennis at the 2023 Pacific Games|target=2023 Pacific Games))

  KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Walk or bike → Active mobility  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Given the great ambiguity here, it would probably be best to let the search engine handle this one. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 21:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep. Note that "walk or bike" is a common phrase and thus a likely search term (see for example the google trends data). Also both walking and biking are mentioned in the current target article - even the lead states The best-known forms of active mobility are walking and cycling, though other modes include running, rowing, skateboarding, kick scooters and roller skates. - so the target is indeed helpful. Duckmather (talk) 15:58, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  I do not dispute either of these arguments, but I still think it's awfully vague. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 20:31, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete as an ambiguous WP:XY situation. There's multiple targets that this search term could be in reference to, none of which are surefire catch-all options. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete as a WP:XY issue per Utopes; no good target this could point to. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom and others. Unhelpful and vague. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep - I disagree about the assertion of "vague". If I am a reader (and I am : ) - and I would like to know about some information/comparison of to "walk or bike" (especially by country), I think this is a very pausible search term. - jc37 22:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 20:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep. Given the target isn't exactly a well-known term, I'm all for giving our searchers a bit of leeway. The best-known forms of active mobility are walking and cycling. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep: Walking and biking are the two main forms of active mobility. If this targeted walking or cycling it'd be a XY but it doesn't. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 21:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• keep. This is not an XY situation as the search term is a common phrase and the target is about both elements. Thryduulf (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Comment, if this stays, I would consider creating Walk and bike, Bike or walk, and/or Bike and walk for consistency. The XY comes from referring to walking OR biking, but in this instance the target article does make mention of both, so it could possibly be considered a "compromise" instead of targeting either Walk or Bike. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:27, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  It's not really a "compromise" as the search term is describing the scope of the target, in discussions of this concept (which I have far more than a typical person does) the use of "or" and "and" are pretty interchangeable as it depends whether you're thinking of it from the perspective of a single person who might be doing either but not both at the same time, or multiple people who might be walking, cycling or both. I do support the creation of those other redirects. Thryduulf (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep. It's fairly clear what this means. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Glugging. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Gluglug → Libreboot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target page. This is apparently a type of laptop associated with Libreboot, but its relevance as a search term to end up at a page where it is not discussed is questionable. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Comment would it be a plausible but misspelled redirect for Glugging? --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• REtarget to glugging for glug-glug/glug glug/glugglug -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 12:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For more input on the retargeting suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete to facilitate uninhibited Search (2 uses). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per Shhh. One of the usages is just made up caveman language, but another says it was the former name of Minifree, which could be a potential future target if we have a page or section on it. Jay 💬 06:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget to Glugging, which is also known as "the glug-glug process". -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Retarget to Glugging per Tavix. Thryduulf (talk) 21:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was No consensus. There are arguments for all of keeping, deleting and disambiguating, all of them about equally strong and none of them has significantly more support than the others. This has been open over 6 weeks already and has been relisted twice, so the likelihood of a consensus emerging now is very low. Thryduulf (talk) 22:58, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• A human → Human  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• A cricket → Cricket (insect)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• A dog → Dog  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible search aids that make it harder to find articles that begin with "A __", no incoming links, and not a generally accepted pattern for redirects. Skynxnex (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. These titles are not particularly useful, and they do impede searches for unrelated titles starting with "A". Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Comment: A little interesting that A dog has a noticeably greater amount of pageviews in the last month than the other two here. Still a (relatively) small amount, just curious. Best, ^user:A smart kitten_meow 13:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep, especially A dog, see the 90-day n-grams (I haven't checked the rest, but this one is used, probably by children but functional as a redirect per those views). Randy Kryn (talk) 13:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Disambiguate "A cricket" We have many "A cricket" teams [2], so targeting Cricket (sport) for the A-level cricket, and List A cricket, and cricket (insect) ("a cricket") would be possibilities -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 12:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  As a cricket nut, this seems like an okay idea. "A cricket" seemed at first to me like natural disambiguation away from cricket, but I suppose it is somewhat plausible for "A cricket" to also refer to A-level cricket, which we should have an article on, though probably not List A cricket). J947 † ^edits 02:45, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Indefinite article redirects were deleted at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 7#An acequia. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Weak keep. The nom suggests these are implausible search aids, but the search results for these are not great. Dog doesn't even show on the first page of search results for [3]. (I assume the search index is updated since the template was added a whole week ago). Given Randy Kryn's note about usage, we should probably keep. Any necessary disambiguation is fine. —siroχo 05:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Something odd's happening with your default search preferences, I think (?). If I'm logged out I get this. J947 † ^edits 05:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • If the search is limited to article namespace it's there, but not when other namespaces are added. Peter James (talk) 12:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  My main reason for suggesting deletion is that we've had past discussions that delete indefinite article redirects and I don't know if any reason these should be treated differently. Skynxnex (talk) 15:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. The pageviews for "A dog" and the others are unimpressive compared to the target articles [4], so the redirects are probably not that useful. Sjö (talk) 08:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  It is absolute numbers not relative numbers that are relevant here. J947 † ^edits 09:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Pasting my !vote from 2019: Keep, unambiguously takes searches where they want to go. For example, if someone searches for "A penguin", the article Penguin would be the correct article for that search. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• One of them is recently created, and the other two were created few months back, all by the same user. Delete all per the 2019 outcome, we wouldn't want this user or any other to start creating "A"/"An" redirects all over again. Jay 💬 09:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per the 2019 discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• A delete per 2019 precedent --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep A cricket; search results are all about the sport. Peter James (talk) 12:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  The current target is about the insect. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. But retagetting to where there is at least a mention (i.e., Super Mario Bros. 2) as it's at least better than the current target. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 00:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Mamu (Nintendo) → Characters of the Mario franchise#Antagonists  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete for its unusual syntax of "(Nintendo)" Retarget and possibly redirect Mamu (character) and Mamu (Nintendo character) to Super Mario Bros. 2 Super Mario Bros. 2 § Plot. マムー (Mamū) is the Japanese name for Wart, the main villain of the game. Wart (Nintendo), Wart (character), and Wart (Nintendo character) already redirect there, and the name "Mamu" is mentioned there in § Doki Doki Panic. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 16:43, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment: I slightly changed by !vote per what Utpoes and Jay have said below. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 21:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment: I also changed the proposed target to match the "Wart" redirects. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 21:35, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Comment: Wart (Nintendo) is currently a redirect to Super Mario Bros. 2 where it is loosely mentioned. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom for not being mentioned at target and not being a likely search term. Page creations, if action is taken about them, should be done separately and not a part of this RfD. My two cents is that I don't think either are likely search terms either, and especially the (Nintendo character) version, as there aren't other characters named "Mamu" at the disambiguation page so there shouldn't be a need to include "Nintendo" in the disambiguator, even though I don't have a problem with the (Nintendo) syntax in theory. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Move to Mamu (character), and retarget to Super Mario Bros. 2 per CopperyMarrow15. Old redirect from 2006. Disambiguation rules have evolved, no reason to delete based on syntax. Wart (Nintendo) was also moved to Wart (character) in 2011. Jay 💬 07:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete Even Super Mario Bros. 2 contains far too little substance to warrant a redirect - all it says is the main villain named Mamu - everyone typing this probably already knows that level of detail. The (Nintendo) disambiguator is of no consequence here - Mamu (character) would be IMO inappropriate for the same reason. There's no actual history here worth holding on to. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete - An obscure character's Japanese name with either disambiguation is just exceedingly rare of a search term. Sergecross73 msg me 16:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget to Super Mario Bros. 2 where explained (don't refine to the plot section, it's actually explained at Super Mario Bros. 2#Doki Doki Panic). I don't see an issue with the disambiguation, and I would otherwise oppose a move per WP:MOVEREDIRECT. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Retarget to Super Mario Bros. 2#Doki Doki Panic, where the subject is mentioned, per Tavix. I would have preferred the title to be at Mamu (character), since there is no other character with this name, but this is not a deal-breaker for me. StonyBrook _babble 01:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. This redirect was clearly created by mistake. Thryduulf (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Sperjohn/sandbox → IUPUI Natatorium  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

moved from a user's sandbox, no need for redirect greyzxq ^talk 21:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Blind (upcoming film) → Blind (2023 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The film has been released, so this redirect is no longer accurate. I'll note that it was created before the films debut. Deauthorized. ^(talk) 20:08, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep for now. The redirect is still getting 10-20 hits a day most days and so is very clearly still necessary to get readers to the content they are looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 21:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • @Thryduulf: To this end, would you (hypothetically) propose this title get re-nominated once the pageviews begin to decline? While the redirect might technically get people to the "right target" in the present time, "upcoming" is no longer an accurate description and is a costly redirect to maintain. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Once the page views have (all-but) ceased then yes it will be fine to be renominated. WP:COSTLY is an essay that grossly overstates the actual costs of redirects (which are actually WP:CHEAP). In cases like this the cost of maintaining the redirect is essentially zero so the benefit from deletion is also essentially zero, but the costs of making it significantly harder for readers to find the content they are looking for are significant. Depending on the combination how they are searching or browsing for the content, what device/browser they are using, and what type of access level they have (anon, confirmed, administrator) a deleted redirect can result in someone being multiple clicks/taps away from the content instead of being taken directly there. Thryduulf (talk) 22:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep per Thryduulf. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• 1Ph0n3 → IPhone  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a plausible misspelling. Deauthorized. ^(talk) 19:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. Likely to be a CSD R3 candidate as well. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Weak delete, don't speedy. This is the leet respelling of the target and as such gets thousands of hits on Google and is not therefore sufficiently implausible to be a G3 candidate. I'm not sure that it's a useful redirect as there is no particular affinity between leet and iPhones (that I'm aware of, but I'm very much not part of either culture) so the spirit of WP:RFOREIGN probably applies. Thryduulf (talk) 21:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Struckthrough possible CSD candidacy. My rationale behind it was that this subject has no notable affinity about being written in leetspeak, as much as any other topic would be. The only (admittedly very loose) association that exists is that both are "technological", but that's about it. The ghits I did not factor in, but almost all results for "1ph0n3" are just that word being included in paragraphs of leet, mainly stemming from a 2021 song on spotify that happens to include that as one of the words.

Side note, but I would not have considered leet to be treated as a foreign language, as I feel regular foreign-language redirects are probably more valid of spellings and search terms. Nobody actually SPEAKS in leet exclusively (at least, I don't think anyone does), meaning that 1ph0n3 wouldn't be the "resorting search term that was created for those who speak leet language", but the slow deletion is probably preferable here. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• d3lete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:50, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Comment 5am5ung was created cotemporaneously on the same basis, and should be considered for inclusion in this RfD. DefaultFree (talk) 11:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Invest 99-L → Invest (meteorology)#Designation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Invest 91-L → Invest (meteorology)#Designation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Invest 98L → Invest (meteorology)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The later RfD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 17#Invest 93L suggests consensus may no longer be in support of having this redirect, plus in this case, the hyphenated usage is extremely uncommon. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Comment: You say that "this 93-L RfD suggests consensus leans towards the removal of this 99-L redirect". Firstly, that particular 93-L RfD is still ongoing and receiving active participation as recently as 10 minutes ago while I'm typing. Alluding that the "consensus is already there" in regards to the outcome of an unfinished RfD does not quite bode well in my opinion, especially when you're directly involved via your deletion vote and your ongoing discussion comments from a few hours ago. These redirect titles could have been easily aired within that discussion as "follow-up redirects to pursue at RfD". There is no WP:RUSH for this discussion to be happening simultaneously to the other one, as the 93-L discussion has been a "hot-topic RfD" up for 3 weeks with multiple relists, and it's still being talked about. Asking editors to juggle this alongside the other RfD that has not yet finished, under the presumption that "consensus has already been decided as delete, so the rest of the similar redirects should get nominated straight-away" is not a great practice and can create confusing contexts, in my opinion. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(edit conflict)As for what to do, I feel this discussion (as well as the other two new RfDs) should probably be closed for the time being to allow the Invest 93-L RfD to finish once everyone says their piece, and allow for an official result to come to pass. If it ultimately closes with a "retarget" verdict, then these extra three nominations won't serve much of a purpose once the precedent has been set (as I presume these will be treated the same way). If 93-L ends up being deleted, THEN I think is a good time to nominate the other three redirects in a bundle, rather than three different discussions. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• If only one redirect had been nominated, I'd just say to wait, but with 98L and 91-L above I'd recommend bundling the noms. Saves us time later down the line. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 00:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• all of these noms should be hasty closed, to prevent confusion/splitting discussion, and bundled with the discussion that has been ongoing. - Darker Dreams (talk) 01:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To bundle Invest 99-L with Invest 91-L and Invest 98L.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Duckmather (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep if Invest 93L is kept otherwise delete. --72.68.134.26 (talk) 16:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep now that Invest 93L points to Invest (meteorology). The hyphenated forms are awkward, but I don't think there's a real reason to delete them, though I would discourage creation of new hyphenated ones unless they are found to be in a decent bit of use. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 15:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• AZK → Azad Kashmir  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Create a disambiguation page at Draft:AZK (disambiguation). Here, there are kinase AZK and a code for Azalhelikopter. It's not known if there is an .azk file extension, but it's likely Amazon Kindle. If AZK has a relation to Azad Kashmir, please redirect Azk to it. 176.33.244.251 (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete. Using Search gives much better results. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Disambig per nom's draft, to which I've added another entry. Having looked in detail I can say that the search results are significantly inferior to the disambiguation page. Thryduulf (talk) 21:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Disambiguate per the above. No clear primary topic of this three-letter acronym. BD2412 T 23:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Disambiguate even after removing entries failing WP:DABNOT, there are still a variety of topics which verifiably use the acronym AZK. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 23:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Dabify per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Tarāpuku → Black-billed gull  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misspelling of Maori-language term Tarāpuka. Does not seem like a plausible typographical error ArcticSeeress (talk) 17:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep. Not a plausible keyboarding error on a qwerty keyboard, but it is a plausible misspelling, which, I suspect, is how it came about. It is not clear to me that any of the ten reasons for deleting a redirect apply. And it's not obvious to me that it is doing any harm. I also see no reason to retarget it. Ultimately I don't care much whether it is kept or deleted. Nurg (talk) 08:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep per Nurg: Harmless. Edward-Woodrow • talk 16:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Francesco Antonio Bertuccio → Francesco Antonio Bertucci  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Spelling not used in article or in sources ArcticSeeress (talk) 18:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete: invented alternative name. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 15:06, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• PartiaTë Gjelbërit e Shqipërisë → List of political parties in Albania#Other registered parties (as of 2005)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Likely meant to redirect to Green Party of Albania, but the missed space between "Partia" and "të" makes it meaningless; implausible typo. Zero page views in last 90 days ArcticSeeress (talk) 11:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• @Hey man im josh: Why was this and the below nomination relisted? I would think me having supported and no opposition makes sufficient consensus to delete. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Pppery: This is my first day closing RfDs so I may have been overly cautious by relisting instead of deleting. Sorry if this is out of the norm. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Hey man im josh: usually 2 or 3 editors are enough for a consensus here in RfD. This is due to RfD having less participants than at AfD. --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete as an implausible typo per nom. (To chime in, it is my understanding per WP:RELIST that relisted discussions don't have to wait another 7 days before being closed. If consensus is found, noms can be re-processed right away, if desired. 😉) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete: per nom. For the record, HMIJ, I'm not an admin but have observed plenty of admin closed and 1 delete is enough for a delete and, as a matter of fact, nominations with no !votes are usually soft deleted without relisting. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 02:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Yeni Mersin İdmanyurdu → Mersin İdman Yurdu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Being a phoenix club of the former Mersin İdman Yurdu, it should have its own article as it's a separate legal entity. – anlztrk (talk) 13:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Write it then ;-) Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete as not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per WP:REDLINK --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per above and WP:REDYES. As mentioned in the above discussion for PartiaTë Gjelbërit e Shqipërisë, this is another situation where a discussion would typically be closed as delete rather than relisted. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 11:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Multi-member university → List of universities in Vietnam#Multi-member universities  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This terminology is no longer mentioned at the target; all mentions of "multi-member university" were scrubbed and replaced with "university systems"... although even with that being said, "multi-member university" is still a vague search term and, to my understanding, not necessarily unique to universities in Vietnam. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Retarget either keep the target List_of_universities_in_Vietnam#University_systems or, if it's used for university systems elsewhere, target there. Existence of redirect does not appear to obstruct or obscure other uses. - Darker Dreams (talk) 02:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:45, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Gary Meyer → Garry Meier  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Better as a search term the can lead readers to the many "Gary Meyer"s mentioned in articles than as a redirect from a misspelling. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Weak Retarget to Stargate (film), as the same redirect location as Gary Meyers, to which this spelling can be a plausible intended target, if no other person named "Gary Meyer" is notable enough for an article. (The redirect can be expanded whenever someone named Gary Meyer meets the criteria for inclusion). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:50, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom, search output is more useful that redirecting to one specific misspelling. —Kusma (talk) 16:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Attha → Soul  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't see how this is related to soul, probably a misunderstanding for the Pāli word for soul, that is atta, without an h. (Pāli is used in Theravāda Buddhism.) Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 14:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep. If OP's assumption is correct, leaving the redirect is still probably better than deleting it for exactly that confusion. If there is something the word is more likely to be reference to, retarget there. Deleting the redirect has no benefit, the redirect existing has no additional cost. - Darker Dreams (talk) 16:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete WP:RFOREIGN per both above -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 06:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete Nobody has identified the language of this redirect, and wikt:attha does not list any meanings as soul in any language. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Citation. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Cite article → Template:Cite news  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This WP:XNR was originally created to target ((Cite article)) which was itself deleted at TfD, and this was automatically redirected to ((Cite news)) by User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster as ((Cite article)) was a redirect to ((Cite news)). As ((Cite article)) was deleted at RfD last year for ambiguity at this RfD Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 3#Template:Cite article, this too should be deleted. TartarTorte 18:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Weak retarget to Citation, which is a general article about citations for those interested in citing articles. (I thought there could be some exposition about specifically citing articles, but that might violate WP:NOTHOWTO and/or be more suitable for Wikibooks than here.) Duckmather (talk) 20:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget to Citation. Someone using this search term could be looking for how to add citations to Wikipedia articles or for how to cite Wikipedia in their own work, the hatnotes at Citation provide links to the project space pages where they can find that information without dropping those who are looking for encyclopaedic information into the pipework. Thryduulf (talk) 21:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget to Citation per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Either delete or retarget to Citation. Given its a XNR which isn't Wikipedia specific and the page of the same name was deleted. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Boxing at the 2023 Pacific Games → 2023 Pacific Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:SELFRED from 2023 Pacific Games Yoblyblob _{(talk / cont)} 16:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yoblyblob: I wanted to note that Archery at the 2023 Pacific Games and Athletics at the 2023 Pacific Games have also been created by the same user. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Hey man im josh thank you, will mark those in a bit. Yoblyblob (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete I don't find the WP:SELFRED argument convincing, but there simply isn't enough substance there to warrant any of these redirects, as the target includes nothing more than a bare list of sports. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Bullet train. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Bullet trains → Shinkansen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Propose retarget to Bullet train because "Shinkansen" is the name of the bullet trains in Japan, but other high speed train systems also are called "bullet trains". Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 13:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• (edit conflict) Retarget per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget per nom and tag as ((R from plural)) and ((R from ambiguous term)). Thryduulf (talk) 15:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget and tag per Thryduulf --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget: obviously. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 16:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Wikipedia:PYRZQXGL → Wikipedia:WTF? OMG! TMD TLA. ARG!  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

As a nonsense smashing of letters, this is impossible to be useful moving forward. Was used once, at User talk:Iridescent/Archive 34, as an example of some obscure policy. It was subsequently turned blue, which IMO ruined the effect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Weak keep: harmless. Edward-Woodrow • talk 22:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 06:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete is slightly better, but neither keeping or deleting does much. —Kusma (talk) 10:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete. Acronym has no significance; the fact that it targets the humorous essay in WP space should not open WP:PANDORA's doors to allow next-to-infinite possibilities for made-up terms. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep The entire point of that target is that Wikipedia's policies and guidelines appear to the uninitated as a massive smashing of letters. This is perfectly self-descriptive. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete Nothing special about this particular permutation of letters. One link, and an average of less than one view per week (including the spikes while this was at RfD), do not suggest that this is useful. ^Complex/_Rational 15:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Coats of arms of the Holy See and Vatican City → Coats of arms of the Holy See  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Coats of arms of the Holy See and of the Vatican City → Coats of arms of the Holy See and Vatican City  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The article used to group the two topics together, but I have split the article into two distinct articles. This resulted in an WP:XY situation. I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep (as targeting Coats of arms of the Holy See). As the former article title, the redirect will still be useful for anything linking to the article. Per WP:XY, redirects of this type are still useful when they point to a location in which both topics are discussed. Both topics are discussed: Coats of arms of the Holy See#Papal States and Vatican City -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep per Tavix. Thryduulf (talk) 15:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Trash. as an alternative to deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• The Trash → The Flash (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not described as such anywhere on the page. Maybe there's an alternative target but... I wouldn't count on it. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• We have Trash (disambiguation) and we have The trash (redirect to Waste container) so I'd retarget to one of those. Preferably trash, as I don't think "the" makes the difference between the actual trash and the bin that contains the trash. Adumbrativus (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Speedy delete. This is clearly spam. -- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 15:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Impeachment of Joe Biden → Efforts to impeach Joe Biden  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seeing this redirect in the queue, I felt it was worth the discussion. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. As this situation currently stands, there is no impeachment, so this redirect's existence in the first place is possibly misleading. If there is an impeachment, then this redirect should exist (although it would probably be an article instead by that point). In the meantime, I feel this redirect, which claims there is an impeachment, may be out-of-place in the current state of events. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep; I think this is fine. While incorrect, I think that impeachment is often used colloquially, or as a shortening of "proposed impeachment". The lede clarifies quick enough for the confused reader. J947 † ^edits 10:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep. While technically incorrect this is a highly plausible search term, likely used by those who are not familiar with the technicalities of what impeachment actually means and/or who don't know whether he has been impeached or not. The target explains the situation so will clear up any misconceptions, misunderstandings, misrememberings or other confusion. Thryduulf (talk) 15:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Nom comment: If this redirect stays in existence, would the article for the Impeachment inquiry against Joe Biden be the more appropriate target for this title? The article in question (for the impeachment inquiry) was created last month, and seems to speak about the impeachment in a much more tangible manner, rather than hand-wavingly referring to the "efforts to impeach", which is not as firm as the current redirect's title suggests it would be.

As a relevant example, the article for Impeachment of Donald Trump is a disambiguation page that includes Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump as a high ranking target option, while the "efforts to impeach Donald Trump" article is relegated to the See Also section. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep. Readers searching for this title will be taken to the most relevant topic, which includes reference to the inquiry. BD2412 T 23:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. ^Complex/_Rational 12:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Botanical & Zoological Garden → Baguio Botanical Garden  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are multiple locations with this name, among multiple variations of this name. To me, it is not overwhelming clear that this particular garden is what is being sought with this search term; alternatives include Botanical and Zoological Garden of Tsimbazaza, Hong Kong Zoological and Botanical Gardens, and other slight typographical differences. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Disambig. Multiple plausible targets with no obvious primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 15:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Disambiguate per nom. A draft disambiguation page is now available below the redirect. - Eureka Lott 23:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Dabify per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Matty (name). ✗plicit 06:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Matty (artist) → Matty Healy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is nobody on Wikipedia named Matty who is listed as an "artist". While this likely refers to musical artists, there are multiple people named Matty to whom this description would apply. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Retarget to Matty (name), per nom. BD2412 T 23:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget to Matty (name) per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:55, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Matty (name). ✗plicit 06:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Matty (musician) → Matty Healy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are multiple musicians named Matty. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Retarget to Matty (name), per nom. BD2412 T 23:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget to Matty (name) per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:55, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Matty (name). ✗plicit 06:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Matty (singer) → Matty Healy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are multiple singers named Matty. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Retarget to Matty (name), which lists these singers. (By the way this nomination could likely be combined with Matty (musician) and Matty (artist).) Duckmather (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I intentionally didn't combine in case there were occasions where some "Matty"'s were musicians, but not specifically singers. Or, in case an artist named "Matty" pops up which may warrant the primary target for being an artist. You're right, they likely could have been, though. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Retarget to Matty (name), per the above. BD2412 T 23:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Retarget to Matty (name) per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:55, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. I am withdrawing this RfD; Hawking appears in numerous sources with these titles which I didn't fully understand the significance of at first. (non-admin closure) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Stephen Hawking CH CBE FRS FRSA → Stephen Hawking  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While these seem to be a list of companionships and fellowships Hawking has been recognized by, I'm unsure how plausible of a search term it would be to include these recognitions after completing the name of the subject. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Andronikos I Komnenos. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Misophaes → Mephistopheles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target article, although the names do sound somewhat similar. I would suggest retargeting this to Andronikos I Komnenos, to which "Misophaes" appears to be one of his epithets. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Retarget to Andronikos I Komnenos per nom, with a hatnote pointing to Demon#Christian demonology where it's listed as a type of demon. Tevildo (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗plicit 06:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• List of Taipei Taishin Mars head coaches → Taipei Taishin Mars#Head coaches  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of Taishin basketball team head coaches → Taipei Taishin Mars#Head coaches  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• List of Taipei Taishin basketball team head coaches → Taipei Taishin Mars#Head coaches  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Three redirects that were created a month apart from each other, which point to a "list" of head coaches. However, this team was only just created this year, and there is only one head coach. There is no indication as to when in the future the next head coach will be brought in, if there will be. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Upcoming Olivia Rodrigo album → Guts (Olivia Rodrigo album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not upcoming, for one. Will become a WP:COSTLY title to maintain for future albums. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per numerous past cases. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete. The page views indicate that this redirect is no longer needed, with over three months of basically zero usage. Thryduulf (talk) 10:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 06:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Xi̱taꞌén → Mazatec  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This name is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. I was unable to find anything online via a cursory search, either. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 06:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Ohio College Republican Federation → College Republicans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No reason to have a redirect for this particular chapter, which is not referred to anywhere at the target page. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. There is agreement that this is a plausible alternative spelling. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Xi Mude → Phyllis Gomda Hsi  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of "Mude" at the target, and the only mention of "Xi" is in reference to the target's sister. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Comment: This is the target's Chinese name in Pinyin (without tones). --ItMarki (talk) 05:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep since pinyin-based romanization is a common/standard method readers can ordinarily expect, even though in this case it's not the person's usual English name. It's in the infobox (admittedly collapsed in desktop mode; with diacritics) and some articles will also put it in the lead sentence or elsewhere too. Adumbrativus (talk) 07:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Thank you for pointing this out! I didn't even realize that box was on the page, and was very confused when I stumbled across this redirect referring to someone that was seemingly not mentioned. If this is an accurate romanization then I'd be alright with closing this discussion, as this can be a plausible alternative spelling for the individual's name, then. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Linday → Linda (given name)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is nobody named "Linday" at the given page. Possible WP:XY with Lindsay as well. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete No Wikipedia articles about any people (or anything else) with this name. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per above. Hits in en.wiki search seems to be misspellings of "Lindsay" --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete within Wikipedia it appeared as a typo for Linda, Lindey, Lindsay, and even Laday. None of the mentions of people correctly called Linday are worth a retarget or a disambiguation. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 07:08, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Hyperbolic ‍secant → Hyperbolic functions  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 2012‌-13 United States network television schedule → 2012–13 United States network television schedule  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 2012‌–13 United States network television schedule → 2012–13 United States network television schedule  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These redirects match existing redirects to their targets or the target itself, excepting the addition of zero-width joiners for two and a zero width non-joiner for the other. All are unlikely search terms that do not serve any navigational purpose, but too old for WP:R3. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:8489:A874:5C01:59F3 (talk) 02:37, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete as I was going to nominate these redirects here as well. I would also point out the related discussion on User talk:NmWTfs85lXusaybq/Archive 1#G6_error_nominations and User talk:Espresso_Addict#Cleanup_of_erroneous_redirects_under_a_title_with_implausible_zero-width_joiner. This maintenance task was originally inspired by a technical move request of P Nation‍. Hope this section could be merged with another part of this request. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy delete R3 is really about allowing implausible redirects out. Even though it technically might not apply, the spirit is more important than the letter. In other words, fix all the links to the one without the non-printing character and then delete. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 16:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• The Baby (Resident Evil) → List of Resident Evil characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of "Baby" of any variety mentioned at the target article Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete as vague. Off the top of my head there was a giant enemy baby in RE The Village but that was just a relatively obscure monster. --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(I believe that is the character being referred to in this redirect, according to the Resident Evil fan wiki. Nevertheless, it's not here at this target.) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).