Elizabeth S. Anderson
Born (1959-12-05) December 5, 1959 (age 61)
United States
Alma materHarvard University, Swarthmore College
AwardsGuggenheim Fellowship; MacArthur Fellows Program; Society for Progress Medal for Private Government
EraContemporary philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolAnalytic, pragmatism
InstitutionsUniversity of Michigan
Doctoral advisorJohn Rawls

Elizabeth Secor Anderson (born 5 December 1959) is an American philosopher. She is Arthur F. Thurnau Professor and John Dewey Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies at the University of Michigan and specializes in political philosophy, ethics, and feminist philosophy.[1]

Education and career

Raised in Manchester, Connecticut, Anderson graduated from Manchester High School in 1977. Her father, an engineer for United Technologies, got her interested in philosophy by reading John Stuart Mill and Plato with her.[2]

Anderson received a B.A. with high honors in philosophy with a minor in economics from Swarthmore College in 1981. In 1987 Anderson completed a Ph.D. in Philosophy at Harvard University. She was a visiting instructor of philosophy at Swarthmore College 1985–86 and took up a position at the University of Michigan in 1987. She was Associate Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies 1993–1999 and was promoted to professor in 1999. In 1994, she was named Arthur F. Thurnau Professor to recognize her dedication to undergraduate education with a demonstrable impact on the intellectual development and lives of her students. In 2005 she was named John Rawls Collegiate Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, and in 2013 the John Dewey Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies.

Anderson was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2008.[3] In 2013, Anderson received a Guggenheim Fellowship to support her work.[4] Anderson was named a Progress Medal Laureate in February 2018 by the Society for Progress for her book Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don't Talk about It).[5] In 2019, she received a "Genius Grant" from the MacArthur Fellows Program. Anderson was also among the unranked bottom 40 in the 2020 Prospect list of the top 50 thinkers for the COVID-19 era.[6]

Philosophical work

Anderson's research covers topics in social philosophy, political philosophy and ethics, including: democratic theory, equality in political philosophy and American law, racial integration, the ethical limits of markets, theories of value and rational choice (alternatives to consequentialism and economic theories of rational choice), the philosophies of John Stuart Mill and John Dewey, and feminist epistemology and philosophy of science.[7]

Anderson's most cited work is her article in the Ethics journal, titled 'What is the Point of Equality'.[8] Within the article, she harshly criticises Luck Egalitarianism: a contemporaneously popular view espoused by writers such as Ronald Dworkin. She advocates for a more relational understanding of equality founded upon democratic principles.[9]

Anderson's book The Imperative of Integration[10] was winner of the American Philosophical Association's 2011 Joseph B. Gittler Award, for "an outstanding scholarly contribution in the field of the philosophy of one or more of the social sciences."[11] She is also author of Value in Ethics and Economics,[12] and dozens of articles.[13]

The Work Ethic

In a variety of lectures and publications, Anderson has explored the work ethic in terms of its origins and continued influence on culture.[14][15] Much of her work focuses on American culture and history, but is broadly influenced by, and applicable to European countries which prominently feature shareholder capitalism.

Anderson reiterates Max Weber (in his 1905 The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism) who points to the protestants, most prominently Richard Baxter, as being the originators of the work ethic. Calvinists believed that to enter heaven and become a saint, one must have faith. Baxter argued that there is no way to know by simple self reflection whether one has faith or not. Instead, one must look to action; specifically, a person’s work ethic. Laziness and sloth were seen as evidence of declining faith. Baxter, in his The Saints Everlasting Rest (1650), set out the core tenets of the protestant work ethic. Many formative puritan thinkers, such as Robert Sanderson, saw workers as doing their duty to God and thus promoted distinctly pro-worker values.[16]

Eventually, these protestant values became secularized by the classical liberals (including Adam Smith, Thomas Payne, John Stuart Mill, etc.) However, Anderson notes that two flavors of thoughts on the work ethic emerged: a conservatives, pro-capital as well as a progressive, pro-worker sets of values. She argues that this was the result of the industrial revolution which split up craftspeople into a capital owning, a working, and an immiserated class (what we consider the precariat today). This divided the work ethic into the progressive interpretations favored by workers, and the conservatives interpretation favored by capital owners.[17]

Anderson goes on to argue that many of the neo-liberal arguments are largely rooted in the works of Thomas Robert Malthus and Jeremy Bentham, and not the actual classical liberals. Malthus espoused stringent individual responsibility, arguing that people were poor because of their own laziness, promiscuity, and vices. Bentham originated the notion that private capitalists would be able to create more efficient delivery of services than the state could.

In contrast the classical liberals were distinctly more pro-worker, and inconsistent with modern day conservatives neo-liberal values. Anderson argues there was a reversal in which capital owners reversed the ire away from the idle rich, onto the poor instead. However, in doing so, many of these ideas became contradictory. Anderson provides multiple examples: while conservatives argue against welfare (because supposedly handouts cannot bring happiness) this argument is not used against the passive receipt of dividends. The idea of individual responsibility is often cited as a reason to not help debtors, but is rarely leveled against creditors for having issued risky loans, or having already charged a risk premium. Anti-monopoly sentiments are often levied against unions, but not against IP protection laws, nor the deconstruction of antitrust laws.[18]

Personal life

Anderson is married to David R. Jacobi, a medical doctor practicing in Detroit, Michigan. The couple have two children named Sean and Benjamin.[9]



Chapters in books

Selected journal articles


  1. ^ "Elizabeth Anderson | U-M LSA Philosophy". lsa.umich.edu. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  2. ^ Dunne, Susan (25 September 2019). "Glastonbury poet Ocean Vuong and Manchester philosopher Elizabeth Anderson win 2019 MacArthur 'genius grants'". Hartford Courant. Hartford, Connecticut. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  3. ^ "Professor Elizabeth S. Anderson". American Academy of Arts & Sciences. Archived from the original on 6 January 2017. Retrieved 3 April 2014. Fellow elected 2008
  4. ^ "Elizabeth S. Anderson". John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. Archived from the original on 1 April 2014. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
  5. ^ societyforprogress.org. "The Medals | Society for Progress". societyforprogress.org. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  6. ^ "The world's top 50 thinkers for the Covid-19 age" (PDF). Prospect. 2020. Retrieved 2020-09-08.
  7. ^ "Elizabeth Anderson". Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan. Archived from the original on 11 June 2015. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
  8. ^ Anderson, Elizabeth S (January 1999). "What is the point of equality?". Ethics. 109 (2): 287–337. doi:10.1086/233897. JSTOR 10.1086/233897. S2CID 144596596.
  9. ^ a b Heller, Nathan (2019). "The Philosopher Redefining Equality". The New Yorker. Retrieved 27 January 2019.
  10. ^ Anderson, Elizabeth (2013). Imperative of integration. S.l: Princeton Univ Press. ISBN 9780691158112.
  11. ^ "Joseph B. Gittler Award - Previous Winners". The American Philosophical Association. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
  12. ^ Anderson, Elizabeth (1993). Value in ethics and economics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674931909.
  13. ^ "Works by Elizabeth Anderson". The PhilPapers Foundation. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
  14. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzRKsprglDs&ab_channel=CentrefortheStudyofGovernanceandSocietyCSGS
  15. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39g51wX_lrY&ab_channel=YanP.LinCentre%2CMcGillUniversity
  16. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzRKsprglDs&ab_channel=CentrefortheStudyofGovernanceandSocietyCSGS
  17. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzRKsprglDs&ab_channel=CentrefortheStudyofGovernanceandSocietyCSGS
  18. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39g51wX_lrY&ab_channel=YanP.LinCentre%2CMcGillUniversity
External video
video icon On Contact: Tyranny of the corporate workplace – Elizabeth Anderson on YouTube

PortalsAccess related topicsBiography portalPhilosophy portalPolitics portalFeminism portalUnited States portal