French writer Françoise d'Eaubonne coined the term in a 1974 book

Ecofeminism is a branch of feminism and political ecology. Ecofeminist thinkers draw on the concept of gender to analyse the relationships between humans and the natural world.[1] The term was coined by the French writer Françoise d'Eaubonne in her book Le Féminisme ou la Mort (1974).[2][3] Ecofeminist theory asserts a feminist perspective of Green politics that calls for an egalitarian, collaborative society in which there is no one dominant group.[4] Today, there are several branches of ecofeminism, with varying approaches and analyses, including liberal ecofeminism, spiritual/cultural ecofeminism, and social/socialist ecofeminism (or materialist ecofeminism).[4] Interpretations of ecofeminism and how it might be applied to social thought include ecofeminist art, social justice and political philosophy, religion, contemporary feminism, and poetry.

Ecofeminist analysis explores the connections between women and nature in culture, economy, religion, politics, literature and iconography, and addresses the parallels between the oppression of nature and the oppression of women. These parallels include, but are not limited to, seeing women and nature as property, seeing men as the curators of culture and women as the curators of nature, and how men dominate women and humans dominate nature. Ecofeminism emphasizes that both women and nature must be respected.[5]

Though the scope of ecofeminist analysis is dynamic,[6] American author and ecofeminist Charlene Spretnak has offered one way of categorizing ecofeminist work: 1) through the study of political theory as well as history; 2) through the belief and study of nature-based religions; 3) through environmentalism.[7]


While diverse ecofeminist perspectives have emerged from female activists and thinkers all over the world, academic studies of ecofeminism have been dominated by North American universities. Thus, in the 1993 essay entitled "Ecofeminism: Toward Global Justice and Planetary Health", authors Greta Gaard and Lori Gruen outline what they call the "ecofeminist framework". The essay provides a wealth of data and statistics in addition to outlining the theoretical aspects of the ecofeminist critique. The framework was intended to establish ways of viewing and understanding our current global situations so that we can better understand how we arrived at this point and what may be done to ameliorate the ills.

Building on the work of North American scholars Rosemary Ruether and Carolyn Merchant, Gaard and Gruen argue that there are four sides to this framework:

  1. The mechanistic materialist model of the universe that resulted from the scientific revolution and the subsequent reduction of all things into mere resources to be optimized, dead inert matter to be used.
  2. The rise of patriarchal religions and their establishment of gender hierarchies along with their denial of immanent divinity.
  3. The self and other dualisms and the inherent power and domination ethic it entails.
  4. Capitalism and its claimed intrinsic need for the exploitation, destruction and instrumentalization of animals, earth and people for the sole purpose of creating wealth.

They hold that these four factors have brought us to what ecofeminists see as a "separation between nature and culture" that is for them the root source of our planetary ills.[8]

Ecofeminism developed out of anarcha-feminist concerns with abolishing all forms of domination, while focusing on the oppressive nature of humanity's relationship to the natural world.[9] According to Françoise d'Eaubonne in her book Le Féminisme ou la Mort (1974), ecofeminism relates the oppression and domination of all marginalized groups (women, people of color, children, the poor) to the oppression and domination of nature (animals, land, water, air, etc.). In the book, the author argues that oppression, domination, exploitation, and colonization from the Western patriarchal society has directly caused irreversible environmental damage.[10] Françoise d'Eaubonne was an activist and organizer, and her writing encouraged the eradication of all social injustice, not just injustice against women and the environment.[10]

This tradition includes a number of influential texts including: Women and Nature (Susan Griffin 1978), The Death of Nature (Carolyn Merchant 1980) and Gyn/Ecology (Mary Daly 1978). These texts helped to propel the association between domination by men of women and the domination of culture over nature. From these texts feminist activism of the 1980s linked ideas of ecology and the environment. Movements such as the National Toxics Campaign, Mothers of East Los Angeles (MELA), and Native Americans for a Clean Environment (NACE) were led by women devoted to issues of human health and environmental justice.[11] Writings in this circle discussed ecofeminism drawing from Green Party politics, peace movements, and direct action movements.[12]

Gendering nature

Petra Kelly

Ecofeminist theory asserts that capitalism reflects only paternalistic and patriarchal values. This notion implies that the effects of capitalism have not benefited women and has led to a harmful split between nature and culture.[13] In the 1970s, early ecofeminists discussed that the split can only be healed by the feminine instinct for nurture and holistic knowledge of nature's processes.

Since then, several ecofeminist scholars have made the distinction that it is not because women are female or "feminine" that they relate to nature, but because of their similar states of oppression by the same male-dominant forces. The marginalization is evident in the gendered language used to describe nature, such as "Mother Earth" or "Mother Nature", and the animalized language used to describe women in derogatory terms.[14] Some discourses link women specifically to the environment because of their traditional social role as a nurturer and caregiver.[15] Ecofeminists following in this line of thought believe that these connections are illustrated through the coherence of socially-labeled values associated with 'femininity' such as nurturing, which are present both among women and in nature.

Alternatively, ecofeminist and activist Vandana Shiva wrote that women have a special connection to the environment through their daily interactions and that this connection has been underestimated. According to Shiva, women in subsistence economies who produce "wealth in partnership with nature, have been experts in their own right of holistic and ecological knowledge of nature's processes". She makes the point that "these alternative modes of knowing, which are oriented to the social benefits and sustenance needs are not recognized by the capitalist reductionist paradigm, because it fails to perceive the interconnectedness of nature, or the connection of women's lives, work and knowledge with the creation of wealth (23)".[16]  Shiva blames this failure on the Western patriarchal perceptions of development and progress. According to Shiva, patriarchy has labeled women, nature, and other groups not growing the economy as "unproductive".[17] Similarly, Australian ecofeminist Ariel Salleh deepens this materialist ecofeminist approach in dialogue with green politics, ecosocialism, genetic engineering and climate policy.


Modern science and ecofeminism

In Ecofeminism (1993) authors Vandana Shiva and Maria Mies ponder modern science and its acceptance as a universal and value-free system. They view the dominant stream of modern science not as objective science but as a projection of Western men's values.[18] The privilege of determining what is considered scientific knowledge and its usage has been controlled by men, and for the most part of history restricted to men. Many examples exist, including the medicalization of childbirth and the industrialization of plant reproduction.

A common claim within ecofeminist literature is that patriarchal structures justify their dominance through binary opposition, these include but are not limited to: heaven/earth, mind/body, male/female, human/animal, spirit/matter, culture/nature and white/non-white. Oppression, according to them, is reinforced by assuming truth in these binaries, which factuality they challenge, and instilling them as 'marvelous to behold' through what they consider to be religious and scientific constructs.[19]

Vegetarian ecofeminism

Main article: Vegetarian ecofeminism

The application of ecofeminism to animal rights has established vegetarian ecofeminism, which asserts that "omitting the oppression of animals from feminist and ecofeminist analyses … is inconsistent with the activist and philosophical foundations of both feminism (as a "movement to end all forms of oppression") and ecofeminism."[20] It puts into practice "the personal is political", as many ecofeminists believe that "meat-eating is a form of patriarchal domination…that suggests a link between male violence and a meat-based diet."[20] During a 1995 interview with On the Issues, Carol J. Adams stated, "Manhood is constructed in our culture in part by access to meat-eating and control of other bodies, whether it's women or animals".[21] According to Adams, "We cannot work for justice and challenge the oppression of nature without understanding that the most frequent way we interact with nature is by eating animals".[21] Vegetarian ecofeminism combines sympathy with the analysis of culture and politics to refine a system of ethics and action.[20]

Materialist ecofeminism

The key activist-scholars in materialist ecofeminism are Maria Mies and Veronika Bennholdt-Thomsen in Germany; Vandana Shiva in India; Ariel Salleh in Australia; Mary Mellor in the UK; and Ana Isla in Peru. Materialist ecofeminism is not widely known in North America aside from the journal collective at Capitalism Nature Socialism. A materialist view connects institutions such as labor, power, and property as the source of domination over women and nature. There are connections made between these subjects because of the values of production and reproduction.[22] This dimension of ecofeminism may also be referred to as "social feminism", "socialist ecofeminism", or "Marxist ecofeminism". According to Carolyn Merchant, "Social ecofeminism advocates the liberation of women through overturning economic and social hierarchies that turn all aspects of life into a market society that today even invades the womb".[4] Ecofeminism in this sense seeks to eliminate social hierarchies which favor the production of commodities (dominated by men) over biological and social reproduction.

Spiritual and cultural ecofeminism

Spiritual ecofeminism is another branch of ecofeminism, and it is popular among ecofeminist authors such as Starhawk, Riane Eisler, and Carol J. Adams. Starhawk calls this an earth-based spirituality, which recognizes that the Earth is alive, and that we are an interconnected community.[23] Spiritual ecofeminism is not linked to one specific religion, but is centered around values of caring, compassion, and non-violence.[24] Often, ecofeminists refer to more ancient traditions, such as the worship of Gaia, the Goddess of nature and spirituality (also known as Mother Earth).[24] Wicca and Paganism are particularly influential to spiritual ecofeminism. Most Wicca covens demonstrate a deep respect for nature, a feminine outlook, and an aim to establish strong community values.[25]

In her book Radical Ecology, Carolyn Merchant refers to spiritual ecofeminism as "cultural ecofeminism". According to Merchant, cultural ecofeminism, "celebrates the relationship between women and nature through the revival of ancient rituals centered on goddess worship, the moon, animals, and the female reproductive system."[4] In this sense, cultural ecofeminists tend to value intuition, an ethic of caring, and human-nature interrelationships.[4]

Environmental movements

Susan A. Mann, an eco-feminist and professor of sociological and feminist theory, considers the roles women played in these activisms to be the starter for ecofeminism in later centuries. Mann associates the beginning of ecofeminism not with feminists but with women of different races and class backgrounds who made connections among gender, race, class, and environmental issues. This ideal is upheld through the notion that in activist and theory circles marginalized groups must be included in the discussion. In early environmental and women's movements, issues of varying races and classes were often separated.[26]

Beginning in the late 20th century, women worked in efforts to protect wildlife, food, air and water.[27] These efforts depended largely on new developments in the environmental movement from influential writers, such as Henry David Thoreau, Aldo Leopold, John Muir, and Rachel Carson.[28][29] Fundamental examples of women's efforts in the 20th century are the books Silent Spring by Rachel Carson and Refuge by Terry Tempest Williams.

Ecofeminist author Karen Warren lists Aldo Leopold's essay "Land Ethic" (1949) as a fundamental work to the ecofeminist conception, as Leopold was the first to pen an ethic for the land which understands all non-human parts of that community (animals, plants, land, air, water) as equal to and in a relationship with humans. This inclusive understanding of the environment launched the modern preservation movement and illustrated how issues can be viewed through a framework of caring.[10]

Women have participated in environmental movements, specifically preservation and conservation beginning in the late nineteenth century and continuing into the early twentieth century.[30]

Movements of the 1970s and 80s

In India, in the state of Uttarakhand in 1973, women took part in the Chipko movement to protect forests from deforestation. Many men during this time were moving to cities in search of work, and women that stayed in the rural parts of India were reliant on the forests for subsistence.[31] Non-violent protest tactics were used to occupy trees so that loggers could not cut them down.[10]

Wangari Maathai

In Kenya in 1977, the Green Belt Movement was initiated by environmental and political activist Professor Wangari Maathai. It is a rural tree planting program led by women, which Maathai designed to help prevent desertification in the area. The program created a 'green belt' of at least 1,000 trees around villages, and gave participants the ability to take charge in their communities. In later years, the Green Belt Movement was an advocate for informing and empowering citizens through seminars for civic and environmental education, as well as holding national leaders accountable for their actions and instilling agency in citizens.[32] The work of the Green Belt Movement continues today.

In 1978 in New York, mother and environmentalist Lois Gibbs led her community in protest after discovering that their entire neighborhood, Love Canal, was built on top of a toxic dump site. The toxins in the ground were causing illness among children and reproductive issues among women, as well as birth defects in babies born to pregnant women exposed to the toxins. The Love Canal movement eventually led to the evacuation and relocation of nearly 800 families by the federal government.[33]

In 1980 and 1981, women like ecofeminist Ynestra King organized a peaceful protest at the Pentagon. Women stood, hand in hand, demanding equal rights (including social, economic, and reproductive rights) as well as an end to militaristic actions taken by the government and exploitation of the community (people and the environment). This movement is known as the Women's Pentagon Actions.[12]

In 1985, the Akwesasne Mother's Milk Project was launched by Katsi Cook. This study was funded by the government, and investigated how the higher level of contaminants in water near the Mohawk reservation impacted babies. It revealed that through breast milk, Mohawk children were being exposed to 200% more toxins than children not on the reservation. Toxins contaminate water all over the world, but due to environmental racism, certain marginalized groups are exposed to a much higher amount.[34]

The Greening of Harlem Coalition is another example of an ecofeminist movement. In 1989, Bernadette Cozart founded the coalition, which is responsible for many urban gardens around Harlem. Cozart's goal is to turn vacant lots into community gardens.[35] This is economically beneficial, and also provides a way for very urban communities to be in touch with nature and each other. The majority of people interested in this project (as noted in 1990) were women. Through these gardens, they were able to participate in and become leaders of their communities. Urban greening exists in other places as well. Beginning in 1994, a group of African-American women in Detroit have developed city gardens, and call themselves the Gardening Angels. Similar garden movements have occurred globally.[36]

The development of vegetarian ecofeminism can be traced to the mid-80s and 90s, where it first appeared in writing. However, the roots of a vegetarian ecofeminist view can be traced back further by looking at sympathy for non-humans and counterculture movements of the 1960s and 1970s.[20] At the culmination of the decade ecofeminism had spread to both coasts and articulated an intersectional analysis of women and the environment. Eventually, challenging ideas of environmental classism and racism, resisting toxic dumping and other threats to the impoverished.[37]

Vandana Shiva

Major critiques

Accused essentialism

In the 1980s and 1990s ecofeminism began to be heavily critiqued as 'essentialism'. The critics believed ecofeminism to be reinforcing patriarchal dominance and norms.[22] Post structural and third wave feminists argued that ecofeminism equated women with nature and that this dichotomy grouped all women into one category enforcing the very societal norms that feminism is trying to break.

The ascribed essentialism appears in two main areas:

Ecofeminist and author Noel Sturgeon says in an interview that what anti-essentialists are critiquing is a strategy used to mobilize large and diverse groups of both theorists and activists.[40] Additionally, according to ecofeminist and author Charlene Spretnak, modern ecofeminism is concerned about a variety of issues, including reproductive technology, equal pay and equal rights, toxic pollution, Third World development, and more.[7]

As it propelled into the 21st century, ecofeminists became aware of the criticisms, and in response they began doing research and renaming the topic, i.e. queer ecologies, global feminist environmental justice, and gender and the environment.[37] The essentialism concern was mostly found among North American academics. In Europe and the global South, class, race, gender and species dominations were framed by more grounded materialist understandings.[citation needed]

Socialist feminist critiques

Social ecologist and feminist Janet Biehl has criticized ecofeminism for focusing too much on a mystical connection between women and nature and not enough on the actual conditions of women.[41] She has also stated that rather than being a forward-moving theory, ecofeminism is an anti-progressive movement for women.[41] The ecofeminist believes that women and nature have a strong bond because of their shared history of patriarchal oppression; whereas, the socialist feminist focuses on gender roles in the political economy. The socialist feminist may oppose the ecofeminist by arguing that women do not have an intrinsic connection with nature; rather, that is a socially constructed narrative.[42]

Rosemary Radford Ruether also critiqued this focus on mysticism over work that focuses on helping women, but argues that spirituality and activism can be combined effectively in ecofeminism.[43]

(Anti-essentialist) Intersectional ecofeminisms

A. E. Kings as well as Norie Ross Singer theorize that ecofeminism must be approached from an intersectionality perspective, and advance an anti-essentialist critical ecofeminism of difference accounting for how multiple axes of identity such as gender, race, and class variously intermesh in human-nonhuman relationships.[44] Kings argues[45] that the discipline is fundamentally intersectional given that it is built upon the idea that patriarchal violence against women is connected to domination of nature. Simultaneously, Kings warns against the presumption of intersectional thought as a natural component of ecofeminism, so as not to disregard the distinctive academic contributions of intersectional feminists.[46]

Feminist thought surrounding ecofeminism grew in some areas as it was criticized; vegetarian ecofeminism contributed intersectional analysis; and ecofeminisms that analyzed animal rights, labor rights and activisms as they could draw lines among oppressed groups. To some, the inclusion of non-human animals also came to be viewed as essentialist.[citation needed]

Ableism and white saviorism

Environmental movements have often been criticized for their lack of consideration for the participation of people with disabilities.[47] Although environmental justice and feminist care ethics have made political pushes for participation of marginalized groups, people with disabilities face issues of access and representation in policy making. In a paper by author Andrew Charles, Deaf people in Wales show concern about their quality of life when unable to safely access outdoor spaces and engage in political movements.[47] There is also an overt nurturing aspect of essentialist ecofeminism that is potentially both oppressive and patronizing to marginalized groups. Through a bioessentialist and matriarchal lens, ecofeminism can create environments where activists may speak for underrepresented groups they aren't a part of or participate in volunteer tourism. This form of radical white savior complex is not unique to ecofeminism, but in any intersectional space it has potential to disrupt self advocacy of marginalized groups.[48]

Wild animal suffering

Catia Faria argues that the view held by ecofeminists that the largest source of harm to non-human animals in the wild is patriarchal culture and that the conservation of nature and natural processes is the best way to help these individuals is mistaken. She instead contends that natural processes are a source of immense suffering for these animals and that we should work towards alleviating the harms they experience, as well as eliminating patriarchal sources of harm, such as hunting.[49]


See also


  1. ^ a b MacGregor, Sherilyn (2006). Beyond mothering earth: ecological citizenship and the politics of care. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. p. 286. ISBN 978-0-7748-1201-6.
  2. ^ a b Merchant, Carolyn (1992). "Chapter 8". Radical ecology: the search for a livable world. New York: Routledge. p. 184.
  3. ^ Glazebrook, Trish (September 2002). "Karen Warren's Ecofeminism". Ethics & the Environment. 7 (2): 12–26. doi:10.2979/ETE.2002.7.2.12. S2CID 144641656.
  4. ^ a b c d e Merchant, Carolyn (2005). "Ecofeminism". Radical Ecology. Routledge. pp. 193–221.
  5. ^ Adams, Carol (2007). Ecofeminism and the Sacred. Continuum. pp. 1–8.
  6. ^ "Ecofeminist Movements" (PDF).
  7. ^ a b Spretnak, Charlene (1990). "Ecofeminism: Our Roots and Flowering". In Diamond, Irene; Ornstein, Gloria (eds.). Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Feminism. Sierra Club Books. pp. 3–14.
  8. ^ Gaard, Greta and, Gruen, Lori (1993). "Ecofeminism: Toward Global Justice and Planetary Health". Society and Nature. 2: 1–35.((cite journal)): CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. ^ Tuana, Nancy; Tong, Rosemarie, eds. (2018). "Anarcha Feminist and Ecological Feminist Perspectives". Feminism And Philosophy: Essential Readings In Theory, Reinterpretation, And Application. Routledge. pp. 327–9. ISBN 978-0-8133-2212-4 – via Google Books.
  10. ^ a b c d Warren, Karen J. (2000). Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. ISBN 9780847692996.
  11. ^ Merchant, Carolyn (2005). Radical Ecology. Routledge. pp. 169–173.
  12. ^ a b Lamar, Stephanie (1991). "Ecofeminist Theory and Grassroots Politics". Hypatia. 6 (1): 28–45. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00207.x. S2CID 145518119.
  13. ^ Oksala, Johanna (Spring 2018). "Feminism, Capitalism, and Ecology". Hypatia. 33 (2): 216–234. doi:10.1111/hypa.12395. S2CID 149338235.
  14. ^ Warren, Karen J. (2015). "Feminist Environmental Philosophy". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  15. ^ Stoddart, Mark; Tindall, D. B. (2011). "Ecofeminism, Hegemonic Masculinity, And Environmental Movement Participation In British Columbia, Canada, 1998-2007: "Women Always Clean Up The Mess"". Sociological Spectrum. 31 (3): 342–368. doi:10.1080/02732173.2011.557065. S2CID 146343509.
  16. ^ Shiva, Vandana (1988). Staying alive: women, ecology and development. London: Zed Books. ISBN 978-0-86232-823-8.
  17. ^ Shiva, Vandana. "Development as a New Project of Western Patriarchy." Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Feminism, edited by Irene Diamond and Gloria Ornstein, Sierra Club Books, 1990, pp. 189-200.
  18. ^ (Mies, Maria, and Vandana Shiva. Ecofeminism. Halifax, N.S. : Fernwood Publications; 1993. 24.)
  19. ^ Hobgood-Oster, Laura. "Ecofeminism: Historic and International Evolution" (PDF). Retrieved March 17, 2012.
  20. ^ a b c d Gaard, Greta Claire (2002). "Vegetarian ecofeminism: A review essay". Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies. 23 (2): 117–146. doi:10.1353/fro.2003.0006. S2CID 143879458.
  21. ^ a b "Do Feminists Need to Liberate Animals, Too?". Carol J. Adams. 1995. Retrieved 2019-04-30.
  22. ^ a b "Ecofeminism: Is the Movement Still Relevant?". Gender Across Borders. Archived from the original on 2019-09-29. Retrieved 2014-05-13.
  23. ^ Starhawk. "Power, Authority, and Mystery: Ecofeminism and Earth-based Spirituality." Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism, edited by Irene Diamond and Gloria Orenstein, Sierra Club Books, 1990, pp. 73-86.
  24. ^ a b Eisler, Riane. "The Gaia Tradition & The Partnership Future: An Ecofeminist Manifesto." Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism, edited by Irene Diamond and Gloria Orenstein, Sierra Club Books, 1990, pp. 23-34.
  25. ^ Merchant, Carolyn (2005). "Spiritual Ecology". Radical Ecology. Routledge. pp. 124–125.
  26. ^ Mann, Susan A (2011). "Pioneers of U.S. Ecofeminism and Environmental Justice". Feminist Formations. 23 (2): 1–25. doi:10.1353/ff.2011.0028. S2CID 146349456.
  27. ^ Glazebrook, Trish (Autumn 2002). "Karen Warren's Ecofeminism". Ethics & the Environment. 7 (2): 12–27. doi:10.2979/ete.2002.7.2.12. S2CID 144641656.
  28. ^ Norlock, Kathryn J. (December 2011). "Building Receptivity: Leopold's Land Ethic and Critical Feminist Interpretation". Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture (Submitted manuscript). 5 (4): 491–509. doi:10.1558/jsrnc.v5i4.491.
  29. ^ Seager, Joni (Spring 2003). "Rachel Carson Died of Breast Cancer: The Coming of Age of Feminist Environmentalism". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 28 (3): 945–973. doi:10.1086/345456. S2CID 146687251.
  30. ^ Mann, Susan A. (2011). "Pioneers of U.S. Ecofeminism and Environmental Justice". Feminist Formations. 23 (2): 1–25. doi:10.1353/ff.2011.0028. JSTOR 41301654. S2CID 146349456.
  31. ^ Poon, Felix (10 January 2022). "The Life and Legacy of Sunderlal Bahuguna and the Chipko Movement in India". New Hampshire Public Radio. Retrieved April 9, 2023.
  32. ^ "Our History". The Green Belt Movement. Retrieved October 8, 2016.
  33. ^ "Love Canal". Center for Health, Environment, & Justice. Retrieved October 8, 2016.
  34. ^ Doverspike, Nicole (2012). "Mother's Milk Project". English 487W Blog: West of Everything. Retrieved October 9, 2016.
  35. ^ Bernstein, Emily (1993). "Neighborhood Report: Harlem; Sowing a Future With Green in It". The New York Times. Retrieved October 9, 2016.
  36. ^ Hawthorne, Susan (2002). Wild Politics: Feminism, Globalisation, Bio/diversity. Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press.
  37. ^ a b Gaard, Greta (2011). "Ecofeminism Revisited: Rejecting Essentialism and Re-Placing Species in a Material Feminist Environmentalism". Feminist Formations. 23 (2): 26–53. doi:10.1353/ff.2011.0017. S2CID 145195744.
  38. ^ a b "Ecofeminism Critique". The Green Fuse.
  39. ^ hooks, bell. "Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center" Cambridge, MA: South End Press 1984
  40. ^ Michiels, Nete. "Social Movements And Feminism." Women & Environments International Magazine, no. 92/93, 2013, pp. 15-17.
  41. ^ a b Biehl, Janet (1991). Rethinking eco-feminist politics. Boston, Massachusetts: South End Press. ISBN 978-0-89608-392-9.
  42. ^ Rocheleau, Dianne; et al. (1996). Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues & Local Experiences. New York: Routledge.
  43. ^ a b Ruether, Rosemary Radford (2003). Eaton, Heather; Lorentzen, Lois Ann (eds.). Ecofeminism and Globalization. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. vii–xi. ISBN 978-0-7425-2697-6.
  44. ^ Norie Ross Singer, "Toward Ecofeminist Communication Studies," Communication Theory, 2020, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 268-89.
  45. ^ A. E. Kings, "Intersectionality and the Changing Face of Ecofeminism," Ethics and the Environment, 2017, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 63-87.
  46. ^ Kings, A. E. (Spring 2017). "Intersectionality and the Changing Face of Ecofeminism". Ethics and the Environment. 22: 63–87. doi:10.2979/ethicsenviro.22.1.04. S2CID 148809508.
  47. ^ a b Charles, Andrew; Thomas, Huw (June 2007). "Deafness and Disability—Forgotten Components of Environmental Justice: Illustrated by the Case of Local Agenda 21 in South Wales". Local Environment. 12 (3): 209–221. Bibcode:2007LoEnv..12..209C. doi:10.1080/13549830601183677. ISSN 1354-9839. S2CID 144903630.
  48. ^ Bandyopadhyay, Ranjan; Patil, Vrushali (2017-08-08). "'The white woman's burden' – the racialized, gendered politics of volunteer tourism". Tourism Geographies. 19 (4): 644–657. doi:10.1080/14616688.2017.1298150. ISSN 1461-6688. S2CID 152134531.
  49. ^ Ruiz Carreras, María (2016-11-04). ""La lucha por la igualdad y la justicia es necesariamente feminista y antiespecista"" [The fight for equality and justice is necessarily feminist and antispeciesist]. Diagonal (in Spanish). Retrieved 2021-02-13.
  50. ^ "Greta Gaard". Retrieved 2019-10-08.
  51. ^ Ralte, Lalrinawmi. The World as the Body of God Ecofeminist Theological Discourse with Special Reference to Tribal Women in India. Archived 2016-05-22 at the Wayback Machine,, accessed March 24, 2012
  52. ^ Plumwood, Val (2003). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New Fetter Lane, London: Routledge.
  53. ^ Johnson, Roberta (2013). "For a Better World: Alicia Puleo's Critical Ecofeminism". In Cibreiro, Estrella; López, Francisca (eds.). Global Issues in Contemporary Hispanic Women's Writing. Routledge. p. 107. ISBN 9780415626941. Retrieved 20 February 2019 – via Google Books.
  54. ^ LaRosa, Patricia. "Finding Aid for Rosemary Radford Ruether Papers, 1954-2002" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2012. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  55. ^ Bouma-Prediger, Steven (1995). The greening of theology: the ecological models of Rosemary Radford Ruether, Joseph Sittler, and Juergen Moltmann. Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press. ISBN 0-7885-0163-1. OCLC 33105042.
  56. ^ "Who's Who of Women and the Environment". Archived from the original on 28 October 2012. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  57. ^ Barthold, Charles; Bevan, David; Corvellec, Hervé (2022) [11 July 2022]. "An ecofeminist position in critical practice: Challenging corporate truth in the Anthropocene". Gender, Work & Organization. 29 (6): 1796–1814. doi:10.1111/gwao.12878. S2CID 250467484.
  58. ^ Charlene Spretnak, "The Early Years of the Green Movement in the United States", in Zelko and Brinkmann, eds., Green Parties, p. 48.
  59. ^ see Starhawk
  60. ^ Guia ecofeminista: Mulheres, direito, ecologia (in Spanish).
  61. ^ "Ecofeminist Talks – Medium".[self-published source]
  62. ^ "Meet Google Drive – One place for all your files".[permanent dead link]
  63. ^ "Instagram".[self-published source]
  64. ^ Vakoch, Douglas A. (2011-01-01). Ecofeminism and rhetoric: critical perspectives on sex, technology, and discourse. New York: Berghahn Books. ISBN 9780857451873. OCLC 714734848.
  65. ^ Vakoch, Douglas A. (2012-01-01). Feminist ecocriticism: environment, women, and literature. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. ISBN 9780739176825. OCLC 815941726.
  66. ^ Vakoch, Douglas A., ed. (2021). Dystopias and Utopias on Earth and Beyond: Feminist Ecocriticism of Science Fiction. London: Routledge. ISBN 9780367716233.
  67. ^ Vakoch, Douglas A., ed. (2021). Ecofeminist Science Fiction: International Perspectives on Gender, Ecology, and Literature. London: Routledge. ISBN 9780367716417.
  68. ^ Vakoch, Douglas A., ed. (2023). The Routledge Handbook of Ecofeminism and Literature. Routledge. ISBN 9781032050119.
  69. ^ Vakoch, Douglas A.; Anae, Nicole, eds. (2022). Indian Feminist Ecocriticism. Lexington Books. ISBN 978-1-66690-871-8.
  70. ^ Vakoch, Douglas A.; Mickey, Sam (2018). Ecofeminism in Dialogue. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. ISBN 9781498569279. OCLC 1005695115.
  71. ^ Vakoch, Douglas A.; Mickey, Sam (2018). Literature and Ecofeminism: Intersectional and International Voices. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0815381723. OCLC 1020319048.
  72. ^ Vakoch, Douglas; Mickey, Sam (2018). Women and Nature?: Beyond Dualism in Gender, Body, and Environment. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781138053427. OCLC 975383028.

Further reading

Key works


Journal articles