Hello, Masterpha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I am pleased to present you with your very first service award, in recognition of becoming a Wikipedia contributor.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that may help you to get up to speed:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~
); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or .
Again, welcome! You can choose to put your award in your user page by editing the source of your user page and writing (including the braces) ((Registered Editor Userbox))
(which is smaller) or ((Registered Editor))
(which is larger). Thinker78 (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2017 Tehreek-e-Labaik protest, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you for your contributions! Thinker78 (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Masterpha. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Great job with this page. I have two requests. Can you add a section of per constituency polls (ordered by date). It will be helpful esp. given the general lack of polls. Also, can you add the last poll pre 2013 elections by each major polling agency or let us say all polls post Fall 2012. It gives a general comparison point for the post elections polls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:4580:E0D0:DD56:2DD8:37E0:D8CE (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (G) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hummerrocket (talk) 21:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Conservative Party (UK), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Just to let you know, many political party logos are copyrighted images and can only be used on the article about the party – they should not be used in opinion polling lists or election infoboxes. Cheers, Number 57 12:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Masterpha reported by User:Saqib (Result: ). Thank you. Saqib (talk) 10:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Störm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Opinion polling for the Pakistani general election, 2018, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Störm (talk) 19:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. NeilN talk to me 01:31, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Masterpha, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Saqib (talk) 15:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Masterpha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I need to defend myself for a sockpuppet investigation in which I believe I have sufficient evidence to defend myself
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You can write out what you want to say here and someone will copy it over for you. --NeilN talk to me 17:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Ok. Can someone please copy this over for me: The reporter claims that I created User: Hussain.r97 as a sockpuppet to continue my edits as me and him both supported the inclusion of the FB poll inside the article, and implies that the user was created for the specific purpose of countering my block. Firstly, the user had his first edit here, at 21:22 GMT on 27 February 2018, and his most recent edit was here at 21:45 GMT on 27 February 2018. Now, my block commenced on 01:31 GMT on 28 February 2018, so there is no evidence that this account was created by me, nor is there any evidence that the account was used to counter my block. As well as this, User: Hussain.r97 had an edit worth 354 bytes at 21:41 on 27 February 2018 here. On 21:42 on 27 February 2018, I made a substantially larger edit worth 4,595 bytes here. This indicates that we were both editing at around the same time. If we were both editing at the same time, how can we be the same person? It is impossible, and therefore I come to the conclusion that User: Hussain.r97 is not an account that I made, nor is it a sockpuppet that I created in order to counter my block. Masterpha (talk) 19:22, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining WikiProject Pakistan, and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) samee talk 13:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC) |
We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan. There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much — or little — you like:
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Shehbaz Sharif has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. There is a difference between vandalism and good faith edits. Please see WP:NOTV. samee talk 13:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, any updates on the Balochistan page? I have created the map for it. Wiki.0hlic (talk) 15:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
That completes the quartet! Excellent work on creating the Provincial Assembly election pages: Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Balochistan. A very valuable contribution to election pages of the country! Wiki.0hlic (talk) 19:14, 7 March 2018 (UTC) |
Hi Could you create an article ? --Panam2014 (talk) 21:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
I do not understand why are you removing candidates from NA-2 (Swat-I), I tend to add as many as possible and you are removing them. All known results need to be in there. I do not care about you replacing one table with another as long as information is not removed and is preserved. This will be a lot of work for me to fix later. Do you mind discussing it before changing a whole lot of pages? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 22:45, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
I was rethinking about using colors vs. flags in election boxes and wanted to run my ideas by you. I am now thinking that flags are better as they are more and true representative of Pakistani political parties. Almost, every party in Pakistan have their own flag and those parties chose those flags to represent themselves. On the other hand colors are an invention of us Wikipedians and I think the root of it comes from following examples of other countries but the thing is political parties of such other countries identify themselves with a color, for example Democratic Party in the United States identify with blue, Republican Party with red and Green Party with green but that is not the case in Pakistan. Then why should we use random colors to identify a party. For example, why should we use red to identify PTI, they have green in their flag as well, same way why we should choose black to identify PPP, they have three colors in their flag. On the other hand, the problem with using flags is a lot of manual work as it stands now, we will have to create flag templates for these parties. I might have done so in the past a long time ago but lost the skill and do not even know if we can create flag templates for political parties or is that just reserved for countries and territories. I will like to hear your input on this. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 03:40, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Party | Candidate | Symbol | Votes | % | ± |
---|
Party | Candidate | Symbol | Votes | % | ± |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PML(N) | Kulsoom Nawaz | 61,745 | 49.35 | -11.19 | |
PTI | Yasmin Rashid | File:BAT - Election Symbol.png | 47,099 | 37.12 | +3.08 |
Independent | Shekh Azher Rizvi | 7,130 | 5.70 | +5.70 |
Sir, I just want to clarify my position. It is nothing personal against you. Stay blessed. Live long WP.Jawadmdr (talk) 18:11, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
I am briefly unprotecting so you can make the edits for the poll and then I'm going to reprotect. Enigmamsg 04:24, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Have you got he percentage for each party?--Panam2014 (talk) 19:31, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grand Democratic Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Have you got a source for joint PM candidate for PML(N) and PPP? --Panam2014 (talk) 14:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
How many seats will be vacants for the legislature's inauguration? What is the date of the inauguration? --Panam2014 (talk) 17:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi I think the article should be sourced and false informations removed. What is the true fondation's date? 1965, 1973, 1977, 1985, or 2002? --Panam2014 (talk) 17:45, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Have you got the name of candidates?--Panam2014 (talk) 15:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Have you got sources about the new chiefs ministers? --Panam2014 (talk) 13:05, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
@Panam2014: no, they will form a coalition with pmlq, but many n league members are said to have formed a forward block in favour of PTI. This is useless because the 18th amendment bars forwards blocks within parties. маsтегрнатаLк 09:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Masterpha. I was really amazed by your little summary about you, and I pretty much agree with what you said, and I have to say, your articles have really engaged me. If possible, please if you can in some way, place a visual map and a visual of the number to National Assembly seats won in the Pakistani elections of 1985, 1988, 1990, 1993, and 1996, because when I see the Indian elections from all of the years, they have a visual map and a visual of the National Assembly seats their parties won. So it would be nice if this could be provided in previous Pakistani elections as well. Thanks! Wbhai89 (talk) 03:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for considering this, because it really would be great it Pakistan, like India, had all of its elections results maps and the visual on the amount of seats won in the National Assembly. Also, if possible, please let me know what outside sources are supposed to be consulted, so I could also try to do something about putting up the election map results and so forth. Wbhai89 (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Never mind, thanks for your time. Wbhai89 (talk) 03:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you guide me how did you calculate swing on NA-28 (Peshawar-II)? Also how do you calculate the change for majority if winning party is different from previous election? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Have you got a source for the name? The alliance collasped when PPP refused to vote for Shehbaz. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
The E=mc² Barnstar | ||
It would be criminal not to recognize your contributions before, during, and after Pakistani general election, 2018 especially the way you have with polls, graphics, and mathematics. Thanks for teaching me along the way as well. You had a very short journey from me asking you "What are you even doing?" to this i.e. from viewing your contributions with suspicion to viewing them with praise. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 19:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC) |
Hi How many new ministers have been created and how many have been kept, renamed and replaced?--Panam2014 (talk) 17:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
But. Khan is also minister of Energy. So should we add it in Imran Khan's infobox? --Panam2014 (talk) 14:09, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Like Muhammad Mian Soomro, what members of PMLQ, PML, PPP have joined PTI? --Panam2014 (talk) 21:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Are we supposed to calculate percentage by valid votes or by total turnout? I have been doing it by turnout but I see By-election 2018 on NA-161 (Lodhran-II) has it by valid votes? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 10:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
@SheriffIsInTown: ECP measures it by valid votes as per this source. As for other countries such as the US and the UK, I believe they don’t use rejected votes as part of the total figure to calculate percentages from. This US page shows that they use total valid votes (displayed as total votes) for percentages and if you look at this UK page it calculates percentages via total valid votes, but they use the term “turnout” instead of total valid votes. маsтегрнатаLк 14:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
@SheriffIsInTown: seems fine to me! маsтегрнатаLк 15:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Like to Imran Khan, should we add in the infobox the ministries led by Benazir Bhutto, Youssaf Raza Gilani, Nawaz Sharif and Shahid Khaqan Abbasi? --Panam2014 (talk) 19:51, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Fazal Ilahi Chaudhry have been elected on 14 August 1973. If the presidential term is 5 years, why his term ended in November 1978 when he resigned? --Panam2014 (talk) 20:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammad Aslam Bhutani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balochistan National Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello I just saw you just created Next Pakistani general election, what does the article title enclose by saying Next? Next is a complex word to be used on an event title - when 2023 comes and passes, the article will still remain Next Pakistani general election. I suggest you change the title to name to clarify that but I need to know your reason behind that title name. If you wish to change its name and may need help for that, do ping me here User:SkillsM674, reply here or leave a message on my talk SkillsM674 (talk) 22:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
To clarify, many articles in other countries also use the term next when they specify next elections, take for example Next German federal election, Next Spanish general election, Next United Kingdom general election, Next Irish general election etc... There is a consensus to leave the year ambiguous unless it is confirmed. маsтегрнатаLк 22:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Next Pakistani general election, Masterpha!
Wikipedia editor Xyzspaniel just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for the article, Can you please add to some categories and some notable newspapers maybe mentioning this election in the reference section.
To reply, leave a comment on Xyzspaniel's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
XyzSpaniel Talk Page 22:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Pakistani general election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Pakistani general election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 20:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Can you improve electoral system?— Bukhari (Talk!) 18:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Will Imran Khan appoint an interior minister? Also, when the new ministers will sworn in? --Panam2014 (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imran Khan ministry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Zaidi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
I trust your results might be correct but can you please complete the job and add the source on NA-69! ☺ Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:53, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Masterpha. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Pakistan Barnstar of National Merit | ||
For your contributions to Wikipedia articles about Pakistan! Pyramids09 (talk) 04:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC) |
thank you! маsтегрнатаLк 10:10, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed the results you added at 2008 Pakistani general election#Punjab are different to those at 2008 Punjab provincial election (specifically the number of seats). Cheers, Number 57 16:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
@Number 57: Hi, thanks for informing me about the position of independents in these tables. I've just looked at the two pages and the vote totals are the same, although you're correct in pointing out the difference in seats. These totals seem to be disputing the count of PML-N and PML-Q elected MPAs. Specifically, the main page gives PML-N 7 extra MPAs. This could be possibly due to confusion around the similar names of the parties (PML-Q is officially registered as Pakistan Muslim League), but if I'm honest I don't know exactly why they differ. I believe that my source (electionpakistan, supported by FAFEN) is more reliable than the UrduPoint source from the main page. If I'm honest, I don't see the need for separate pages for federal and provincial elections so long as the provincial results are sufficiently covered in the main general election page (even though I did begin the tradition of creating separate pages for provincial elections in Pakistan, sorry!). It makes a lot more sense to have a single page containing both federal and provincial results, especially considering that these elections are held on the same days and that the assemblies dissolve at the same time. маsтегрнатаLк 21:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Kindly dont made edits, at National Assembly of Pakistan and Next Pakistani general election until situation goes clear Currently matter is in Supreme Court of Pakistan wait for Court decision. 103.141.159.74 (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Why for First Time provincial will not be held alongside NA elections? Panam2014 (talk) 18:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Do you have information of the NA terms of Benazir? --Panam2014 (talk) 13:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't have information as I have not tried to look for them маsтегрнатаLк 23:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Why not all MNA does not resign from NA? Should we create article about By elections? Also, why PTI mass resigned and will PTI contest by election? --Panam2014 (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
some members defected from PTI (not officially but they said they wouldn't support IK's leadership), the number of them is 22. I'm not sure about the remaining 10 who haven't resigned. As for by elections, no we shouldn't make an article yet. It's possible that the by elections won't happen and that NA may be dissolved before they can happen - PPP have said they want early elections right after electoral reforms and NAB abolition, Zardari is rumoured to believe that the government won't last for more than 2 months. маsтегрнатаLк 23:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
PTI mass resigned to put pressure on govt to accept their demand to early elections. With ~40% of the assembly vacant it leads to the assembly lacking legitimacy to an extent. маsтегрнатаLк 23:51, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Do you have sources about full portfolio repartition? --Panam2014 (talk) 22:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
no маsтегрнатаLк 02:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Could you update the articles about new ministries, ministries abolished and others renamed? --Panam2014 (talk) 12:08, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi
it should be added Panam2014 (talk) 20:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
so add it маsтегрнатаLк 11:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi
how many seats are vacants? 12, 13, more? We need article about by elections. Panam2014 (talk) 12:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
perhaps, but i'd like to wait until the courts hear the pti appeal on the acceptance of the resignations маsтегрнатаLк 11:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Panam, I am not active on wiki anymore, please make these pages yourself or ask someone else маsтегрнатаLк 09:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please give your opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pakistani politics.Ameen Akbar (talk) 18:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
The article Caretaker Prime Minister of Pakistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The powers of the caretaker prime minister are not different from the 'regular prime minister' except in a few areas which warrant a completely separate page, When the caretaker prime minister succeeds Shehbaz Sharif, whose photo and name will be published on Prime Minister of Pakistan? A subsection was sufficient on the Prime Minister of Pakistan is sufficient in my opinion
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jibran1998 (talk) 17:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi
According to Pakistan's constitution, Ministers of state are not members of the cabinet. We should add it Panam2014 (talk) 15:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)