< June 9 June 11 >

June 10

Category:Post-rock songs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Post-rock songs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Articles can function more effectively under Category:Band name songs C1k3 (talk) 02:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Black Falcon (talk) 23:30, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sugar Hill Records (bluegrass) albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Sugar Hill Records (bluegrass) albums to Category:Sugar Hill Records albums
Nominator's rationale: Per main article, add ((for)) to dab. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 05:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξxplicit 04:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Black Falcon (talk) 23:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Relinquishing parents

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Relinquishing parents to Category:People who have relinquished parental rights
Nominator's rationale: Current name is unclear, imo, as "relinquishing" could be a verb or adjective. If understood as a gerund (verb), category could be misunderstood as being about children relinquishing parents, rather than the other way around, I think. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are you suggesting that the category is inappropriate because it is unseemly and thus implicates the biography of a living-person? That would seem overtly puritanical, if not bordering on censorship.Tobit2 (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing admin: Tobit2 (talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If your opinion is the exact opposite, then giving away a child, in your view, would have no impact on a parent. That would seem inhumane, which is, without doubt, a defining psychological characteristic. Is that what you meant?Tobit2 (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry - no useful suggestions on the name, however.HeartofaDog (talk) 14:21, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Unusual runways

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Unusual runways (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. OCAT, ambiguous and subjective inclusion criteria. To quote from the introduction, These runways are notable for unusual physical features such as short length, steep slope, airplane proximity to unsecured people, or crossing automobile traffic. This is so overly broad and ambiguous that I can include a bunch of airports here. What makes an airport runway short? What is short for a 747 is not short for a Cessna 172. What exactly is an unsecured person? It is is what I think it is, then you need to add a bunch of airports. This might be useful as a list that explains what the unique characteristic is, but I don't thinks a listify is appropriate since the list article would be time consuming and require research to properly create. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:05, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Women's college basketball head coaches

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge all. — ξxplicit 05:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Army Black Knights women's basketball head coaches to Category:Army Black Knights women's basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Baylor Lady Bears basketball head coaches to Category:Baylor Lady Bears basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Duke Blue Devils women's basketball head coaches to Category:Duke Blue Devils women's basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Georgia Lady Bulldogs basketball head coaches to Category:Georgia Lady Bulldogs basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Iowa Hawkeyes women's basketball head coaches to Category:Iowa Hawkeyes women's basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:LSU Lady Tigers basketball head coaches to Category:LSU Lady Tigers basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders women's basketball head coaches to Category:Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders women's basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Oklahoma Sooners women's basketball head coaches to Category:Oklahoma Sooners women's basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Purdue Boilermakers women's basketball head coaches to Category:Purdue Boilermakers women's basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Stanford Cardinal women's basketball head coaches to Category:Stanford Cardinal women's basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Tennessee Lady Vols basketball head coaches to Category:Tennessee Lady Vols basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Texas Longhorns women's basketball head coaches to Category:Texas Longhorns women's basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:UConn Huskies women's basketball head coaches to Category:UConn Huskies women's basketball coaches
Propose merging Category:Virginia Cavaliers women's basketball head coaches to Category:Virginia Cavaliers women's basketball coaches
Nominator's rationale: Merge. This category tree isn't developed enough for this kind of subdivision. All but two of these categories are single-entry, and if the process continues, almost every subcategory of Category:College women's basketball coaches in the United States will be composed of no pages and one subcategory. See Category:UConn Huskies women's basketball head coaches; Geno Auriemma is the only member of that category, and that category is the only member of Category:UConn Huskies women's basketball coaches. And there aren't so many famous coaches of women's college basketball that we can't have Andy Landers in with a couple of assistants.--Mike Selinker (talk) 16:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Boavista players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Boavista players to Category:Boavista F.C. players
Nominator's rationale: Rename. There is Boavista SC of Brazil, the name is not unique. Matthew_hk tc 14:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Boavista

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Boavista to Category:Boavista F.C.
Nominator's rationale: Rename. There is Boavista SC of Brazil, the name is not unique. Matthew_hk tc 14:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American expatriate soul musicians in the United Kingdom

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:American expatriate soul musicians in the United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Extreme over-categorization. Pichpich (talk) 13:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Years in anthropology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Years in anthropology (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Category empty. Replaced by Category:Decades in anthropology following page merges Gwinva (talk) 10:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:General robots

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:General robots to Category:Robots
Nominator's rationale: The current explanation of this cat is: "A category for entries on specific individual robots who do not fit into any of the specific categories which are for individual robots by specific type or function." Isn't that what the category category:robots is for? (rhetorical question) As such, I propose this should be up-merged. Wizard191 (talk) 10:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I made this category because I didn't want important articles such as Differential wheeled robot to share a category with articles like Beer Launching Fridge, Nabaztag, or Enon (robot). There will probably be a growing need for this category in the coming years, as robots increase in numbers and variety. I do appreciate your inquiry into this though. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
ok. point taken. I moved a bunch of articles. just stating that here in the interests of full disclosure, and also in candor with one's fellow editors. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 02:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dutch Treat Club members

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Dutch Treat Club members (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Not a defining characteristic of its members. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 07:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ukrainian Greek Catholics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 June 20#Ukrainian Greek Catholics. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: Rename. These names are generally confusing as they stand now. If we start piling three and sometimes four adjectives on top of one another ("Canadian Ukrainian Greek Catholic bishops"—what?), many users will be unsure what exactly is being referred to. These proposals are meant to clarify and are patterned after some of those names selected for Category:Eastern Orthodox Christians by nationality. Good Ol’factory (talk) 06:25, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_June_10as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sailing at the 1920 Summer Olympics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. However, the files in this category will be recategorized. — ξxplicit 21:27, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Sailing at the 1920 Summer Olympics to Category:Sailing events at the 1920 Summer Olympics
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Matches naming of the other preexisting categories. or Split in two, as the other categories have a media category and an article category. If split, I suggest the media category be named as Category:Images of the sailing events at the 1920 Summer Olympics 70.29.212.131 (talk) 06:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sailing at the 1972 Summer Olympics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete as empty. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Sailing at the 1972 Summer Olympics to Category:Images of the sailing events at the 1972 Summer Olympics
Nominator's rationale: Rename. This category only categorizes images, the related Category:Sailing events at the 1972 Summer Olympics categorizes articles. 70.29.212.131 (talk) 06:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sailing at the 1924 Summer Olympics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Olympic sailing images. — ξxplicit 21:27, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Sailing at the 1924 Summer Olympics to Category:Images of the sailing events at the 1924 Summer Olympics
Nominator's rationale: Rename. This category only categorizes images, the related Category:Sailing events at the 1924 Summer Olympics categorizes articles. 70.29.212.131 (talk) 05:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sailing at the 1912 Summer Olympics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete as empty. — ξxplicit 05:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Sailing at the 1912 Summer Olympics to Category:Images of the sailing events at the 1912 Summer Olympics
Nominator's rationale: Rename. This category only categorizes images, the related Category:Sailing events at the 1912 Summer Olympics categorizes articles. 70.29.212.131 (talk) 05:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sailing at the 1908 Summer Olympics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Olympic sailing images. — ξxplicit 21:27, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Sailing at the 1908 Summer Olympics to Category:Images of the sailing events at the 1908 Summer Olympics
Nominator's rationale: Rename. This category only categorizes images, the related Category:Sailing events at the 1908 Summer Olympics categorizes articles. 70.29.212.131 (talk) 05:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sailing at the 1900 Summer Olympics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Olympic sailing images. — ξxplicit 21:27, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Sailing at the 1900 Summer Olympics to Category:Images of the sailing events at the 1900 Summer Olympics
Nominator's rationale: Rename. This category only categorizes images, the related Category:Sailing events at the 1900 Summer Olympics categorizes articles. 70.29.212.131 (talk) 05:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sailing at the Summer Olympics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge as nominated. — ξxplicit 05:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Sailing at the Summer Olympics to Category:Sailing at the Olympics
Nominator's rationale: Merge. Duplicates existing category. 70.29.212.131 (talk) 05:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sailors at the Summer Olympics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. — ξxplicit 05:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Sailors at the Summer Olympics to Category:Olympic sailors
Nominator's rationale: Merge. Duplicates existing category 70.29.212.131 (talk) 05:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Historical revisionism (political)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 July 3#Category:Historical revisionism (political). — ξxplicit 05:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Historical revisionism (political) to Category:Historical revisionism (negationism)
Nominator's rationale: to match name of main article. Prezbo (talk) 04:22, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Vintners

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Vintners to Category:Winemakers
Nominator's rationale: as the article page Vintner redirects to Winemaker Mayumashu (talk) 02:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Hollywood

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:People from Hollywood to Category:People from Hollywood, Los Angeles
Nominator's rationale: to disambiguate as Hollywood, Florida is a city with a fair population - over 140, 000 Mayumashu (talk) 02:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Categories need that extra layer of clarity - where article page titles can be helpful they should be the basis for category page naming Mayumashu (talk) 20:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Domestic terrorists in the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete, as it booms WP:BLP violations. — ξxplicit 04:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Domestic terrorists in the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Given the deletion of Category:Terrorists, this should be deleted for the same reasons. Possible alternative is to rename to the wider Category:Domestic terrorism in the United States Pichpich (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree with you in general, I think the intent here was to distinguish between terrorism in the US committed by citizens and terrorism in the US committed by foreigners. I see the real problem with the category as being its lack of an objective criteria. Savidan 23:10, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't keep this one in anything close to its present form, and most of these people were neither charged with nor convicted of terrorism. Instead, its current contents depend largely on the subjective judgement of a few wikipedians. Savidan 19:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.