Hey! During your moving of Talk:List of school shootings in the United States (2000–present), you forgot to update the archive location. This is just a reminder - don't worry, I've fixed it. Thanks! Aidan9382 (talk) 07:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Extorc,
It seems you closed[1] a move request along the same time as I made a support vote. Should I revert my vote? I ask because with my vote, it seems like the RM could use more discussion. I'm not sure what the convention is in such cases.VR talk 16:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Extorc. Hope you are keeping fine. I observe you have redirected my articles on Direct Tax in India and Indirect Tax in India to Taxation in India. Both deserve independent articles due to sufficient reliable sources and Notability. Redirecting to single article makes in confusing and misleading. Request you to reinstate as guide me to improve. Kindly share your thoughts. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Tejasimha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
asilvering (talk) 23:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Greetings! Hope you're doing well. I noticed that you removed content from multiple articles since the source was 'Maktoob media' citing that it is a non-reliable source. Some of the content you removed is actually well-known (covered by multiple sources) if one has knowledge about the subject. Moreover, the website has been cited on multiple pages and the selective removal is confusing. There doesn't seem to be any discussion on wikipedia declaring that the website is not a reliable source and it seems to be accepted by editors. Hence, I wanted to make sense about the changes you made. Thank you and have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indianite (talk • contribs) 11:44, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
"Some of the content ... the subject"If there are well known events that have been reported by many reliable sources then it is better if we replace the non-RS with RS instead of letting the non-RS be cited on a page.
"Moreover, the website ... confusing."Yes, I found that the website had been cited on multiple articles and I removed it from around 8 out of the 16 articles on which it was cited.
"There doesn't seem ... accepted by editors."May I direct your attention towards WP:NEWSORG which states that
" News reporting from less-established outlets is generally considered less reliable for statements of fact". >>> Extorc.talk 14:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
The proper uses of a questionable source are very limited- not zero - and the site in question is hardly that. Hemantha (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Extorc,
Thank you for creating Ranasimha.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
There are various unsourced statements which require inline citations per WP:BURDEN.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Meena))
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
– Meena • 22:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Apologies if you are already in process, will you perform the move? Cheers. Selfstudier (talk) 09:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Extorc, when listing something at RMT, please bear in mind that the rationale you provide in the template will end up the edit summary of the move (which will remain as a permanent record in the history and especially the logs). It's best to avoid cryptic jargon like "RM disc" and it's almost universally expected that there will be a link to the RM discussion itself.
And another point. RM closures do occasionally get listed at RMT, but that's more the exception than the rule. If that's your main modus operandi, it's worth considering whether that is really saving anyone work. Instead of the usual short series of steps (an editor closes the RM, moves the pages and then cleans up after the move) now there's a longer process: you close the move and list it at RMT, then someone else will have to look at the closure to check it's OK, move the pages, clear the completed request from RMT and then do the usual clean-up. – Uanfala (talk) 12:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
" that doesn't point back to the same page"- Other cases dont require RMT? @Uanfala >>> Extorc.talk 13:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi. When relisting RM discussions, the "relisting" should be added just after the signature of nominator, like I have done here. Keep up the good work :-) —usernamekiran (talk) 08:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Extorc,
Please do not cast aspersions and imply other editors are using sockpuppets or are behaving deceitfully in a deletion discussion. This could be construed as a personal attack and lead to a loss of editing prvileges. If you believe there is sockpuppetry going on, the appropriate thing to do is to file a SPI case where you can present your evidence and checkusers can evaluate it. I understand deletion discussions can get a little heated but please try to remain civil. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I took care of your request at WP:RM/TR, but just wanted you to know, in case you don't already, that you should be able to do these kinds of moves yourself. As long as there is not more than one edit at the redirect that points back to the article to be moved, any autoconfirmed editor should be able to move that article over the redirect. Station1 (talk) 20:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Extorc You are not allowed to restore WP:BLP violations and violations of WP:SUSPECT. The article was a mess and I wonder how much of this was added by you. Please discuss any objections you have on the talk page of the article. Venkat TL (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Extorc. Thank you.
Sir here, a user is claiming Rajput resistance to Muslim conquests article as a hoax [2]. Is this true or they are venting out their frustration of failing to get the article deleted in the past ? 2409:4051:2E02:33E9:AA9A:1DB6:2A31:2C14 (talk) 18:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello Extorc,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged September and October 2022 for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 07:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)