Royer2356

Royer2356 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

11 July 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

User:This user will be blocked for "abusing multiple accounts" has created four userpages with ((sockpuppet)), claiming to be sockpuppets of User:Royer2356. This seems like an open invitation to check. Drm310 (talk) 22:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Got some people said that actually Supreme Genghis Khan and all of his sockpuppets are belonged to Royer2356, mentioned at this and this diff. Royer2356 its own-self also said that "It's very easy to evade blocks on this site and very easy to create accounts which can't be linked back to him. Multiple Long-term abuse cases have been opened against the account since he first came on this site 4 years ago. This also includes Supreme Genghis Khan, many other socks of him exist, some of which aren't even blocked yet", wrote at this and this diff, don't know what is going on of that....SA 13 Bro (talk) 02:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In replying to your comment SA 13 Bro, this is correct. I'm merely trying to unveil the truth so you can ban me as appropriate. I will soon be quitting Wikipedia anyway, so it makes no difference to me if you block me. My edit will now totally be discredited, will be reverted and I'll be blocked indefinitely. "You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia"! Getting the job done (talk) 10:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting the job done is a sockpuppet of Royer2356. —Preceding undated comment added 11:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If there's any credibility to this claim, then all of Royer2356's sock userpages should be nominated for deletion, per Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Supreme Genghis Khan. --Drm310 (talk) 14:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Linguist111: @ThePlatypusofDoom: @Blakegripling ph: @TheCoffeeAddict: Take a note, somebody claim that he is Supreme Genghis Khan socks. SA 13 Bro (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Does this mean we should write about this on the LTA page or its talk page or something? Linguist 111talk 15:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The account Royer2356 was blocked by admin DoRD in 4 years ago as vandalism-only account. Currently, have to wait the admin for the information result to make any kind of decision on that. SA 13 Bro (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that CheckUsers will be able to do anything to confirm it. SGK's accounts were reported to have used IPs from different ranges, so it's likely that there won't be a IP link between the Supreme Genghis Khan and Royer2356 accounts. Anyway, I wonder if the investigation into this should be another WP:DENY situation, because again, by looking into this, we're giving SGK attention. I was also on the fence about the creation of the LTA page for the same reason. Linguist 111talk 19:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Given the rationale for the LTA page pertaining to You-Know-Who, it would be best for admins unacquainted by his antics to know what should be done on sockpuppets created by him, i.e. block and purge, and that should be it - no other YKW-related pages should be made in accordance to the WP:DENY mandate. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



12 July 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Created A blatant rubbish page created by Royer2356 and left a comment above in 11 July. Sam Sailor Talk! 11:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


19 July 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

On User talk:Theoppositeman, he says he might be a sockpuppet of Crummybullsomething. This is the dumbest SPI ever. Sro23 (talk) 20:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added User:The Opposite Woman. Sro23 (talk) 21:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

A clue lurks in everything (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
The Opposite Guy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Mike VTalk 18:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Mirrors Sockrevealer (talk · contribs) and This user will be blocked for "abusing multiple accounts" (talk · contribs). Is just an open invitation to check. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 01:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


16 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


It states on the sockpuppets userpage that it's owned by RasterofMandomness. Both of the accounts are only using Wikipedia for test edits, which can be considered vandalism on multiple accounts. Xoina233 (talk) 00:06, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


21 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

This user added a sockpuppet template on Royer1410 just like last time. I think it's worth checking out. Woodstop45 (talk) 21:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. User was blocked by Nthep indefinitely. Woodstop45 (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


30 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Very similar usernames. Also, Fairfax5 and Fairfax4 have been engaging in similar edits on the article Quan. Normally, consisting of blanking the page and replacing it with a disruptive message shown in [diff] and [diff] SSA21 (talk) 13:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Added Fairfax6. Sro23 (talk) 20:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new account (SBT2) has been adding socktags to these users. It is clearly another sock, that's just what they do, and I wasn't sure whether to report it here or to AIV. Sro23 (talk) 19:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by GeneralizationsAreBad as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

@SSA21: Just a friendly word of advice - you may want to report really obvious socking to AIV, where it will be handled far more quickly. I'm surprised they waited nearly two years to vandalize the same article again. Admin action requested: Please block this sockpuppet. Thank you! GABgab 20:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhh, gotcha.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done and closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03 September 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 13:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


11 September 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Looks like Harassing For example User And Royer2356 ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 00:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


13 September 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Self-confessed on their userpage Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 18:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 September 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Per Duck and concatenating name of respected admin  Velella  Velella Talk   13:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Added User:Junior5a and Royer2356. I know the account hasn't made any edits, but come on, it's so obviously a sockpuppet. There's no way a new innocent user chose that name by coincidence, plus I've seen admins block username socks with no edits before, so I don't understand why this should be any different. Sro23 (talk) 16:46, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Username. Linguist Moi? Moi. 00:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


28 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Posted on my talk page "Royer2356 is back!!!!" after I reverted one of his edits. WNYY98 (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


08 February 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Admitted as such MereTechnicality (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


12 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

self-admission Septrillion (talk) 05:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


24 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Name checks the master a couple, of times, created DoRD is a bullshit admin (attacking the blocking admin). Etc. A VOA, but worth filing paperwork over. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 11:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



24 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Self-explanatory, for the files. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 11:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


09 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

 Looks like a duck to me SemiHypercube (talk) 01:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


16 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Self-admitted sock. Person who formerly started with "216" (talk) 13:37, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



16 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Admitted with tag on user page. Hamtechperson 22:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


10 March 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Says so on the user page? Maybe a joe-job? Chris Troutman (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed + Yerols accountancy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki).  Blocked without tags. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


23 September 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Sock that self tagged it’s own user page. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


17 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Within 10 minutes of account creation, they tagged themselves as a sock of the mentioned account. Also, on AIV they posted something about black people getting shot. I am requesting CU to check if they really are a sock. NW1223(Howl at me/My hunts) 02:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Account has been blocked by DreamyJazz. This can be closed NW1223(Howl at me/My hunts) 03:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments