LGBT rights in European Union
|Status||Never criminalised in EU law.|
Last state criminalisation repealed in 1998.
|Military||Allowed to serve openly in all states|
|Discrimination protections||Outlawed in employment with further protections in some member states' law|
|Recognition of relationships||Same-sex marriage in 13/27 states|
Recognition of same-sex unions in 23/27 states
No recognition of same-sex couples in 4/27 states
|Restrictions||Same-sex marriage constitutional ban in 7/27 states.|
|Adoption||Joint adoption in 14/27 states|
Step-child adoption in 18/27 states
LGBT rights in the European Union are protected under the European Union's (EU) treaties and law. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in all EU states and discrimination in employment has been banned since 2000. However, EU states have different laws when it comes to any greater protection, same-sex civil union, same-sex marriage, adoption by same-sex couples.
The Treaty on European Union, in its last version as updated by the Treaty of Lisbon in 2007 and in force as of 2009, makes the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union legally binding for the member state of the European Union and the European Union itself. In turn, Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union includes an anti-discrimination provision that states that "any discrimination based on any ground such as [...] sexual orientation shall be prohibited."
Furthermore, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides in Articles 10 that the European Union has a positive duty to combat discrimination (among other things) on the grounds of sexual orientation and provides in Article 19 ways for the Council and the European Parliament to actively propose pass legislation to do so. These provisions were enacted by the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1999.
Following the inclusion in the Treaties of the above-mentioned provisions, Directive 2000/78/EC "Directive establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation" was enacted in 2000. This framework directive compels all EU states to adopt anti-discrimination legislation in employment. That legislation has to include provisions to protect people from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
In practice, this protects EU citizens from being refused a job, or from being fired, because of their sexual orientation. It also protects them from being harassed by a colleague due to their sexual orientation.
Directive 2000/78/EC does not cover being refused medical services or treatment, refusal of being given a double room in a hotel, protection from bullying in a school and refusal of social security schemes (e.g. survivors' pensions and financial assistance to carers). Protection under EU law in these circumstances exists, but is granted on the grounds of race or gender only.
As such, in 2008, a proposal of a Directive to more broadly fight anti-discrimination has been introduced, which would outlaw discrimination in the areas of social protection, social advantages, education and access to supply of goods, on the basis of religious belief, disability, age, and sexual orientation. However, despite strong support from the European Parliament, the directive has since been stalled in the Council.
EU law currently takes a different approach to transgender issues. Despite the European Parliament adopting a resolution on transgender rights as early as 1989, transgender identity is not incorporated into any EU funding and was not mentioned in the law establishing the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) as sexual orientation was. However, the case law of the European Court of Justice provides some protection by interpreting discrimination on the basis of 'sex' to also refer to people who have had 'gender reassignment'. Thus all EU sex discrimination law applies to transgender people. In 2002, the 1976 equal treatment directive was revised to include discrimination based on gender identity, to reflect case law on the directive.
As in 2022, 8 member states proclaims Gender self-identification laws. Named Portugal, Greece, Luxembourg, Denmark, Malta, Ireland, France and Belgium. Other 10 states provide legal mechanisms for legal gender change without any required surgery: Spain, Netherlands, Austria, Germany, Sweden, Slovenia, Croatia, Lithuania, Italy and Estonia. 6 states require surgery for legal gender change: Poland, Latvia, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Romania and Finland. Hungary, Cyprus and Bulgaria don't allow legal gender change in any case.
In February 2019, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the rights of intersex people. The resolution called European Union member states to legislate better policies that protected intersex individuals, especially from unnecessary surgery and discrimination. It stated that the parliament "strongly condemns sex-normalizing treatments and surgery; welcomes laws that prohibit such surgery, as in Malta and Portugal, and encourages other member states to adopt similar legislation as soon as possible." The resolution also urged legal gender recognition based on self-determination. It also confirms that intersex people are "exposed to multiple instances of violence and discrimination in the European Union" and calls on the European Commission and the Members States to propose legislation to address these issues. It also includes the need of adequate counselling and support for intersex people and their families, measures to end the stigma and pathologisation intersex people face and increased funding for intersex-led civil society organisations.
Between 2001 and 2006, a Community Action Programme to Combat Discrimination involved the expenditure of €100 million to fight discrimination in a number of areas, including sexual orientation.
In 2009 the European Commission has acted to tone down a law in Lithuania that included homophobic language and also aimed to support the gay pride parade in the country and others under threat of banning.
In June 2010, the Council of the European Union adopted a non-binding toolkit to promote LGBT people's human rights.
In June 2013, the Council upgraded it to binding LGBTI Guidelines instructing EU diplomats around the world to defend the human rights of LGBTI people.
Further information: Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Same-sex marriage has been legalised in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden. Same-sex civil unions have been legalised in Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Estonia, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Slovenia. In Denmark, Sweden, Finland, and Ireland, civil partnerships were legal between 1989 and 2012, and between 1995 and 2009, and between 2002 and 2017, and between 2011 and 2015, respectively. In Germany, registered life partnerships were legal between 2001 and 2017. However, existing civil unions/registered life partnerships are still recognised in all of these countries.
Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia have constitutionally defined marriage as being between a man and a woman. In December 2020, Hungary also explicitly legally banned adoption for same-sex couples within its constitution.
European Union law (the Citizens’ Rights Directive 2004/38/EC) requires those member states that legalised same-sex partnerships to recognise each other's partnerships for the purpose of freedom of movement. The European Parliament has however approved a report calling for mutual recognition.
According to European Court of Justice case law based on the Employment Equality Framework Directive, employees in a civil partnership with a same-sex partner must be granted the same benefits as those granted to their colleagues upon their marriage, where marriage is not possible for same-sex couples. The Court established this principle in 2008 in the case of Tadao Maruko v. Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen with regards to a German registered life partnership. In December 2013, the Court confirmed this in the case of Frédéric Hay v. Crédit agricole mutuel (C-267/12) with regards to a French civil solidarity pact, which is significantly inferior to marriage than a German registered life partnership.
Also, according to the European Court of Justice in the case of Coman and Others, by judgement of 5 June 2018, a "spouse" (or partner or any other family member) in the Free Movement Directive (2004/38/EC) includes a (foreign) same-sex spouse; member states are required to confer the right of residence on the (foreign) same-sex spouse of a citizen of the European Union. However, most of east-central European new EU member countries (A8 countries) do not recognise same-sex unions themselves, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania, but are still bound by a ruling by the European Court of Justice to recognise same-sex marriages performed within the EU and including an EU citizen for the purposes of granting legal residence, though they do not always respect this ruling in practice (in case of Romania is still ignoring implementation of the ruling).
In 2021, 10 EU member states refused to recognize same-sex couples as joint parents to their children. This leads to situations where two people recognized as parents in one country would have their family ties legally dissolve after crossing a border. A frequently encountered issue is that birth certificates issued in one member state and listing two people of the same sex as parents are not recognized in other countries. Some children do not have passports as a result. The pending CJEU case V.M.A. v. Stolichna Obsthina involves a child who could not claim Bulgarian nationality because her parents were a lesbian couple. A policy brief commissioned by European Parliament Committee on Petitions recommends that the European Commission or the CJEU should clarify that Directive 2004/38 on free movement also applies to rainbow families, who should not be discriminated against in their exercise of EU free movement rights. The case was finally decided on 14 December 2021, with the CJEU accepting the European Parliament Committee on Petitions's position, and finding Bulgaria in breach of EU law for not issuing documents to the child of the lesbian couple. The decision points out that while it is still a Member State's prerogative to decide whether or not to extend same-sex marriage and LGBT adoption rights to its own citizen, this choice cannot come at the expense of the child being deprived of the relationship of one of her parents while exercising her rights to freedom of movement within the EU.
In March 2018, a majority of representatives in the European Parliament passed a resolution in a 435–109 vote condemning conversion therapy and urging European Union member states to ban the practice. A report released by the European Parliament Intergroup on LGBT Rights after the measure was passed stated that "Currently, only Malta and some regions in Spain have explicitly banned LGBTI conversion therapies." Conversion therapy for minors was banned in Germany in 2020 and in France in 2022. Bans have also been proposed in Ireland, Netherlands, and Austria.
Further information: LGBT rights in Europe § Legislation by country or territory
Openly gay people are allowed to serve in the military of every EU country since 2018.
In December 2016, Malta became the first country in the EU – as well as in Europe – to ban conversion therapy.
|LGBT rights in:||Unregistered cohabitation||Civil union||Marriage||Adoption||Anti-discrimination laws||Hate crime/speech laws|
|Austria||Yes (Since 2003)||Yes (Registered Partnership since 2010)||Yes (Since 2019)||Yes (Since 2016)||All||Yes|
|Belgium||No||Yes (Legal Cohabitation since 2000)||Yes (Since 2003)||Yes (Since 2006)||All||Yes|
|Bulgaria||No||No||Constitutional ban since 1991||No||All||No|
|Croatia||Yes (Since 2003)||Yes (Life Partnership since 2014)||Constitutional ban since 2013||Yes (Since 2022)||All||Yes|
|Cyprus||No||Yes (Civil Cohabitation since 2015) ||No||No||All||Yes|
|Czech Republic||Yes (Since 2001)||Yes (Registered Partnership since 2006)||No (pending)||No (Step-child adoption pending. It is possible for a person in a registered partnership to adopt as an individual)||All||No|
|Denmark||Yes (Since 1986)
|Registered Partnership from 1989 to 2012; certain partnerships are still recognised||Yes (Since 2012)||Yes (Since 2010)||All||Yes|
|Estonia||No||Yes (Cohabitation Agreement since 2016)||Recognition of marriage celebrated abroad since 2016||Step-child adoption since 2016||All||Yes|
|Finland||No||Registered Partnership from 1989 to 2012; certain partnerships are still recognised||Yes (Since 2017)||Yes (Since 2017)||All||Yes|
|France||Yes (Since 1999)||Yes (Civil Solidarity Pact since 1999)||Yes (Since 2013)||Yes (Since 2013)||All||Yes|
|Germany||No||Registered Partnership from 2001 to 2017; certain partnerships are still recognised||Yes (Since 2017)||Yes (Since 2017)||All||Yes|
|Greece||No||Yes (Cohabitation agreement since 2015)||No||Same-sex couples in civil partnerships are allowed to become foster parents. Single individuals, regardless of sexual orientation, may adopt.||All||Yes|
|Hungary||Yes (Since 1996)||Yes (Registered Partnership since 2009)||Constitutional ban since 2012||Constitutional ban since 2020||All||Yes|
|Ireland||Yes (Since 2011)||Civil Partnership from 2011 to 2015; certain partnerships are still recognised||Yes (since 2015)||Yes (Since 2015)||All||Yes|
|Italy||Yes (since 2016)||Yes (Civil Union since 2016)||In 2018 the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriages performed abroad must be registered as civil unions||Stepchild adoption not legally recognized, admitted by the Court of Cassation only under very limited circumstances since 2016||Some[vague]||No|
|Latvia||No||No||Constitutional ban since 2006||No||Some[vague]||No|
|Lithuania||No||No||Constitutional ban since 1992||No||All||Yes|
|Luxembourg||No||Yes (Registered Partnership since 2004)||Yes (Since 2015)||Yes (Since 2015)||All||Yes|
|Malta||Yes (Since 2017)||Yes (Civil Union since 2014)||Yes (Since 2017)||Yes (Since 2014)||All||Yes|
|Netherlands||Yes (Since 1979)||Yes (Registered Partnership since 1998)||Yes (Since 2001)||Yes||All||Yes|
|Poland||Yes (Since 2012)||No||Constitutional ban since 1997||No||Some[vague]||No|
|Portugal||Yes (Since 2001)||Yes||Yes (Since 2010)||Yes (Since 2016)||All||Yes|
|Slovakia||Yes (Limited rights for "close person" recognized under civil and penal law since 2018)||No||Constitutional ban since 2014||No||All||Yes|
|Slovenia||Yes (Since 2006)||Yes (Registered Partnership since 2017)||No||Step-child adoption since 2011||All||Yes|
|Spain||Yes (Since 1995)||Yes (All regions and autonomous cities of Spain since 2018)||Yes (Since 2005)||Yes||All||Yes|
|Sweden||Yes (Since 1988)||Registered Partnership from 1995 to 2009; certain partnerships are still recognised||Yes (Since 2009)||Yes (Since 2002)||All||Yes|
Due to the Cyprus dispute placing Northern Cyprus outside the Republic of Cyprus' control, EU law is suspended in the area governed by the self-proclaimed Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.
|LGBT rights in:||Civil union||Marriage||Adoption||Anti-discrimination laws||Hate crime/speech laws|
Below is the share of respondents per country who agreed with the following statements in the 2019 Eurobarometer on Discrimination.
|Member state||"Gay, lesbian and bisexual people
should have the same rights
as heterosexual people"
|"There is nothing wrong
in a sexual relationship between
two persons of the same sex"
|"Same sex marriages should be
allowed throughout Europe"
|Change from 2015|
on last statement
Matrimony shall be a free union between a man and a woman.
Marriage, being a union of a man and a woman, as well as the family, motherhood and parenthood, shall be placed under the protection and care of the Republic of Poland.
W dotychczasowym orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego, wypracowanym i ugruntowanym zarówno w okresie obowiązywania poprzedniego, jak i obecnego Kodeksu postępowania karnego, a także w doktrynie (por. wypowiedzi W. Woltera, A. Zolla, A. Wąska), pojęcie "wspólne pożycie" odnoszone jest wyłącznie do konkubinatu, a w szczególności do związku osób o różnej płci, odpowiadającego od strony faktycznej stosunkowi małżeństwa (którym w myśl art. 18 Konstytucji jest wyłącznie związek osób różnej płci). Tego rodzaju interpretację Sąd Najwyższy, orzekający w niniejszej sprawie, w pełni podziela i nie znajduje podstaw do uznania za przekonywujące tych wypowiedzi pojawiających się w piśmiennictwie, w których podejmowane są próby kwestionowania takiej interpretacji omawianego pojęcia i sprowadzania go wyłącznie do konkubinatu (M. Płachta, K. Łojewski, A.M. Liberkowski). Rozumiejąc bowiem dążenia do rozszerzającej interpretacji pojęcia "wspólne pożycie", użytego w art. 115 § 11 k.k., należy jednak wskazać na całkowity brak w tym względzie dostatecznie precyzyjnych kryteriów.
Polska Konstytucja określa bowiem małżeństwo jako związek wyłącznie kobiety i mężczyzny. A contrario nie dopuszcza więc związków jednopłciowych. [...] Małżeństwo (jako związek kobiety i mężczyzny) uzyskało w prawie krajowym RP odrębny status konstytucyjny zdeterminowany postanowieniami art. 18 Konstytucji. Zmiana tego statusu byłaby możliwa jedynie przy zachowaniu rygorów trybu zmiany Konstytucji, określonych w art. 235 tego aktu.
W doktrynie prawa konstytucyjnego wskazuje się nadto, że jedyny element normatywny, dający się odkodować z art. 18 Konstytucji, to ustalenie zasady heteroseksualności małżeństwa.
Ustawa o świadczeniach zdrowotnych finansowanych ze środków publicznych nie wyjaśnia, co prawda, kto jest małżonkiem. Pojęcie to zostało jednak dostatecznie i jasno określone we wspomnianym art. 18 Konstytucji RP, w którym jest mowa o małżeństwie jako o związku kobiety i mężczyzny. W piśmiennictwie podkreśla się, że art. 18 Konstytucji ustala zasadę heteroseksualności małżeństwa, będącą nie tyle zasadą ustroju, co normą prawną, która zakazuje ustawodawcy zwykłemu nadawania charakteru małżeństwa związkom pomiędzy osobami jednej płci (vide: L. Garlicki Komentarz do art. 18 Konstytucji, s. 2-3 [w:] Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz, Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, Warszawa 2003). Jest wobec tego oczywiste, że małżeństwem w świetle Konstytucji i co za tym idzie - w świetle polskiego prawa, może być i jest wyłącznie związek heteroseksualny, a więc w związku małżeńskim małżonkami nie mogą być osoby tej samej płci.
art. 18 Konstytucji RP, który definiuje małżeństwo jako związek kobiety i mężczyzny, a tym samym wynika z niego zasada nakazująca jako małżeństwo traktować w Polsce jedynie związek heteroseksualny.