User:This user will be blocked for "abusing multiple accounts" has created four userpages with ((sockpuppet)), claiming to be sockpuppets of User:Royer2356. This seems like an open invitation to check. Drm310 (talk) 22:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Got some people said that actually Supreme Genghis Khan and all of his sockpuppets are belonged to Royer2356, mentioned at this and this diff. Royer2356 its own-self also said that "It's very easy to evade blocks on this site and very easy to create accounts which can't be linked back to him. Multiple Long-term abuse cases have been opened against the account since he first came on this site 4 years ago. This also includes Supreme Genghis Khan, many other socks of him exist, some of which aren't even blocked yet", wrote at this and this diff, don't know what is going on of that....SA 13 Bro (talk) 02:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
In replying to your comment SA 13 Bro, this is correct. I'm merely trying to unveil the truth so you can ban me as appropriate. I will soon be quitting Wikipedia anyway, so it makes no difference to me if you block me. My edit will now totally be discredited, will be reverted and I'll be blocked indefinitely. "You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia"! Getting the job done (talk) 10:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Getting the job done is a sockpuppet of Royer2356. —Preceding undated comment added 11:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Created A blatant rubbish page created by Royer2356 and left a comment above in 11 July. Sam Sailor Talk! 11:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
On User talk:Theoppositeman, he says he might be a sockpuppet of Crummybullsomething. This is the dumbest SPI ever. Sro23 (talk) 20:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Mirrors Sockrevealer (talk · contribs) and This user will be blocked for "abusing multiple accounts" (talk · contribs). Is just an open invitation to check. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 01:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
It states on the sockpuppets userpage that it's owned by RasterofMandomness. Both of the accounts are only using Wikipedia for test edits, which can be considered vandalism on multiple accounts. Xoina233 (talk) 00:06, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This user added a sockpuppet template on Royer1410 just like last time. I think it's worth checking out. Woodstop45 (talk) 21:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. User was blocked by Nthep indefinitely. Woodstop45 (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Very similar usernames. Also, Fairfax5 and Fairfax4 have been engaging in similar edits on the article Quan. Normally, consisting of blanking the page and replacing it with a disruptive message shown in [diff] and [diff] SSA21 (talk) 13:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Added Fairfax6. Sro23 (talk) 20:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
This case is being reviewed by GeneralizationsAreBad as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 13:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Blocked, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Looks like Harassing For example User And Royer2356 ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 00:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Self-confessed on their userpage Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 18:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Per Duck and concatenating name of respected admin Velella Velella Talk 13:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Username. Linguist Moi? Moi. 00:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Posted on my talk page "Royer2356 is back!!!!" after I reverted one of his edits. WNYY98 (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Admitted as such MereTechnicality (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
self-admission Septrillion (talk) 05:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Name checks the master a couple, of times, created DoRD is a bullshit admin (attacking the blocking admin). Etc. A VOA, but worth filing paperwork over. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 11:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Self-explanatory, for the files. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 11:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Looks like a duck to me SemiHypercube (talk) 01:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Self-admitted sock. Person who formerly started with "216" (talk) 13:37, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Admitted with tag on user page. Hamtechperson 22:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Says so on the user page? Maybe a joe-job? Chris Troutman (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed + Yerols accountancy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Blocked without tags. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Sock that self tagged it’s own user page. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Within 10 minutes of account creation, they tagged themselves as a sock of the mentioned account. Also, on AIV they posted something about black people getting shot. I am requesting CU to check if they really are a sock. NW1223(Howl at me/My hunts) 02:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.