This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Sorry, I accidentally published my recent undo of this change before I finished the edit message.
Per WP:PARTIAL this page is not a search index for evereything with "Canadian" in the name. Only things that might reasonably be titled "Canadian" should be listed here. If people do in fact regularly refer to canoes as "Canadians" then I apologize; please add an explanation here or in the edit message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Falsifian (talk • contribs) 19:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Strong oppose Articles do not link to disambiguation pages. If your rationale for moving it is to make articles link to a disambiguation page, then that's bad. I will note that Canadian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) used to redirect to Canada, so I suggest it revert to that usage, since linking to a disambiguation page is wrong. 70.24.251.158 (talk) 07:15, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Check out American, German, Mexican, Brazilian as examples of similar ambiguous terms being directly linked to a disambiguation page. The reason is that the terms ARE ambiguous. Linking to the disambiguation page in an article is temporary until the term is piped to the proper unambiguous article. In this case "Canada" is not always correct. Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment articles do not link to disambiguation pages. We have a cleanup template for such an error, Template:Disambiguation needed. If your reason for making Canadian a disambiguation page is because articles link to it, it is wrong, because articles do not link to disambiguation pages. 70.24.251.158 (talk) 04:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I believe most of the incoming links refer to Canada rather than Canadians. (I looked at several pages and that seemed correct for them; the same is true of Turkish not counting links intending Turkish language.) However, people who type in "Canadian" are more likely to be looking for Canadians I would think. But one must ask if WP:TWODABS is relevant (as there are two primary meanings, most similar titles also may refer to a language). TimBentley(talk)16:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. as per Mindmatrix and TimBentley(talk) comment about what our readers "are more likely to be looking for", What should take place is the fixing of the link in articles and with re-writing phrases to there proper context. Moxy (talk) 01:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.
Support: Seems like 'Canadian' covers a lot of ground. Why not just simplify things and rename it? Other countries have done it, too. Waqar💬15:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. When you refer to the term Canadian, the absolute number one thing people think about are Canadians, hence the redirect. There is really only one term that 'Canadian' by itself refers to, which are Canadians. The purpose of specifying that this is a disambiguation page is to list other terms that include the term 'Canadian', but are not called 'Canadian' by themselves. Canadians, on the other hand, are simply called 'Canadian'. The current title of Canadian (disambiguation) is perfectly fine. – Handoto (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose as it's a demonym clearly representing a people. It is also clearly the primary topic.... All other instances would require a qualifier. Junk make work project for the rest of us.Moxy🍁 18:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the plural 'Canadians' may refer to how many Canadian people can fit on the head of a pin (one at a time), but the key point is that an individual Canadian belongs to the overall group - Canadians. Per Handoto and Moxy. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, has Canadian have to be any different in which it has a primary topic for its people? (currently a redirect to Canadians) Literally every other nationality I can think of is a disambiguation page because the term can also refer to the country (Maple syrup is Canadian is another way to say maple syrup is from Canada and doesn't refer to its people. ). The term 'Canadians' is unambiguous and could only plausibly refer to its people. JuniperChill (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]