< January 21
January 23 >

January 22

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 22, 2016.

Encore Consumer Capital

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Encore Consumer Capital and Encore Capital Group appear to be two unrelated companies with different websites. I can find no evidence (aside from the appendix of this PriceWaterhouseCoopers document, but it might be a typo) that they are the same corporation. Thus I'm suggesting delete for the redirect. /wiae /tlk 23:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bubblenest frog

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all without prejudice against recreation of bubblenests and bubblenester by another editor who wants to take ownership of that decision. Deryck C. 23:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like this to be a precedent for the Neelix frog redirects. He likes to stick words together and make fake compound words. These spread error across the web, clutter search results, and don't help the reader find anything. If it's a compound word that just sticks real words together in a frog name I'd like to see it speedy deleted based on this RfD. Legacypac (talk) 23:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

St. Lukes Church

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep all. (non-admin closure) sst✈ (speak now) 12:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These duplicate redirects with the ' so they don't help the reader, just clutter the search results with bad grammar. Legacypac (talk) 23:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Video gaming industries

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep Video gaming industries and Video games industries. Convert to set index Gaming industry, Gaming industries, Games industries, Game industries. (Closing two sections in conjunction as suggested.) Deryck C. 21:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Izno: (and IP editor) - I'm not sure what's the appropriate content for the SIA and which is the best page title, so I'll leave you to do it. Deryck C. 21:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typos. There is only one video game industry. You would not write about the car industries or gold mining industries either. Legacypac (talk) 23:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Video gaming industries and video games industries, the phrase could possibly be used a sentence like "the video game industries of France and the United States...". Commented on the third link below.--Prisencolin (talk) 00:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gaming industry is a very common term mentioned at the new target. I fixed the Neelix redirect on it. However, I'm open to the idea that these terms are fairly meaningless without a modifier like casino or video etc. Legacypac (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Game industries[edit]

As opposed to Games industry which is a better redirect, this suggests multiple industries. Board games, sports etc. Not that useful as a redirect. Legacypac (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Prisencolin: huh? That page is red, and always has been. Si Trew (talk) 07:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
relocated next to related discussion Legacypac (talk) 22:48, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's necessary if you want it to point there, unless this is a really circumspect vote for deletion, since that would make it G8 eligible. --BDD (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lord, Protect My Child

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 16:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extra comma just clutters search results and does not help the reader. Legacypac (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Scotty Wotty

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 23:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article; presumably non-notable. BDD (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ball juggler

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was obvious result is retarget so done Legacypac (talk) 22:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible; I could see an innocent person getting sent to Oral sex through this. Should be a redirect to Juggling. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Legacypac closed this before I could post my comment. Many thanks for taking care of this! Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 22:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ya bit of an edit conflict. Can't see the point of debating the obvious. Legacypac (talk) 22:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Geneva Mercadel Tucker

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neelix took different parts of the subject's birth, stage and married names and mixed them together in various ways. No evidence she used any of these variations. Legacypac (talk) 22:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater Restaurant Film

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. --BDD (talk) 21:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually targets a deleted section of the article Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater Restaurant#Entertainment and there are several dozen redirects with every conceivable variation on spelling and puctuation already. Legacypac (talk) 21:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Truth Red White and Black

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 15:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Slight variations in punctuation that make the target harder to find in search. Search ignores punctuation. Delete all and let the reader get straight to the actual article. Neelix cleanup. I don't think any have incoming links so they are not needed for ease of linking. Legacypac (talk) 17:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ronnie Drake

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Cilvia Demo. --BDD (talk) 15:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is a plausible birthname not mentioned at the target. Ronnie Drake is more commonly the title of an offensive rap song. Delete or maybe disambiguate if someone can prove Eckstine was ever known by Drake? Legacypac (talk) 17:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Cilvia Demo, the album where the rap song is mentioned, with ((R from song)). No dab needed yet unless it is established that Eckstine was ever known as Drake in reliable sources. A certain Ronnie Drake was a member of the 1970s backup group Sound 70 [4], which apparently did some TV jingles and record work, but I can't establish notability for that group, let alone that Ronnie Drake, so again until there are plausible alternate targets no dab needed. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bamey-mugging

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted via CSD Legacypac (talk) 03:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible, not even in urban dictionary. Maybe a badly kerned version of barney-mugging? BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 16:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Table Soccer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep, but move Table soccer (disambiguation) to Table football (disambiguation) to match. --BDD (talk) 15:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is Table Soccer (Redirect) and I did Table soccer (disambig). How it should be look in English Wikipedia? I'm polish and I'm not from any English-language society. Dawid2009 (talk) 11:28, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I also suggest wieddling it [5] like to Russian Wikipedia. Dawid2009 (talk) 11:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I`m not sure about primarytopic, because table hockey hasn`t it. Table soccer is main popular as thing foosball but other table soccer games are totally other. Actually only the same name, not genesis and other. Table football aren`t wrong as primary topic but table soccer I`m not sure. Dawid2009 (talk) 23:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Grayishbrowns

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Made up words that shove two colors together, by Neelix. We've deleted dozens of these already (example [6]), and here are some more. Legacypac (talk) 08:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

White-water

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was that batch-nomination is not conducive in this case. I'm closing as no action. @Legacypac, Arthistorian1977, and SimonTrew: please nominate subsets separately. Deryck C. 23:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Various Neelix invented words and phrases that have an incorrect dash in them. He built out a whole string of these, and we should eliminate the errors to prevent them from spreading. Search ignores the dashes, so they don't help people searching, just confuse the results. Legacypac (talk) 08:23, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The white-supremacy redirect was speedied as part of a list about 15 similar terms not used in RS. I just checked the top 100 results for "white-supremacy" in quotes (to force Google to look for the hyphenated version) and could not find a single use of the term that included a hyphen. Legacypac (talk) 20:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't dispute that the term didn't turn up in google search results, but when there are multiple "keep" votes at that redirect's RfD, then I think we should wait to speedy per WP:G6. Otherwise, we would allow one or two people to make decisions that may conflict with the community consensus that is developed at RfD discussions. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel strongly about keeping it you can recreate it under the G6 Neelix exception. Legacypac (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Speaker men

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted G6 by Sphilbrick. JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly thought out Neelix redirects. Could cover guys that set up a rock concert. Some are not really words either. Legacypac (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Incidentally, Mrs Speaker, Madam Speaker, Madame Speaker, Soundwoman, Sound woman, Soundperson and Sound person are all red; I've marked Soundman, Sound man and Spokesman as ((R from gender)).) Si Trew (talk) 12:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

It is a major river

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are major rivers (broadly defined, if even) in every country on earth, and I don't think this sentence is a logical search term for any river, including the lists at Lists of rivers. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Occasional

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 February 1#Occasional

Springers (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 15:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DAB pointed at a DAB, only history is created by Neelix. Nothing links to it. Housekeeping delete? Legacypac (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cossets

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate between the surname and the verb. Deryck C. 21:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This term means "care for and protect in an overindulgent way" which can obviously mean parenting like at the target, but other sources refer to animals like lambs and dogs. Worth changing?. Legacypac (talk) 05:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Currently Cosset targets François Cosset, a French composer (created on 19 April 2013 at 01:03 by Neelix, five minutes before this one). But we also have a redirect Sébastien Cosset → Kerascoët, which could go on there (and I don't think either is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC). "Cossets" is then an ((R from plural)) as a plural noun of the family name, like "Joneses", "Flintstones".
Corset has a ((confused)) to Cosset which of course redirects to the composer, which is perhaps WP:SURPRISEing. So, a WP:TWODABS would seem the cleanest way to fix all this, as on the draft I have put a link to Wiktionary for "cosset" and a ((confused)) back to Corset. Si Trew (talk) 06:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment we also have Cosseter and Cosseted(but not Cosseting) but I think that they can stay put, since they're being used as verbs (or verbal nouns). I imagine nominator was aware of those. Si Trew (talk) 06:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding the 2nd one. I think I saw that as reasonable before seeing the others. I looked at Cosseter and Cosseted and found these words were primarily related to the target. Cosset was a very rare word that an author picked up and used in discussing helicopter parenting. That one book, and discussions of it, throw everything off in search results. If anyone wants to tackle the newly reorganized Neelix redirect project [8] to [9] it is broken into an 5 editable vanishing lists now. Legacypac (talk) 07:15, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't think it was a particularly rare word, at least not in British usage. Si Trew (talk) 12:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Those lists are not very helpful without having links to both the redirect and the target. I seem to recall User:Anomie tailoring the previous request to do this, at my request. Si Trew (talk) 15:40, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@User:SimonTrew the lists are basically grouped by target because he built redirects as many as 399 in one sitting at a target. I learned if you turn on 'popups' in your preferences you can see the target and a preview which is often enough to assess the reasonableness, especially for reasonable redirects like ones for alternate names in the lead and variations on word form like a redirect from plural to singular. Legacypac (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd never heard of this word in a parenting or any context, and I live in Canada but went to university in the US. It's a real but obscure word, popularized by a single fairly recent book as best as I could tell. Legacypac (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've never heard of cosseting, but I've heard a lot about helicopter parenting. I doubt an AfD would be successful there. --BDD (talk) 15:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Happy slaves

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the "happy slave" a common stock character in Jim-Crow era minstrel shows? Redirecting this to a claimed mental disorder doesn't not match people's expectations. If there isn't a good retarget, it should be deleted. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I considered a retarget to Minstrel show, which has in the lede "Racial integrationists decried them as falsely showing happy slaves" (my underline). But Happy slave and Happy Slave are red. Searching for Happy Slave is fruitful in finding lots of uses of the expression "happy slaves" (including the one above), so I think this redirect just obstructs the search; WP:RFD#D2 confusing. Si Trew (talk) 07:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per search obstruction rationale. Otherwise, redir it and the singular form (without the title-case capitalization) to Minstrel show, and boldface "happy slaves" in the article as a redir term. The current redir is boneheaded, because what it links to is the opposite.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  03:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lieutenant Palmer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mae Jemison wasn't the only person to play "Lieutenant Palmer." I also hit on Elizabeth Rogers. In addition, several articles also mention a Lieutenant Palmer, including Mount Breakenridge, Action of 8 March 1795, Battle of Genoa (1795), HMS Berwick (1775), and others. Our readers would be better served by search results. -- Tavix (talk) 05:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That wouldn't make sense as there isn't anyone notable by that name. -- Tavix (talk) 06:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SCTN

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Deryck C. 23:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The org shortens its name to SCTNow, not this. Many possible better targets, the best of which seems to me to be a company Schematic technologies that uses this as it's stock ticker. Maybe a good article? Or other suggestions for retarget or a DAB? Legacypac (talk) 04:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kukalaka

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTWIKIA. This is the name of the character's teddy bear. Not mentioned at the article. -- Tavix (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Subatoi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, middle name of a fictional character. I don't see any evidence that he's known as "Subatoi." -- Tavix (talk) 04:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American Federation of Reformed Young Mens Society

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 29#American Federation of Reformed Young Mens Society

Chief Sepass

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Turned into article Legacypac (talk) 08:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Theatre is named after a real person. I'd like to see this redirect deleted per WP:REDLINK to encourage article creation on the actual native leader who I'd like to know more about. I added a sentence to the school article so it will show red. Good research job for a student at the school. Legacypac (talk) 04:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What I don't understand is that User:Legacypac has created Sepass on 22 January 2016 pointing at this R, which is a bit of a foregone conclusion. Adding that to the nom (I've marked it as ((R from short name)), too). Si Trew (talk) 08:00, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In all scenarios Sepass should point at the guy's name Chief Sepass even if redlinked or left to point at the place for now. Lots of buildings, parks etc are named after people, but we don't usually point the name of the person at the place as far as I know. If anything we write an article about the person and note places that are named for them. Terry Fox for example. I found a good source now (could not see one earlier) so starting the article myself. That should end this discussion. Legacypac (talk) 08:15, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Arnold Schwarznigger

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural close as deleted. (non-admin closure) by Si Trew (talk) 12:51, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold Schwarznigger → Arnold Schwarzenegger  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, while "Schwarzenegger" is a hard-to-spell name, I'm afraid this spelling could be seen as a WP:BLP violation due to the n-word being in it. Stats are below one hit/day. -- Tavix (talk) 03:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Declinedly

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted, G6, by Drmies (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 05:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very very rare word. Not found in dictionaries. Basically Neelix adding extra suffixes. Legacypac (talk) 03:08, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unknown Soldier (2015 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Anthony Appleyard. --BDD (talk) 15:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not mentioned at Arnold Schwarzenegger filmography and I can't find anything but rumors. -- Tavix (talk) 02:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Governor Arnold

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as vague. An incomplete list of governor's named Arnold include: Benedict Arnold (governor), Lemuel H. Arnold, and Arnold Wienholt Hodson. Search results would serve our readers better. -- Tavix (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into that. I hadn't even thought about disambiguation as an option since I thought that <[position] [name]> disambiguations were being rejected: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Edward is still fresh in my mind. Disambiguation could work, but I'm afraid of the combinatorial explosion (Si's phrase?) that could occur since there are a LOT of positions and a LOT of names. I think I still prefer deletion, but other things to consider include retargeting to the dab/name page as a ((R from ambiguous name)) or keeping it with a hatnote to "Arnold." -- Tavix (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Combinatorial explosion is not exactly my phrase. But use a lot I do it. (Or is that a permutational explosion?) Si Trew (talk) 14:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Broken condom style

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable parody that isn't mentioned in the article. -- Tavix (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trouser snake

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 11:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible slang term. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 01:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The rich

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 29#The rich

Debt of Third World countries

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 11:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Our own article on the term "Third World" says that it is a "stereotype" to refer to poor countries under this label. It really means they haven't picked a side of the Cold War. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Planting season

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can start planting certain seeds like Kale in the summer, and still get a good crop. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lisabeth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. This remains a set index rather than a redirect. Merge or delete discussions may proceed if desired, but it's now out of RfD's scope. --BDD (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are several women with articles carrying this name. The target is likely not notable and has been AfD'd. Delete or maybe do a DAB page? Legacypac (talk) 00:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. -- Tavix (talk) 01:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Travix closed with: "The result of the discussion was procedural close, no longer a redirect. (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 01:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)" but based on additional comments below the close, I've reopened. Hope he does not mind. Legacypac (talk) 03:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. They are different names. -- Tavix (talk) 05:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There are many unified name pages with variant forms included in them. There are also many unified disambiguation pages with small variations included. -- 70.51.200.135 (talk) 05:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There's no evidence that these are variants. It's an assumption being made because they appear similar. -- Tavix (talk) 05:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've got a strong feeling that someone searching "Lisabeth" is doing so purposefully. They aren't looking for an "Elizabeth," but just in case they are for whatever reason, it's a link in the see-also, so that person would only be one click away. There's also no evidence that Lisabeth and Lizabeth are short-forms of "Elizabeth." Of the four people with either as a forename, only Lizabeth Scott is reported to have a different birth name, and it was Emma. Sure, the names are similar, but we can't assume. In addition, I feel like a merger will make it harder for our readers to find what they're looking for, which is never a good solution. -- Tavix (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Inequality in the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Inequality" does not always relate solely to how much money one is taking in. This could also be applied to racism, sexism, etc. Seems more like Discrimination in the United States. That article is of poor quality, however. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feeling the Bern, Si? --BDD (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Butter worth

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 29#Butter worth

Neither rich nor poor people

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does not make sense to me. Sounds more like Middle class (though I wouldn't redirect it there either). Mr. Guye (talk) 00:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nordic communism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The target article makes no mention of communism. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Democratic communism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Communism" and "socialism" aren't synonymous. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Communist democracy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect assumes that "communism" and "socialism" are the same thing, even though they aren't. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orwell (a self-described "democratic Socialist") points out somewhere, I think in Politics and the English Language, that all countries call themselves "democratic" and none wants a firm definition in case they are themselves excluded. Si Trew (talk) 14:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Socialistic democracy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Socialist democracy. JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think "democratic socialism" is different from "social democracy", even though they are similar. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Middle-income country

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The same user that created this redirect also created various redirects (e.g. Low-income country) that go to the same target. Low-income country = Middle-income country? It is too confusing. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

שוורצנגר

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:48, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN. -- Tavix (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Basilan Island

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Basilan. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First choice: an article about the island. Second choice: deletion of this obvious misinterpretation of a redirect. The island and the people are not nearly the same topic, there is some overlap but that's it. This also is true for the province Basilan. Interestingly, Talk:Basilan Island is also a redirect but with another target. And, of course, there are two Wikidata sets for island and province: Q810053 and Q13737 → «« Man77 »» 21:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I've just realized something in the history. → «« Man77 »» 21:23, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More