This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I find your handling of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PROIV (2nd nomination) to be inappropriate and request you carefully analyze the situation. While it is unlikely a !supervote there is a marginal possibility or that. There is a serious matter here which probably requires taking to DRV; namely the raising of a second AfD within 24 hours of the closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PROIV by Daniel as no consensus and I see no evidence of Daniel being contacted over that matter. I believe re-opening is inappropriate and it is a DRV matter. Thankyou. 10:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talk • contribs) .
An editor has asked for a deletion review of PROIV. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi, @Filelakeshoe: Santosh Mahadik This article has already been removed, I moved this article to draft but the author of this article did not submit the draft and moved this article back to the article's crossname I searched on google about this article But did not get any important information, now if I enrolled it for AFD then I will have to face big problem.Best Regards JiggyzizTalk✍️ 10:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
JiggyzizTalk✍️ 10:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
A poet named Rasheed Hasrat belongs to Balochistan Pakistan he has written a book named sookhe paton pe qadam and the second is awaiting publication so kindly respond me if you can poet it in The portion of list of urdu poets can you help me out writing about him? Thanks waiting for your kind response Asher Rasheed (talk) 07:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
With all due respect, If four warnings and two blocks (24h and 48h) are not sufficient warning, what is? Do you think another 4im is going to change anything for someone with this contribution list? Their MO is to choose a random article and vandalise it. --Muhandes (talk) 10:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, may I ask you for help with fight against vandalism? I'm constantly reverting edits of someome who disrupts twin towns sections of various cities and municipalities and jumps between different IPs (178.143.50.74, 178.143.50.89, 193.87.63.204, 95.102.249.250). I'm not good at it so I just manually revert every edit one by one and it's exhausting. I notice you already reverted some edits of User talk:193.87.63.204 and wrote him. I tried to solve this through Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism which helped when I dealt with User talk:HunCzeLit224 and User talk:178.143.50.74 (both obviously same person as now) in April, but this time my request for blocking just disappeared without resolution. FromCzech (talk) 08:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
(copypaste of article removed)
Thanks so much for participating in Phase 1 of the RfA 2021 review. 8 out of the 21 issues discussed were found to have consensus. Thanks to our closers of Phase 1, Primefac and Wugapodes.
The following had consensus support of participating editors:
The following issues had a rough consensus of support from editors:
Please consider joining the brainstorming which will last for the next 1-2 weeks. This will be followed by Phase 2, a 30 day discussion to consider solutions to the problems identified in Phase 1.
There are 2 future mailings planned. One when Phase 2 opens and one with the results of Phase 2. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Best, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I have just seen that the above article has been deleted after a deletion discussion resulted in that decision.I understand that this is Wikipedia protocol and I am not disputing it.
I actually created that page in around 2007 which was highlighting the disproportionate way that certain schools/social classes were recognised for gallantry. It had a very robust deletion discussion then which actually resulted in a keep. As Wikipedia has moved on and new policies developed, so the debate has changed. Fair enough. I didn’t realise the more recent deletion debate was occurring (although in fairness I was informed).
However, many many hours went into that article from a large amount of contributors over the period that Wikipedia deemed it a worthy inclusion. I am a little sad that has now disappeared. I am not asking for you to reinstate the article at all. However, would it be possible to get a copy of the page? Preferably the wiki code that underpins it?
Many thanks Kwib (talk) 07:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much for doing this. Kwib (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Following a 2 week brainstorming period and a 1 week proposal period, the 30 day discussion of changes to our Request for Adminship process has begun. Following feedback on Phase 1, in order to ensure that the largest number of people possible can see all proposals, new proposals will only be accepted for the for the first 7 days of Phase 2. The 30 day discussion is scheduled to last until November 30. Please join the discussion or even submit your own proposal.
There is 1 future mailing planned with the results of Phase 2. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
16:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Can you revisit the close for this article? After the close, the nominator and the first delete votes, were blocked as sock puppets. Though I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't notable - but I can't see the article. Thanks, Nfitz (talk) 01:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
1.145.149.66 (talk) 02:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)13/12/2021
Hi, you deleted my company's page 'myDNA' due to "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". It was simply a company page discussing our history, structure and products. Just wondering if you could please provide further feedback/recommendations that we could make or consider reviewing your decision to delete?
Kindest
The 2021 re-examination of RFA has been completed. 23 (plus 2 variants) ideas were proposed. Over 200 editors participated in this final phase. Three changes gained consensus and two proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration. Thanks to all who helped to close the discussion, and in particular Primefac, Lee Vilenski, and Ymblanter for closing the most difficult conversations and for TonyBallioni for closing the review of one of the closes.
The following proposals gained consensus and have all been implemented:
Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?Special thanks to xaosflux for help with implementation.
The following proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration:
Editors who wish to discuss these ideas or other ideas on how to try to address any of the six issues identified during phase 1 for which no proposal gained are encouraged to do so at RFA's talk page or an appropriate village pump.
A final and huge thanks all those who participated in this effort to improve our RFA process over the last 4 months.
This is the final update with no further talk page messages planned.
01:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
A token of thanks
Hi Filelakeshoe! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, ((u|Sdkb)) talk ~~~~~
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Probably talking to myself here, but just to put on the record that I voted NO in the UCoC Enforcement vote.
If local arbitration and dispute resolution procedures struggle to effect a resolution, the last thing we need is a foreign vessel sticking its nose in, inevitably creating even more dialogue, more drama and more discord. We have solid proof that this is what happens. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 10:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Happy (late) First Edit Day, Filelakeshoe, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! --Isro! chatter 19:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC) |
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
It is the year 2030 on en.wikipedia. Administrators now need to climb one incremental service award per year or lose their tools. Obviously, everyone knows that admin standards need to keep getting stricter because occasionally admins make mistakes and get drawn and quartered for them in front of Arbcom, which makes Wikipedia look bad. If we have fewer admins, admins make fewer mistakes, right? That's just basic maths. People need to have about 30,000 edits and 5 years of experience to even stand a chance of passing an RfA now, with an impeccable record with no bad edits throughout the whole tenure. For every 50 admins that depart, maybe one gets promoted if they're lucky.
Meanwhile, WP:ANI becomes a ghost town. WP:AIV is so large that it takes forever to load, even on an undecuple core i69 processor. AfDs take a month to be closed, other XfDs longer. WP:AFC collapses entirely. How does en.wikipedia resolve these issues? Why, with automated moderation, of course. What could possibly go wrong?
Now to cbeck the archives in a decade and see if there's any truth to this... – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 15:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Please explain why am I looking at this Tiwonia22 (talk) 10:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Everything until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
I nominated Hazel Henderson for RD. The article appeared ready to post before the nomination was archived. User:PFHLai said to ask someone to take a look a the article as a review before it could be posted. Could you take a look to see if everything is in the clear? Thank you, Thriley (talk) 01:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Platty Joobs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 2#Platty Joobs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 03:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Template:Esko color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:17, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Filelakeshoe,
I didn't mean to step on your toes when I deleted some of these articles. I thought that you hadn't noticed that most of the nominated articles weren't deleted when you closed this AFD discussion. I've found this the rule, more than the exception, with most bundled nominations that most of the articles aren't deleted by XFDCloser when the discussion is closed. Most editors do bundled nominations infrequently and they are not aware of the proper way to list other nominated pages. But I apologize if you thought I was interfering with you carrying out your work, that was not my intention. All the best, Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi there @Filelakeshoe. Lately I've been reviewing a lot of drafts at AfC, as the backlog drive is going on, but sometimes I run into a problem while accepting drafts. Some of the draft title which I try to move already exist on the mainspace as a redirect to some other article, as a result I have to CSD tag it under G6 Housekeeping and non-controversial cleanup and wait for an administrator to delete it. Example here, here, and here. I don't have any problem in waiting for an admin to delete them, but this page here (List of Miss Earth editions) put me into a dilemma. I was trying to accept Draft:List of Miss Earth editions but couldn't as the redirect exists, and I don't think I can CSD tag it for deletion as the redirect page states
This is a redirect from a page containing substantive page history. This page is kept as a redirect to preserve its former content and attributions
...... nor delete this page.
. I believe a round-robin swap would be ideal in this case. I frequently run into this 'articleexists' problem that's why I wanted to ask for the Page mover rights. The Wikipedia:Page mover article states that At their discretion, any administrator can grant this right to experienced and trusted users who regularly move pages...
And so I ask you for the rights. Here are the pages I have moved which shows my familiarity. However, the page mover article also states that the reviewer is expected to have atleast 6 months of editing history, which I think I lack (this account was created 4 months ago). But hopefully I still think I am worthy of the user right as I have substantial knowledge of the policies and other related stuffs. I would appreciate if you could grant the right to me, or if not, provide a solution to my problems, it would be great. Thanks. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 20:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Liz moved page Draft talk:Mike Wazowski to Mike Wazowski: Talk page forgotten in article move. I'm not so sure about what happened but right now the Mike Wazowski article is empty and sitting in the mainspace, while the draft article is gone. I sincerely apologise because all of this mess was created in spite of my actions, and I hope we can fix everything as soon as convenient. Thank you. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 05:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello @Filelakeshoe the article for Cliff Pierre is not advertisement or copyright infringement, I would like to appeal your decision. HenryJacobson1 (talk) 17:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
What is your opinion about my contested deletion at Draft talk:Nikhil Prasad? Jay 💬 14:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Filelakeshoe,
I've seen you around AFD lately and now I see that you are putting in some time at WP:REFUND. I don't blame you, restoring drafts for editors who want to work on them is one of the more pleasant admin tasks I know of.
But here's one thing that's not in any of the admin guides: When you restore a draft that has been deleted for CSD G13 reasons, the admin has to make a minor edit to the page or it immediately becomes eligible for G13 deletion again because, of course, it hasn't been edited in at least six months (which is why it was deleted). What many admins who help out at REFUND make use of is User:SD0001/RFUD-helper...if you use it, the script will make these little edits for you on the restored draft so you don't have to remember to. Just a suggestion. I hope you have a pleasant weekend! Liz Read! Talk! 00:29, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Five years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk (talk) 08:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
May I know the detailed reasons of deletion of this page 2402:3A80:1089:1B99:446A:90ED:DA55:8381 (talk) 13:00, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Earlier you blocked 81.104.128.234 based on my ANV report. They returned to the same article using a different IP address and made the same edit here and also mentioning me in the summary to make it clear. Ss112 14:27, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
This cute Kitten is for you.
Misterrrrr (talk) 06:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Filelakeshoe, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 17:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
May I know the exact detailed reasons for the deletion of this page? Aquacannon (talk) 09:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
I see you did not respond on his talkpage. There is no opposition for the merger. Sakiv (talk) 22:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Regarding this edit summary, if you aren't aware, pronunciations are WP:OR magnets. It's better that they are sourced than people changing it back and forth based on their personal understanding. So no, I don't think there should be a break in policy for them. TylerBurden (talk) 22:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Myself Farhan. Please remove/delete this revision. - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leena_Gangopadhyay&oldid=1141513663 ≈ Farhan «Talk» 08:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
I mean "hide" ≈ Farhan «Talk» 08:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
At some point can you boldly edit the template's message? My on-the-spot "This article could be improved by adding text relevant to the section's heading" should probably not be in the passive voice and anyway more-or-less duplicates the second sentence. It need to convey that a previous editor thought someone should provide text described by the topic, and you can help! I also think DePiep was suggesting that the doc page could suggest other context-specific replacement text. David Brooks (talk) 17:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC) ETA: just looked at your user page. I grew up in Penge. David Brooks (talk) 17:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
please don't remove like this, if you did then delete other pages too because those pages also vandalised... Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 08:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
The page Quiet Council of Krakoa was been redirected to Krakoa and even in discussion no one responded to redirected it to Immortal X-Men page. Before discussion, it was once redirected to Immortal X-Men instead of Krakoa because that page contains little information about team. Now the page of Krakoa is itself redirected to Giant Sized X-Men, I request you to move the redirection of Quiet Council back to Immortal X-Men. Ringardiumleviossa (talk) 12:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
I see you already deleted my edits on Line B - thanks, I was about to do those myself. And I deleted my edits on Line A and the railway stations. Should I expect a block/ban/etc. for this incident? Piotrusp98 (talk) 03:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Could you return the name to Good Choice, the "moderates" platform left the party and they returned to their original name Braganza (talk) 09:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your participation at the AfD for Martin Krňávek. I only saw it after doing a cleanup/expansion on the page after finding it on the Unreferenced BLPs cleanup list. But looks like we found similar sources. The Czech Willy Wonka. Keep up the good work! C679 05:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see this AFD conversation ended as a soft delete. Could you make it available for edit as I am working on the article to repost it? Saw it on AFD and thought to rework it. I think it meets the notability clause, just badly written. Pshegs (talk) 08:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Football in Slovakia: urcite je lepsie ked citatel ide na hlavne stranky ktore sa castejsie aktualizuju Michael H (talk) 20:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi! Please restore or move to draft Taisija Smirnova Latvia national women's team player. I will update asap this page with citations and sources. Renārs Krīgers (talk) 10:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)