This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Israeli disengagement from Gaza article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
|
|
Sections older than 6 months may be automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. |
Archive 1: April 2005 - October 2006
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/319985/jewish/Gaza-
The text "A widespread opinion has it that Israel left Gazans with a generous endowment consisting of a rich infrastructure of greenhouses to assist their economic regrowth, and that this was immediately destroyed by the Palestinians. " is very misleading as the consensus view is that it was the Israeli settlers that dismantled about 50% of the greenhouses and then minor looting occurred by the Palestinians. the text should be "A widespread but unsupported opinion has it that Israel left Gazans with a generous endowment consisting of a rich infrastructure of greenhouses to assist their economic regrowth, and that this was immediately destroyed by the Palestinians. 216.209.181.111 (talk) 18:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Israeli disengagement - from reality!
Although the Israeli settlers then dismantled about 50% of the greenhouses, the Israeli 'Defence' Forces are now attempting to dismantal up to 50% of the houses. So might not the article highlight concerns that - whatever gains were made by the Disengagement Policy - have they not been totally undermined by the hard-hearted actions of this hard-right Government? Also, given all the human rights outrages by the IDF - does not the title need updating?
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change (in reference 15) "https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/ariel-sharons-dark-greatness'Ariel" (links to page not found) to "https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/ariel-sharons-dark-greatness" (links to article referenced). TheGalach (talk) 19:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
This entire article reads like a conspiratorial, left wing funded take on the rationale for the israeli pullout. Theres no doubt in my mind that there were undercurrents and talks of demography. But the stated rationale was that Israel was busy babysitting 8,000 Jewish settlers amongst a million Palestinians and it wasn't worthwhile absent a negotiated peace. 2601:147:C102:DDA0:A02D:F4A8:6365:6D87 (talk) 04:26, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change "Israel unilaterally disengaged from the Gaza Strip in 2005. The UN and a number of human rights organizations continue to consider Israel as the occupying power of the Gaza Strip due to its blockade of the territory;[12][13][14][15][16] Israel rejects this characterization.[17]"
to
"Although Israel claims to have disengaged from the Gaza strip, "it continues to maintain direct control over Gaza's air and maritime space, six of Gaza's seven land crossings, maintains a no-go buffer zone within the territory, controls the Palestinian population registry, and Gaza remains dependent on Israel for its water, electricity, telecommunications, and other utilities.[5][7]""
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_disengagement_from_Gaza#cite_note-occ-5
B'tselem, Israel's largest human rights organization, explained, in its comprehensive Jan 2021 report, that only one regime has control of Israel, Gaza and the West Bank and that is Israel. https://www.btselem.org/publications/fulltext/202101_this_is_apartheid
On October 8, 2023, Israel unilaterally turned off water and food supplies to the entire population of Gaza. Over the next week, a humanitarian crisis developed. Over one million Palestinian children were cut off from water, food, electricity and medical supplies in punishment for the crimes committed by a terrorist organization on October 7th.
https://www.who.int/news/item/13-10-2023-who-pleads-for-immediate-reversal-of-gaza-evacuation-order-to-protect-health-and-reduce-suffering Lrimawi (talk) 22:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
((Edit extended-protected))
template. Brendan ❯❯❯ Talk 04:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC)This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change spelling mistake “enivisaged” to “envisaged”. Eva1una77 (talk) 08:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
"Israel and Egypt have concluded an agreement under which Egypt can increase the number of police on its side of the border, while the IDF evacuates the Gazan side. The text of the agreement is not yet public."
Can this be updated? It's not clear when this occurred, and there's no citation or source. 130.179.243.152 (talk) 20:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please revise the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph to include important context on settler relocation. This fact is verifiable using the attached reference under ISBN 9781139493963.
Eight thousand Jewish settlers from the 21 settlements in the Gaza Strip were relocated, receiving an average of USD $200,000 in compensation per family. [1]
Also, please note there exists some typo of "thi" in the very first words of the article. ARationalPerson (talk) 19:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Hanne Cuyckens is currently being used as a source supporting the claim that Israel occupies Gaza in her article "Is Israel Still an Occupying Power in Gaza?" However, in her conclusion to that article she writes, "Given that there is no longer any effective control in the sense of Article 42 of the Hague Regulations, it is difficult to sustain that Gaza is still occupied." — Preceding unsigned comment added by UClaudius (talk • contribs) 23:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)