The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Can be userfied at creator's request. Primefac (talk) 00:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Repr3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template produces hard-coded 12 chars ("Repr. Cat. 3") and does nothing else. Used on exactly one page, creator's sandbox, not edited since 2016 — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete or move without redirect to userspace. Frietjes (talk) 14:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Golden Child (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Group has an article for one album. Provides no navigational benefit. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:28, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As the creator of this template I am fine with deleting it User:EN-Jugwon (talk) 10:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Template creator is ok with deletion. So let's close this thing up. Otherwise regular delete per not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:G7 TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WEi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No directly related articles for this to be a worthwhile navigational tool for the band. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• So, two of the band members do have articles but still doesn't seem to meet the threshhold of WP:NENAN. The template wouldn't be added to the articles listed in the "related topic" grouping. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I didn't read the WP:NENAN before creating this template. So since this template doesn't meet the threshold I propose this template to be deleted for now. Sorry for not doing my research beforehand. --User:EN-Jugwon (talk) 04:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that NENAN is just an essay but if if you, as the creator of the template, are ok with deletion, this can be speedied. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 05:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm ok with deleting it User:EN-Jugwon talk 06:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Marques zarzuelas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redundant to ((Miguel Marqués)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes + the image is excluded in the mobile platform and therefore invisible to half the visitors to the linked pages. There's also something malformed about Template:Marques zarzuelas. In the code it has the name "Gaztambide zarzuelas", thus when the edit button on the template in the article is clicked, it takes you to Template:Gaztambide zarzuelas. Voceditenore (talk) 08:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jommelli operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redundant to ((Niccolò Jommelli)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes + the image is excluded in the mobile platform and therefore invisible to half the visitors to the linked pages. Voceditenore (talk) 09:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Traetta operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on five articles. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redundant to ((Tommaso Traetta)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes + the sidebar image is excluded in the mobile platform and therefore invisible to half the visitors to the linked pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voceditenore (talk • contribs) 10:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Thomson operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redundant to ((Virgil Thomson)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes and is more complete than just his 3 operas + the sidebar image is excluded in the mobile platform and therefore invisible to half the visitors to the linked pages. Voceditenore (talk) 15:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Taylor operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on two articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redundant to ((Deems Taylor)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes + the sidebar image is excluded in the mobile platform and therefore invisible to half the visitors to the linked pages. I've replaced ((Taylor operas)) with the composer's portrait in both articles. It is now not used in any articles. Voceditenore (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Vaccai operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the article when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:05, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redundant to ((Nicola Vaccai)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes + the sidebar image is excluded in the mobile platform and therefore invisible to half the visitors to the linked pages. Voceditenore (talk) 11:08, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Vinci operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Redundant to ((Leonardo Vinci)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes + the sidebar image is excluded in the mobile platform and therefore invisible to half the visitors to the linked pages. Incidentally, there are six articles on Vinci operas here and Template:Vinci operas only listed two of them. Voceditenore (talk) 14:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Stewart Wallace operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on two articles; fails WP:NENAN. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Redundant to ((Stewart Wallace)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes + the sidebar image was purely a placeholder showing generic musical notes. The third article had an infobox instead. Voceditenore (talk) 15:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Le Sueur operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Redundant to ((Jean-François Le Sueur)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes + the image in the sidebar is rendered invisible on the mobile platform. There are a number of excellent images available for all three operas which I will be adding over the next few days. Voceditenore (talk) 16:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Landi operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on two articles; fails WP:NENAN. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Redundant to ((Stefano Landi)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes + the image in the sidebar is rendered invisible on the mobile platform. There is currently no image in this sidebar but there are a number of excellent images available for the composer and both operas which I will be adding to the ledes over the next few days. Voceditenore (talk) 17:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lalo operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on two articles; fails WP:NENAN. Redundant to ((Édouard Lalo)). Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Useless since there's only two articles Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Redundant to ((Édouard Lalo)), a more complete navbox already placed at the foot of the page, the preferred location for them + the image in the sidebar is rendered invisible on the mobile platform. There are much more apt and illustrative images available for these operas, either as stand-alones or in an infobox, both of which can be seen by all readers. Incididentally, there are three articles on Lalo's operas, but unlike ((Édouard Lalo)), this sidebar has not been updated since 2011 and shows only two. Voceditenore (talk) 08:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Roussel operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Useless since there's only three articles Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Redundant to ((Albert Roussel)) (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes and its more complete with links to Roussel's ballets and instrumental music as well. Plus, the composer's image in the sidebar is rendered invisible to readers on the mobile platform.
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Fall operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; fails WP:NENAN. Redundant to ((Leo Fall)). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The footer ((Leo Fall)) is the preferred position for navboxes + the sidebar image is excluded in the mobile platform and therefore invisible to half the visitors to the linked pages. Voceditenore (talk) 15:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per consensus at listed discussion, and no opposition here. Primefac (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:LIRR Far Rockaway platform layout (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Consensus over at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trains/Archive:_2019#RfC_about_station_layouts_and_exits was to not include station/platform layouts, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:AwardsYearHeader (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Seems to be a relic of earlier phases in the development of category header templates. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:28, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused. Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC) Proposed deletion of the 207 templates at Category:Unnecessary taxonomy templates per Wikipedia_talk:Automated_taxobox_system/Archive_2#How_to_delete_taxonomy_that_is_no_longer_valid?. See previous TfDs at here and here.[reply]

Not going to tag the others as this is purely technical nomination as both the category and the established precedents are to delete these. Gonnym (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. The templates are no longer unused and are unusable (no content). —  Jts1882 | talk  15:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. As per Jts1882: all are unused and have no content. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 00:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Being worked on (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Just 56 transclusions - a few in archives, the majority of the remainder simply documenting its existence. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. By its nature this is a temporary template for responding to edit requests while work is done and then to be replaced when afterwards. As such of course the trans liaison list is going to be low. That means it's doing its job properly. oknazevad (talk) 18:51, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Oknazevad. ((Being worked on)) is only meant to be transcluded while the thing being worked on is in the process of being worked on, and when it's no longer being worked on, the template will normally be replaced with another one, like ((resolved)). – Uanfala (talk) 15:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 October 17. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Suppressed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Uw-selfinfo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. I have substituted these (see these edits) but please feel free to replace them with another template. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:06, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:AFLScorecard2006 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:AFLScorecardGF2006 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:AFLScorecard2007 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:AFLScorecard2007ET (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:AFLScorecard2008 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:AFLPre-SeasonScorecard (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These templates, which all only have a few transclusions, are redundant to Template:AFLGameDetailed, which has a cleaner design but, more importantly, is the most widely used match template. (Not sure if this means they should be merged or deleted, though; if a TfD regular could give an opinion on which option is best that would be great). – Teratix ₵ 11:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete after replacing with another template or a table. Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Makoy Canlas/I Can See Your Voice editing instructions

Since the user has used this a template I'm nominating it as such. This is a horrible pseudo-manual-of-style for I Can See Your Voice articles which is placed on their talk pages. Besides my personal distaste for the color scheme, sections and general layout, this is not the place to put these, nor is there any consensus that their way is the way to do it. Gonnym (talk) 11:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete or move to a subpage of the main talk page. WP:MFD may be a better place to discuss this but who knows. Frietjes (talk) 14:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:I Can See Your Voice (Chinese game show) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single season show which last aired 4 years ago so no season planned. Navbox not really needed here. Gonnym (talk) 10:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Only 4 working links to English-language articles, including the header. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:FaxonRash (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete after replacing with a see also and/or a category. Frietjes (talk) 14:34, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac (talk) 00:41, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Epic Rap Battles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links for a separate navbox. -- /Alex/₂₁ 05:21, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Festivals by year pre1000 cat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused template, and highly unlikely to be used. Currently Category:Festivals by year goes back only to the 1750s. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused. Frietjes (talk) 14:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. If someone really wants to userfy it, they can, but general consensus is to just delete it. Primefac (talk) 01:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Module:Citation/CS1/autofix (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

See Help talk:Citation Style 1#Is Module:Citation/CS1/autofix used by anything? * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not useful. Abandoned experiment by a now-banned editor. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user is blocked, not banned. I do not endorse that user's opinions/behaviour at all, but this piece of code was obviously a good faith contribution, therefore the current status of that user should not be relevant in the evaluation of the code. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 10:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Userfy. It has no place in main module-space, but should be moved to Module:Sandbox/Wikid77/Citation/CS1/autofix, User:Wikid77/sandbox or similar, as it is worth being preserved as a proposal how to fix certain errors in citations. The proposal was not executed and has some flaws but also includes some good ideas, therefore wasn't a totally wasted effort as it is possible to learn from it for future solutions. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 10:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete useless, userfying pointless templates serves no purpose. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 October 17. (non-admin closure) St3095 ^(?) 15:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox_Syria_place (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).