This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Can you please do the monobook qui or whatever for me because it isn't working. Please put it on my talk and user pages. Also, can you arrange my userboxes so that half of them arfe on the right side of the page and half of them are on the left side of the page.
Wireless Keyboard, I just wanted to let you know that I have changed my username from TennisPl8r to UVA16...UVA16 (talk)
Also, why is your page protected?
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
I saw your note on my talk page (which you reverted, which is OK - hope you don't mind if I reply anyway).
I think cleaning up school articles is a good idea. I also think that to do it correctly requires looking at every article, as an individual, to see if it asserts notability in any way, and then rather liberally accepting such assertions. It would be an involved process, as one would have to make notes in all the talk pages, get feedback, etc. - which while appropriate per the process, is sure, at some point, to create a firestorm of controversy among those with a vested interest and/or perceived ownership of those articles. JoeSperrazza (talk) 17:33, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Cheers, ► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 19:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
See Talk:Tanoli#Vandalised_once_again. The blanked content has been challenged and has no sources supporting it. I have restored the sourced sub-tribe list, which had lost the sources at some point in time. --Enric Naval (talk) 14:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
I don't really know anything about "Belfor", but I will try to help... as you can see with Lightspeed Systems, I had to fight off a SD request by saying I would work on the article. You can help improve it if you want. Once I become confirmed, I will upload some images. Mithrandir (talk) 17:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
look at the category of internet filters, all of them have logos uploaded, I have already gotten a picture of the lightspeed logo, but I need to be confirmed before I can upload it... Will you check the copyright rules about it? I don't want to bother with autoconfirmation, so I requested an admin. to confirm me. Mithrandir (talk) 17:37, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, would you like your userpage semiprotected so that IPs can no longer vandalise it? ϢereSpielChequers 18:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
That would be great! ► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 19:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
how do I create a user subpage for myself? Mithrandir (talk) 15:59, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
That's awesome? Where did you find all the info? Mithrandir (talk) 20:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Do you patrol new pages? I do... :) Mìthrandir (talk) 00:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Please see China Fire and Security Group. It's our next project. You can use the companies website to add to the info. I am in the middle of fighting off a speed deletion. Check out my userpage... you can do the same, make a section of links to your articles. Mìthrandir (talk) 01:14, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Look at how unprofessionally he handled this... User_talk:Nakon. It's the section at the bottom. He said, "it doesn't help you evade SD templates" and then I ask what it is good for, and he says "i don't know, ask someone"... Mìthrandir (talk) 21:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
I am creating two new articles, Quia and Discovery Education.... Cheers... Mìthrandir (talk) 21:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
How do I look up my edits and find what percentage are in which category? Cheers... Mìthrandir (talk) 00:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Look at the denied request on this page... see that he says that a realistic amount of articles is 25.... we only have 22 more to create! Mìthrandir (talk) 16:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Secure Tracking of Office Property, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add ((hangon))
on the top of Secure Tracking of Office Property and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
I removed this warning, because technically they do say that in the episode, it is trivial and unimportant though, so I won't revert the edit to the page. Thanks, CTJF83 00:24, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
When you report a user to AIV, you don't have to put cheers in there. Oh that's what STiki does. WayneSlam 00:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
— SpikeToronto 06:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
How do you use the Stiki app? Mìthrandir (talk) 14:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Please don't forget to notify the creator of an article when you nominate for CSD, e.g. Kept kards--SPhilbrickT 19:11, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
I just reverted it to mess with you because I am in Stiki and I saw you were the editor so I reverted it for fun... I'm not going to do it again... :) FYI... you should have used this template on the page... it's been restored already though... Cheers... Mìthrandir (talk) 22:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi! How is this test edit/vandalism? --CarTick (talk) 22:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
The ClueBot NG rv on the List of The Cat in the Hat Knows a Lot About That! Episodes that I reverted was obviously a false positive. I reported it and reverted the edit. I'm confused about why you reverted my edit and left a warning on my Talk page...the ClueBot edit was clearly a false positive. -Dwimble (talk) 22:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
By undoing my edit to No-No Boy you restored a very long piece of blatant plagiarism from enotes.com--which I had noted in my original edit summary. I've reverted your change and would like to have the vandalism template removed from my talkpage. Thanks, Aristophanes68 (talk) 01:56, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Could you kindly review and perhaps tone down the templated vandalism/test warning that you left at User_talk:Migdiachinea#February_2011 regarding her edit to Saturday Night Special (film)? This followed her question at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Saturday_Night_Special. I agree with you that her "clean up" edit was too thorough, reducing the article to just one line, but I don't think it fair to call it "vandalism". -- John of Reading (talk) 22:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
I didn't mean to reduce the article to just one line. I cut the text to paste and edit it when my connectivity became an issue, as it has been for about two weeks intemittently. In any event -- I'm glad that you see that I had no intention of vandalizing any page -- my intention was to tone it down because it is so self promotional in its nature. It looks like a public relations campaign. Right now, I'm in the middle of my quarter, so I have no time whatsoever -- much to get done. I wish that someone would edit the page in question because anyone can see how laudatory it is. Thanx so much! Mig (talk) 21:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
I've removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Ed Lucas(baseball), as it does assert some notability by being signed for the Braves. I've prodded the article, as it appears to fail WP:BASEBALL/N. Thanks, Borkificator (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
I am writing because you reverted one of my edits mistaking it for vandalism a few days ago. As requested on this page, I replyed on my talk page to this revert, giving the reasons why I felt this was a nesesary edit, and stating that it wasn't in any way vandalism, and asking for permission to re-revert it. I usually prefer not to edit a page when there's a dispute with another person that hasn't been settled, but I have waited patiently and am waiting for a response, and I feel that if I don't hear from you in the next couple of days it would be fine for me to do it myself. MoreofaGlorifiedPond,Really... (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Lilbit411". The reason given for Lilbit411's block is: "Vandalism-only account: trolling".
Accept reason: autoblock lifted -- Luk talk 14:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Is it OK if I have the IP-block exempt flag? I do edit sometimes at an educational institution where people do vandalize Wikipedia? Cheers! ► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 13:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
The IP address at my educational institution was autoblocked, and I was caught in it (at that time I was at there). However, I couldn't even edit my own talk page to ask for an unblock (I emailed an admin). Is there a reason for this now? I thought you could edit your talk page under an autoblock. Cheers! ► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 00:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
((unblock))
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.
Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.
Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).
I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.
Can I ask a favour in return - get rid of that Jimbo pop-up on this page. It's funny for about two seconds, then just annoying, particularly for those of us with Classic skin as it blocks our links. Thanks. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 14:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Your recent vandalism of the Esperanza Spalding page = fail. In a few years, your teenage pope idol JB will reach his used by date and slide into oblivion once his voice breaks and you will find another flavour-of-the-minute toyboy to latch onto. Spalding, like all the great artists, will be getting better and better and better with age. But I guess you wouldn't really understand any of that.
Your page asks to "please assume good faith"
Vandalising the pages of artists is not good faith, it's childish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magicpossum (talk • contribs) 01:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
You have not explained why Robert Pitcairn (antiquary) fails WP:N citeria, please do that or remove the tag. Robert Pitcairn (antiquary) has a notice in the DNB, as noted in the references, they are notable. cygnis insignis 13:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
I have made an account on the ACC account creation interface. This is the confirmation edit to my talk. ► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 22:02, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Wireless Keyboard thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request so welcome to the team. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process.
You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly.
Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome!Mlpearc powwow 23:01, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi!!!Thanks for your message...I am accepting your offer...Actually,i am new in wikipedia and i am looking forward to publish more articles which wikipedia won't delete...Thanks for your kind offer... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Study addict (talk • contribs) 09:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Please explain why you have rejected my correction of "holocaust" - I corrected it to "Holocaust", which is consistent with the rest of the article. Headhitter (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I am not familiar with this method of communication, but I hope this is the right way to clarify this.
My user name is NoAmGeogSoc.
The article now on the web entitled "Cow Island, Montana" was an early draft of an article I had been working on about Cow Island, in the Missouri Breaks area of Eastern Montana. I had been working on this early (and incomplete) draft on March 2, under "User:NoAmGeogSoc/Sandbox7a". Then I lost the article and was never able to find it. I thought it was because the designation "...7a" following "...Sandbox" was not appropriate.
This source for the article now on Wikipedia as "Cow Island, Montana", is confirmed by the following under the "view history" tab at the "Cow Island, Montana" entry:
(cur | prev) 00:46, 2 March 2011 Wireless Keyboard (talk | contribs) m (2,067 bytes) (moved NoAmGeogSoc/Sandbox7a to Cow Island, Montana: User moved from his userspace into mainspace, improperly named) (undo)
After losing track of the earlier draft, I rewrote the "Cow Island" article in this place: "User:NoAmGeogSoc/Sandbox15".
Today, in a routine search I came across the "Cow Island, Montana" article. I was appalled to find my earlier fragmented work on Wikipedia, and decided to move my current draft on that topic from my "user" space onto the "mainspace" (is that the right word) where it is now lodged as "Cow Island, Missouri Breaks, Eastern Montana".
I am glad that this move got a response from you, so we could clear up the confusion between the two articles.
So, the current article with the full title, "Cow Island, Missouri Breaks, Eastern Montana" has the fully merged content of the earlier "Cow Island, Montana" article, along with additional content.
The proper title for this article is "Cow Island, Missouri Breaks, Eastern Montana". As you might guess there are many different "Cow Island" designations, and this particularly Cow Island is uniquely associated with the Missouri Breaks, and Eastern Montana. Eastern Montana, by the way, is a specifically and commonly designated region of Montana -- see "Eastern Montana" on Wikipedia.
It is my intention to continue to work on the article in the next few days, adding footnotes, categories, "See Also" and all the rest until the article is complete. I will get some photos of this "Cow Island" in the future, when the weather is better.
I would like your help in removing the "Cow Island, Montana" article in its entirety, and leaving the "Cow Island, Missouri Breaks, Eastern Montana" article to be completed.
Thank you.
NoAmGeogSoc
[3] That was a blatant attack site. Please be extra vigilant with BLPs and double-check any edits made by new accounts, thanks. -- Ϫ 21:36, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
sad —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.186.98.242 (talk) 03:37, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:25, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:58, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi WK! Douglas S. Freeman High School is an article with an ongoing problem with unreferenced material. However, I was interested to know why you chose to remove this unreferenced text, while apparently having no problems with the equally unreferenced existing text to which it had been added. Was there a particular problem with the addition? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Wireless Keyboard! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 01:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC).
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:28, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Wireless Keyboard,
Since you were a part of the WikiGuides project, I thought I'd give you a heads-up about a new way you can help/mentor newbies on en.wiki: we've recently released a feature called the Feedback Dashboard, a queue that updates in real time with feedback and editing questions from new registered contributors who have attempted to make at least one edit. Steven Walling and I are putting together a task force for experienced Wikipedians who might be interested in monitoring the queue and responding to the feedback: details are here at Wikipedia:Feedback Dashboard. Please sign up if you're interested in helping out! Thanks, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Stubs | Cleanup | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Merle Zuver | Napalm | |||
Leonel Vangioni | Big Oak Tree State Park | |||
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines cricket team | PC Supporters | |||
Ken Snelling | Merge | |||
Melvyn Maxwell and Sara Stein Smith House | Uetsu Main Line | |||
Robert Hughes (running back) | International Hot-Air Balloon Festival in Château-d'Oex | |||
Martín Tonso | Hair weave | |||
Green Grow the Rushes (film) | Add sources | |||
Fletcher's Fields | Z with stroke | |||
Rona Hartner | Ramakrishna Nagar | |||
Stan Kinsey | Victor Central Victor Harbor | |||
M-Doc | Wikify | |||
Reptiles (magazine) | FinanceMalta | |||
Vanishing of the Bees | Miss Teen Universe 2010 | |||
John Wager | VBR-Belgium | |||
Chann McRae | Expand | |||
Rumoi Main Line | Oscar Micheaux | |||
The Hits (MC Hammer album) | Pe with descender | |||
Kertson Manswell | Central Collegiate Hockey Association |
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hey guys!
I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.
It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:18, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Absorb LMS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Quia logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:59, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 00:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
65 | The West Coast Pop Art Experimental Band (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
3 | Vestbanen (S-tog) (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
46 | Tomandandy (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
37 | Rod Jackson (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
31 | The Joker Blogs (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
11,454 | Sons of Anarchy (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
1,884 | The Heroes of Olympus (talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
1,940 | Brian Cox (actor) (talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
9 | João Maria Ferreira do Amaral (talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
192 | Cricket in India (talk) | Expand | ||||||
6 | Luis Miguel Rodríguez (footballer) (talk) | Expand | ||||||
121 | Shorty Awards (talk) | Expand | ||||||
61 | Channel drift (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
1,815 | Lou Reed (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
39 | Fateless (film) (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
16,442 | Lana Del Rey (talk) | Merge | ||||||
41 | Renato (talk) | Merge | ||||||
16 | Kanto Gakuin University (talk) | Merge | ||||||
3 | David Wynne (composer) (talk) | Wikify | ||||||
76 | Gary Kirsten (talk) | Wikify | ||||||
130 | England women's cricket team (talk) | Wikify | ||||||
0 | Mauro Brandoni (talk) | Orphan | ||||||
Mic slayer (talk) | (({CONTENTORPHAN2))} | (({HEADINGSORPHAN2))} | (({IMAGESORPHAN2))} | (({LINKSORPHAN2))} | (({SOURCESORPHAN2))} | Orphan | ||
6 | Virginia Transformer Corporation (talk) | Orphan | ||||||
1 | Czatkowy (talk) | Stub | ||||||
1 | Małżewko (talk) | Stub | ||||||
17 | Watch the Sun Come Up (talk) | Stub | ||||||
38 | Bananas!* (talk) | Stub | ||||||
1 | Gniszewo (talk) | Stub | ||||||
0 | Waćmierek (talk) | Stub |
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)