![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 August 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If Leo Trotsky took power over Russia after winning the Civil War, would Russia have been known as a Millitary Junta? -G
Would the bakufu in Japan have been a junta? 204.52.215.107 (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
does this seem really biased? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.236.143 (talk) 06:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Should we put North Korean National Defence commission as military junta? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barciur (talk • contribs) 01:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
If we define a "military junta" as "a government led by a committee of military leaders", then Fiji may not fit the bill. The government in Fiji is still composed of civilians as well as military officers. I don't know who's replacing Nailatikau at Indigenous Affairs, but Sayed-Khaiyum, Luveni, Bole and Cokanasiga are civilians. Of course, its leader is a military man, and it's clear that the military is very much in control of the country, but what we have is more of an "unelected mixed civilian and military government with a military leader" than a junta by the proposed definition. I've been collecting press articles on Fiji's politics for several years now, from various media, and, in literally hundreds of articles, I have only one in which the word "junta" is used. It's an opinion piece in the Fiji Times, from March 2008; you can find it here. A quick Google search comes up with a few others (in the New Zealand Herald, in The Age and The Irish Times, where the word is used briefly, without further comment or definition, by journalists). I can find no mention of politicians (in Fiji or elsewhere) using the word, nor academics. On the whole, it seems to be little used. Sufficiently for the word to be used as fact in a Wikipedia article? I leave it to my fellow editors to consider it. It seems to me unsourcable, except if we use the undeveloped opinion of a small number of journalists as a factual source; Wikipedia policy would seem to disagree with presenting unsourcable opinion as hard fact. (And if there are no comments in reply to this in a week or so, I'll probably remove Fiji from the article.) Aridd (talk) 08:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
The elections in Niger have just been held. These are democratic elections and thus the new President will not be a military Junta. Niger should be removed. 1 Nigerien presidential election, 2011 --Smart30 (talk) 02:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
I think that CAR is not a military junta; who is in power is not the army, but a former rebel group. Yes, can be argued that these former rebel group is a kind of "army", but, by this criteria we should consider "military juntas" all case when an armed rebellion takes power - like Mao in China, Fidel in Cuba, the Taliban in Afghanistan, the Khmer Rouge in Cabodja etc, etc. I think usually the expression "military junta" are only used when it is the "official" army who seizes power.--MiguelMadeira (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Aren't Military Junta and Stratocracy basically the same thing, but just said with an other word? Wikipedia also considers Military Junta a stub, so maybe it should be merged into Stratocracy as a section?
Hyshinara (talk) 19:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Maybe I've been too hasty:
Stratocracy reads that "the state and the military are traditionally or constitutionally the same entity", in contrast to a Military Junta, where (I guess) it just might have been a militaristic political party that got democratically elected and now has political majority. (or, you know, a coup d'état, that works too :P )
Hyshinara (talk) 20:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
I have added Egypt to the current juntas as the countries government is appointed by a military junta just as Fiji's is. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:45, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
As no one else has made a case I shall ask them to/
Explain how the Ukraine (which holds democratic elections) is a military Junta based upon two organizations that are not in fact its government? Slatersteven (talk) 13:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Note, if IP's keep on adding this back without discussion and gaining wp:consensus I will ask for PP. Slatersteven (talk) 13:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
PP now asked for. Slatersteven (talk) 10:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Per WP:PRESERVE
Bold indicates a current military junta.
@Mach61: Such a "list of military juntas" is unsustainable, setting precedent from military dictatorship which has achieved good article status without being a list of military dictatorships as it formerly was PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 20:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)