|
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello Eldhorajan92, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas of Cana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syrian Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Baselios Yeldo a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Baselios Yeldho. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 20:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, regarding your recent good-faith edits at Nayanthara, there is a difference between any-old-source and a reliable source. Wikipedia is not interested in what faceless blogs have to say about a subject, because anyone can start a blog and make up whatever they want. We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and clear editorial policies have to say. This would include established newspapers, established news sites, established magazines, books from established publishers, etc. Please take a look at our guidelines for reliable sources to get a better sense of what may and may not be used. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marthoma Cheriapally Kothamangalam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malankara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
There are some errors in St Thomas Christian site especially in the st.Thomas division diagram . I want to discuss with you about this. Also I contacted you in Facebook. Please reply, Thanks Gaur 18:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Gaur 18:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Please explain your edits in the future.Xx236 (talk) 11:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Girdle of Thomas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syrian Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Eldhorajan92. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Curien Kaniamparambil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 16:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Curien Kaniamparambil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curien Kaniamparambil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 11:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Eldhorajan92, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Curien kaniamparambil corepiscopa have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:25, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
You are putting yourself at serious risk of being blocked from editing if you continue to edit-war on Syrian Church. There is a talk page -- Talk:Syrian Church -- use it. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm unsure whether Vilayil Tharakan Gothram is even notable and I'm afraid a lot of it makes no sense but, worse, you appear to have been copying from, for example, Pakalomattom family without providing any attribution, which is a breach of Wikipedia's licensing. And you've managed to misrepresent what the Pakalomattom article says by being selective in what you copied in order to push what appears to be your own opinion.
You have had a lot of warnings and explanations but do not seem to be improving. Aside from the issues relating to our policies and guidelines, it also appears that your ability to write in the English language, while way better than my ability to write using Indian languages, is not as good as perhaps you think. Indeed, much of what you write is effectively gibberish, sorry. For that reason alone, I suspect that English is not your first language and that you might be better editing (in compliance with their policies etc) at some other version of Wikipedia. The project exists in numerous language forms, including Tamil.
Please note the information below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 07:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.It's obvious that you are using IPs to continue your disruption and that's obviously not allowed. You will be blocked if that continues. —SpacemanSpiff 11:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Eldhorajan92. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The Christianity Barnstar | ||
For your valuable effort in making articles related to christianity. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 03:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC) |
ICHTHUS |
May 2018 |
Project News
By Lionelt
Last month's auspicious relaunch of our newsletter precipitated something of an uproar in the Wikipedia community. What started as a localized edit war over censorship spilled over onto the Administrator's Noticeboard finally ending up at Wikipedia's supreme judicial body ArbCom. Their ruling resulted in the admonishment of administrator Future Perfect at Sunrise for his involvement in the dispute. The story was reported by Wikipedia's venerable flagship newspaper The Signpost.
The question of whether to delete all portals--including the 27 Christianity-related portals--was put to the Wikipedia community. Approximately 400 editors have participated in the protracted discussion. Going by !votes, Oppose deletion has a distinct majority. The original Christianity Portal was created on November 5, 2005 by Brisvegas and the following year he successfully nominated the portal for Featured Portal. The Transhumanist has revived WikiProject Portals with hopes of revitalizing Wikipedia's system of 1,515 portals.
Stay up-to-date on the latest happenings at the Project
Achievements
Four articles in the Project were promoted to GA: Edict of Torda nom. by Borsoka, Jim Bakker nom. by LovelyGirl7, Ralph Abernathy nom. by Coffee and Psalm 84 nom. by Gerda_Arendt. The Psalm ends with "O Lord of hosts, blessed is the man that trusteth in thee." Words to live by. Please support our members and send some WikiLove to the nominators!
Featured article
Nominated by Spangineer
Operation Auca was an attempt by five Evangelical Christian missionaries from the United States to make contact with the Huaorani people of the rainforest of Ecuador. The Huaorani, also known as the Aucas, were an isolated tribe known for their violence, both against their own people and outsiders who entered their territory. With the intention of being the first Protestants to evangelize the Huaorani, the missionaries began making regular flights over Huaorani settlements in September 1955, dropping gifts. After several months of exchanging gifts, on January 2, 1956, the missionaries established a camp at "Palm Beach", a sandbar along the Curaray River, a few miles from Huaorani settlements. Their efforts culminated on January 8, 1956, when all five—Jim Elliot, Nate Saint, Ed McCully, Peter Fleming, and Roger Youderian—were attacked and speared by a group of Huaorani warriors. The news of their deaths was broadcast around the world, and Life magazine covered the event with a photo essay. The deaths of the men galvanized the missionary effort in the United States, sparking an outpouring of funding for evangelization efforts around the world. Their work is still frequently remembered in evangelical publications, and in 2006, was the subject of the film production End of the Spear. (more...)
Did You Know
Nominated by Dahn
"... that, shortly after being sentenced to death for treason, Ioan C. Filitti became manager of the National Theatre Bucharest?"
You should have moved the page. You want to delete history of the old page.Xx236 (talk) 12:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
ICHTHUS |
June 2018 |
Project news
By Lionelt
Here are discussions relevant to the Project:
The following articles need reviewers for GA-class: Type of Constans nom. by Gog the Mild, Tian Feng (magazine) nom. by Finnusertop. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Stay up-to-date on the latest happenings at the Project
Did You Know
Nominated by Gonzonoir
... that in 1636, Phineas Hodson, Chancellor of York Minster, lost his 38-year-old wife Jane during the birth of the couple's 24th child?
Featured article
Nominated by Cliftonian
The Mortara case was a controversy precipitated by the Papal States' seizure of Edgardo Mortara, a six-year-old Jewish child, from his family in Bologna, Italy, in 1858. The city's inquisitor, Father Pier Feletti, heard from a servant that she had administered emergency baptism to the boy when he fell sick as an infant, and the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition held that this made the child irrevocably a Catholic. Because the Papal States had forbidden the raising of Christians by members of other faiths, it was ordered that he be taken from his family and brought up by the Church. After visits from the child's father, international protests mounted, but Pope Pius IX would not be moved. The boy grew up as a Catholic with the Pope as a substitute father, trained for the priesthood in Rome until 1870, and was ordained in France three years later. In 1870 the Kingdom of Italy captured Rome during the unification of Italy, ending the pontifical state; opposition across Italy, Europe and the United States over Mortara's treatment may have contributed to its downfall. (Full article...)
ICHTHUS |
July 2018 |
The Top 7 report
By Lionelt
The big news was the marriage of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The Top 7 most popular articles in WikiProject Christianity were:
Did you know
Nominated by The C of E
... that the little-known 1758 Methodist hymn "Sun of Unclouded Righteousness" asks God to send the doctrine of the "Unitarian fiend ... back to hell", referring to both Islam and Unitarianism?
Our newest Featured list
Nominated by Freikorp
List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events. Predictions of apocalyptic events that would result in the extinction of humanity, a collapse of civilization, or the destruction of the planet have been made since at least the beginning of the Christian Era. Most predictions are related to Abrahamic religions, often standing for or similar to the eschatological events described in their scriptures. Christian predictions typically refer to events like the Rapture, Great Tribulation, Last Judgment, and the Second Coming of Christ.
Polls conducted in 2012 across 20 countries found over 14% of people believe the world will end in their lifetime, with percentages raging from 6% of people in France to 22% in the US and Turkey. In the UK in 2015, the general public believed the likeliest cause would be nuclear war, while experts thought it would be artificial intelligence. Between one and three percent of people from both countries thought the apocalypse would be caused by zombies or alien invasion. (more...)
Help wanted
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. eldhose 17:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Belivers Church
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
required for Believers Eastern Church Article because of unwanted editing with clearly reference
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. eldhose 17:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malankara Metropolitan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Eldhorajan92. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ICHTHUS |
June 2019 |
The sad news was the 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings. The Top 6 most popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:
... that the first attempt to build the Holy Trinity Cathedral of the Alexander Nevsky Lavra resulted in the demolition of the nearly completed structure?
Saint Fin Barre's Cathedral is a Gothic Revival three-spire cathedral in the city of Cork, Ireland. It belongs to the Church of Ireland and was completed in 1879. The cathedral is located on the south side of the River Lee, on ground that has been a place of worship since the 7th century, and is dedicated to Finbarr of Cork, patron saint of the city. It was once in the Diocese of Cork; it is now one of the three cathedrals in the Church of Ireland Diocese of Cork, Cloyne and Ross, in the ecclesiastical province of Dublin. Christian use of the site dates back to a 7th-century AD monastery, which according to legend was founded by Finbarr of Cork. The entrances contain the figures of over a dozen biblical figures, capped by a tympanum showing a Resurrection scene.
(more...)
Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 09:50, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
ICHTHUS |
July 2019 |
A suicide attack on July 11th claimed by Islamic State (IS) near a church in the Syrian city of Qamishli shows that Christians remain a major target of the terror group. The Top 6 most popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:
When God Writes Your Love Story: The Ultimate Approach to Guy/Girl Relationships is a 1999 book by Eric and Leslie Ludy, an American married couple. After becoming a bestseller on the Christian book market, the book was republished in 2004 and then revised and expanded in 2009. It tells the story of the authors' first meeting, courtship, and marriage. The authors advise single people not to be physically or emotionally intimate with others, but to wait for the spouse that God has planned for them.
The book is divided into five sections and sixteen chapters. Each chapter is written from the perspective of one of the two authors; nine are by Eric, while Leslie wrote seven, as well as the introduction. The Ludys argue that one's love life should be both guided by and subordinate to one's relationship with God. Leslie writes that God offers new beginnings to formerly unchaste or sexually abused individuals.
(more...)
Content you included in the above article when you created it in May 2018 appears to have been copied from the church's website, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. For copyright reasons, a lot of the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
ICHTHUS |
December 2019
|
The Top 3 most popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:
Being a Ghost Story of Christmas, commonly known as A Christmas Carol, is a novella by Charles Dickens, first published in London by Chapman & Hall in 1843 and illustrated by John Leech. The book is divided into five chapters, which Dickens titled "staves". A Christmas Carol recounts the story of Ebenezer Scrooge, an elderly miser who is visited by the ghost of his former business partner Jacob Marley and the spirits of Christmas Past, Present and Yet to Come. After their visits, Scrooge is transformed into a kinder, gentler man. (more...)
“ | Be kindly affectionate to one another with brotherly love, in honor giving preference to one another. | ” |
Romans 12:10 New King James Version (NKJV)
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.
ICHTHUS |
January 2020
|
The Top 3 most-popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:
A Song for Simeon, is a 37-line poem written in 1928 by American-English poet T. S. Eliot (1888–1965). It is one of five poems that Eliot contributed to the Ariel poems series of 38 pamphlets by several authors published by Faber and Gwyer. "A Song for Simeon" was the sixteenth in the series and included an illustration by avant garde artist Edward McKnight Kauffer. The poem's narrative echoes the text of the Nunc dimittis, a liturgical prayer for Compline from the Gospel passage. Eliot introduces literary allusions to earlier writers Lancelot Andrewes, Dante Alighieri and St. John of the Cross. Critics have debated whether Eliot's depiction of Simeon is a negative portrayal of a Jewish figure and evidence of anti-Semitism on Eliot's part.
(more...)
“ | May He grant you according to your heart’s desire, And fulfill all your purpose. | ” |
Psalm 20:4 New King James Version (NKJV)
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.
|
Hello, Eldhorajan92. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "JSC News".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Jacobite Syrian Christian Church does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 20:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Eldhorajan92, copyvios, edit-warring, disruption regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Iam not do war editing, Iam something to do more information to article with my information and available reference's. Eldhose Talk 05:53, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Eldhorajan92. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Only delete photos with proved evidence? I have collections of photos used Nikon D5100,other DSLR and Sony Digital, whatever ignose these contributions others are collected pictures, not icon. Then ignore these Issues without evidence. Eldhose Talk
Avoid Nikon D5100, other DSLR Sony Digital photos of my collection's own my copyright pictures, other pictures are my collections without any violation. Eldhorajan92 (talk) Upload in my Nikon D5100 are given below
Used by Sony Digital Camera
Elizium23 Above all picture's,surely own copyright of mine not violation others. If you want to delete pictures to do with proved evidence and ignore those pictures from deletion. Eldhose Talk
ohk Eldhose Talk 06:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syriac Orthodox Archbishop of Jerusalem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caesarea in Palaestina. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for information. Talk 07:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Syriac Orthodox Archbishop of Jerusalem; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 05:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Elizium23, Iam not doing any edit war, their making fake history when It's avoidable, kindly avoid fake content without say reference? In example, It don't say first syriac church is St.Magdalene church is newly built in 5th century? Whatever, It's fake history. My revert based on adding reference or any other information, grammatical mistake to improve content. Already, Iam including to increase content with ref. Unfortunately, without any talk, It to become edit war. Iam respect other content and including more and also avoid fake content. In future, concentrate to content about repeatedly editing and edit war. Thank you for information. Eldhose Talk 07:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
(Edited)
Eldhose Talk 06:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 04:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 05:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
ohk Eldhose Talk 05:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 06:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Catholicos of the East. Elizium23 (talk) 21:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the note added in my talk page. Replied there and requesting to have the discussion on article's talk page itself to have easy reference for all users. Not understanding the reason behind your recent changes in the article List of Malankara Metropolitans after my edits. ---John C. (talk) 14:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
The Syriac Orthodox Church of India, came under the direct jurisdiction of the Pulikkootil Joseph Mar Divanasios, who was created Malankara Metropolitan by Ignatius Peter IV, the incubent Syriac Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch is known as Syriac Orthodox Church of India (Known as Jacobite Syrian Christian Church)
User talk:Johnchacks After reformation of Malankara Syrian Church, which turns to two churches known as Jacobite Syrian Church, who support Patriarch of Antioch and Marthoma Syrian Church, who support Malankara Metropolitan Mathews Mar Athanasius. Iam Pointed to Split of Church. Eldhose Talk 14:33, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[1][2][3][4]
User talk:Johnchacks, Syriac Orthodox Church of India known as Jacobite Syrian Christian Church always under Patriarch of Antioch. Eldhose Talk 14:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
-- 06:40, Monday, November 16, 2020 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
-- 06:40, Monday, November 16, 2020 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Heads up, it is probably not a good idea to advertise that you have userrights when you do not actually have them, such as rollbacker, new page reviewer, page mover, etc. You need to actually petition and qualify for those rights before they are granted to you here. Elizium23 (talk) 06:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
ohk, I Don't know what is this, Iam just checking! Eldhose Talk 06:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Please check this Talk:List of Malankara Metropolitans#Query on the edit in Introduction. Thanks -John C. (talk) 09:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Updated the above section, please check and respond there ---John C. (talk) 10:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Malankara Metropolitans; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 09:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
With the discussion with you in Talk:List of Malankara Metropolitans#Query on the edit in Introduction, I felt there is no direct mention of the topic in referenced google books you added as supporting evidences . I already expressed it there and also on another section in same talk page Talk:List of Malankara Metropolitans#Quotes Missing for the references. Multiple times I requested you to use the "|quote" option to give remarks/mention you used from online books(google books)/PDF documents which you are using for references to edit Wikipedia articles. This is required for other editors and readers to confirm two things : i> is there such a mention of the topic? ii> is the mention actually related to the topic? But you are not ready for quoting remarks using "|quote" option and keep on adding some google books as references and engaging in edit war. If you say I am giving the quotes in Talk pages as per request, that is not sufficient, if you are quoting an online books/PDF docs, quotes to be added in references in article itself for ready references for anyone reading it, it is not possible to read entire google books to find which quotes you have used for each and every edit. -John C. (talk) 04:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Elizium23, guess that attributes 25 to 50% of the problem. Another 50% of the problem, this user deliberately wanted to push POVs in to topics related to Churches in Kerala, Syriac Christianity etc. Thats my view. I just checked a small portion his edits in other article Catholicos of the East and surprised to see this user had used the info from a Church website on the rift between this Church and another Church. That means this user largely depends on the views of one Church on historical events. Again this user quoted some online documents which are not supposed to use in Wikipedia or any encyclopedia platforms (Example: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/33910958/2002-parumala-association-a-facts-malankara-syriac-voice 2002). This doc does not have author/publisher details - not even able to understand whose views are listed in these docs. Going trough each of his edits in hundreds of articles, examining every reference is a very hard and time consuming task. I feel only option I left out is to select one of such articles, revert this user's edits completely, then monitor the edits he makes in the article. -John C. (talk) 01:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Elizium23, John C., Iam added page number in all reference. Some of reference added for clarence of what happens?. The another problem is whole pages of wikipedia carried by Malankara Orthodox faction or who support the Malankara Orthodox Church like John.C Eldhose Talk 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
One of content in Catholicos of the East is foreign Patriarch's claim to secular authority over the Indian Church, its dioceses and parishes led to a rift what the sense of this? As per claudius Buchan and Mulanthuruthy Synod, Malankara Syrian Church under Patriarch Of Antioch and Malankara Metropolitan is the Metropolitan of Syriac Orthodox Church before 1911. The other fact is they are doing with out any reference! Eldhose Talk 03:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
John C., If you have reference then you can go other ways not. Eldhose Talk 03:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
This is only one of reference for that article for clear to what happens other one is existed! https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/33910958/2002-parumala-association-a-facts-malankara-syriac-voice Eldhose Talk 03:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
John C., This is only supported reference(Second hand Reference) for another reference or for more details other ways not more Eldhose Talk 04:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC) Eldhorajan92, In an article, how you can place a link to a PDF not even mentioning the author/publisher name, what is the use of such doc for other users/readers? -John C. (talk) 04:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
John C., The document(Author:Malankara Syriac Voice) gives reference in the last two pages! Check that and also this is a secondary reference. The author is>> [1](Malankara Syriac Voice) Eldhose Talk 04:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Its done by permission of Church but not official. This reference is only for Secondary to support other one reference not any more! Eldhose Talk 04:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
@Jstalins, Do you think this pdf can consider as a reference to be used in Wikipedia articles? These kind of sources are acceptable? I feel its nothing but a propaganda doc -John C. (talk) 11:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Jstalins for providing a feedback based on Wikipedia guidelines. Removing this questionable source from the article. -John C. (talk) 03:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 08:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 19:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Eldhorajan92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Iam using sandbox for good purpose or improve article unfortunately certain name space are come with my mistake but I don't get any warning for this time then kindly pardon me! I can give more Articles in future also... Eldhose Talk 19:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Eldhorajan92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Give a good reason for your unblock
As a user requesting to be unblocked, it is your responsibility to tell clearly and briefly, in easily readable English, why your block violated Wikipedia's blocking policy. Specifically:
Keep it short. Administrators will often say no to read requests that are too long. Be kind. The use of profanities, ramblings, ALL CAPS SCREAMING and personal attacks will lead to the decline of your unblock request without further review of your changing history. The block duration may also be extended. Say what is wrong with your block. It is not enough if you just say that the block was "wrong" or "unfair". You must explain why it was wrong, and why this means that the block has broken our blocking policy. Address the block reason. As explained above, you have been informed about the reason for your block. You must address this reason in your request. This means that you must either explain why the block reason does not apply to your case, or you must convince the reviewing administrator that you won't do it again. Give evidence. If you state that you did or did not do something, please provide a link in the form of a diff if possible. Don't behave like you think lawyers do. Unblock requests are unacceptable proceedings. A ban or block is a removal of your privilege to change Wikipedia. Any legal right you may have to freedom of speech does not stop us from enacting and enforcing our own policies and guidelines. We may also check which IP address you change from, and which other accounts use it, where this is necessary to prevent abuse. Do not threaten legal action, either. Such threats may, by themselves, result in an indefinite block or evenly, a ban.Eldhose Talk 08:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous 2021 on the behalf of Christmas task force of WikiProject Holidays.
Happy holidays!
You can do!
|
Recent...
|
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Mz7 (talk) 19:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)