Name	Novelty	Status	Authors	Age	Type locality	Country	Notes
Allodaposuchus iberoarmoricanus^[16]	Sp. nov	Valid	Blanco	Late Cretaceous (Campanian)		France	An allodaposuchid eusuchian, a species of Allodaposuchus.
Amphicotylus milesi^[17]	Sp. nov	Valid	Yoshida et al.	Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian)	Morrison Formation	United States ( Wyoming)	A goniopholidid crocodyliform, a species of Amphicotylus.
Antaeusuchus^[18]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Nicholl et al.	Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian)	Kem Kem Group	Morocco	A peirosaurid crocodylomorph. The type species is A. taouzensis.
Aphaurosuchus^[19]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Darlim, Montefeltro & Langer	Late Cretaceous (Campanian-Maastrichtian)	Bauru Basin	Brazil	A baurusuchid crocodylomorph. The type species is A. escharafacies.
Brachiosuchus^[20]	Gen. et sp. nov	In press	Salih et al.	Late Cretaceous	Kababish Formation	Sudan	A dyrosaurid crocodylomorph. The type species is B. kababishensis.
Burkesuchus^[21]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Novas et al.	Late Jurassic (Tithonian)	Toqui Formation	Chile	An early member of Mesoeucrocodylia. The type species is B. mallingrandensis.
Caipirasuchus attenboroughi^[22]	Sp. nov	Valid	Ruiz et al.	Late Cretaceous (Turonian-Campanian)	Santo Anastácio Formation	Brazil	A sphagesaurid crocodylomorph, a species of Caipirasuchus.
Chinatichampsus^[23]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Stocker, Brochu & Kirk	Eocene (Uintan-Duchesnean)	Devil's Graveyard Formation	United States ( Texas)	A caiman. The type species is C. wilsonorum.
Coronelsuchus^[24]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Pinheiro et al.	Late Cretaceous (Turonian)	Araçatuba Formation	Brazil	A sphagesaurian crocodylomorph. The type species is C. civali
Cricosaurus albersdoerferi^[25]	Sp. nov	Valid	Sachs, Young, Abel, & Mallison	Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian)	Torleite Formation	Germany	A metriorhynchid thalattosuchian, a species of Cricosaurus.
Cricosaurus puelchorum^[26]	Sp. nov	Valid	Herrera, Fernández & Vennari	Early Cretaceous (Berriasian)	Vaca Muerta	Argentina	A metriorhynchid thalattosuchian, a species of Cricosaurus. Announced in 2020; the final version of the article naming it was published in 2021.
Cricosaurus rauhuti^[27]	Sp. nov	Valid	Herrera, Aiglstorfer & Bronzati	Late Jurassic (Tithonian)	Mörnsheim Formation	Germany	A metriorhynchid thalattosuchian, a species of Cricosaurus.
Dongnanosuchus^[28]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Shan et al.	Eocene	Youganwo Formation	China	An alligatoroid belonging to the group Orientalosuchina. The type species is D. hsui.
Eptalofosuchus^[29]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Marinho et al.	Late Cretaceous	Uberaba Formation	Brazil	A notosuchian crocodylomorph. The type species is E. viridi. Announced in 2021; the final version of the article naming it was published in 2022.
Etjosuchus^[30]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Tolchard et al.	Middle Triassic	Omingonde Formation	Namibia	A non-crocodylomorph loricatan. The type species is E. recurvidens.
Gunggamarandu^[31]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Ristevski et al.	Pliocene or Pleistocene		Australia	A tomistomine crocodylian. The type species is G. maunala.
Kocurypelta^[32]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Czepiński et al.	Late Triassic (Norian)	Lissauer Breccia	Poland	An aetosaur. The type species is K. silvestris.
Sebecus ayrampu^[33]	Sp. nov	Valid	Bravo, Pol & García-López	Paleocene	Mealla Formation	Argentina	A sebecid mesoeucrocodylian, a species of Sebecus.
Yanjisuchus^[34]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Rummy et al.	Cretaceous (Albian–Cenomanian)	Longjing Formation	China	A paralligatorid crocodyliform. The type species is Y. longshanensis. Announced in 2021; the final version of the article naming it was published in 2022.

Non-avian dinosaurs

Research

General

A study on the impact of the disparity between neonates and adults on the structure and diversity of dinosaur communities is published by Schroeder, Lyons & Smith (2021), who claim that communities with giant theropods lacked carnivores weighing 100 to 1000 kg, and argue that juveniles of giant theropod species likely filled the mesocarnivore niche, resulting in reduced overall taxonomic diversity;^[86] their conclusions are subsequently contested by Benson et al. (2022).^[87]^[88]
Evidence of cessation of longitudinal skeletal growth in non-avian dinosaurs, inferred from a study of the articular surfaces of long bones, is presented by Rothschild & Witzmann (2021).^[89]
A study aiming to determine the survivorship curves of Albertosaurus sarcophagus, Gorgosaurus libratus, Daspletosaurus torosus, Tyrannosaurus rex, Maiasaura peeblesorum and Psittacosaurus lujiatuensis in populations with an age distribution which was stable in shape over time is published by Griebeler (2021).^[90]
A study aiming to determine whether the presence of keratan sulfate is exclusive evidence for the presence of medullary bone in dinosaur fossils (and therefore whether it can be used to identify dinosaur specimens as gravid females) is published by Canoville et al. (2021).^[91]
A study on the variation in tail anatomy and length across the Dinosauria is published by Hone, Persons & Le Comber (2021).^[92]
A study on the possibilities of determination of the presence of sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs, evaluating whether the previous method used for dinosaurs correctly recognizes living animals as dimorphic, is published by Motani (2021).^[93]
A study on the role of climate in shaping the geographic distribution of Mesozoic dinosaurs is published by Chiarenza et al. (2021).^[94]
Review of the fossil record of Carnian dinosaurs from South America is published by Novas et al. (2021), who also interpret Chindesaurus, Daemonosaurus and Tawa as likely late-surviving members of Herrerasauria.^[95]
A study on dinosaur trackways that show changes in direction from Jurassic and Cretaceous sites in North and South America, Europe and Asia is published by Lockley et al. (2021).^[96]
Fossil trackways made by theropods, ornithopods and possibly ankylosaurs, are reported from the Folkestone Formation of the Lower Greensand Group by Hadland et al (2021), representing the youngest known footprints of non-avian dinosaurs known from the United Kingdom.^[97]
A new dinosaur trackway is reported from the Early Cretaceous Eumeralla Formation (Wattle Hill, Australia), by Romilio and Godfrey (2021), who report the presence of ornithopod and bird-like tracks, as well as a large theropod footprint possibly belonging to the ichnogenus Megalosauropus.^[98]
A study on the climate of the Lufeng area (China) during the Early Jurassic, and on the relations between the global distribution of dinosaur fossils and climate during the Jurassic, is published by Shen et al. (2021).^[99]
A study on the relationships between diet, tooth complexity and tooth replacement rates in Late Jurassic dinosaurs is published by Melstrom, Chiappe & Smith (2021).^[100]
Description of the fossil material of a tyrannosauroid theropod and an early member of the family Hadrosauridae from the Upper Cretaceous Merchantville Formation (Delaware and New Jersey, United States), possibly representing new taxa, and a study on the phylogenetic affinities of these dinosaurs is published by Brownstein (2021).^[101]
Druckenmiller et al. (2021) report the discovery of a diverse assemblage of herbivorous and carnivorous non-avian dinosaurs, including perinatal and very young specimens, from the Upper Cretaceous Prince Creek Formation (Alaska, United States), and interpret this finding as indicating that most, if not all, dinosaurs from this assemblage were nonmigratory year-round Arctic residents.^[102]
A study on the distribution of dinosaurs across the latest Cretaceous of North America is published by García‐Girón et al. (2021).^[103]
A study aiming to determine whether plant-eating dinosaurs could have moved seeds long distances is published by Perry (2021).^[104]
Dinosaur tracks with elongated metatarsal marks and superficially human-like appearance are interpreted by Lallensack, Farlow & Falkingham (2021) as more likely to be caused by deep penetrations of the foot in soft sediment than by a plantigrade mode of locomotion.^[105]
A study on changes of diversity of dinosaurs belonging to the families Ankylosauridae, Ceratopsidae, Hadrosauridae, Dromaeosauridae, Troodontidae and Tyrannosauridae during the Late Cretaceous is published by Condamine et al. (2021), who interpret their findings as indicative of a decline of non-avian dinosaur diversity during the last 10 million years of the Cretaceous period, and attempt to determine possible causes of this decline.^[106]
The study published by Bonsor et al. (2020), aiming to determine whether non-avian dinosaurs were in long-term decline prior to the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event,^[107] is criticized by Sakamoto, Benton & Venditti (2021).^[108]
A study on a dinosaur nesting site preserved in the Upper Cretaceous Wido Volcanics (Wi Island, South Korea) is published by Kim et al. (2021; final version published in 2022), providing new information on how these dinosaurs chose their nesting sites.^[109]

Saurischians

New fossil material of theropod and sauropod dinosaurs, including a caudal vertebra with pneumatic internal structures rarely observed outside Late Cretaceous South American saltasaurines, is described from the Campanian Quseir Formation (Egypt) by Salem et al. (2021).^[110]
Evidence indicating that some mid-sized dendroolithid eggs were laid by a therizinosauroid theropod is presented by Kundrát & Cruickshank (2021), who also report the discovery of putative embryonic remains (possibly of a titanosaur sauropod) in a faveoloolithid egg.^[111]
Putative large-sized sauropodomorph specimen from the Carnian strata at the 'Cerro da Alemoa' locality (southern Brazil) is reinterpreted as a herrerasaurid specimen (the largest dinosaur reported from the Candelária Sequence to date) by Garcia et al. (2021).^[112]
Putative tracks of a large-bodied predatory dinosaur from the Upper Triassic Blackstone Formation (Australia) are reinterpreted by Romilio et al. (2021) as sharing characteristics with the sauropodomorph ichnogenus Evazoum, and possibly representing the first evidence of basal sauropodomorph dinosaurs from Australia.^[113]

Theropods

A study aiming to determine whether the knowledge of patterns of species abundance and clade diversity in theropod dinosaurs is significantly impacted by the diagnosability of their fossils is published by Cashmore, Butler & Maidment (2021).^[114]
A study on the evolution of vision and hearing modalities in theropod dinosaurs is published by Choiniere et al. (2021), who interpret their findings as indicative of early evolution of nocturnal predation in alvarezsauroid theropods.^[115]
A study on changes of feeding mechanics of theropods throughout their evolutionary history is published by Ma et al. (2021).^[116]
Bishop et al. (2021) create three-dimensional simulations of gait in Coelophysis bauri, and interpret their findings as indicative of a crucial and dynamic role of the tail in the locomotion of this theropod.^[117]
A vertebra of a non-coelophysoid, non-averostran neotheropod which may be 15 million years older than Dilophosaurus wetherilli is described from the Lower Jurassic (Hettangian) Whitmore Point Member of the Moenave Formation (Utah, United States) by Marsh et al. (2021), who interpret this finding as indicating that not all contemporaneous theropod traces were made by coelophysoids.^[118]
McMenamin (2021) describes a humerus of a neotheropod from the Portland Formation of the Early Jurassic (Massachucetts, USA) older and larger than Dilophosaurus, and interpret it as a large piscovorous creature based on the locale's ecology.^[119]
An assemblage of over 100 theropod footprints of various size and morphology is described from the Lower Jurassic Fengjiahe Formation (China) by Li et al. (2021), representing the track site with the largest number of theropod footprints in Yunnan reported to date.^[120]
New fossil material of ceratosaur theropods, probably representing one of the oldest known record of abelisaurids, is described from the Upper Jurassic Cañadón Calcáreo Formation (Argentina) by Rauhut & Pol (2021).^[121]
A study on the skeletal anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Xenotarsosaurus bonapartei is published by Ibiricu et al. (2021).^[122]
Two new furileusaurian abelisaurid specimens from the Santonian Bajo de la Carpa Formation (Argentina), providing new information on the abundance of abelisaurids in this area and on variety of abelisaurid morphotypes that coexisted in the north of Argentine Patagonia during the Late Cretaceous, are described by Méndez et al. (2021; final version published in 2022).^[123]
Description of the preserved integument of Carnotaurus sastrei is published by Hendrickx & Bell (2021).^[124]
Revision of the phylogenetic affinities and evolutionary significance of Saltriovenator zanellai and Scipionyx samniticus is published by Cau (2021), who interprets his findings as raising doubts on the systematic status of theropod specimens assigned to the family Compsognathidae, which might turn out to be immature individuals belonging to various lineages of large-bodied tetanurans, with the holotype specimen of S. samniticus possibly being an immature carcharodontosaurid.^[125]
Two trackways belonging to fast-running theropods (probably basal tetanurans) are described from the Lower Cretaceous Enciso Group (Spain) by Navarro-Lorbés et al. (2021), who present the speeds of locomotion calculated for both trackways, which are among the top speeds ever calculated for non-avian theropod tracks, and interpret one of the trackways as produced by a dinosaur with the ability to make and control substantial speed changes while running.^[126]
Spinosaurid neck vertebrae distinct from known vertebrae of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus and exhibiting an unusual combination of positionally variable characters are described from the Kem Kem Group (Morocco) by McFeeters (2021), who interprets this finding as evidence of a greater degree of intraspecific variation in the vertebrae of S. aegyptiacus than previously recognized, or alternatively, evidence for the occurrence of two spinosaurid taxa in the Kem Kem Group.^[127]
Spinosaurid caudal vertebrae are described from the Lower Cretaceous Sao Khua Formation (Thailand) by Samathi, Sander & Chanthasit (2021), who also reinterpret the putative ceratosaur Camarillasaurus cirugedae as a spinosaurid.^[128]
A study on the diversity of the premaxillae shape in spinosaurids, an on its implications for the knowledge of the phylogenetic relationships of the spinosaurids, is published by Lacerda, Grillo & Romano (2021).^[129]
Hone & Holtz (2021) evaluate the evidence for the competing interpretations of the ecology of Spinosaurus, and reject the interpretation of this theropod as a specialised aquatic pursuit predator.^[130]
Pahl and Ruedas (2021) suggest that carnosaurs like Allosaurus were primarily scavengers that fed on sauropod carcasses, which they consider to be analogous to whale falls;^[131] however, their conclusions are criticized by Kane et al. (2023)^[132] but later defended by Pahl and Ruehdas (2023).^[133]
A study on the histology and geochemistry of a tibia and a femur of a specimen or specimens of Allosaurus fragilis from the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry (Utah, United States), and on its implications for the knowledge of the growth strategy of this species, is published by Ferrante et al. (2021).^[134]
Caudal vertebra of a theropod with affinities to Carcharodontosauria is described from the Upper Jurassic Sergi Formation by Bandeira et al. (2021), representing the first unambiguous record of a dinosaur from the Jurassic of Brazil reported to date.^[135]
A study on the phylogenetic affinities of putative carcharodontosaurid teeth from the Upper Cretaceous strata in northern and central Patagonia, and on their implications for the knowledge of the timing of extinction of carcharodontosaurids in South America, is published by Meso et al. (2021).^[136]
Description of new fossil material of Phuwiangvenator yaemniyomi from the Lower Cretaceous Sao Khua Formation (Thailand), and a study on its implications for the knowledge of the early evolution of Megaraptora, is published by Samathi et al. (2021).^[137]
A study on the skeletal anatomy of Aerosteon riocoloradensis is published by Aranciaga Rolando et al. (2021).^[138]
Fragmentary specimens of tyrannosaurid theropods from the Dinosaur Park Formation of the Alberta, Canada) in the collection of the San Diego Natural History Museum were described by Yun (2021).^[139]
Bones of tyrannosaurid theropods with extensive tooth marks matching the teeth of tyrannosaurids are described from the Upper Cretaceous of the San Juan Basin (northwestern New Mexico, United States) by Dalman & Lucas (2021), who interpret this finding as evidence for cannibalistic behavior among tyrannosaurids.^[140]
Caneer, Moklestad & Lucas (2021) describe structures which are not readily assignable to any known ichnotaxon from the Upper Cretaceous of the Raton Basin (New Mexico), and interpret them as one footprint and two forearm/hand prints probably produced by a large tyrannosaurid theropod standing up from a prone position.^[141]
Perinatal tyrannosaurid bones and teeth are described from the Upper Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation (Montana, United States) and Horseshoe Canyon Formation (Alberta, Canada) by Funston et al. (2021), who evaluate the implications of these findings for the knowledge of the minimum hatchling size of tyrannosaurids, their nesting habits and development of their teeth.^[142]
A study on tyrannosaurid tracks from the Campanian Wapiti Formation (Alberta, Canada), evaluating the implications of these tracks for the knowledge of changes in pedal anatomy of tyrannosaurids during their ontogeny, is published by Enriquez et al. (2021).^[143]
Tyrannosaurid fossil material is described from the Blagoveshchensk and Kundur fossil localities (Amur Region, Russia) by Bolotsky, Ermatsans & Bolotsky (2021).^[144]
A study on possible causes of monopolization of large carnivore guilds in Asian and American dinosaur assemblages by tyrannosaurids in the latest Cretaceous is published by Holtz (2021).^[145]
A study on the morphology, frequency, and ontogeny of facial bite marks in tyrannosaurid specimens is published by Brown, Currie & Therrien (2021), who interpret the ontogenetic distribution of bite scars in the studied specimens as possible evidence of agonistic behaviour associated with the onset of sexual maturity.^[146]
A study on changes of mandibular biomechanical properties and tooth morphology in Albertosaurus sarcophagus and Gorgosaurus libratus during their ontogeny is published by Therrien et al. (2021), who interpret their findings as indicating the occurrence of ontogenetic dietary shift in albertosaurine tyrannosaurids.^[147]
A study on the mechanical properties of the mandibles of tyrannosaurine tyrannosaurids representing different ontogenetic stages (including small juvenile) is published by Rowe & Snively (2021).^[148]
New bone bed containing at least four specimens of Teratophoneus curriei or a related tyrannosaurid is described from the Campanian Kaiparowits Formation (Utah, United States) by Titus et al. (2021), who study the taphonomy of this bone bed, and evaluate its implications for the knowledge whether known accumulations of tyrannosaurid specimens represent time-averaged or forced accumulations, or whether they are evidence of gregariousness of tyrannosaurids.^[149]
A metatarsal of juvenile tyrannosaurid theropod from the Dinosaur Park Formation of the Alberta, Canada, possibly referable to Daspletosaurus torosus was described by Yun (2021).^[150]
A study on the anatomy of the braincases of two specimens of Daspletosaurus is published by Paulina Carabajal et al. (2021).^[151]
A study aiming to calculate population variables such as abundance at any one time, species persistence and total number of individuals that ever lived for Tyrannosaurus rex is published by Marshall et al. (2021);^[152] the study is subsequently criticized by Meiri (2022).^[153]^[154]
A study aiming to estimate the natural frequency of the vertical swaying of the tail and the preferred walking speed and step frequency of Tyrannosaurus rex is published by van Bijlert, van Soest & Schulp (2021).^[155]
A study on the morphology of the neurovascular canal in the dentary of Tyrannosaurus rex is published by Kawabe & Hattori (2021).^[156]
A study attempting to determine bite force of a juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex, based on mechanical tests designed to replicate bite marks attributed to juvenile specimens of this species, is published by Peterson, Tseng & Brink (2021).^[157]
A study on the taphonomic and geochemical history of the Tyrannosaurus rex specimen MOR 1125 is published by Ullmann et al. (2021).^[158]
A study on the anatomy of the postcranial skeleton and on the phylogenetic relationships of Pelecanimimus polyodon is published by Cuesta et al. (2021), who name a new clade Macrocheiriformes, defined as Pelecanimimus and all derived ornithomimosaurs.^[159]
New ornithomimid fossil material, providing new information on the distal tarsal morphology in ornithomimids, is described from the Campanian Kaiparowits Formation (Utah, United States) by Nottrodt & Farke (2021).^[160]
A study on pelvic musculature in non-avian maniraptorans is published by Rhodes, Henderson & Currie (2021).^[161]
A study on the neuroanatomy of a new alvarezsauroid skeleton in the collection of the Henan Geological Museum (China) is published by Agnolín et al. (2021).^[162]
A study on the skeletal anatomy, probable musculature and likely function of tails of alvarezsaurian theropods is published by Meso et al. (2021).^[163]
A study on growth strategies and body miniaturization in the evolutionary history of alvarezsauroid theropods is published by Qin et al. (2021).^[164]
A study on the osteology of Fukuivenator paradoxus is published by Hattori et al. (2021), who described previously undescribed elements and reinterpret this genus as a basal therizinosaur.^[165]
A study on the anatomy of the postcranial skeleton of Beipiaosaurus inexpectus is published by Liao et al. (2021).^[166]
Reevaluation of putative blood cells preserved in the holotype specimen of Beipiaosaurus inexpectus is published by Korneisel et al. (2021), who interpret putative blood cells as more likely to be diagenetic structures.^[167]
Reconstructions of the muscular system of the hindlimb, forelimb and the shoulder girdle of Nothronychus are presented by Smith (2021).^[168]^[169]
Zheng et al. (2021) study cellular and nuclear preservation in femoral articular cartilage of a specimen of Caudipteryx from the Yixian Formation (China).^[170]
Partial skeleton of Elmisaurus rarus, preserving elements overlapping with known fossil material of Nomingia gobiensis, is described from the Upper Cretaceous Nemegt Formation (Mongolia) by Funston et al. (2021), who interpret this specimen as indicating that N. gobiensis is likely a junior synonym of E. rarus.^[171]
A study on the body mass of Anzu wyliei is published by Atkins-Weltman, Snively & O'Connor (2021).^[172]
A caenagnathid metatarsal is described from the Campanian Mesaverde Formation (Wyoming, United States; representing the first record of a caenagnathid from this formation) by Yun & Funston (2021), who evaluate the implications of this specimen for the knowledge whether reported differences in metatarsal morphology between "Macrophalangia" and Chirostenotes were merely allometric in nature, or whether they might represent phylogenetically informative variation.^[173]
An exceptionally preserved, articulated oviraptorid embryo, found inside an elongatoolithid egg in a posture previously unrecognized in a non-avian dinosaur but sharing aspects of bird-like tucking postures, is described from the Upper Cretaceous Hekou Formation (China) by Xing et al. (2021);^[174] however, the conclusions of the authors are subsequently contested by Deeming & Kundrát (2022), who argue that this specimen was not close to hatching, and that the positioning of its head relative to its body cannot bear any relationship to hatching position of this animal.^[175]
Cau et al. (2021) report the identification of additional elements of the pectoral apparatus of the holotype specimen of Halszkaraptor escuilliei, including the furcula, and evaluate its implications for the knowledge of the evolution of the avian furcula.^[176]
A study on the anatomy of the skeleton of Unenlagia comahuensis is published by Novas et al. (2021).^[177]
A study on the vertebral pneumaticity in Unenlagia comahuensis is published by Gianechini & Zurriaguz (2021).^[178]
Description of a new troodontid specimen from the Upper Cretaceous Wulansuhai Formation (China), and a study on the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the Late Cretaceous troodontids, is published by Wang et al. (2021).^[179]
A unique troodontid nest is described by Maipig et al. (2021), preserving a unique spiral pattern of eggs embedded vertically into substrate.^[180]
Multi-individual aggregates of mammal skeletons are described from the Upper Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation (Montana, United States) by Freimuth et al. (2021), who interpret these aggregates as the oldest known mammal-bearing regurgitalites, probably produced by Troodon formosus.^[181]
A study on the anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Borogovia gracilicrus is published by Cau & Madzia (2021).^[182]
Brown, Tanke & Hone (2021) describe a hadrosaurid bone from the Campanian Dinosaur Park Formation (Alberta, Canada) preserved with bite marks produced by a small- to medium-sized theropod dinosaur, deviating from the majority of known theropod tooth marks and indicative of a behavior similar to mammalian gnawing.^[183]
Revision of the biodiversity of theropods from the Dinosaur Park Formation is published by Cullen et al. (2021).^[184]
Exquisitely preserved, ornamented partial eggs with theropod affinities, representing some of the smallest Mesozoic eggs reported to date, are described from the Campanian Kaiparowits Formation (Utah, United States) by Oser et al. (2021), who name a new ootaxon Stillatuberoolithus storrsi.^[185]

Sauropodomorphs

Review of the diversity and composition of South American sauropodomorph faunas throughout the Late Triassic is published by Pol et al. (2021).^[186]
A study on the evolution of the olfactory system in sauropodomorph dinosaurs, as indicated by the ratio between the size of the olfactory bulbs and cerebral hemispheres in sauropodomorph endocasts, is published by Müller (2021).^[187]
A study on the timing of the earliest occurrence of Triassic sauropodomorphs in their northernmost range (Fleming Fjord Formation, Greenland), and on possible relationship between climate changes and early sauropodomorph dispersal to the temperate belt of the Northern Hemisphere, is published by Kent & Clemmensen (2021).^[188]
Probable tracks of large sauropodomorphs dinosaurs, potentially representing the largest known tracks belonging to the ichnogenus Eosauropus reported to date, are described from the Upper Triassic (likely Rhaetian) Blue Anchor Formation (Penarth, south Wales, United Kingdom) by Falkingham et al. (2021).^[189]
A study on the evolution of the morphological diversity of sauropodomorph dinosaurs is published by Apaldetti et al. (2021).^[190]
New skull material of Plateosaurus, including the first two juvenile skulls of members of this genus, is described from the locality of Frick (Switzerland) by Lallensack et al. (2021), who attempt to determine whether the locality of Frick and German localities of Trossingen and Halberstadt contain specimens of Plateosaurus belonging to a single species.^[191]
A study on the skeletal growth during the ontogeny in Massospondylus carinatus is published by Chapelle, Botha & Choiniere (2021).^[192]
A study on the age of the fossil material of Yunnanosaurus youngi is published by Ren et al. (2021).^[193]
A study on the cranial anatomy of Anchisaurus polyzelus and the development of cranial characters in sauropodomorph ontogeny is published by Fabbri et al. (2021)^[194]
An assemblage including over 100 eggs and skeletal specimens of 80 specimens of Mussaurus patagonicus, ranging from embryos to fully-grown adults, is described from the Laguna Colorada Formation (Argentina) by Pol et al. (2021), who assign an Early Jurassic (Sinemurian) maximum age for the Mussaurus bearing sediments, and interpret this assemblage as likely evidence of colonial nesting habits, presence of social cohesion throughout the different stages of the lifespan, and age-based social partitioning within a herd structure in Mussaurus.^[195]
An extensive Late Jurassic sauropod tracksite, preserving the longest continuous sequence of sauropod pes prints reported to date and representing a rare record of a >180° turn made by the sauropod trackmaker to completely change direction and cross its own trackway, is described from a high altitude locality near Ouray (Colorado, United States) by Goodell et al. (2021).^[196]
A study on the anatomy of the axial skeleton of Bagualia alba is published by Gomez, Carballido & Pol (2021).^[197]
New fossil material of Shunosaurus, providing new information on the development of the skeleton of this sauropod during its ontogeny, is described from the Middle Jurassic Shaximiao Formation (China) by Ma et al. (2021).^[198]
A study on the skeletal anatomy of the holotype of Patagosaurus fariasi is published by Holwerda, Rauhut & Pol (2021).^[199]
A new specimen of Haplocanthosaurus with expanded neural canals is described by Wedel et al. (2021).^[200]
A study on the anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Amphicoelias altus is published by Mannion, Tschopp & Whitlock (2021).^[201]
The paleohistology of two dicraeosaurids from the La Amarga Formation (Argentina) is studied by Winholdz and Cerda (2021), who find that the holotype specimen of Amargatitanis macni belonged to a more mature individual than the holotype of Amargasaurus cazaui.^[202]
Fossilized skin of a juvenile member of the genus Diplodocus, providing evidence of new scale shapes and patterns never before seen in diplodocids, is described from the Mother's Day Quarry (Bighorn Basin, Montana, United States) by Gallagher, Poole & Schein (2021).^[203]
A study on the anatomy of the braincase of a diplodocid sauropod (possibly Leinkupal laticauda) from the Lower Cretaceous Bajada Colorada Formation (Argentina) is published by Garderes et al. (2021; final version published in 2022).^[204]
Redescription of the anatomy of the braincase of Limaysaurus tessonei is published by Paulina-Carabajal & Calvo (2021).^[205]
A description of well preserved fossil material of Camarasaurus, including an articulated, nearly-complete skull, and an analysis of variability within the genus based on cranial allometry trends is published by Woodruff et al. (2021).^[206]
Partial sauropod maxilla, possibly belonging to a brachiosaurid, is described from the Cretaceous (Albian–Cenomanian) Longjing Formation (northeast China) by Liao et al. (2021).^[207]
Sauropod tracks probably produced by non-titanosaurian titanosauriforms are described from the Rupelo Formation (Spain) by Torcida Fernández-Baldor et al. (2021), who evaluate the paleoenvironmental and paleoecological implications of this finding, and name a new ichnotaxon Iniestapodus burgensis.^[208]
A study on tooth replacement rates in early somphospondylans, as indicated by data from a dentary from the Lower Cretaceous (Aptian–Albian) Haoling Formation (China), is published by Chang et al. (2021).^[209]
A study aiming to determine whether titanosaur osteoderms could act as defensive structures is published by Silva Junior et al. (2021; final version published in 2022).^[210]
Description of the anatomy of the referred specimen of Diamantinasaurus matildae and a study on the phylogenetic relationships of this species is published by Poropat et al. (2021), who name a new clade Diamantinasauria, which includes it alongside Savannasaurus and Sarmientosaurus.^[211]
Fossil material of a giant titanosaur sauropod, distinct from Andesaurus and probably exceeding Patagotitan in size, is described from the Cenomanian Candeleros Formation (Argentina) by Otero et al. (2021).^[212]
Revision of known fossil material of Pellegrinisaurus powelli and a study on the skeletal anatomy, bone histology and phylogenetic relationships of this sauropod are published by Cerda et al. (2021).^[213]
New titanosaur remains, possibly belonging to a member of Colossosauria distinct from previously known taxa, are described from the Upper Cretaceous Portezuelo Formation (Argentina) by Bellardini et al. (2021).^[214]
A study on the anatomy of the axial skeleton of Rinconsaurus caudamirus is published by Pérez Moreno et al. (2021).^[215]
A study on the composition of several gastroliths from the Morrison are published by Malone, Strasser, Malone, D'Emic, Brown, and Craddock, who point to the differences between them and the surrounding rock and similarities to another site 1,000 km eastwards to suggest evidence of migration in sauropod dinosaurs.^[216]
Description of new fossil material and a study on the phylogenetic relationships of Tengrisaurus starkovi is published by Averianov, Sizov & Skutschas (2021).^[217]
Aureliano et al. (2021) report preservation of histological structure related to an avian-like air sac system in a vertebra of a saltasaurid titanosaur from the Upper Cretaceous São José do Rio Preto Formation (Bauru Group, Brazil).^[218]
Evidence of the preservation of nitrogen-bearing organic molecules (identified as proteinaceous moieties) in titanosaur eggshell from the Maastrichtian Lameta Formation (India) is presented by Dhiman et al. (2021).^[219]
A study on the stable isotope compositions of titanosaurian eggshells, bone and an associated tooth sampled in three Late Cretaceous nesting sites from La Rioja Province (Argentina), evaluating their implications for the knowledge of the body temperature of titanosaur sauropods, their diet, and the environmental conditions they needed reproduce, is published by Leuzinger et al. (2021).^[220]

Ornithischians

Revision of the phylogenetic nomenclature of ornithischian dinosaurs is published by Madzia et al. (2021), who name new clades Corythosauria, Euceratopsia, Saphornithischia, Panoplosaurini and Struthiosaurini.^[221]
New fossil material of ornithischians, including remains of basal euiguanodontian and hadrosaurid ornithopods and the southernmost record of ankylosaurs from South America reported to date, is described from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian–Maastrichtian) Chorrillo Formation (Argentina) by Rozadilla et al. (2021), who evaluate the implications of these fossils for the knowledge of the evolutionary history of ankylosaurs and hadrosaurids in South America.^[222]
A study on the Late Cretaceous ornithischian assemblage of western North America, aiming to examine the prediction that juveniles of large herbivores competitively excluded small herbivorous species, and that the small species that were able to coexist alongside the juveniles of larger species did so because of their unique occupation of niche space, is published by Wyenberg-Henzler, Patterson & Mallon (2021).^[223]
Radermacher et al. (2021) describe a new, fully articulated skeleton of Heterodontosaurus tucki, preserving a suite of novel postcranial features unknown in any other ornithischian dinosaur, and evaluate the implications of this specimen for the knowledge of the evolution of ornithischian respiratory biology.^[224]

Thyreophorans

A study on the skeletal anatomy and bone histology of Scutellosaurus lawleri, providing new data on the morphology and new life reconstruction for this dinosaur, is published by Breeden et al. (2021).^[225]
A stegosaurian humerus is described from the Cañadón Calcáreo Formation (Argentina) by Rauhut, Carballido & Pol (2021), extending the fossil record of Stegosauria to the Late Jurassic of South America.^[226]
A study on the morphology, macro- and microwear, and microanatomy of the stegosaur teeth from the Teete locality (Lower Cretaceous Batylykh Formation; Sakha, Russia), evaluating their implications for the knowledge of the paleobiology of the Teete stegosaur, is published by Skutschas et al. (2021).^[227]
The smallest stegosaur track reported to date, co-occurring with the tracks of larger individuals, is described from the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group (Xinjiang, China) by Xing et al. (2021).^[228]
The type locality and holotype of Dracopelta zbyszewskii are reinterpreted by Russo & Mateus (2021), who also chronicle the history of the holotype.^[229]
Riguetti et al. (2021) describe nodosaurid tracks from the Maastrichtian El Molino Formation (Bolivia), increasing known diversity of ankylosaur tracks from South America.^[230]
Several fragmentary skulls and skull elements of Hungarosaurus, providing new information on the morphological diversity, development and possible function of the ornamentation of nodosaurid skulls, are described by Ősi et al. (2021).^[231]
A study on dental microwear and jaw movement of Jinyunpelta, and on its implications for the knowledge of the evolution of the feeding mechanism of ankylosaurids, is published by Kubo et al. (2021).^[232]
Articulated postcranial skeleton of an indeterminate ankylosaurid dinosaur is described from the Barun Goyot Formation (Mongolia) by Park et al. (2021), who interpret this specimen as indicating that Asian ankylosaurids evolved rigid bodies with a reduced number of pedal phalanges, as well as the existence of at least two forms of flank armor in ankylosaurids, and discuss possible adaptations for digging in ankylosaurids.^[233]

Cerapods

A study on the skeletal anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Haya griva is published by Barta & Norell (2021).^[234]
Duncan et al. (2021) describe ornithopod jaws from the Lower Cretaceous Eumeralla Formation (Australia), and evaluate the implications of these fossils for the knowledge of the diversity of Early Cretaceous ornithopods from this area.^[235]
A study on the anatomy of the manus of Tenontosaurus tilletti is published by Hunt, Cifelli & Davies (2021).^[236]
A study on the accumulated remains of Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki from the Upper Jurassic Tendaguru Formation (Tanzania) is published by Hübner et al. (2021), who interpret two large bonebeds as most likely resulting from two independent catastrophic mortality events.^[237]
A study on the anatomy of the braincase and probable brain size in Proa valdearinnoensis is published by Knoll et al. (2021).^[238]
A specimen of Gobihadros mongoliensis preserving features of cessation of growth, indicating that it reached the terminal size and advanced age, is described from the Upper Cretaceous Bayan Shireh Formation (Mongolia) by Słowiak et al. (2021), who diagnose this specimen as affected by calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease, making it the first known non-avian dinosaur specimen affected with this disease.^[239]
Redescription of the anatomy and a study on the phylogenetic relationships of Lophorhothon atopus, based on data from the holotype and from a new specimen, is published by Gates & Lamb (2021).^[240]
A study on the anatomy of the postcranial skeleton of Tanius sinensis is published by Borinder et al. (2021).^[241]
Description of new fossil material of Tethyshadros insularis from the Villaggio del Pescatore fossil site (Italy), a study on the age of this site and on the phylogenetic affinities of T. insularis, and a reevaluation of claims about the evolution of insular dwarfism in Late Cretaceous hadrosauroids, is published by Chiarenza et al. (2021).^[242]
Description of new fossil material of hadrosaurids from the Upper Cretaceous Lago Colhué Huapí Formation (Argentina), and a study on the environment inhabited by these hadrosaurids and on the influence of paleoenvironmental conditions on South American hadrosaurid distribution, is published by Ibiricu et al. (2021).^[243]
Holland et al. (2021) describe an assemblage of late juvenile hadrosaurid specimens from the Spring Creek Bonebed (Alberta, Canada), representing the first record of lambeosaurines from the Wapiti Formation and possibly indicating that age segregation was a life history strategy among hadrosaurids.^[244]
Revision of the type material and a study on the phylogenetic affinities of Latirhinus uitstlani is published by Ramírez-Velasco, Espinosa-Arrubarrena & Alvarado-Ortega (2021);^[245] a study on the taphonomy of the skeletal elements in the holotype of L. uitstlani designated by the aforementioned authors, on the skeletal composition of the holotype, on the diagnostic utility of the characters used by Ramírez-Velasco, Espinosa-Arrubarrena & Alvarado-Ortega (2021) for referring other specimens to different hadrosaurid clades, and on the phylogenetic affinities of L. uitstlani is subsequently published by Serrano-Brañas & Prieto-Márquez (2021).^[246]
Redescription of Parasaurolophus cyrtocristatus, based on data from a new skull from the Campanian Fruitland Formation (New Mexico, United States), is published by Gates, Evans & Sertich (2021).^[247]
A study on the injuries of the holotype specimen of Bonapartesaurus rionegrensis, and on their implications for the knowledge of its paleobiology, is published by Cruzado-Caballero et al. (2021).^[248]
Five new partial skulls of Maiasaura peeblesorum, providing information on the acquisition of the crest and changes to the surrounding cranial elements during the ontogeny of this dinosaur, are described from the Campanian Two Medicine Formation (Montana, United States) by McFeeters, Evans & Maddin (2021).^[249]
A study aiming to determine the taxonomic validity of the species Sphaerotholus buchholtzae and S. edmontonensis is published by Woodruff et al. (2021).^[250]
Vinther, Nicholls & Kelly (2021) describe the first fossil cloacal vent in an exceptionally preserved non-avian dinosaur specimen (a specimen of Psittacosaurus from the Early Cretaceous Jehol deposits of Liaoning, China).^[251]
A study on jaws and teeth of juvenile and adult specimens of Psittacosaurus lujiatunensis, aiming to determine whether this dinosaur underwent a dietary shift during its ontogeny, is published by Landi et al. (2021).^[252]
A study on the ontogenetic changes in the femoral histology of Psittacosaurus sibiricus is published by Skutschas et al. (2021).^[253]
A study on the whole-skull shape in a large sample of specimens of Protoceratops andrewsi is published by Knapp, Knell & Hone (2021), who argue that the frill of P. andrewsi shows several characteristics consistent with a socio-sexual trait.^[254]
A study on the anatomy of a specimen of Protoceratops andrewsi from the Bayan Zag locality (Djadochta Formation, Mongolia), interpreted as most likely to be a large immature female, and on its implications for explanation of the polymorphism in the fossil material attributed to P. andrewsi and for diagnosing P. andrewsi from vertebrae considering the age and sex of compared specimens, is published by Tereshchenko (2021).^[255]
Description of a skull of a subadult specimen of Einiosaurus procurvicornis from the Two Medicine Formation (Montana, United States), and a study on the implications of this specimen for the knowledge of the sequence and timing of development of primary cranial ornaments in eucentrosauran ceratopsids, is published by Wilson & Scannella (2021).^[256]
A study on the dentition of Stegoceras validum and Thescelosaurus neglectus, and on its implications for the knowledge of the feeding behavior of these ornithischians, is published by Hudgins, Currie & Sullivan (2021).^[257]
A study on the biodiversity patterns of Late Cretaceous hadrosaurids and ceratopsids from the western interior of North America, evaluating whether the fossil record provides evidence of faunal provinciality of these dinosaurs, is published by Maidment et al. (2021).^[258]

New taxa

Name	Novelty	Status	Authors	Age	Type locality	Country	Notes
Ajnabia^[259]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Longrich et al.	Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)	Ouled Abdoun Basin	Morocco	A lambeosaurine hadrosaurid. The type species is A. odysseus. Announced in 2020; the final version of the article naming was published in 2021.
Arackar^[260]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Rubilar-Rogers et al.	Late Cretaceous (Campanian–Maastrichtian)	Hornitos Formation	Chile	A lithostrotian titanosaur sauropod. The type species is A. licanantay.
Arrudatitan^[261]	Gen. et comb. nov	Valid	Silva Junior et al.	Late Cretaceous (Campanian-Maastrichtian)	Adamantina Formation	Brazil	A titanosaur sauropod; a new genus for "Aeolosaurus" maximus.
Australotitan^[262]	Gen. et sp. nov	Disputed	Hocknull et al.	Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian-? Turonian)	Winton Formation	Australia	A titanosaur sauropod. The type species is A. cooperensis. Considered to be an indeterminate diamantinasaurian and a possible junior synonym of Diamantinasaurus matildae by Beeston et al. (2024).^[263]
Berthasaura^[264]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	De Souza et al.	Early Cretaceous (Aptian-Albian)	Goio-Erê Formation	Brazil	A noasaurid theropod. The type species is B. leopoldinae.
Brighstoneus^[265]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Lockwood et al.	Early Cretaceous (Barremian)	Wessex Formation	United Kingdom	A non-hadrosaurid hadrosauriform. The type species is B. simmondsi.
Ceratosuchops^[266]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Barker et al.	Early Cretaceous (Barremian)	Wessex Formation	United Kingdom	A spinosaurid theropod. The type species is C. inferodios.
Dzharatitanis^[267]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Averianov & Sues	Late Cretaceous (Turonian)	Bissekty Formation	Uzbekistan	A sauropod of uncertain phylogenetic placement. Originally described as a rebbachisaurid, but subsequently argued to be a member of Titanosauria.^[268] The type species is D. kingi.
Erythrovenator^[269]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Müller	Late Triassic (Carnian-Norian)	Candelária Formation	Brazil	A basal theropod. The type species is E. jacuiensis. Announced in 2020; the final version of the article naming it was published in 2021.
Fylax^[270]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Prieto-Márquez and Carrera Farias	Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)	Figuerola Formation	Spain	A non-hadrosaurid hadrosauromorph. The type species is F. thyrakolasus.
Garrigatitan^[271]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Díez Díaz et al.	Late Cretaceous (Campanian)	Grès à Reptiles	France	A titanosaur sauropod. Genus includes new species G. meridionalis. Announced in 2020; the final version of the article naming it was published in 2021.
Hamititan^[272]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Wang et al.	Early Cretaceous	Shengjinkou Formation	China	A titanosaur sauropod. The type species is H. xinjiangensis.
Issi^[273]	Gen. et sp. nov		Beccari et al.	Late Triassic (Norian)	Malmros Klint Formation	Greenland	A plateosaurid sauropodomorph. The type species is I. saaneq.
Kansaignathus^[274]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Averianov and Lopatin	Late Cretaceous (Santonian)	Ialovachsk Formation	Tajikistan	A velociraptorine dromaeosaurid. The type species is K. sogdianus.
Khulsanurus^[275]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Averianov & Lopatin	Late Cretaceous (Campanian)	Barun Goyot Formation	Mongolia	An alvarezsaurid theropod. The type species is K. magnificus.
Kuru^[276]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Napoli et al.	Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)	Barun Goyot Formation	Mongolia	A dromaeosaurid theropod. The type species is K. kulla.
Kurupi^[277]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Iori et al.	Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)	Marília Formation	Brazil	An abelisaurid theropod. The type species is K. itaata.
Llukalkan^[278]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Gianechini et al.	Late Cretaceous (Santonian)	Bajo de la Carpa Formation	Argentina	A furileusaurian abelisaurid. The type species is L. aliocranianus.
Menefeeceratops^[279]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Dalman et al.	Late Cretaceous (Campanian)	Menefee Formation	United States ( New Mexico)	A centrosaurine ceratopsid, possibly a member of the tribe Nasutoceratopsini. The type species is M. sealeyi.
Menucocelsior^[280]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Rolando et al.	Late Cretaceous (Campanian-Maastrichtian)	Allen Formation	Argentina	A titanosaur sauropod. The type species is M. arriagadai. Announced in 2021; the final version of the article naming it was published in 2022.
Napaisaurus^[281]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Ji & Zhang	Early Cretaceous	Xinlong Formation	China	A basal member of Iguanodontia. The type species is N. guangxiensis. Announced in 2021; the final version of the article naming it was published in 2022.
Ninjatitan^[282]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Gallina, Canale, & Carballido	Early Cretaceous (Berriasian–Valanginian)	Bajada Colorada Formation	Argentina	The earliest known titanosaur sauropod found. The type species is N. zapatai.
Omeisaurus puxiani^[283]	Sp. nov	Valid	Tan et al.	Middle Jurassic	Shaximiao	China	A mamenchisaurid sauropod, a species of Omeisaurus. Announced in 2020; the final version of the article naming was published in 2021.
Ornatops^[284]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	McDonald et al.	Late Cretaceous (Campanian)	Menefee Formation	United States ( New Mexico)	A saurolophine hadrosaurid belonging to the tribe Brachylophosaurini. The type species is O. incantatus.
Papiliovenator^[285]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Pei et al.	Late Cretaceous (Campanian)	Bayan Mandahu Formation	China	A troodontid theropod. The type species is P. neimengguensis. Announced in 2021; the final version of the article naming it must be published in 2022.
Pendraig^[286]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Spiekman et al.	Late Triassic (Norian-Rhaetian)	Pant-y-Ffynnon Quarry	United Kingdom	A basal theropod. The type species is P. milnerae
Portellsaurus^[287]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Santos-Cubedo et al.	Early Cretaceous (Barremian)	Margas de Mirambell Formation	Spain	A styracosternan hadrosauroid. The type species is P. sosbaynati
Rhomaleopakhus^[288]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Upchurch et al.	Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian–Tithonian)	Kalazha Formation	China	A sauropod belonging to the family Mamenchisauridae. The type species is R. turpanensis.
Riparovenator^[266]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Barker et al.	Early Cretaceous (Barremian)	Wessex Formation	United Kingdom	A spinosaurid theropod. The type species is R. milnerae.
Shri^[289]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Turner, Montanari & Norell	Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)	Barun Goyot Formation	Mongolia	A dromaeosaurid theropod. The type species is S. devi.
Sierraceratops^[290]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Dalman, Lucas Jasinski, & Longrich	Late Cretaceous (latest Campanian–Maastrichtian)	Hall Lake Formation	United States ( New Mexico)	A chasmosaurine ceratopsid. The type species is S. turneri. Announced in 2021; the final version of the article naming it must be published in 2022.
Silutitan^[272]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Wang et al.	Early Cretaceous	Shengjinkou Formation	China	A sauropod belonging to the family Euhelopodidae. The type species is S. sinensis.
Sinocephale^[291]	Gen. et comb. nov	Valid	Evans et al.	Late Cretaceous	Ulansuhai Formation	China	A pachycephalosaur previously classified as Stegoceras. The type species is "Troodon" bexelli Bohlin (1953).
Spicomellus^[292]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Maidment et al.	Middle Jurassic (Bathonian-Callovian)	El Mers Group	Morocco	An ankylosaur. The type species is S. afer.
Stegouros^[293]	Gen. et sp. nov		Soto-Acuña et al.	Late Cretaceous (Campanian-Maastrichtian)	Dorotea Formation	Chile	An ankylosaur. The type species is S. elengassen.
Tamarro^[294]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Sellés et al.	Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)	Talarn Formation	Spain	A troodontid theropod. The type species is T. insperatus.
Tarchia tumanovae^[295]	Sp. nov	Valid	Park et al.	Late Cretaceous (Campanian-Maastrichtian)	Nemegt Formation	Mongolia	An ankylosaurid, a species of Tarchia.
Tlatolophus^[296]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Ramírez-Velasco et al.	Late Cretaceous (Campanian)	Cerro del Pueblo Formation	Mexico	A lambeosaurine hadrosaurid belonging to the tribe Parasaurolophini. The type species is T. galorum.
Ulughbegsaurus^[297]	Gen. et sp. nov	Dubious	Tanaka et al.	Late Cretaceous (Turonian)	Bissekty Formation	Uzbekistan	A theropod of uncertain affinities; originally assigned to the group Carcharodontosauria, but Sues, Averianov & Britt (2022) subsequently argued that it lacked unambiguous diagnostic features of that clade.^[298] The type species is U. uzbekistanensis.
Vectiraptor^[299]	Gen. et sp. nov	In press	Longrich, Martill, & Jacobs	Early Cretaceous (Barremian)	Wessex Formation	United Kingdom	A dromaeosaurid theropod. The type species is V. greeni.
Yamatosaurus^[300]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Kobayashi et al.	Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)	Kita-Ama Formation	Japan	A basal hadrosaurid. The type species is Y. izanagii.
Ypupiara^[301]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Brum et al.	Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)	Marília Formation	Brazil	An unenlagiine dromaeosaurid. The type species is Y. lopai.

Birds

Research

The study on the phylogenetic relationships and powered flight potential of early birds and their closest relatives published by Pei et al. (2020), arguing that the potential for powered flight evolved at least three times (once in birds and twice in dromaeosaurids),^[302] is criticized by Serrano & Chiappe (2021).^[303]^[304]
Review of the most relevant events in limb evolution across the dinosaur-bird transition and the origins of bird flight is published by Nebreda, Hernández Fernández & Marugán-Lobón (2021).^[305]
A study on the diversification rates of birds throughout their evolutionary history is published by Yu, Zhang & Xu (2021).^[306]
A study on the evolution of the brain in birds, based on data from extant and recently extinct birds, Archaeopteryx and non-avian coelurosaurian theropods, is published by Watanabe et al. (2021).^[307]
A study aiming to infer the diets of the last common ancestor of living birds, based on data from digestive system-related genes, is published by Wu (2021), who interprets his findings as indicative of a diet shift from carnivory to herbivory at the non-avian archosaur-to-bird transition, and evaluates possible implications of this diet shift for the evolution of early birds.^[308]
Review of methods used to determine diet in modern and fossil birds, evaluating their utility for determination of diets of Mesozoic birds, is published by Miller & Pittman (2021).^[309]
A study on patterns and modes of the evolution of skeletal morphology and limb proportions in Mesozoic birds is published by Wang et al. (2021).^[310]
A study on the variation in tooth crown shape of Mesozoic birds, and its implications for the knowledge of their diets, is published by Zhou et al. (2021).^[311]
A study on the impact of tooth loss on the diversification of Mesozoic birds is published by Brocklehurst & Field (2021), who find no evidence for a link between toothlessness and accelerated cladogenesis, as well as no evidence for models whereby acquisitions of toothlessness among Mesozoic birds were driven by an overarching selective trend.^[312]
Review of the variability of bone histology in basal members of Avialae is published by Monfroy & Kundrát (2021).^[313]
A study on the ecomorphology of extant and fossil birds, aiming to determine whether the ecologies of Mesozoic birds can be inferred on the basis of data from measurements of their forelimbs and hindlimbs, is published by Bell et al. (2021).^[314]
The study published by Kaye, Pittman & Wahl (2020), reporting evidence interpreted by the authors as indicative of the feather moulting in the Thermopolis specimen of Archaeopteryx,^[315] is criticized by Kiat et al. (2021).^[316]^[317]
A study on the cellular preservation in the calcified cartilage of specimens of Confuciusornis and Yanornis from the Early Cretaceous Jehol biota (northeast China) is published by Bailleul & Zhou (2021).^[318]
A study on the nanostructures of the melanosomes sampled from a specimen of Eoconfuciusornis from the Lower Cretaceous Huajiying Formation (China) is published by Pan et al. (2021), who interpret their findings as evidence of brilliant iridescent plumage color in Eoconfuciusornis.^[319]
A study on the histology of the scapulocoracoid in Confuciusornis is published by Wu et al. (2021).^[320]
New enantiornithine specimen with a well-preserved skull, retaining the plesiomorphic dinosaurian palate and diapsid temporal configurations indicative of an akinetic skull, is described from the Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation (China) by Wang et al. (2021), who evaluate the implications of this specimen for the knowledge of the evolution of bird skulls.^[321]
A study on teeth replacement patterns in members of Enantiornithes, based on data from three specimens from the Cretaceous Adamantina Formation (Brazil), is published by Wu et al. (2021).^[322]
A study aiming to infer resting metabolic rates of Concornis and Iberomesornis on the basis of data from bone histology is published by Cubo et al. (2021).^[323]
A study on the anatomy of the quadrate bone of Longipteryx chaoyangensis, evaluating its possible functional implications, is published by Stidham & O'Connor (2021), who consider Camptodontornis yangi and Shengjingornis yangi as synonyms of Longipteryx.^[324]
Description of a new bohaiornithid specimen from the Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation (China), providing new information on the skull anatomy and teeth replacement pattern in bohaiornithids, and a study on the phylogenetic relationships of enantiornithines traditionally included in the family Bohaiornithidae, is published by Liu et al. (2021; final version published in 2022).^[325]
A study on the identity of purported gastroliths reported in a referred specimen of Bohaiornis guoi from the Early Cretaceous of China is published by Liu et al. (2021).^[326]
A study on the bone histology and growth of the skeleton of Mirarce eatoni is published by Atterholt et al. (2021).^[327]
An almost complete juvenile specimen of Archaeorhynchus is described from the Aptian Jiufotang Formation (China) by Foth et al. (2021), who evaluate the implications of the anatomy of this specimen for the knowledge of the ontogenetic development of Mesozoic birds.^[328]
A study on variations in bone growth and on the thermal regime of Yanornis martini is published by Monfroy et al. (2021).^[329]
Ju et al. (2021) revise the fossil material of Iteravis huchzermeyeri and Gansus zheni, and consider these species to be synonymous.^[330]
A study on the bone histology of Gansus yumenensis, and on its implications for the knowledge of the evolution of uninterrupted bone deposition in birds, is published by Monfroy et al. (2021).^[331]
A cervical vertebra of a member of Ornithuromorpha distinct from Gargantuavis, representing the first fossil evidence of a giant bird from the late Maastrichtian of Europe reported to date, is described from Beranuy (Huesca, Spain) by Pérez-Pueyo et al. (2021).^[332]
Torres, Norell & Clarke (2021) describe a new specimen of Ichthyornis dispar from the Niobrara Formation (Kansas, United States), preserving a nearly complete skull, and evaluate the implications of the anatomy of this specimen for the knowledge of the evolution of birds and for the knowledge of probable reasons why birds survived the end-Cretaceous mass extinction.^[333]
New information on the anatomy of Vegavis iaai, based on data from the holotype specimen which was fully extracted from the sedimentary matrix, is presented by Acosta Hospitaleche & Worthy (2021).^[334]
Mayr & Zelenkov (2021) interpret eogruids and ergilornithids as representatives of the stem group of Struthioniformes, based on data from new fossils from the late Eocene of Mongolia.^[335]
A fossil ostrich specimen with exceptional soft-tissue preservation is described from the Miocene Liushu Formation (Linxia Basin, China) by Li et al. (2021).^[336]
A femur of a giant ostrich, significantly larger than the living common ostrich, is described from the Pleistocene Nihewan Formation (China) by Buffetaut & Angst (2021), who assign it to Pachystruthio indet. and interpret this finding as evidence of wide geographical distribution of giant ostriches in the Early Pleistocene of Eurasia.^[337]
A study on the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of extant and fossil tinamous is published by Almeida et al. (2021).^[338]
A mid-Holocene coprolite deposit attributed to the bush moa is reported from southern New Zealand by Wood et al. (2021), who evaluate the implications of this finding for the knowledge of the diet and ecology of this moa.^[339]
A study comparing egg size and volume in extinct island emus and in mainland emu, aiming to determine egg size in relation to body size in island emus and their breeding strategy, is published by Hume & Robertson (2021).^[340]
A study on the phylogenetic relationships of Brontornis burmeisteri is published by Agnolin (2021), who interprets this taxon as a member of Galloanserae.^[341]
Reexamination of specimens of Omorhamphus storchii and Gastornis parisiensis alleged to preserve alveoli for teeth is published by Louchart et al. (2021), who reject claims of presence of teeth in gastornithids.^[342]
A study on the morphology of the dromornithid brain, based on data from dromornithid endocast material spanning from the late Oligocene to the late Miocene, is published by Handley & Worthy (2021).^[343]
A study on the bone histology, growth dynamics and life history of Genyornis newtoni is published by Chinsamy & Worthy (2021).^[344]
A study on bone pathologies in specimens of Genyornis newtoni from the Lake Callabonna fossil deposit (Australia) is published by McInerney et al. (2021), who interpret the studied specimens as likely affected by osteomyelitis.^[345]
Partial humerus of a coscoroba swan is described from the Upper Pleistocene Capellanía Formation (Argentina) by Vezzosi et al. (2021), who evaluate the implications of this finding for the knowledge of the knowledge of the dispersal of Neotropical swans during the Pleistocene.^[346]
Partial skull of a pheasant-sized galliform land bird of uncertain phylogenetic placement is described from the latest Eocene or earliest Oligocene Jansen Creek Member of the Makah Formation (Washington, United States) by Mayr, Goedert & Rabenstein (2021), who report that this specimen preserves a foramen in the temporal region that enabled the vena profunda to enter the braincase, and interpret this foramen as a previously unnoticed cranial autapomorphy of galliforms.^[347]
Redescription of Columba congi is published by Shen, Stidham & Li (2021).^[348]
Description of new fossil material of Scandiavis mikkelseni from the Eocene Fur Formation (Denmark), providing new information on the brain anatomy of this bird, and a study on the phylogenetic affinities of Scandiavis is published by Heingård et al. (2021).^[349]
Oswald et al. (2021) recover a nearly complete mitochondrial genome of the Haitian cave rail (Nesotrochis steganinos) from fossils, and find this bird to be a relative of the families Sarothruridae and Aptornithidae rather than a rallid as previously thought.^[350]
A study reconstructing the wing musculature of the great auk and Mancalla is published by Watanabe, Field & Matsuoka (2021).^[351]
New fossil material of plotopterids, resembling bones of Olympidytes (which was previously considered endemic to North America), is described from the Eocene to Oligocene Itanoura and Kakinoura formations (Japan) by Mori & Miyata (2021), who interpret these fossils as indicating that early diversity of this family in Japan was higher than previously thought.^[352]
New fossil material of plotopterids is described from Washington by Mayr & Goedert (2021), who also revise the species Tonsala buchanani and transfer it to the genus Klallamornis.^[353]
A carpometacarpus of a petrel, potentially representing a new genus and species, is described from the Miocene Gaiman Formation (Argentina) by Piro & Acosta Hospitaleche (2021).^[354]
A study on the anatomy and pneumaticity of the skull and on the paleoneurology of the fossil banded penguin Spheniscus urbinai is published by Acosta Hospitaleche, Paulina‐Carabajal & Yury‐Yáñez (2021).^[355]
A study on the new referred material of Dryornis pampeanus from the Pliocene Chapadmalal Formation (Argentina) and on the phylogenetic relationships of this species is published by Degrange et al. (2021), who interpret D. pampeanus as the largest cathartiform reported to date.^[356]
The first unequivocal fossil material of teratorns from the Pleistocene of South America is described from four fossiliferous localities of Central Argentina by Cenizo et al. (2021), who evaluate the implications of these fossils for the knowledge of the evolutionary history of teratorns, and update the taxonomy of the family.^[357]
A study on the feeding capabilities and behaviour of the Haast's eagle is published by van Heteren et al. (2021).^[358]
Description of a partial skeleton of a member of the genus Septencoracias from the Eocene London Clay (United Kingdom), belonging or related to the species S. morsensis, and a study on the phylogenetic affinities and likely ecology of this bird is published by Mayr (2021).^[359]
Redescription of the type specimen of Macrornis tanaupus from the Eocene Totland Bay Formation (Hampshire, United Kingdom) is published by Buffetaut & Angst (2021), who interpret this fossil as a partial tibiotarsus of a large terrestrial bird, possibly a phorusrhacid.^[360]
A review of the knowledge of phorusrhacid skull anatomy is presented by Degrange (2021).^[361]
Mayr, De Pietri & Scofield (2021) describe new fossil material of birds from the Eocene Nanjemoy Formation (Virginia, United States), including the first representatives of the families Messelasturidae, Psittacopedidae and Zygodactylidae from this formation.^[362]
Two passerine specimens representing different size classes (thrush-sized and sylvid-sized), providing information on skeletal element proportions of the middle Miocene passerines, are described from the Miocene of Austria by Happ et al. (2021).^[363]
A distal end of the left tarsometatarsus of a phasianid, which represents the first avian fossil record of Taiwan, is described from the Pleistocene Chiting Formation (Tainan, Taiwan) by Tsai & Mayr (2021).^[364]
A study on the mechanics of egg incubation by giant extinct birds is published by Yen et al. (2021).^[365]
Revision of the fossil material of birds from Miocene localities in the Iberian Peninsula is published by Sánchez-Marco (2021).^[366]
Ramírez-Castro & Reynoso (2021) report fossil material of a shelduck and a ringed kingfisher from the Chapala-Zacoalco basins (Mexico), providing new information on the distribution of these birds in the Late Pleistocene.^[367]
An assemblage of bird bones dated to late Pleistocene through middle Holocene is described from the Istykskaya cave (Pamir Mountains; Tajikistan) by Zelenkov, Sayfulloev, Shnaider (2021), who report the presence of bones of the water rail and a species of Podiceps (the black-necked grebe or the horned grebe) which were not recorded at such high altitudes before, and interpret this finding as evidence of milder environmental conditions in Eastern Pamir during late Quaternary.^[368]
A study on the sensory systems in extant kiwis and the kākāpō and extinct moa and elephant birds is published by Johnston & Mitchell (2021).^[369]
A study aiming to determine the impact of global climatic changes during the last 120,000 years on Afro-Palearctic migrant birds, as indicated by paleoclimate data and genomic-based estimates of effective population size, is published by Thorup et al. (2021).^[370]

New taxa

Name	Novelty	Status	Authors	Age	Type locality	Country	Notes	Images
Apteryx littoralis^[371]	Sp. nov	Valid	Tennyson & Tomotani	Pleistocene	Upper Rangitikei Formation	New Zealand	A kiwi.
Archaehierax^[372]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Mather et al.	Late Oligocene	Namba Formation	Australia	A member of the family Accipitridae. The type species is A. sylvestris.
Archaeodromus^[373]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Mayr	Eocene (Ypresian)	London Clay	United Kingdom	A member of the family Archaeotrogonidae. The type species is A. anglicus.
Bitumenpicus^[374]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Campbell & Bocheński	Late Pleistocene	La Brea Tar Pits	United States ( California)	A woodpecker. The type species is B. minimus.
Breacopus^[374]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Campbell & Bocheński	Late Pleistocene	La Brea Tar Pits	United States ( California)	A woodpecker. The type species is B. garretti.
Brevidentavis^[375]	Gen. et sp. nov	In press	O'Connor et al.	Early Cretaceous	Xiagou Formation	China	An early member of Ornithuromorpha. The type species is B. zhangi. The generic name "Brachydontornis" is also used by the authors.
Brevirostruavis^[376]	Gen. et sp. nov	In press	Li et al.	Early Cretaceous	Jiufotang Formation	China	A member of Enantiornithes. The type species is B. macrohyoideus.
Bumbalavis^[377]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Zelenkov	Late Paleocene-early Eocene	Naran-Bulak Formation	Mongolia	A member of the family Presbyornithidae. The type species is B. anatoides.
Bumbanipes^[378]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Zelenkov	Early Eocene		Mongolia	A member of Gruiformes showing the greatest similarity with modern limpkin. The type species is B. aramoides.
Bumbanipodius^[378]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Zelenkov	Early Eocene		Mongolia	A member of Galliformes showing morphological similarities with Argillipes aurorum and members of the family Quercymegapodiidae. The type species is B. magnus.
Bumbaniralla^[378]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Zelenkov	Early Eocene		Mongolia	Bird described on the basis of a coracoid, morphologically intermediate between those of Walbeckornis and members of the family Messelornithidae. The type species is B. walbeckornithoides.
Bumbanortyx^[378]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Zelenkov	Early Eocene		Mongolia	A small galliform bird showing morphological similarities with members of the families Quercymegapodiidae and Gallinuloididae. The type species is B. transitoria.
Buteo dondasi^[379]	Sp. nov	Valid	Degrange et al.	Pliocene (Piacenzian)	Chapadmalal Formation	Argentina	A large buzzard, a species of Buteo.
Buteogallus irpus^[380]	Sp. nov	Valid	Suárez & Olson	Quaternary (probably late Pleistocene)		Cuba Dominican Republic	A species of Buteogallus.
Crosnoornis^[381]	Gen. et sp. nov	In press	Bocheński et al.	Oligocene (Rupelian)		Poland	A passerine, an early member of Suboscines. The type species is C. nargizia.
Eopelecanus^[382]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	El Adli et al.	Eocene (Priabonian)	Birket Qarun Formation	Egypt	A pelican. The type species is E. aegyptiacus.
Fortipesavis^[383]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Clark & O'Connor	Early Cretaceous (Albian)	Burmese amber	Myanmar	A member of Enantiornithes. The type species is F. prehendens.
Gallirallus astolfoi^[384]	Sp. nov	Valid	Salvador, Anderson & Tennyson	Holocene		French Polynesia	A species of Gallirallus.
Kairuku waewaeroa^[385]	Sp. nov	Valid	Giovanardi, Ksepka & Thomas	Oligocene (Whaingaroan)	Glen Massey Formation	New Zealand	A penguin, a species of Kairuku.
Klallamornis buchanani^[386]	Comb nov	valid	(Dyke, Wang, & Habib)	Oligocene	Pysht Formation	USA Washington	A plotopterid. Transferred from "Tonsala" buchanani (2011).^[387]	Klallamornis buchanani
Kaririavis^[388]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Carvalho et al.	Early Cretaceous (Aptian)	Crato Formation	Brazil	An early member of Ornithuromorpha. The type species is K. mater.
Manuherikia primadividua^[389]	Sp. nov	In press	Worthy et al.	Miocene	Bannockburn Formation	New Zealand	A member of the family Anatidae from the St Bathans fauna.
Marambiornopsis^[390]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Jadwiszczak, Reguero & Mörs	Eocene (Priabonian)	Submeseta Formation	Antarctica	A small-sized penguin. The type species is M. sobrali.
Margarobyas abronensis^[391]	Sp. nov	In press	Zelenkov & González	Late Pleistocene		Cuba	A species of Margarobyas.
Meemannavis^[375]	Gen. et sp. nov	In press	O'Connor et al.	Early Cretaceous	Xiagou Formation	China	An early member of Ornithuromorpha. The type species is M. ductrix.
Melanerpes shawi^[374]	Sp. nov	Valid	Campbell & Bocheński	Late Pleistocene	La Brea Tar Pits	United States ( California)	A woodpecker, a species of Melanerpes.
Neimengornis^[392]	Gen. et sp. nov		Wang et al.	Early Cretaceous	Jiufotang Formation	China	A member of Jeholornithiformes. The type species is N. rectusmim.
Palaeogeranos^[393]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Louchart & Duhamel	Early Oligocene		France	A member of Gruoidea related to the limpkin and cranes. The type species is P. tourmenti.
Parapsittacopes^[394]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Mayr	Early Eocene	London Clay	United Kingdom	A relative of Psittacopes, Pumiliornis and Morsoravis. The type species is P. bergdahli.
Pica praepica^[395]	Sp. nov	Valid	Boev	Early Pleistocene		Bulgaria	A species of Pica.
Procellaria altirostris^[396]	Sp. nov	Valid	Tennyson & Tomotani	Pliocene (Piacenzian)	Tangahoe Formation	New Zealand	A species of Procellaria.
Tynskya waltonensis^[397]	Sp. nov	Valid	Mayr	Eocene (Ypresian)	London Clay	United Kingdom	A species of the messelasturid Tynskya.
Ueekenkcoracias^[398]	Gen. et sp. nov		Degrange et al.	Eocene (Ypresian)	Huitrera Formation	Argentina	A member of the stem group of Coracii. The type species is U. tambussiae.
Vinchinavis^[399]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Tambussi et al.	Miocene	Toro Negro	Argentina	A large eagle. The type species is V. paka. Announced in 2020; the final version of the article naming it was published in 2021.
Yuanchuavis^[400]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Wang et al.	Early Cretaceous	Jiufotang Formation	China	A member of Enantiornithes belonging to the family Pengornithidae. The type species is Y. kompsosoura.
Yuornis^[401]	Gen. et sp. nov	In press	Xu et al.	Late Cretaceous	Qiupa Formation	China	A member of Enantiornithes. The type species is Y. junchangi.

Pterosaurs

Research

A study aiming to determine the nature and average number of osteological characters used to diagnose pterosaur species, as well as aiming to estimate how many pterosaur taxa are still unknown, is published by Fernandes, Nunes & Costa (2021).^[402]
A study on the phylogenetic affinities of pterosaurs is published by Baron (2021).^[403]
A study on the flight abilities of hatchling pterosaurs is published by Naish, Witton & Martin-Silverstone (2021).^[404]
A study on size range of pterosaurs from the Cretaceous Kem Kem Group (Morocco) and on the bone histology of small pterosaur specimens from these strata is published by Smith et al. (2021), who interpret their findings as indicating that in the Cretaceous period the niches previously occupied by small pterosaurs were increasingly occupied by early ontogenetic stages of large pterosaurs rather than by birds.^[405]
New information on the skeletal anatomy of Austriadraco dallavecchiai is provided by Dalla Vecchia (2021).^[406]
Fossil material of a rhamphorhynchine pterosaur is described from the Upper Jurassic Cerro Campamento Formation (Chile) by Alarcón-Muñoz et al. (2021), representing the first record of this group from Gondwana reported to date.^[407]
An early juvenile or late hatchling specimen of Kunpengopterus sinensis, providing new information on the skeletal changes during ontogeny in wukongopterids, is described from the Tiaojishan Formation (China) by Jiang et al. (2021).^[408]
Pêgas, Costa & Kellner (2021) attempt to reconstruct the adductor musculature of the pterodactyloid skull, and to estimate bite force for nine pterodactyloid species.^[409]
A study on soft tissues of a pterodactyloid specimen from the Upper Jurassic Solnhofen Limestones (Germany) is published by Pittman et al. (2021), who interpret their findings as providing evidence of the presence of a biological wing root fairing in pterosaurs.^[410]
A well-preserved large skull of Ctenochasma elegans is described from the Upper Jurassic Painten Formation (Germany) by Bennett (2021).^[411]
Partial mandible of Forfexopterus is described from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota (China) by Zhou, Wang & Wang (2021), who report evidence of tooth wear in this specimen, making it the first known record of tooth-tooth occlusion in ctenochasmatids, and evaluate its implications for the knowledge of the feeding strategy of ctenochasmatids.^[412]
Fragment of an ulna of a pteranodontid pterosaur is described from the Campanian locality Polunino 2 (Volgograd Oblast, Russia) by Averianov & Yarkov (2021), representing the first record of the family Pteranodontidae from the Lower Volga region reported so far.^[413]
A review of putative boreopterid pterosaurs from the South Korea was published by Yun (2021), who concluded that they could not be confidently referred to Boreopteridae.^[414]
New specimen of Istiodactylus latidens, probably coming from the Lower Cretaceous Vectis Formation (United Kingdom) and possibly representing the missing jaws of the holotype of this species, is described by Averianov et al. (2021).^[415]
Bantim et al. (2021) describe a pteranodontoid pterosaur with anhanguerid affinities from Aptian-age deposits of the Romualdo Formation (Brazil).^[416]
A new pterodactyloid mandible from the Valanginian of Germany is described by Abel et al. (2021), representing the oldest anhanguerian known to date.^[417]
A study on the variation of pneumaticity patterns in the vertebral column of an anhanguerid specimen from the Romualdo Formation is published by Buchmann et al. (2021).^[418]
Solonin et al. (2021) describe teeth from the Upper Cretaceous (Santonian) Dmitrov Formation (Ryazan Oblast, Russia), referrable to ornithocheirid pterosaurs, leading to the first occurrence of them in said formation.^[419]
A well-preserved, almost complete and articulated new specimen of Tupandactylus navigans, associated with soft tissue remains, is described from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation (Brazil) by Beccari et al. (2021).^[420]
New specimen of Sinopterus dongi, improving knowledge on the anatomy of this pterosaur, is described from the Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation (China) by Shen et al. (2021).^[421]
Partial femur of a large-sized dsungaripteroid pterosaur is described from the Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) Praia da Amoreira–Porto Novo Formation (Portugal) by Bertozzo et al. (2021), representing the second confirmed report of a dsungaripteroid from the Jurassic, and the first record of this group from the Iberian Peninsula reported to date.^[422]
Postcranial elements referrable to Lonchognathosaurus, confirming the validity of the genus and providing new information on the anatomy of this pterosaur, are described from the Lower Cretaceous Lianmuqin Formation (China) by Augustin et al. (2021).^[423]
114 small pterosaur footprints, possibly produced by pterosaurs belonging to the species Noripterus complicidens, are described from the Lower Cretaceous Shengjinkou Formation (China) by Li, Wang & Jiang (2021), who name a new ichnospecies Pteraichnus wuerhoensis.^[424]
New fossil material of pterosaurs is described from the Lower Cretaceous Lianmuqin Formation (China) by Augustin et al. (2021), who interpret these fossils as probable evidence of the presence of a second dsungaripterid taxon (distinct from Lonchognathosaurus) in this formation.^[425]
New fossil material of dsungaripterids is described from the Lower Cretaceous Hutubei Formation (China) by Augustin et al. (2021), representing the first record of pterosaurs from this formation reported to date, and one of the oldest records of dsungaripterids from the Tugulu Group.^[426]
A study on the internal architecture and mechanical properties of a hyper-elongate cervical vertebra of an azhdarchid pterosaur from the Kem Kem Group (Morocco) is published by Williams et al. (2021).^[427]
Fragment of the wing metacarpal of an azhdarchid is described from the Campanian of the Orenburg Oblast (Russia) by Averianov, Zverkov & Nikiforov (2021), representing the first record of a pterosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Southern Urals reported to date.^[428]
A study on the anatomy and phylogenetic affinities of Aerotitan sudamericanus is published by Pêgas et al. (2021; final version published in 2022), who name the new clades Azhdarchomorpha and Alanqidae.^[429]
A large wing bone (possibly an ulna) of a pterosaur with an estimated wingspan comparable with the holotype specimen of Cryodrakon boreas is described from the Campanian Kaiparowits Formation (Utah, United States) by Farke (2021).^[430]
Studies on the paleoenvironment, functional morphology, and the phylogenetic affinities of Quetzalcoatlus, which also focuses on the phylogeny of pterosaurs in general and names the new clades Azhdarchiformes, Nyctosauromorpha and Ornithocheiriformes are published by Lehman et al. (2021),^[431] Padian et al. (2021)^[432] and Andres (2021).^[433]

New taxa

Name	Novelty	Status	Authors	Age	Type locality	Country	Notes
Draigwenia^[434]	Gen. et comb. nov	Valid	Holgado	Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian)	Cambridge Greensand	United Kingdom	An ornithocheiromorph. The type species is "Ornithocheirus" platystomus Seeley (1870).
Kariridraco^[435]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Cerqueira et al.	Early Cretaceous (Aptian)	Romualdo Formation	Brazil	A member of the subfamily Thalassodrominae. The type species is K. dianae.
Kunpengopterus antipollicatus^[436]	Sp. nov	Valid	Zhou et al.	Late Jurassic (Oxfordian)	Tiaojishan Formation	China	A wukongopterid, a species of Kunpengopterus.
Leptostomia^[437]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Smith et al.	Cretaceous (?Albian–Cenomanian)	Kem Kem	Morocco	A small, long-beaked pterosaur, likely a member of Azhdarchoidea. The type species is L. begaaensis. Announced in 2020; the final version of the article naming it was published in 2021.
Quetzalcoatlus lawsoni^[438]	Sp. nov	Valid	Andres and Langston Jr.	Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)	Javelina Formation	United States ( Texas)	A quetzalcoatline azhdarchid, a species of Quetzalcoatlus.
Sinomacrops^[439]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Wei et al.	Middle–Late Jurassic (Callovian–Oxfordian)	Tiaojishan Formation	China	An anurognathid. The type species is S. bondei.
Tacuadactylus^[440]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Soto et al.	Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian)	Tacuarembó Formation	Uruguay	A gnathosaurine ctenochasmatid. The type species is T. luciae
Thapunngaka^[441]	Gen. et sp. nov	Valid	Richards, Stumkat & Salisbury	Early Cretaceous (Albian)	Toolebuc Formation	Australia	A member of the family Anhangueridae. The type species is T. shawi.
Wellnhopterus^[438]	Gen. et sp. nov	Debated	Andres and Langston Jr.	Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)	Javelina Formation	United States ( Texas)	An azhdarchid. The type species is W. brevirostris. Part of the type specimen was independently made the type specimen of the species "Javelinadactylus sagebieli" the same year; however, the article naming that species was subsequently retracted.^[442]

Other archosaurs

Research

Marchetti et al. (2021) revise the tetrapod (including dinosauromorph) footprint assemblage from the Quarziti del Monte Serra Formation (Ladinian of Italy), and interpret this assemblage and other findings of Ladinian dinosauromorph footprints as evidence of wide dispersal of dinosauromorphs as early as the Middle Triassic.^[443]
The first putative forelimb and pectoral girdle of Lagerpeton chanarensis is described by McCabe & Nesbitt (2021).^[444]
A study on the nature of tooth attachment in silesaurids, and on its implications of the knowledge of the evolution of tooth attachment of archosaurs, is published by Mestriner et al. (2021).^[445]
Two partial skeletons of Lewisuchus admixtus, providing new information on the anatomy of this dinosauriform, are described from the Chañares Formation (Argentina) by Agnolín et al. (2021).^[446]

General research

Pseudosuchians

Crocodylomorphs

Crocodylomorph research

Aetosaur research

General pseudosuchian research

Non-avian dinosaurs

Research

General

Saurischians

Theropods

Sauropodomorphs

Ornithischians

Thyreophorans

Cerapods

New taxa

Birds

Research

New taxa

Pterosaurs

Research

New taxa

Other archosaurs

Research

References