The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Russia Squad EuroBasket 2017 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Estonia squad 2015 FIBA EuroBasket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Estonia squad 2001 FIBA EuroBasket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 2001 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Bosnia and Herzegovina squad – EuroBasket Women 1999 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Croatia squad – EuroBasket Women 1999 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1999 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Bosnia and Herzegovina squad – EuroBasket Women 1997 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1997 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Croatia squad – EuroBasket Women 1995 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1995 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Estonia squad 1993 FIBA EuroBasket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia Squad EuroBasket 1983 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia Squad EuroBasket 1967 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia Squad EuroBasket 1959 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia Squad EuroBasket 1957 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia Squad EuroBasket 1955 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia Squad EuroBasket 1953 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia Squad EuroBasket 1947 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Estonia squad 1939 FIBA EuroBasket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Estonia squad 1937 FIBA EuroBasket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1989 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1985 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1981 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1976 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1974 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1966 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1964 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Yugoslavia squad – EuroBasket Women 1954 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 19:14, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per WP:TCREEP, as well as prior consensus cited in nom. Teams that do not earn a medal do not need the Wikipedia equivalent of a participation award.—Bagumba (talk) 02:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 12. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WSHL_labelled_map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 12. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Uw-mmawarning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Have immense potential and an inherent need.And these are used (even if rarely). (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 11:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Uw-NPR-1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Uw-NPR-2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Uw-NPR-3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Uw-NPR-4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

None of these appear to have ever been used. Keeping in mind that they have been subst'd, searching for the phrases in these warnings turns up very few results. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Kudpung, DGG, and I are the most common people who deal with inexperienced users doing things such as tagging archbishops for A7 deleting and taggbombing municipalities. These are very useful when a warning is needed to be given, and I think Floq inquired to Kudpung about adapting them for recent changes recently. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep . These are being proposed for deletion simply because they exist. The purpose for which they have been designed is not even a year old yet and the number of reviewers is till growing. With ACTRIAL in place we will now be able to turn more of our attention to the issue of poor reviewing and these templates are likely to be used much more often. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as inherently of use, and iof probable increasing use, and trout for nominator on their timing... — fortunavelut luna 07:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. As ACTRIAL is underway, these templates will be needed to inform new users who are not in the the New page reviewers group of the qualifications they need to review new articles. Mduvekot (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Utah County Labelled Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Template is in use in List of counties in Utah. --  Denelson83  04:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• keep, clearly used. Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per above, but also used in List of ghost towns in Utah as well. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:14, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• @TenPoundHammer: "unused is not a valid rationale, try again". Frietjes (talk) 23:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 12. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Unprod2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:US tornadoes by month (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, outdated Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The template doesn't specify which year. Steel1943 (talk) 03:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Template's source is unverifiable (404 not found), it's unused and not likely to be used, and it's been abandoned for almost a decade. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:UNGL Stadiums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, league defunct since 2010 Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Transversity (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, no reason to hardcode this Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Traditional Song boilerplate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused boilerplate, goes into far too many details for an article. Is "Broadsides" or "Songs that refer to" going to be relevant? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Too small (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:SNOW. No rationale other than "unused". KMF (talk) 02:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete because enlarging a small image would create a large, pixilated image. This template serves no useful purpose. Steel1943 (talk) 03:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  Striking. Steel1943 (talk) 14:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: The purpose of the template is to flag images that are too small to convey the detail they need, not a request to enlarge a small image. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 12:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Additionally, "unused" was the rational behind the prior nomination for deletion. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 12:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• keep, clearly serves a purpose. Frietjes (talk) 14:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Toomanyflags (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Previous discussion from June closed as "no consensus" Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Snow keep. No rationale other than "unused" and "I don't like the outcome of the previous discussion". KMF (talk) 02:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @KATMAKROFAN: So you're saying a "no consensus" should not be relisted ever? The lack of consensus is exactly why I relisted this. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:20, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete since this template could be placed on almost all international sports-related articles; the use of many flags on those articles is intentional. Steel1943 (talk) 03:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It might come in handy, and it isn't taking up much space. --John (talk) 05:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• @John: WP:ITSUSEFUL is not a valid rationale, try again. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • It isn't being used at present but if it is needed in the future, it'll be easier if it hasn't been deleted. AKA, it might come in handy. --John (talk) 22:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• keep, has been used in the past, and may be used in the future. Frietjes (talk) 23:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Todis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:18, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Uhh, the only thing that it does is to put the transcluding article into Category:Wikipedia page-name maintenance templates. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, we now have other procedures for moving articles, as described at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Timeline Electrocution first period (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Time zones of Denmark (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Swans (band) graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, just subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:37, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, Swans (band)#Timeline is sufficient. Frietjes (talk) 23:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect (NAC) Frietjes (talk) 15:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Sutiya dynasty (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect (changed from delete) - redundant to ((Sutiya Dynasty)). Mr rnddude (talk) 03:45, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Template:Sutiya Dynasty since it's just a capitalization difference. Steel1943 (talk) 03:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Why do I keep forgetting that you can redirect. Mr rnddude (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Subscribe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, doesn't seem like it's useful Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Stub redirect (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Keep. Just because a template is unused right now doesn't mean it will be unused in the future. KMF (talk) 01:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Surprisingly enough this template is redundant to ((Article for deletion)). That, and Wikipedia:Stubs for redirection, a place to start such discussions, doesn't exist and shouldn't. Steel1943 (talk) 03:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, as indicated above, the process is (1) boldly redirect it and (if that is disputed) (2) take it to WP:AFD, or (3) start a discussion and tag the article with ((Merge to)). this template is not part of the process. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Streets in Orange County (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a proper navigational aid, as most of these redirect to state highway articles Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. --Rschen7754 00:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).