This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 19 |
Nice work sprucing up Alan Wiggins for an FA run. Was there a specific reason you removed that Gene Richards held the Padres single-season SB record that Wiggins broke in 1983?—Bagumba (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Eric: I could not figure out how to use this before so I sent an email. Now that I figured it out I am letting you know about the email. My bio is under Carl O Helvie, and my email is carlhelvie@cos.net I look forward to a respose to my email. My best Carl --~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlos124 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
On 21 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Horace Smithy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when cardiac surgeon Horace Smithy had a patient die on the operating table, he may have lost the chance to undergo heart surgery himself? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Horace Smithy. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
I have just realized, I have already reverted the user with IP address 74.12.122.27 4 times on a single article, but his edits are clearly vandalism, so I'm not sure if the 3 revert rule applies... Is reverting vandalism exempt from this rule? Academic Ninja (talk) 07:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
I am taking a break from this, can you take over? Academic Ninja (talk) 09:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Eric: Thank you for your message and information. Now that I know how it should not be a problem to use the talk function. I do not understand a lot about independent coverage. I thought it was similar to documentation that I do when presenting information in my books but I must be wrong. Also, for clarification I have never written anything about myself or anyone else on Wikipedia--I thought that was forbidden. I considered being a user when I retired from academia but decided it was more complex and took more time to learn how to do it right than I could give with other responsibilities. I did discover the history function and followed the discussion when I was notified by Wikipedia that some wanted to remove my bio but there was disagreement and it was left. This was at the same time as a friend who is one of the top 40 spiritual leaders in the world and is internationally known was also being considered for removal. Other than that and my use of the content I know little about Wikipedia or how it works. So I look forward to guidance about what would improve my bio. Best, Carl Carlos124 (talk) 21:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Eric:In your email you said you would link me to guidelines for appropriate sourcing that would help me understand what is needed. Once I have time to do this am I to send the sourcing to you on the talk page? Thanks, Carl Carlos124Carlos124 (talk) 17:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
I have been reviewing the material cited. I do not understand the first article about using someone to list but the second is helpful. In your message did you mean adding to my listing or correcting the current lusting or both that should be put on my talk page. I will also probably send one example to make sure I understand before I put anything on my talk page. Thank you. Carl Carlos124 Carlos124 (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC) Carlos124 (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Technically it is true. He is a free agent. NFL says it, he says it. FlashGaming (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you've edited O Canada before on the Spanish wiki, and if you could, please translate and change the lyrics as they've officially been changed from "in all thy sons command" to "in all of us command" [1]. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, that was the work of stray fat fingers on a mobile. Shyamal (talk) 02:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear sir Please explain me how to format d content of Wikipedia because I want to write our school history in wiki so your thoughts are appreciated
My email niyazimi@gmail.com Niyazimi (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Nice edits, This barnstar is for your hard work Siddiq Sazzad (Chat) 18:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC) |
Eric: I tried to start balancing a highly biased page targeting functional medicine. Could you provide perspective on your roll back? FYI: The first sentence that I contradicted has a dead reference link. Is it considered ok to delete it? Kenneth
Ok Thanks!
Hi. I just reverted a vabdalizing edit to the Photic sneeze reflex article by User:RandolphWerscht. I see in the user's talk page that he's been warned about this before, including by yourself. I suspect it's time this user account lose editing privileges, but I don't know where to start, and I'm stuck to my phone for the next several days. I'm hoping you may be able to initiate the process. Thanks. ☽Dziban303 »» Talk☾ 22:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
I responded to your comments on the featured article nomination of the Alex Owumi article several weeks ago. Could you please get back to me on those, because I have fixed the issues you pointed out? If there are no longer any issues, feel free to support the nomination. TempleM (talk) 22:49, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.
I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!
Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!
If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.
Thank you!
- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team
This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello. Yesterday I made additions to World Series games that had no commentaries to them. They are as follows; 1925 World Series, 1930 World Series, games 1-4, 1931 World Series, 1933 World Series, 1934 World Series, games 3-7, 1940 World Series, games 1-6, and the 1942 World Series,games 2,3,4, a total of 36 additions. An editor by the name of Dorsetonian reverted all of them yesterday and now they are blank again. He took issue that I added statements that weren't in the retrosheet play by play if you go to his talk page. Actually I did use the Macmillan Baseball Encyclopedia Ninth edition copyright 1993 for those additions, I changed the wording on the additions. Can I use that as my source? Here are the page #s: 1925 WS:2706,1930 WS:2711,1931 WS:2712, 1933 WS:2714,1934 WS:2715, 1940 WS:2721,1942 WS:2723. Two hours of work wasted. I feel those games should have a commentary about them. Can you help me have those additions put back? I have contacted you before, with good results. See what you can do. I appreciate it and have a great day.2601:581:8500:949C:304C:CD3D:3958:6A95 (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello and good day. Yes, you are right, I shot myself in the foot yesterday and I apologize and I am not going to make any more additions no matter what subject because I don't know how to source my additions. With baseball, I should just stick with editing statistical data,i.e. linescore errors, batting averages, ERAs, etc, because it can be proven with Baseball Reference or other sources at the bottom of the page. With the World Series games with no commentaries, maybe I should leave a request on the talk page of the World Series I requested and maybe they can be filled in with a source? There are good Wikipedia editors out there that can do a better job than I did, that's for sure. Every World Series game has a story, and there should be something about the 36 games with nothing that I believe should be mentioned. I just thought I was doing a good thing, which I have done with other World Series games in the past, but again were unsourced. Should I do that with the talk pages? Or go to WikiProjects: Baseball. Thank you and have a great day and thanks for your advice.2601:581:8500:949C:304C:CD3D:3958:6A95 (talk) 12:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
... that I mentioned you at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Edit_warring_and_accusations_by_User:Certified_Gangsta. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 10:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
The 2017 Cure Award | |
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
The "Chattahucci Gang" user is a sock of User:Jack Gaines, a longterm wiki vandal who has recently taken a shine to antagonizing me and vandalizing Alan Jackson articles. Please do not handle with kid gloves -- this guy needs a hard block up the ass now. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Can you help me adding the semi protection to Dalida? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DalidaEditor (talk • contribs) 14:49, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Not quite a mistake, but I won't reinstill the warning. After making 6 disruptive edits, a level 2 warning does not make sense as the most recent warning. I can understand your intuition about taking action only after additional edits have been made. However, a level 4 warning makes it explicit that such disruptive editing is not appropriate and will not be endlessly permitted. Rather than removing ClueBot's warning, I added an additional message. See WP:NOTHERE. Also, I made sure to include "Articles: Baseball (ball), Beetroot" to inform which articles I was referring to. --JustBerry (talk) 04:15, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
I see you edited Wikipedia page listing mlb players who went straight to majors without having played in minors. I don't know how to do this. Could you please add Gil Hodges to the list?
Good evening. Can you add the following to his stats line, after IP, Hits(H)1646, Runs(R)778, Earned runs(ER)711. Source:Baseball Reference. Note, I also put this request at Wikiprojects:Baseball. Thank you for your time.2601:581:8500:949C:EC96:D668:7EFF:2FD9 (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
I recommend taking this to WP:SPI since it involves sockpuppetry, no one ended up blocking it, and a bot removed the WP:AIV report as stale. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 14:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I was in the process of restoring the corrections you made, but we edit conflicted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello Eric. I just wanted to drop a note that I understand your good faith edit at Robert Sears (physician). Admin JzG reverted your edit (I did not ask him to) but I wanted to add a little information to help in future editing decisions of this type. The following is offered in good faith to help you improve your edits. I hope you will receive this helpful advice in the cooperative spirit in which it is given.
The policy you referenced, WP:BLPPRIMARY, is a cautionary policy, not a proscriptive one. The section is subtitled "Avoid misuse of primary sources" [emphasis added] and begins with the sentence "Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources." I highlight these two items to make clear that primary sources are not forbidden in BLP articles, but must be used very carefully.
The next sentence in the policy probably is the source of your good-faith logic for removing the citation but that sentence must be read carefully and completely. It says: "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person." and in this case I think maybe you missed the key phrase "to support assertions about a living person". My usage of the citation does not support any assertions about the Mr. Sears, but rather it supports the assertion that the Medical Board of California filed an Accusation. It is a verifiable fact that a legal document was created, filed, and published. It was the history and content of the document that the citation was supporting, not any assertion about the person named in the document.
The previous text which I replaced only discussed one of the three charges filed and was therefore POV and needed to be expanded on. When stating "Mr. A has been charged with X, Y, and Z" there is no more accurate and reliable source than the actual legal filing. Newspaper articles often summarize such charges for the sake of focusing an article on a specific issue, as was the case here.
Finally, for specific assertions about Sears I made a separate edit using a separate source which discussed not only the legal charges but also interviewed his peers showing both pro and con opinions by those peers, which I believe is about as WP:NPOV "balanced" as an editor can get here.
Thank you for taking the time to make WP a better encyclopedia and thank you for reading these comments. 172.88.134.103 (talk) 19:52, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello and good day. Go to Miguel Cabrera's page, go to 2018. Where it says... He finished the season with a .301 batting average, I changed .301 to .299, yet my revert wasn't accepted. Baseball Reference has his BA at .299 and they are up to date and reliable. And I would use that as a source. See what you can do. Have a good week.2601:581:8500:949C:58C:356:57CA:693D (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you keep taking my edits off of wikipedia. I know Frederick Robin personally and the information I added is 100% accurate. Please explain to me why you are taking my edits off and please tell me what to do to get them on there properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frederick Robin (talk • contribs) 05:29, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes, you are right. Where it says Looking for a comeback in 2003, put by itself in New York Mets paragraph. My mistake.Thanks.2601:581:8500:949C:C502:A1AF:94EE:671A (talk) 19:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you put it back when you have a chance? If there was no source tag, I would do it myself. Just looks out of place. Thank you2601:581:8500:949C:C502:A1AF:94EE:671A (talk) 21:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC).
My edits are entirely true and you still remove them. Why do you do this? Currymuncher4000 (talk) 05:56, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Same here. 71.219.141.37 (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I’m adding valuable information regarding the Memorial band. I plan on adding UIL events as well as accplisments the band has had. Why won’t you let me? TruthfulCooper (talk) 16:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Bro stop removing my edits they are true!!! User:GBPackers27
For rolling back those IP edits. I was just about to report them, and now they're blocked. Thanks again! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry to disturb you, but there are some things I'm not understanding.
Ok, thank you!
Can I disturb you for another problem? In the page List of Latin phrases (O) I found a link that points to [[Love Conquers All (disambiguation)]], but the last one is only a redirect to the "real" disambiguation page, which is simply called "Love Conquers All". So I thought it would have been a good idea to fix the link. But a registered user is undoing my edit.
I already asked him his reasons, but he didn't answer, so I'm still thinking I'm right. Please explain me my mistake, or otherwise could you contact him? 95.253.203.9 (talk) 08:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Actually he edited the page after my first request. However I'm not asking you a moral opinion on this! I just asked if there is an official rule about disambiguation pages, so I thought that maybe you were aware of it and you could answer me if I was wrong and, otherwise (without the existence of any rule), he should have been automatically wrong. But -of course- I'm not in a hurry. I'll wait for his answer. Thank you. 95.253.203.9 (talk) 09:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you reverted all my edits to the aforementioned page deeming them as vandalism of sorts. In the talk section of such page I've made out some points on why the current status of the page is completely not encyclopedic and biased.
I'm new to wikipedia thus I don't know how to proceed, as I wish the page to become as neutral as possible and, while I did cut some parts because I found the citations to be insufficient, I also added material with proper citations (it actually was a lot of work).
How do you suggest me to proceed? Should I report each paragraph for which the citations are insufficient? May I add and modify the page while adding proper citations?
Hello,
I am E. Whittaker, I am working with Wikimedia’s Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.
Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Hey Eric, can you check out this author's article here and give him/her feedback. I am telling you this since you are a member of the WikiProject for Crime and Criminal Biography and the author of the article wants feedback from users who belong to that particular Wikiproject. Thanks JC7V-constructive zone 17:33, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi there EricEnfermero. You recently requested a username change to the name "Larry Hockett". The rename process appears to have gotten stuck on the English Wikipedia, as seen here. The issue is currently being tracked at T201314. We're working on getting the rename jobs unstuck so you will be able to access your account again.
Sorry for the inconvenience. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:43, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
die mad about it larry
sincerely, an actual autistic person — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olliflower (talk • contribs) 07:32, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Hey can you save and edit Relay Ball it’s a fun game idea to play ZanerGT (talk) 23:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Larry Hockett, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 05:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hi. I found a mistake in a category name, but nobody noticed my alert. Some days have passed, so I decided to contact you, because you know for sure who can fix the mistake (or maybe you can do it yourself). My message is here. Feel free - obviously - to check if I'm saying the truth. Thank you. 95.253.203.9 (talk) 12:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. Probably I could have already done it, if I had thought a little more. But I ended disturbing you. I'm sorry. 95.253.203.9 (talk) 09:40, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Could you please create an article for Ithikkara Pakki ? He is a heroic outlaw roamed in the 19th century British India, a Robin Hood-esque highwayman and savior of the poor. He along with Kayamkulam Kochunni are the most popular bandits of Kerala and legends on them are part of the local folklore. Not much of any information is available, but there are few. --2405:204:D303:5504:F80A:63F0:BD5A:8479 (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I am informing you that I am wondering why you editors keep removing the facts that I keep updating and you say it is because "the sources I am using are not reliable" - there are other things in the same section (Feud with Lil Uzi Vert) that also came from the same website I used, which was Complex. I am wondering why if the sources I used were not reliable, why the other ones from Complex were allowed to be in the article. I feel if you have to remove what I updated, you might as well remove the entire entry on Rich the Kid's Wikipedia page called "Feud with Lil Uzi Vert". I don't mean to sound mean, but I feel like I am not allowed to update anything on Wikipedia when everyone else is. By this I mean what everyone else has already contributed to the section "Feud with Lil Uzi Vert" on Rich The Kid's Wikipedia page was allowed and my content was not - - some of their sources came from the same website as my sources. The resources used from Complex on Rich The Kid's Wikipedia page (not by me, by previous editors) include https://www.complex.com/music/2018/04/rich-the-kid-has-more-to-say-about-lil-uzi-vert and https://www.complex.com/music/2018/03/rich-the-kid-doesnt-think-lil-uzi-vert-will-respond-to-dead-friends and the events I described were the most important parts of what happened between Lil Uzi Vert and Rich The Kid and if you do not think that is necessary to include in an encyclopedia, then you may as well delete the whole section "Feud with Lil Uzi Vert" on Rich the Kid's Wikipedia page. Because like I said, what I was trying to add to the article was the most important part of the feud by far, far more important than https://www.complex.com/music/2018/04/rich-the-kid-has-more-to-say-about-lil-uzi-vert and https://www.complex.com/music/2018/03/rich-the-kid-doesnt-think-lil-uzi-vert-will-respond-to-dead-friends — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxxtentacionskimasktheslumpgod (talk • contribs) 17:58, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
How is the source I used not reliable?
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/people/raini-rodriguez
You might like to edit what is said about the National Council of State Boards of Nursing in this list.Rathfelder (talk) 20:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Can you please explain how an NFL.com bio page is a "self-published" source?
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For your diligence and helping out at the refdesk.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 07:00, 28 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hey there, I saw you're a member of the Biography science and academia work group and I was hoping you could help me review a new BLP I'm working on. I have a paid COI with MSK, and I've been researching and writing an article on one of their doctors, Nancy Y. Lee (sandbox link). Do you have the time or interest to help review it to ensure it's aligned with Wikipedia's guidelines and written neutrally? I'd greatly appreciate it.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 00:47, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Could you weigh in on a user (Prof David Eager (talk) who appears to be editing his own Wikipedia article, David Eager? None of his edits seem to me to be problematic contentwise, but are an issue of wp:COI. I left a COI notice on his talk page, but he's since re-added his edits. Unsure how to proceed. Thanks. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting all those edits by Frosty. I've blocked him indefinitely, which hopefully will cramp his style for a while. - Donald Albury 17:42, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Larry Hockett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
yes i meant to make a test edit i apologize for inconvenience Thedasgruber (talk) 02:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:04, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
why whu why???? MirchiBen (talk) 12:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
You are Welcome
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:58, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi I’m Seyer123 I was just wondering why is my youngest brother unblock in Wikipedia by this wikipedian name ferret? I just want to know. Seyer123 (talk) 18:25, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey Larry, hope you're doing well! I've been working on another BLP for an MSK doctor, this time for Luis Diaz (sandbox link). If you've got the time to spare, do you think you could take a look at this one too? The help is always appreciated.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! | |
Hello Larry Hockett, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding ((subst:Seasonal Greetings)) to other user talk pages. |
Hello Larry Hockett: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)