This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
On 14 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Len Garrison, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey Chzz--
I gave the article on Jorge Cruise another go (I'm not quite sure how to link you to it?). I was hoping you might have some feedback for me on the second go-around . . . I just want to make sure that I addressed everything from the first time! (I also hope I did everything correctly . . . this is my first article, so I hope I didn't screw anything up administratively.)
Thanks a lot for all of your help,
Sad squirrel (talk) 05:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for all of your help (and for the lesson in linking)! Let me know if there's anything else I should keep working on to make the article more than mostly OK ;) Thanks again!
Sad squirrel (talk) 23:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Sad squirrel (talk) 01:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
On 14 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, how should I respond? (This users behaviour resembles that of hamiltonstone.) About one in three AIDS carriers suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder. [1] Denial is a symptom of PTSD.
Please note the discussuion 'Misunderstanding of "denial" in this context?' in 'user talk:HIV'.
Additional discussion on talk pages WILL NOT lead to consensus as the edit is patently unreasonable. The next logical step is to post the evidence that PTSD is common among people with HIV/AIDS along with the evidence that denial is a symptom of the disorder. However, such a post WILL be deleted. How should I proceed? KBlott (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the note and edits, Chzz! I appreciate it. On the source for "Registered Investment Advisor" it would appear that the link is dynamically generated every time someone runs a search - so if you click on the link it just takes you to the search page. How should I go about appropriately noting that source? Thanks again! Andihazelwood (talk) 22:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
[[Registered Investment Advisor]],<ref>((Citation | title=Investment Adviser Representative Report for Ray Lucia | publisher=Investment Adviser Public Disclosure | accessdate = 2010-10-14 | url = http://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov/ )) (Searching 'Advisors' for "Ray Lucia")</ref>
The key principle is to give the reader enough details so that they can, if they wish, check the fact somehow.
See also User:Chzz/help/refs. Chzz ► 04:58, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Awesome. We're good to go. Thanks for all your help! Andihazelwood (talk) 20:25, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey Chzz, in the spirit of disclosure, I want to let you know I opened a discussion about the nominations of Ike Robin at Wikipedia talk:Did you know. Another user had nominated the same article a day prior to you and I am not completely sure how the process works in this case for a double nom.--NortyNort (Holla) 03:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
On 15 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 140th Year Anniversary Celebration of the Emancipation Proclamation, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing (and improving) the article I started on David Musselwhite.Proof64 (talk) 14:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
On 16 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Military engineering-technical university, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
I have read your post to my talk page about the deletion of Les Cowley. I confess that, after I had deleted it, I myself wondered if I had been too precipitate, and should have held back. I suppose, though, that to undelete the article now would convey all the wrong messages, so I suppose you are right: what is done is done. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
:)
Sophie (Talk) 15:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
78.144.26.61 (talk) 17:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
On 16 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Philadelphia School of Circus Arts, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
I received a request from an editor to look into an issue related to a request for feedback submitted 10 October. I see that the main page goes back to 13 October, so I clicked on the link for older items, and arrived at Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/navigation#2010. Where do I find the rest of October entries?--SPhilbrickT 18:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks bro! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BiGg3st iTaLiAn0 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
The St Francis article has an issue. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
On 17 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Greg Williams (photographer), which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
...by THENEWMONO 02:36, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the great feedback on the Stukeley Westcott article. I can fix a lot of what you mentioned. The picture of the Providence settlement was enlarged because the caption reads "to the left of the letter C in the word Providence." If you can't even see the word "Providence" then the caption is meaningless. I enlarged the image to at least give the reader an idea of where Westcott's property was located without having to click on the image for a full enlargement. Is this reasonable, or should I just leave the image tiny and let the reader click on it?
What is ALT text, re the images?
I don't think that this article is near good status yet, but would you take a look at "William Arnold (settler)"? That article has a lot of stuff, and is meant to debunk a lot of garbage that's floating around both printed sources and the internet.
Great to get your feedback.Sarnold17 (talk) 23:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
[[File:Dannebrog.jpg |thumb|alt=A red flag divided into four by a white cross. |The oldest [[Flag of Denmark]].]]
I'll try to have a look at William Arnold as soon as I can. Cheers, Chzz ► 03:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
I made a few minor fixes myself.
OK - I'll stop here... I hope that gives some thoughts. Cheers, Chzz ► 11:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback on the South Sound Speedway article. I have begun, but not finished, work on your suggestions. I understand your concern regarding the classes.(super stocks, street stocks) Unfortunately Wikipedia does not have articles explaining these topics. I however am aware of a few external web pages which explain the matter. Of course I, being quite tyronic, am unaware of how to incorporate these external links into my work. If you could assist me with such a task it would be greatly appreciated. Dylan2448 (talk) 02:28, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Any help you could offer this article would be good. This director is notable as new associate director of State Theatre Company of South Australia along with these artists - Jim Sharman, Gale Edwards (129.96.234.165 (talk) 22:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC))
You've now shut down the page because of a copyright violation. How can we write about this person and establish notability in a way that pleases you? (129.96.234.173 (talk) 04:54, 31 October 2010 (UTC))
Hi! I've uploaded several images from Panoramio to the Commons and they are now listed in Category:Panoramio review needed. Since I'm not quite sure what to do next and your name is listed there among the reviewers, I thought I'd ask you. I contacted the image uploader and got his permission for use on the Commons and the wiki and used flinfo tool to upload the images. Thanks!--Tomobe03 (talk) 07:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
There were four images in the above category;
I have reviewed the licence on these four images, and everything seemed fine, so I have now marked them as checked.
I think/hope I've done it all correctly. Thanks! Chzz ► 11:21, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
On 20 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Liberty Green Historic District, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chzz. Hope you're enjoying your break. A snippet for you:
Best, Trafford09 (talk) 07:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
On 20 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Blue Monkey Brewery, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
On 20 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Elina Ringa, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello. You made a decision to delete an article (about Foster-Harris [2], which I'd like to discuss.
Basically, I was just starting the article when I went into Wp's Live Talk and was told not to write it. That it would be deleted, for the reason that there are no (that I know of) published biographies of the guy. So I threw in the towel.
In the event, it seems the article wasn't given the axe immediately, but hung around on death row for 24 hours, which makes me wonder if the original advice I was given wasn't the whole story. And indeed, I've come across articles in the past that talk about a person's *work* while saying very little about their *life.*
I'm really not interested in writing an entire article if it's a foregone conclusion it'll be deleted by someone on the basis they haven't heard of the subject before. My argument for this man's inclusion into Wp is that he's an authority on fiction writing -- taught at University; wrote two books -- and on the Old West.
Also, I only know about him because I ran into his writing books used, but found him incredibly useful. It would have been a great benefit to me if Wp had listed him.
In other words, I'm arguing that the man might be *obscure*, but he's nevertheless *important*.
Can you advise me? 76.118.23.40 (talk) 16:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry that you feel that way. Please realise that, as an Encyclopaedia, the idea is to collect information that other people have already documented in reliable sources. We do not do any original research - so, if nobody has written a biography on him, then Wikipedia probably can't be the first - because there wouldn't be any suitable source material.
I appreciate you would have saved time if Wikipedia had an article, but then again, what if Wikipedia had had incorrect information?
Consider the basic tenents of Wikipedia, especially regarding verifiability, that;
When the page was up for review, all the reviewer had to go on was this;
Foster-Harris won the Owen Wister Award for 1974. Sources
* The Look of the Old West: A Fully Illustrated Guide by William Foster-Harris * The Basic Formulas of Fiction by Foster-Harris * The Basic Patterns of Plot by Foster-Harris * http://www.westernwriters.org/owen_wister_award_history.htm
...that was it, the entire content. I hope you will agree that a) just that would have not have saved you years of research, and b) given that submission, we really couldn't accept the article.
If you are able to develop it, then we'll happily look at it again. And if you need any help with it, lots of people will be quite willing to do what they can.
I'm sure you are aware that people are constantly adding misinformation to Wikipedia. An article lacking independent references is a target for such vandalism. If we permit facts that cannot be checked, then anyone can write anything - and we'd have no way of knowing which parts were true. This is particularly important for biographic articles; I'm sure you'll agree, we must take every care to present accurate information about Mr. Foster-Harris. The only way we can do that is, if there are reliable sources for our claims. This is not small-minded or some petty bureaucratic issue; it is the only logical way to control the accuracy of the project.
If there really are not enough references, there is little we can do unless/until we find some - whether they are online or offline. If there are no such 'reliable sources' to satisfy the policies of Wikipedia, then this is the wrong site to host the information - there are, of course, other websites where you can write anything you like. But for Wikipedia, rule #1 must be verifiability.
I'm sorry if it is frustrating. If there is anything I can do to help, by all means let me know. I am keen to have articles on any and all subjects which satisfy the notability requirements. Chzz ► 15:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Good grief.76.118.23.40 (talk) 15:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
On 21 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article ForceSelect, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
On 21 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Shikha Tandon, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
for saving my user page. Alandeus (talk) 12:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
On 21 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rusty Mike Radio, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey Chzz, thanks for all your help today. MikesTooLz (talk) 17:38, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
On 22 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Educology, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:04, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
((tb|Sven Manguard))
Done Chzz ► 17:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
((Talkback|User talk:SpikeToronto|ACC_request|07:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC))) — SpikeToronto 07:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Done Chzz ► 17:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Herman ring at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Allen3 talk 13:08, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the outstanding feedback on these two articles. I've commented on your comments on my talk page.Sarnold17 (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
On 21 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Waybacks, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Why don't you try Igloo? Wayne Olajuwon chat 19:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
All Around Amazing Barnstar | ||
Thank you for being such an amazing helper on the IRC and with anything else you can help with. You deserve this and many more. JoeGazz ▲ 01:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) |
((Talkback|User talk:SpikeToronto|ACC_request|05:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC))) — SpikeToronto 05:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
On 24 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sisters of St. Francis of the Holy Cross, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Damon J. Smith was nominated by you at DYK. I'm afraid I might have gone a bit over the top but the article has some serious problems. A lot of the sourcing is unreliable, mis-represented or self-published. I'm not too hot on WP:NSPORTS but it's not clear to me he would pass for either his football or motocross.
It's practically impossible to verify he was at the Calgary Stampeders, see this search. His blog states as well as the opportunity to play pro ball with the Calgary Stampeders. After sustaining a season ending injury, Damon quickly reconfigured his goals and entered the business world. (my formatting) This makes me suspect he never played, although he did get a contract, and was then injured-out. All the sourcing on his "entrepreneurship" is self-published. The motocross stuff takes note that he competes, but there's nothing that would pass WP:GNG.
The mis-representation of sources makes me doubt the credibility of the two cited off-line articles. Can you access them?
Fair play to the guy, he's busy out there doing things while I edit here, but I don't think this article is notable, and I wanted to hear your thoughts before moving forward. Thanks, Bigger digger (talk) 22:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Feinoha would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Feinoha to accept or decline the nomination. A page will then be created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chzz2. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. |
Feinoha Talk, My master 01:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
On 23 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Evangelical Mysticism, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
The Articles for Creation barnstar | ||
You have done substantial work on the AfC and have eliminated the backlog almost completely daily. You are critical to the success of the project, without you we would have 100+ submissions daily. Thank you so much! JoeGazz ▲ 01:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC) |
Hi Chzz! You know if you uses the ((wikibreak)) template with the message=
parameter, you can customize it to be anything you want. So that ((wikibreak|message=Gone fishin’))
would produce
Gone fishin’
I just thought you might want to try it out since you’re off on a break that some of the other available parameters might not fit.
You can even create it as a separate page in your own user namespace that, when you update it, automatically updates your userpage and your talk page. You would
((User:Chzz/Wikibreak))
at the top of either or both of User:Chzz and User talk:ChzzThen, whatever you have on User:Chzz/Wikibreak would appear on those pages. Have fun! — SpikeToronto 18:16, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I've made my case both on the talk page, and Rangoon11 (talk · contribs)'s talk page. I need some outside comments. Thanks.--TalkToMecintelati 17:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
On 24 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pedro Borrell, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
— SpikeToronto 18:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Done Chzz ► 13:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
We deal with a lot more ridiculous items. We may have opposed it but we understand why you nominated it and why it is importantYour story was at least Significant news in Britain's Biology and animal lovers community. . Just look with what we are dealing with now "Death of Paul the Octopus" and last week 2010 Belgian love triangle skydiving murder trial. Do not be discouraged and stop by again soon The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 18:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Emperor of Exmoor, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emperor of Exmoor until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Simple Bob (talk) 21:11, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Rangoon11 is doing the same with flags @ Linklaters what should be done. also at Baker & McKenzie VHarris44 (talk) 10:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I clarified why Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wikipedia:WikiProject North America/Recognized content appears blank. It's a bot request page, that will be filled in by a bot. The current contents is an invisible template, but JL-Bot (talk · contribs) is supposed to come around and place content underneath that as an automated service for Wikiprojects. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. User:ResidentAnthropologist persists in making erroneous and improper edit reverts at Jediism. I am reporting him to you for violating RRR rule. He has reverted my edits from that article, edits which have removed mentions of nontheism and some fictitious "Way of Shao-lin" that have no basis in fact. Please come and help, this is rather tedious. The user does not post anything on the talk page, nor do I suspect this user will do so in future.75.21.159.227 (talk) 16:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Hmm. That is exactly what I have been doing--relaxing--for quite some time. Yet the reversions of improvements I make are continuing. I understand the concern about vandalism at the article, and I also forget to add edit summaries. However, I will not tolerate the continued mention of something fictitious as if it were a fact. There is no "way" of Shao-lin except Buddhist vows. Thanks for your input and help.75.21.159.227 (talk) 17:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I see. So it is preferable to allow my corrections to be reverted back to fantasy and inaccuracy? Even though I have posted, begged, pleaded on the talk page while this editor only posted today?75.21.159.227 (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I am little confused to as to what exactly the issue is here, I reverted some unsourced additions by an Ip two days ago in which sourced statements were removed and unsourced statements added in exchange. I then get an extremely angry message on my page today threatening to report me for something or other. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 17:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For dedicated efforts evaluating new users' first attempts at article creation, resulting in a rare clearance of the Article for Creation backlog, I award Chzz this Barnstar.--ragesoss (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC) |
I'll work on the article some more.
I was hoping that a statement by an independent reliable source that Pariyatti is "North America’s leading source of books for students of the Theravadan tradition" of Buddhism, plus Pariyatti publishes its own books on Buddhism, plus Pariyatti is the sole source in the west for books from two of the most notable publishers of Buddhist books - - I was hoping that would be considered notable.
I'm trying to imagine what characteristics - other than articles about it in independent newspapers, magazines, books or websites - might make a publishing house/bookstore/service organization notable?
Carljs27 (talk) 00:28, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my blank page for article on Suburban Chinatown. LOL I wonder where my article went?? There was one honest! ;-) I am sure glad I kept a copy! (somewhere-eek!) Happy reviewing, may they all be so easy! Hah! Namaste...DocOfSoc (talk) 09:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chzz, i worked on the article for Maurizio Bolognini some more. Could you please have a look....? thank you!! Vera V.fanis1 (talk) 09:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm leaning towards deleting this as blatant advertising. Thoughts? TNXMan 14:28, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop in a thank-you for your attempts at calming this, and for not having added any fire to it. I am extremely embarrassed about my temporary loss of control, but I hope you can understand me when I say a lot of people here need to practice what they preach.
Also, if you ever had some time, examining the changes at Jediism would reveal that ResidentAnthropologist simply reverts...he does not discuss, warn or explain on the talk page. If I did that I'd have already been unjustly strung up for being a vandal.
In any case I thank you. My IP has already fluctuated, so don't panic if it looks different than my last one.75.21.155.253 (talk) 15:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm responding to your message that "In Wikipedia, 'notability' means significant coverage in independent reliable sources".
Do you not consider the two sources included in the article to be independent and reliable? I believe they are. I will paste some information about them below.
Or do you not consider those two articles to be "significant coverage"? For a small independent nonprofit publishing house/bookstore/service organization to get any coverage at all, let alone coverage that calls it “North America’s leading source of books for students of the Theravadan tradition” of Buddhism seems significant to me.
Here's some info about those two sources. More info about them can be found on their Wikipedia pages:
TRICYCLE: THE BUDDHIST REVIEW FROM http://askville.amazon.com/Buddhist-tricycle/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=460255 "Tricycle: The Buddhist Review is a Buddhist quarterly published by the New York City-based Tricycle Foundation, formerly known as Buddhist Ray, Inc. It has the largest circulation of any Buddhist magazine in the US.
The periodical is an internationally distributed, mainstream quarterly dedicated to exploring the full range of Buddhist activity and its impact on Western Life. The first issue of Tricycle was dated Fall 1991, featuring an interview of the Dalai Lama by Spalding Gray.
Tricycle claims an upscale audience of approximately 200,000 readers. According to the 2005 Writers' Market, circulation of the magazine is 60,000.
HERE'S INFO ABOUT THE INDEPENDENT BOOK PUBLISHER'S ASSOCIATION, PUBLISHER OF THE "INDEPENDENT", THE SECOND SOURCE CITED "IBPA, the Independent Book Publishers Association is a trade association of independent publishers. Founded in 1983, it serves book, audio, and video publishers located in the United States and around the world.
IBPA's membership of more than 4,000 publishers continues to grow. It is governed by a voluntary board of directors that meets regularly to discuss and plan the association's business. Board members reflect the varied membership and serve two- to four-year terms.
Carljs27 (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, If you are able to rescue more images from ((Short-Rationale)) feel free.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chzz,
I bit back a little at Talk:Sydenham#Disambiguation_required. Do you mind taking a look and advise if I am being argumentative? I am wondering if I would be better off avoiding the multiple move requests on other UK cities raised by the same user by taking them off my watch-list rather than expressing any opinions or risking giving an impression of hounding. If you would rather not give advice on this one, let me know and I'll ask another experienced editor. Cheers, Fæ (talk) 20:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
I knew that was a copyvio, but I couldn't find appropriate phrases to search for. :) Corvus cornixtalk 22:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Chzz, yesterday you wrote: OK; I've tweaked a few minor things, and removed the 'unreviewed' tag. Cheers, Chzz ► 13:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
but the template has not been removed from the page..... I don't think I can do it (sorry, I don't know how this works....)
V.fanis1 (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Business Consulting & Design 21, which you PRODed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business Consulting & Design 21 until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 15:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Chzz, yesterday you wrote: OK; I've tweaked a few minor things, and removed the 'unreviewed' tag. Cheers, Chzz ► 13:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC) but the template has not been removed from the page..... I don't think I can do it (sorry, I don't know how this works....) V.fanis1 (talk) 17:45, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
it's ok now. thank you! V.fanis1 (talk) 07:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Tag was removed by My76Strat here 21:52, 29 October 2010. Chzz ► 18:15, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
You have been invited to comment in a special Request for Constructive Criticism page. I am looking for areas in which I can improve. I have identified you as both an experienced and trusted Wikipedian, and as someone that has had sufficient contact with me to able to recognize areas in which I can improve.
Please feel free to visit and post any comments or criticism you have. At a certain point, I cannot improve if no one tells me what I need to work on. Thanks in advance, Sven Manguard Talk 00:23, 31 October 2010 (UTC) |
On 2 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Billy Porter (criminal), which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
-- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
On 30 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jameela Jamil, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:07, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
On 5 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Emperor of Exmoor, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
-- Cirt (talk) 18:03, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, and thanks for your comment on my talk page. You asked what I thought was wrong with this article; essentially, it's not so much the way it was written but the content it contains. It has far too much trivial information which is only of interest to a fan (height, size, childhood memories, favourite foods, etc) to be acceptable as an encyclopaedic article. As a suggestion of how it should look, I've boldly cut it down to the content which is relevant to an encyclopaedia: see [5]. That's a pretty drastic reduction, and feel free to revert it if you want; but this article should look more like that than the version I found it in. It's not about whether content is verifiable or neutral, it's about whether it belongs in an encyclopaedic biography at all. Robofish (talk) 23:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
I've commented on WP:UAA - just thought I'd let you know ;). Happy editing! Hope to see you around! --Addihockey10e-mail 05:50, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
That page's content, "faythe bashaw is hot" didn't meet the criteria for G1, which requires utterly meaningless text, garbled to the common English speaker. This content was not, and would've been better tagged with A7, the "no reasonable claim of notability" criteria. Maybe this is just bureaucracy at its best, but if you're going to categorise something, it might as well be done (more) correctly. Happy editing, --Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
I saw your proposal for deleting the article "New Guns N' Roses album", and after reading the guidelines for future albums I think it's fair enough. Just one thing, you wrote that much of the references and information were gossip which have been refuted. I was just wondering if you could be more specific, as the information and sources are coming directly from the band members Axl Rose and Dj Ashba. None have been refuted to my knowledge. Spirit83 (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi there - it's Addihockey10, I was just wondering if I could help improve edit filters a bit, however, I know nothing about them ;). Is it possible for you to help me "learn the ropes" with edit filters? Thanks for your consideration! Happy editing! --Addihockey10e-mail 16:54, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
He eh. Nice to see you around Chzz. I was awfully surprised when I got an edit conflict and saw your name. Are you back for the long haul or just stopping by? Sven Manguard Talk 21:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
You do make me laugh :) - Sophie (Talk) 22:51, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, can you check T:TDYK#Cirencester Amphitheatre. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 20:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
This is just to let you know, I have listed you as "friendly person" on my friendly userpage :) Sophie (Talk) 16:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC) |
She just needs someone to talk to —Preceding unsigned comment added by Just a friendly someone (talk • contribs) 02:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bob and brian logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:37, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
On 21 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Michael Dweck, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that fine art photographer Michael Dweck was the first living artist to have a solo show at Sotheby's of New York, in 2003? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
You should try to leave veiled messages like that viewable to him as he is an admin and I reported a member / part-time mod.MallowMeltsBA (talk) 23:34, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
23:37, 23 November 2010 Tnxman307 (talk | contribs) blocked MallowMeltsBA (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (((checkuserblock))) Chzz ► 03:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
What was the problem with this edit? 128.151.91.93 (talk)
I restored the legit edit, but it's little more than an external link. Strange entry. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
On 20 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cirencester Amphitheatre, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Roman Cirencester Amphitheatre in Gloucestershire was once used for the sport of bull-baiting? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
On 20 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Windmill tump, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Windmill tump is a tumulus burial mound in Gloucestershire which contains the remains of ten adults and children? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
This page and your user page have both said "Chzz is taking a break from Wikipedia" for quite a while, even though you you have been active here. Is this an oversight? There is at least one case of a user being misled by the notice. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
WTF Dude, I changed the editing, didn't add any new content, How about you do some of your own research before chastising me for not citing reliable sources —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.8.233.65 (talk) 00:51, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
((tb|Sophie)) - Sophie (Talk) 22:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
On 27 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Black Carts Turret, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that although the Black Carts Turret Roman fortification is connected to Hadrian's Wall, it was probably built before the wall itself? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
((tb|sophie)) - Sophie (Talk) 13:43, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sophie (Talk) 00:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chzz, Hope you are fine--long time since we talked. There is an article, Mario Kleff, largely autobiographical, that I nominated for deletion. For some reason I could not add it to the aFd page. Can you please look at it and finish the process? I tried several times with no success. Thanks. รัก-ไทย (talk) 09:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Done Chzz ► 00:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Nympsfield Long Barrow at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mikenorton (talk) 11:14, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. My question was the result of my misunderstanding and a graphics-user-interface / human factors effect. It is shown by a comparison of the results of a Google search on "sulphur" and a Google search on "The Professor and the Madman". Because the keys "sulphur" and "sulfur" are short, look very similar and have the same sound (and I know they are equivalent) I take it for granted that I have found the Wikipedia article for what I want, without having to look at the next line to see that this is so. "The Professor and the Madman" and "The Vicar of Crowthorne" look and sound so completely different, it took me about 20 seconds to realize I was looking at the appropriate link. I assumed that the Google entry was a consequence of the Google indexing algorithm, and did not know that it resulted from a Wikipedia redirect. I feel confident now about constructing redirects, finding pages that redirect, and recognizing their effects on Google searches.
I put this reply on my User:talk page first. Should I have put it there or here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael P. Barnett (talk • contribs) 21:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Please participate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Why_Don't_You_Love_Me_(Beyonc%C3%A9_Knowles_song)#Single.3F Jivesh boodhun (talk) 05:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chzz,
I believe you're the moderator who proposed the deletion of my article on this short film (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Karma:_A_Very_Twisted_Love_Story) and wanted to get in touch to see if this decision could be reviewed. I've provided some online references I found that might address the original issue, lack of notability and significant coverage.
Thanks.
Raindance Film Festival 2010 Official Selection http://www.raindance.org/site/index.php?id=519,6201,0,0,1,0
Milano International Film Festival 2010 Nominated Best Short Film http://www.miff.it/nominees_karma.php?lang=1
Rome International Film Festival 2010 Nominated Best Narrative Short http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rome_International_Film_Festival
Williamsburg International Film Festival Winner, Outstanding Achievement in Filmmaking http://www.willifest.com/awardslist.html
Philadelphia Asian-American Film Festival Official Selection http://phillyasian.bside.com/2010/films/shortsprogram2visions_kevinfoong_phillyasian2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gen247 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
On 2 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nympsfield Long Barrow, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that haematite found during the excavation of Nympsfield Long Barrow may have been used to make face-paint, so that the dead could appear alive? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 23:49, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Couch on his Head and Smiling (talk) 23:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valeri Lilov (2nd nomination), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 December 3#Valeri Lilov. Cunard (talk) 09:58, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Hey there! I noticed that you were the person who blanked this page. I currently have an OTRS email from the New York University Archives department releasing the material for use on Wikipedia. Could you please advise me on how you would like to proceed? I noticed there were some issues with the trivia section but I wasn't sure if that was enough of a reason to decline the article's creation. Thanking you in advance! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
I have proposed a change in policy at [[WT:BLP#Do we need a WP:BILP policy?]], it should explain what my motivation was. Also sent to some other people: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. <( User:Couch on his Head and Smiling (talk) )> 06:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Bang has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 01:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
for dealing with this. If you look in the history, it took him 7 tries to get it, and 6 just to get it to become a db-reason tag (and never got it to be the G11 tag he was trying for). I am the one who tagged his page for G11 initially, because it was the poster child for it, and this is a textbook example of WP:POINT. Thanks again, or should I say おうきに (or ありがとう, whatever your preference). The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:21, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Waterfox would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Waterfox to accept or decline the nomination. A page will then be created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chzz 2. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. |
You've done much progress since your last RfA; I suggest you to run again. — Waterfox ~talk~ 16:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Since you made this edit [6]. I made a request for check user. It seems I have found a Second sock to the one you found. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 03:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
After seeing how active you are with helping users in #wikipedia-en-help I thought you should have this. Enjoy! Jacnoc (T)(CELB) 18:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC) |
Hi! Thanks for signing the Online Ambassador interest list. We're gearing up for the next term right now, and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program will be supporting considerably more courses, with considerably more student activity... possibly upwards of 500 students who will need mentors.
If you're still interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!
You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).
I hope to hear from you soon. (And I'll just add, pretty please? I think we're turning a corner for next term with the ambassador program in terms of getting the assignments and communications with professors and the campus ambassador roles into good shape, and I'd really like to have your wisdom as an Online Ambassador to help us keep up on the online side of things.) --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:34, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Mr R00t Talk 'tribs is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding ((subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Balloon)) to your friends' talk pages.
I know you've been hellishly busy lately. Take a breather and chill while you read my message. Happy Holidays, Mr R00t Talk 'tribs 04:20, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
To the Fir-Tree (Anonymous) |
Also
Happy (belated) Hanukkah! Happy Eid al-Adha! Happy Kwanzaa! Happy Festivus! Happy New Year! May this holiday season bring you the music of laughter, the warmth of friendship, and the steadying hand of love. Cheers! /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 04:57, 19 December 2010 (UTC) |
I created the article on Jameela. I'm glad you've expanded on what I started. Its written on Twitter Feb 2010 she mentioned her birthday on Feb 25 and her "old Indian father dancing in a cringe-worthy fashion.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:47, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Uh, that's exactly why I didn't source it.. But it should be as reliable as a magazine interview if not more because she said it herself. Yeah some of the article is a bit too magazine-like. Her favourite foods and that are not appropriate, I guess that's why they showed concerns...When I started it the amount of decent sources on her were very poor..♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:57, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
February 25, 1986 from the horses mouth.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:01, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Yeah that's what I thought, I was seeing her on TV every day and was amazed she didn't have an article or much written about her on the web. It was quite some time before I started the article too. It wouldn't qualify for a DYK now anyway its too late.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
User:DeltaQuad/Christmas2010
Happy Holidays! |
Dear Chzz, Best wishes to you and your family this holiday season, whether you are celebrating Christmas or a different holiday. It's a special time of the year for almost everyone, and there's always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! ;) Love, --Meaghan [talk] ≈ 15:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
Hello. I noticed you tagged comparison of IPv6 support by major transit providers for speedy deletion per C1. I don't believe this applies; IPv6 is a well known protocol, and the author provides a wikilink to it, thus establishing context. I went ahead and removed the tag for now. If you still want to delete the article, go ahead and nominate it at AfD. Feezo (Talk) 02:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I've started a discussion about Findley's sport here. Thanks and regards, GiantSnowman 22:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Done Chzz ► 16:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
happy holidays
from mono
wishing you a joyful new year
MonoALT (talk) 03:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
I thought it was a subpage! Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:49, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to respond. :) My problem wasn't solved, so I have added the template again. Syed Kazim (Talk | Contribs) 17:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Done Chzz ► 23:35, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the greeting messages, everyone, and happy Xmas. Chzz ► 15:16, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
The Articles for Creation barnstar | ||
Thank you for your hard work in AFC, WP:Feedback, and in IRC. Alpha Quadrant talk 14:37, 24 December 2010 (UTC) |
Hi, I just wanted to follow up on the reason for declining submission of the Deloitte Central Europe Top 500 page. The entry doesn't appear to be written in a self-promotional way--it describes one of Deloitte's popular programs which annually ranks to the fastest growing companies in this region. The companies also often reference the rankings themselves and it's usually reported in the media. Can you tell me if there's something we need to do or change the way it's written to make it passable? Thanks! Jcc813 (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your help at my talk page. :) Syed Kazim (Talk | Contribs) 18:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC) |
I appreciate your edits to the Fast_ForWord page. Thank you. Nwiesen (talk) 17:30, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
On 4 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jameela Jamil, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Channel 4 music presenter Jameela Jamil was struck by a car at the age of 17 and was told she might never walk again? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from me and the wiki users Victuallers (talk) 15:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
I don't care too much, when I login I can make edits normally and not be affected by the ban, however, I am curious if there was a recent edit that I made that spurred my warning from you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.82.9.80 (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Chzz, I am demonstrating to an audience at Wikipedia 10 New Delhi. Can you please explain NPOV on our talk page? 121.245.5.80 (talk) 11:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
One of the core principles of Wikipedia is neutrality - we need to maintain a totally neutral viewpoint. It is one of the five pillars.
The most common problem with neutrality occurs when facts are not suitably referenced. If we stick to information that can be checked - verified - in reliable sources, that helps to keep things neutral. All facts should have a reference - and when that happens, naturally we use proven facts, and thus it is more neutral.
Sometimes though, that is not enough; if there are several viewpoints about a topic. For example, if there were 10 books saying that "Chzz is a great writer", but another 10 books saying they are not...then we'd need to provide balance in the article. If we only used the 'good' references, then we'd be introducing a one-sided point of view.
One of the biggest problems we have is with conflict of interest. When an editor is too closely involved with a subject (for example: a company they work at), then it is so very hard to be neutral - which is why we strongly recommend not editing articles you are closely associated with.
That can seem counter-intuitive; at first thought, it might seem better for an article to be written by people involved...but, oddly, it is better if the editors are removed from the subject mattter. In that latter case, then the editors do not have personal information and they have to rely on facts gathered from references.
...well, that's some brief thoughts. Hope that maybe helps a little? Let me know if there is more I can do.
And happy 10th anniversary! Chzz ► 11:19, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Chzz, you never seem to be on IRC at the same time as I'm in there anymore so I thought I would send you a message here instead (!). I think there is some issue with the auto-archiving setup on my talk page; some threads aren't being automatically archived even though they are older than 14 days. I'm not sure what's going wrong; I think it might be an issue with a timestamp somewhere but I don't know. Any help would be much appreciated.
On another note, how are you? Have you moved to your new place yet? I know you were staying somewhere temporarily over Christmas.
Thanks very much, Chevymontecarlo 16:30, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The tea helped, thanks ^_^ Normally I think more along the lines of the WP:DGAF-ians, but for some reason this particular set of articles was really riling me up. I think you're right, I'll go and work on something else and take a deep breath. - ManicSpider (talk) 11:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Howdy! The actual name of the act has the year in it. If the page was moved for only that reason, could you please add the date? Thanks! JFHJr (㊟) 08:03, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Your prod edit conflicted with mine, but yours was better worded! Still, good call! -- roleplayer 11:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thanks for your response.... but my new problem is I cant unify this ac to other ac in other wiki projects...... and thus I cant use single username to login to all wiki project... Isn't there any deactivation to user ac which are not in use for many days???
Aniruddha22Paranjpye (talk) 07:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thanks for help... Aniruddha22Paranjpye (talk) 07:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)