The result of the debate was rename
Should be obvious. - R to r. Grutness...wha? 23:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. Um...? BJAODN? ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 19:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename
Rename to Cat:Burkinabé people stubs to match the permcat and the similar material. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 19:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. Too small. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 19:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename & upmerge
From WP:WSS/D. Rename to ((Russia-university-stub)) and upmerge into Cat:Russia stubs. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 19:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename
Both Cat:Climatology - Meteorology stubs and Cat:Climatologist and meteorologist stubs are inelegantly named and the first also breaks the naming convention with the hyphen-minus and the capital M. Suggest renaming the categories to Cat:Atmospheric science stubs (as a child of Cat:Atmospheric sciences} and Cat:Atmospheric scientist stubs (as a child of Cat:Atmospheric scientists). The former non-stub category has been around a while serving as a parent for Cat:Climatology and Cat:Meteorology and I just now created Cat:Atmospheric scientists to do the same for Cat:Climatologists and Cat:Meteorologists. Caerwine Caer’s whines 04:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
A redirect of ((US-bio-stub)) that doesn't follow the naming guidelines. Other than that I have no real objection to it. By itself it is harmless enough, but the problems it could cause for confusion as to whether the vast number of US-*-stub 's have American-*-stub counterparts, leads me to suggest deletion. Caerwine Caer’s whines 22:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Brought straight here for deletion without waiting for the discoveries page, as it's in the same vein as the other U.S. commercial television network stubs deleted back in October. Only 5 stubs, all station affiliates, 4 of them low power stations. Caerwine Caer’s whines 20:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Badly-named redirect, resulting from a move. Alai 23:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was upmerge
Despite the ((WPSS-cat)) banner on top, this was created unproposed from an upmerged template, and should have stayed upmerged: the template is only on 14 articles. Cat:Oregon building and structure stubs is also undersized and technically unproposed, but upmerging the sports venues will put it at 53, and there are airports that can be double-tagged to bring that number up some. Upmerge and delete. --CComMack (t–c) 18:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the help! Katr67 20:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was PRC becomes umbrella cat for Mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau
My reading of this discussion is that there's very little basis, and certainly no consensus for the current structure, which is in any event both internally inconsistent (in one case having a PRC umbrella, and the other keeping the "Mainland" and the SARs entirely separate), and with the permcats, which don't use this organisation at all. Alai 07:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy
Used in only one article (Highville Mustard Seed Charter School), where I have removed it; this is actually not a stub template at all, but a misappropriation of the namespace. Suggest deletion. —TangentCube /c /t 21:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep
From WP:WSS/D. A mite small. Might need resorting. Also open to upmerging. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 21:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was redirect supernatural to paranormal-stub, upmerge cryptozoology
From WP:WSS/D. Related to Wikipedia:WikiProject Paranormal (which has been notified).
Delete. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 20:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename
Either rename to ((icehockey-arena-stub))/((icehockey-stadium-stub))/((icehockey-venue-stub)) or just delete. Most of these are double-tagged by state, so I'm not sure an additional by-sport template is really necessary. Also brings up problems of multi-sport arenas (which is why they're split by state, I assume). As a side note, we might need a ((Canada-sports-venue-stub)), just based on the contents of this category. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 20:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was lots of stuff happened - see final solution by Amalas
From WP:WSS/D. Previously deleted. Overlaps existing ((cell-biology-stub)). Awful template name. The associated WikiProject has been notified. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 15:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think this covers everything and this can now be closed. Hopefully. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 17:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename
This is part of a large group nomination at WP:CFD. Under those circumstances, please comment there rather than here. Grutness...wha? 10:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename template(s) by country and/or city, upmerge
I was going to put this on WSS/D, but then found it had already been discussed with the consensus to send it here in early September. Seeing no further discussion in the September logs, here it is. The category currently contains 26 articles. Propose upmerge to ((Metro-stub))/Category:Rapid transit stubs. Slambo (Speak) 21:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep, rename
From WP:WSS/D. 8 articles. Delete both and retag articles with ((CP-stub)). ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was upmerge/rename
From WP:WSS/D. 18 articles. At the very least needs a rename to...something. It is associated with Wikipedia:WikiProject Oklahoma. They also have plans for a ((OKState-stub)) it seems. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was upmerge/rename
From WP:WSS/D. At the very least, rename to ((QuebecCity-stub)) / Cat:Quebec City stubs. A mite small at 22 articles, but Cat:Quebec stubs has about 150, so maybe there are more floating around in there. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete any cats not above 40, upmerge templates
And many, many more... my morale levels aren't sufficient to tag them all just at the moment. The most annoying thing is that this makes my properly proposed Cat:European record label stubs completely pointless: all the stubs have been diverted off into 3-article categories, created without so much as a mention. Upmerge all, either to existing parents or new by-region categories. Alai 06:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
None of these were over 30 at time of tagging; most are less than ten; many have a single article in each. As per my earlier estimates, the Australians and Germans are likely to be at least close to viable if fully sorted-to, as might a couple of others. I also note that I've made some renames from hyphens (Puerto-Rico- to PuertoRico-, etc, but I feel no burning need to get rid of the redirects, given that this aspect of the NGs still seems to be "bedding down", so they're arguably useful. Alai 00:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Lugnuts 20:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy delete
From WP:WSS/D. No category. Not used on any articles. Probably speediable. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 19:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was upmerge
From WP:WSS/D. Associated with Wikipedia:WikiProject Belfast.
Too small, even if associated with a WP. There were also concerns on /D that this wouldn't be the right way to split. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 19:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy rename
From WP:WSS/D. It's large enough and makes sense enough to list on WP:STUBS, but the template needs a rename first. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. 22 articles. Not really sure this is a good split. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep
From WP:WSS/D. It's pretty close to 60 articles, though. A ((pageant-stub)) was proposed in April, but not created. This might be useful to weed out Cat:Model stubs though. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 17:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep top-level Ghost town stubs, delete rest
From WP:WSS/D. Associated with WikiProject Ghost towns.
9 categories.
11 templates that don't conform to the naming guidelines.
7 stub articles total.
Left a notice on the WikiProject talk page 9 days ago, no response. Recommend a definite delete on all except Category:Ghost town stubs with a rename of ((ghost town stub)) to ((ghosttown-stub)). The potential is there for a viable and useful stub type, but given the lack of response from the WikiProject, I wouldn't mind a delete of even the root stub type, if that's needed for consensus. Caerwine Caer’s whines 00:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. This has previously been deleted in other forms/spellings. 22 articles. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 17:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was restub w/ sf-tv-stub or other appropriate & delete
From WP:WSS/D. Used for Sci Fi Channel (United States). A bit small at 38 articles. We've deleted most of the by-channel stubs already, so this shouldn't be much different. I'm also open to a renaming if someone feels strongly that this should be kept. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 17:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename/upmerge
From WP:WSS/D. Too small. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 17:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename/upmerge
This discovered stub is not following mythology name standards, and is not more than 10 stubs: I propose to upmerge to ((euro-myth-stub)) and Cat:European mythology stubs because that is the next higher level. Goldenrowley 04:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy rename
Correct spelling. Her Pegship (tis herself) 06:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
A redirect as a result of my moving this to ((NorthAm-composer-stub)), it must be said -- where it really should have in the first place, given past precedents. If there are no speedy obs., I'll bot over the transclusions presently. Alai 20:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Though I can see the point of all the separate year olympic templates (and let's not forget that Winter olympics are now intercalated!) this one strikes me as unnecessary - especially since the only article tagged with it is about 1912!. Delete - at least until after Beijing. Grutness...wha? 23:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Airlines are surely better split by where they are from than whether they're still going. Has a mere 14 stubs, a miscapitalised and unparented category, and don't even get me started on the name of the template! Delete, or - if kept, rename. Grutness...wha? 10:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to -politician- and delete -president-
Never proposed... may prove useful, but not with this name! At the very least rename to ((Uruguay-politician-stub)) (yes, it's for politicians, not politics). Unused, BTW. Grutness...wha? 06:17, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename. Create category if / when we have 50-60 articles or so. Delete the similar "-president" since we don't single out presidents for other nations. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 09:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Voting per Valentinian. Xiner (talk, email) 20:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Never used - for a Hong kong bus company, y the looks of it. Doubt it'd ever get to 60 stubs, certainly it isn't at the moment at 60, and is both cryptically and non-standardly named. Delete. Grutness...wha? 06:17, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 09:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 15:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Not what you think. This is for U.S. Army bios - already well covered by other stub types. Unused and - not surprisingly - never proposed. Delete as already covered and astoundingly ambiguous. Grutness...wha? 06:17, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 09:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it was proposed albeit only as the category. The same guy who created ((US-army-bio-stub)) from the proposal also did the this stub, but didn't quite complete the work for whatever reason. It is ambiguous, seeing as how most people are not worried about the distinction between U.S.A. (United States of America) and USA (United States Army) that is used by the GPO. Still, once get rid of this one, we probably ought to consider for the purpose of consistency renaming ((USAF-bio-stub)) and ((USCG-bio-stub)) to match ((US-army-bio-stub)) and ((US-navy-bio-stub)). Perhaps ((USAF-mil-bio-stub)) or ((US-USAF-bio-stub)) with matching stubs for the other four armed services (A Marine Corps bio stub has been proposed and will probably be created soon.) I know that there does seem to be some redundancy by adding a superfluous US- or -mil- to the template, but it would enable consistency without having to resort to a ((US-coastguard-bio-stub)) or the like. Caerwine Caer’s whines 04:19, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename
Misnamed (and never proposed). has 33 stubs, so may be worth keeping, but not with this capitalisation. Should be at ((Pakistan-school-stub)), if kept. Grutness...wha? 05:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Hopelessly hyperspecific stub types used on two Canadian highways. Never proposed, of course :/ Grutness...wha? 05:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 09:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Xiner (talk, email) 20:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OPPOSE.PLEASE DO NOT DELETE. It is very important for us to classify all the stubs we marked for each specific county, as per part of our WikiProject. If these stubs are deleted, this means the WikiProject would be ruined. -- The Geography Expert--Glad to serve you • Chat or discuss something with me • What I give *This signature prooves that this discussion/article/section is official! 21:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename
Rename, paralleling ((UTexas-stub)) and ((UOklahoma-stub)). ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 17:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom. Xiner (talk, email) 20:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename
Fixing capitalization. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
To quote Grutness: "This one was kept after an SFD debate a year ago, when the WikiProject involved assured us of how rapidly growing the stub category was... nine stubs in a year doesn't seem rapidly growing to me, though". The debate in question. I only count 8 stubs myself btw. Can easily all be categorised under ((UK-tv-channel-stub))
The result of the debate was keep, rename template
From WP:WSS/D. This had already been deleted in April (although it was ((AFStub)) then). Yes, it's a re-creation, but it does have 30 articles now, so I brought it here instead of speedying. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. Waaaay too small. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. biogeography is an important discipline at the intersection of physical geography and biology. Tossing biogeography articles into the stub categories of other disciplines will only obscure matters, rather than bring greater order or clarity. Biogeography is not, for example, a sub-discipline of topography, which is the study of landforms; Montane, pygmy forest, Oak savanna, and Evergreen forest ought not be classified as topography stubs at all, but rather as biogeography stubs.
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. Has 43 articles, but the articles would be much better stubbed -org- or -politician- or whatever. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep both -politician- stubs
From WP:WSS/D. These need a good sorting out and deciding which template/cat to use.
~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete all
From WP:WSS/D Associated with WikiProject Ossetia. 7 articles total.
Probably just a delete all, unless more articles can be found. If so, then keep the general Ossetia-stub and delete the rest. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 15:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename
Rename to match other sport biographies. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 15:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Unproposed, and showing a clear lack of use of the naming guidelines, and also some confusion as to what the stub type is for - none of the four stubs marked with this are about the church of Scotland per se, they are about church buildings of that denomination in Scotland. As such, if anything, they should be marked with Scotland-church-stub (or at the very least, if we don't yet have that, with UK-church-stub). Certainly there is no indication that there would be enough stubs on the organisation, liturgy and ranks within the Church of Scotland to require a stub type - and if there were, it would have a more clear-cut template name. Grutness...wha? 06:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Unproposed and unused. Judging by the number of subcats of Cat:Florida stubs, such a category (and an associated ((Miami-geo-stub))) might be useful, but there's no evidence of it here. If there's no sign of this reaching threshold in the immediate future, there's no point in keeping it. Grutness...wha? 06:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep, rename it (and auto-part-stub) to automotive-xxxx-stub, create Automotive technology stubs cat
Created today with no proposal. This is a tricky one - it feeds into the Cat:Auto part stubs, for which we already have ((Auto-part-stub)). The reason given in the edit summary for its creation is that this would cover the grey area of auto technology which isn't actually parts, and there is some merit in that, but if kept its place in the stub hierarchy will need to be looked at - if anything it will need some swapping around, since parts are technology, not the other way round. At the moment, I'd say weak delete, though a persuasive case for keeping it could easily make me change my mind. Grutness...wha? 03:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was use cuesport-stub / Cue sport stubs; snooker-stub, snooker-bio-stub / Snooker stubs
I tried to straighten this out a bit, but it still needs some work.
~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 21:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 15:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus was apparently to move Billiards over to Cue sports, and although that has yet to actually happen, I'm assuming it will and I am updating the stub templates accordingly:
The result of the debate was rename to ClujCounty-geo-stub and upmerge
From WP:WSS/D. It's for a Romanian city. Used on 9 articles. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 20:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. Only used on 2 articles. Currently upmerged to Cat:Comedian stubs. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 20:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. Used on 1 article. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 20:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. Associated with Wikipedia:WikiProject Uruguay. Not used on any articles. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 20:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to Dharmic-reli-stub / Dharmic religion stubs
From WP:WSS/D. Only used on 4 articles. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 20:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Not currently used on any articles, and yes, that is the real category name. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy delete
Used on one article. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to MTG-game-stub
Associated with Wikipedia:WikiProject Magic: The Gathering. Needs to be renamed. MTG redirects to Modern Times Group, so that option is out. Maybe a ((MagicTG-stub))? ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 18:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy delete
From WP:WSS/D. Not used on any articles. Probably speediable. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename and upmerge
From WP:WSS/D. Redundant to existing ((emergency-services-stub)). Used on only 5 articles. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename
Rename to match ((ArchbishopofCanterbury-stub)). ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename
Rename to match ((ArchbishopofCanterbury-stub)). ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. A bit small at 16 articles, and there are less than 200 articles in the corresponding permcat. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also of note, it looks like the template and cat were created 16 November, but then the template was deleted on 17 November "per WP:SFD". Here's the previous discussion. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
From WP:WSS/D. Merge w/ ((Wikipedia-stub)). ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Wikimedia-stub is not used on any articles, MediaWiki is used on 2 articles, but they do not properly populate into the category. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was upmerge
From WP:WSS/D. "Created back in May and used on 40 articles. Non-standard scope and I'm pretty sure the image used is the picture of a secessionist leader." ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
Never proposed, of course. No cat, though there is a redlink to one. Malformed name. And split by artist. 60 stubs? Your guess. Currently the only artists with their own stub types are the Beatles and Tenacious D. Which ranks Tenacious D above Elvis, the BeeGees, U2, the Beach Boys, Elton John, Eminem, Van Halen, Pink Floyd, Weird Al... you name it. Not. Tenacious Delete. Grutness...wha? 01:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep
Relisted from WP:TfD. Duplicate of ((anime-stub)) with no consensus to create/split. (One people proposing and one agreeing with no other discussion does not form a consensus.) It is also unused after existing for over a month. --TheFarix (Talk) 20:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete "Hong Kong-", "Hong-Kong"; keep "HongKong-, "HK-"
The naming guidelines make it fairly clear - full name, CamelCase, or abbreviations if they're widely enough used to be unambiguous. No gaps, and no hyphens unless a subtype is implied.
So why does HongKong-geo-stub not only have a fairly acceptably named redirect at HK-geo-stub, but also unacceptably named ones at ((Hong Kong-geo-stub)) and ((Hong-Kong-geo-stub))? Does it really need so many redirects?
And why is there also a redirect to ((HongKong-stub)) at ((Hong Kong-stub))?
And, since "Hong-Kong-xxx-stub" is unacceptable (after all, it's not a subtype of Kong-xxx-stub), what about these redirects: ((Hong-Kong-bio-stub)), ((Hong-Kong-edu-stub)), ((Hong-Kong-gov-stub)), ((Hong-Kong-road-stub)), ((Hong-Kong-tv-stub))?
I'd like to propose keeping the HongKong-xxx-stub styled templates, and any HK-xxx-stub redirects, but deleting all the Hong-Kong-xxx-stub and Hong Kong-xxx-stub redirects. Grutness...wha? 05:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete
...and so, we move into "wtf?" territory, with a fork of a template. Unused, unexplained, unnecessary. Delete, please! Grutness...wha? 05:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was upmerge
Was listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries a couple of weeks ago. Decision was to give it a couple weeks, and then if it's still undersize send it to deletion. It currently contains 19 articles. Eli Falk 21:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]