< June 19 June 21 >

June 20

Template:PLoSlink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and useless template Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:58, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox FIBA tourney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox FIBA tourney with Template:Infobox basketball tournament season.
Same article scope, ((Infobox FIBA tourney)) does not really add anything unique to FIBA/national teams. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox all-star basketball game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox basketball game. Izno (talk) 00:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox all-star basketball game with Template:Infobox basketball game.
Redundant template. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox BBL team season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 June 29. Izno (talk) 00:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox ANZ Premiership team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with ((Infobox sports team)). –Aidan721 (talk) 21:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Marmaray style

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/TCDD Taşımacılık. Gonnym (talk) 20:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Optima Tours succession templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Optima Tours. Gonnym (talk) 20:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ADA color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Adaray. Gonnym (talk) 20:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WEmoji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a template to show emojis - Template:Emoji. Additionally, there is no need to create a template for each single emoji as was done with this template's subpages. Any usages should be replaced with ((Emoji)). Gonnym (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The goal of WEmoji is to provide Wikipedians with an easy-to-use, user-friendly system which has codes that are easy to memorize. If you use the other system, you'd need to constantly check the codes depending on the emoji. The code for a sunglasses emoji looks like this on Emoji: ((emoji|1F60E)). The code for sunglasses on WEmoji looks like this: ((WEmoji|cool)). In summary, the two templates are different -- Emoji is better supported, but not as refined. WEmoji is not as well supported, but easier to use. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 23:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The templates can give the same result and have very similar syntax (it's written in the documentation). ((Emoji)) just giving you more options. For basic "word" usage: ((WEmoji|cool)) vs ((Emoji|name=sunglasses)) ( vs 😎). Gonnym (talk) 09:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tram İzmir color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Tram İzmir. Gonnym (talk) 09:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

İzmir Metro succession templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/İzmir Metro. Gonnym (talk) 09:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NRLW2019Ladder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Table was merged into article. Gonnym (talk) 08:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

İZBAN succession templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/İZBAN. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox hiking trail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was moved Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Current name Target name

Propose renaming Template:Infobox hiking trail to Template:Infobox trail.
This template covers hiking trails, cycling trails, greenways, and more; so, it makes sense to broaden the name. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:00, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tangential Comment - I have done a lot of work recently on "trail" articles for Pennsylvania (a topic for which I am knowledgeable), which informs my vote above. However I would like to point out that navigation boxes and categories for "trails" are in really bad shape throughout Wikipedia, due to the definitional issues merely introduced in this discussion about the infobox name. Navboxes for "hiking" trails are polluted with things that do not fall under the definition of hiking (see Template:Maryland hiking trails as just one example among hundreds), pure "hiking" trails appear in navboxes and categories for old railroad tracks that are now bike trails, sidewalks alongside freeways (e.g. US 202 Parkway Trail) have been categorized as hiking, and lots of other confusion in every conceivable direction. I have fixed this problem for Pennsylvania, but for anyone interested in this general topic area, cleaning this up for the rest of the world will give you Wikipedia work for months to come. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(2) My second suggestion is that, when giving "Elevation gain/loss" in the Infobox, editors should specify in which direction is the gain and which is the loss.
Mike Marchmont (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
More