Hello and welcome to the wikiproject. Here's the bulletin - if you don't like it just delete it from your talk page. Kind regards --Mcginnly | Natter 00:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Articles related to architecture over the past two weeks are listed automatically by AlexNewArtBot.
This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.
possibly others). Would you mind transferring those to Wikipedia:Commons? That would make them available for the other language Wikipedia projects as well. While doing so, you may also want to use more descriptive file names in place of just numbers. Thanks! --Latebird 11:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A tag has been placed on Scott tallon walker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — ERcheck (talk) 12:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A tag has been placed on Scott Tallon Walker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
Please create a separate article for the Gifford company. It is absolutely against common practice and WP conduct to overwrite established redirects to geographical articles named and redirected in accordance with standard conventions. Sorry if that's a bit technical, please ask if you would like it clarified. However, Gifford (company) or Gifford UK is probably all you need for now. You can copy / paste from this revison: [1]. Thanks, Deiztalk 05:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I hope i am in the right place to bring you some comments. i would like highlight what i have found in your recent edited structural engineering article. i referred to the third reference you provided and it does not point out Imhotep was a civil engineer but a structural engineer (please be informed a structural engineer can never hold a civil engineering degree or license such as those from architectural, mechanical or other backgrounds ). Secondly, i think the 1st reference means structural engineering is previous viewed as an activity within civil engineering rather than a subset of civil engineering. Thus i will edit it again to ensure that readers can receive correct information. Lastly, your contributions to the article are much more appreciated. Thank you. User:Tigershark82007, 03 December 2007
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
I am trying to translate Euler-Bernoulli_beam_equation into
Japanese, ja:モールの定理. Thanks to excellent writers, the article is very fruitful not only for English speakers, but also for other language speakers like Japanese speakers including me.
I would like to ask you if you mind my putting your great beam example pictures to wikimedia commons, or kindly you are to put them on commons, so that I can put those pictures on Japanese translation project.
Unspecified source for Image:Indore_City_Street_before_Slum_Networking_Project.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Indore_City_Street_before_Slum_Networking_Project.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the ((GFDL-self)) tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Nv8200ptalk 21:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Right to assembly, right to protest and protest article[edit]
High there, I have extended the right to assembly article, started a article on the right to protest, and taken out the human rights footer you have recently added to the protest article. The reason is that there is a distinction between actual protest, and the perceived human right to protest that may arise out of other rights.... in short have a look, i think it works better now. I wanted to ask if you could help me to take the diversion to "protest" out of the human rights footer. In the footer, when you click on "right to protest" you get diverted to the "protest" article, but it should link to the "right to protest" article. I don’t know how to change the footer, so any help welcome.
--SasiSasi (talk) 21:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, I reverted an edit to the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation which was inconsistent with the example equations you put there. But to me there seem to be some typographical errors in the equations for several of the examples. For instance signs and the label A, B, C referring to the point where they apply. Regards, Crowsnest (talk) 20:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The discussion about whether/how to include abortion on the humanrightsfooter was all taking place on the talk:abortion page, rather than on the talk page for the footer. Seemed like having the discussion on another page would make it harder to maintain the footer. I moved the discussion to the footer talk page, I hope that is okay with you. Since you posted the first message in the discussion, I thought I should let you know. Zodon (talk) 05:06, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
An IP-based editor ( 124.188.149.205 ) is currently working through this article, editing a lot of the text which deals with Utzon's part in the design, and various more or less controversial parts of the House's construction history.
The net effect of these changes (apart from improving the quality of the writing) is to tone down or remove any criticism of Utzon, remove references to or de-emphasise any collaborators in the design, and generally ramp up the hagiographic qualities. - eg changing "Utzon's plywood corridor designs" to "Utzon's exquisite plywood corridor designs".
While a lot of the changes are improvements, and I'm reluctant to revert anything, this seems to be veering away from WP:NPOV, and really should not be being done without some discussion, I think.
As one of the people who seem to have made sensible edits to the page in the past, and who is involved in the architecture project, I was wondering if you might like to take a look over the changes and see what you think? Machina.sapiens (talk) 10:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
Disambiguation link notification for November 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Structural Awards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages URS, WSP and Arup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 16 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alfaisaliah.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:BHPentagram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for November 18[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Structural Awards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bangor, URS and Arup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Ewb-uk logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, Tkn20. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Tkn20. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for uploading File:Expedition Engineering Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Template:Infobox professional association has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:Articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Amisom (talk) 13:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Template:Infobox engineering career has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox engineer. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)