Welcome IsraPara2!

A tag has been placed on Category:Paralympic goalballball players by country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

An article you recently created, Margalit Peretz, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 16:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

We need more coverage outside of bouts and positions. Paralympic sources are a good start, though.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margalit Peretz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IsraPara2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IsraPara2. Thank you for your work on Ariela Meizan. User:EchidnaLives, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|EchidnaLives)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Yehu Adani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 02:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IsraPara2. Thank you for your work on Lihi Ben-David. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IsraPara2. Thank you for your work on Elham Mahamid Ruzin. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IsraPara2. Thank you for your work on Avraham Keftelovitch. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IsraPara2. Thank you for your work on Sivan Mor. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IsraPara2. Thank you for your work on Yisachar Navon. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IsraPara2. Thank you for your work on Kinneret Wallach. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Is an image possible? Happy editing

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IsraPara2. Thank you for your work on Smadar Tzur. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Is an image possible? Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Tombah per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tombah. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)). Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 21:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IsraPara2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't understand this action. I am not connected to anyone and my only focus is on paralympic games with no connection to others and no edits in the community. This block damages cover of the paralympics. IsraPara2 (talk) 18:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppetry, as clear as they come. Yamla (talk) 12:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If any CU disagrees with my evaluation of the technical evidence, feel free to unblock, but before you do that, take a look at the notes I left in cuwiki. RoySmith (talk) 19:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

IsraPara2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't understand. puppet for what? The list of inappropriate uses is for people that try to influence and not relevant to me:

• Creating an illusion of support - I don't vote or discuss.
• Strawman socks - I don't vote or discuss.
• Circumventing blocks, bans or sanctions - I was never blocked.
• Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts- How can I do this if I only create articles on the paralympic games.
• Avoiding scrutiny - How can I do this if I only create articles on the paralympic games?
• "Good hand" and "bad hand" accounts - I only improve ane create articles.
• Role accounts - I am a regular user.
• Deceptively seeking positions of community trust - I don't vote or discuss. I only improve ane create articles.
• Using more than one administrator account - I am a regular user.
• Posing as a neutral or uninvolved commentator - I don't vote or discuss.

I don't understand what I have to do with other users if I am the only contributor to most of the articles I work on? IsraPara2 (talk) 20:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

((Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I don't understand. puppet for what? The list of inappropriate uses is for people that try to influence and not relevant to me: *'''Creating an illusion of support''' - I don't vote or discuss. *'''Strawman socks''' - I don't vote or discuss. *'''Circumventing blocks, bans or sanctions''' - I was never blocked. *'''Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts'''- How can I do this if I only create articles on the paralympic games. *'''Avoiding scrutiny''' - How can I do this if I only create articles on the paralympic games? *'''"Good hand" and "bad hand" accounts''' - I only improve ane create articles. *'''Role accounts''' - I am a regular user. *'''Deceptively seeking positions of community trust''' - I don't vote or discuss. I only improve ane create articles. *'''Using more than one administrator account''' - I am a regular user. *'''Posing as a neutral or uninvolved commentator''' - I don't vote or discuss. I don't understand what I have to do with other users if I am the only contributor to most of the articles I work on? [[User:IsraPara2|IsraPara2]] ([[User talk:IsraPara2#top|talk]]) 20:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~))

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting ((subst:Decline reason here)) with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

((unblock reviewed |1=I don't understand. puppet for what? The list of inappropriate uses is for people that try to influence and not relevant to me: *'''Creating an illusion of support''' - I don't vote or discuss. *'''Strawman socks''' - I don't vote or discuss. *'''Circumventing blocks, bans or sanctions''' - I was never blocked. *'''Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts'''- How can I do this if I only create articles on the paralympic games. *'''Avoiding scrutiny''' - How can I do this if I only create articles on the paralympic games? *'''"Good hand" and "bad hand" accounts''' - I only improve ane create articles. *'''Role accounts''' - I am a regular user. *'''Deceptively seeking positions of community trust''' - I don't vote or discuss. I only improve ane create articles. *'''Using more than one administrator account''' - I am a regular user. *'''Posing as a neutral or uninvolved commentator''' - I don't vote or discuss. I don't understand what I have to do with other users if I am the only contributor to most of the articles I work on? [[User:IsraPara2|IsraPara2]] ([[User talk:IsraPara2#top|talk]]) 20:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) |decline = ((subst:Decline reason here)) ~~~~))

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

((unblock reviewed |1=I don't understand. puppet for what? The list of inappropriate uses is for people that try to influence and not relevant to me: *'''Creating an illusion of support''' - I don't vote or discuss. *'''Strawman socks''' - I don't vote or discuss. *'''Circumventing blocks, bans or sanctions''' - I was never blocked. *'''Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts'''- How can I do this if I only create articles on the paralympic games. *'''Avoiding scrutiny''' - How can I do this if I only create articles on the paralympic games? *'''"Good hand" and "bad hand" accounts''' - I only improve ane create articles. *'''Role accounts''' - I am a regular user. *'''Deceptively seeking positions of community trust''' - I don't vote or discuss. I only improve ane create articles. *'''Using more than one administrator account''' - I am a regular user. *'''Posing as a neutral or uninvolved commentator''' - I don't vote or discuss. I don't understand what I have to do with other users if I am the only contributor to most of the articles I work on? [[User:IsraPara2|IsraPara2]] ([[User talk:IsraPara2#top|talk]]) 20:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~))

• The CU data is irrefutable that IsraPara2, שקולניק, and Wierzba are all controlled by the same person. The only reason I didn't block these accounts immediately upon discovering this is that these account go back a long time (in one case, 18 years) and accounts with that long history get the benefit of the doubt. But when I came back and looked again, I couldn't come up with any plausible scenario for the data I was seeing other than that these accounts are all one person. Are you denying that? RoySmith (talk) 22:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know Tombah or שקולניק. I know well user wierzba and maybe you link the same connection for both users from one device but it's not the same user. Also our edits have nothing to do with each other to cause any influence. It's what you see on Template:User_shared_IP_address IsraPara2 (talk) 20:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]