The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Major league basball 2k5 → Major League Baseball 2K5  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misspelled word, 10 views in 2019 compared with 6,269 for the article. Clutter; delete. Narky Blert (talk) 21:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete obvious error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unnecessary clutter. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - It's a somewhat plausible typo, I guess, but then... well, I just don't see this as really helpful. Deletion appears to be the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Basball manager → Manager (baseball)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misspelled word, 18 views in 2019 compared with 680 for the correct redirect. Delete. Narky Blert (talk) 21:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unnecessary clutter. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 23:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Doug Baldwin (Amrican football) → Doug Baldwin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misspelled qualifier, and ((R from unnecessary disambiguation)) with it. The redirect Doug Baldwin (American football) exists, and got 10,259 views in 2019. The nominated redirect is clutter, with 13 views in 2019; delete. Narky Blert (talk) 20:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete obvious error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unnecessary clutter. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete obvious typo, and clutter. Hitpoint0213 (talk) 19:18, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was All thrown off into the abyss of April 2nd's arrival. Steel1943 (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

• User:Steel1943/Redirect A → User:Steel1943/Redirect B  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect B → User:Steel1943/Redirect C  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect C → User:Steel1943/Redirect D  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect D → User:Steel1943/Redirect E  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect E → User:Steel1943/Redirect F  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect F → User:Steel1943/Redirect G  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect G → User:Steel1943/Redirect H  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect H → User:Steel1943/Redirect I  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect I → User:Steel1943/Redirect J  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect J → User:Steel1943/Redirect K  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect K → User:Steel1943/Redirect L  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect L → User:Steel1943/Redirect M  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect M → User:Steel1943/Redirect N  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• User:Steel1943/Redirect N → User:Steel1943/Redirect O  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect O → User:Steel1943/Redirect P  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect P → User:Steel1943/Redirect Q  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect Q → User:Steel1943/Redirect R  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect R → User:Steel1943/Redirect S  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect S → User:Steel1943/Redirect T  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect T → User:Steel1943/Redirect U  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect U → User:Steel1943/Redirect V  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect V → User:Steel1943/Redirect W  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect W → User:Steel1943/Redirect X  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect X → User:Steel1943/Redirect Y  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• User:Steel1943/Redirect Y → User:Steel1943/Redirect Z  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• User:Steel1943/Redirect Z → User:Steel1943/Redirect A  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The never-ending redirection... Steel1943 (talk) 20:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Create lowercase equivalents to the uppercase versions to assist any user who lacks a working shift key. Narky Blert (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per RFOREIGN, RFFL, and RLOTE, no affinity for letters in Latin. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget all to Caesar cipher. ComplexRational (talk) 21:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Francis Joseph (fotballer) → Francis Joseph (footballer)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misspelled qualifier. 38 views in 2019, compared with 1,697 for the article. Clutter; delete. Narky Blert (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. ComplexRational (talk) 21:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete obvious error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as above. GiantSnowman 13:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Rules for Fools → Wikipedia:Rules for Fools  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessary WP:XNR. I get it, we want to make sure that the encyclopedia is not destroyed/vandalized today, but we also don't need a redirect in the article namespace to attract WP:SEO-ish results on search engines stating that we allow it. In other words, see WP:BEANS. Steel1943 (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unnecessary CNR and we may need this title for something in the future. Hog Farm (talk) 20:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unnecessary cross-namespace redirect Mz7 (talk) 23:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per WP:G7. Author here. Sorry I took so long, I was blocked for less than 5 hours. I didn't know that you weren't supposed to make redirects to articles that start with Wikipedia and I thought namespace articles were something else. Also, the reason i created this was because I thought there would be a few people like me, who would forget Wikipedia:Rules for Fools starts with wikipedia. OcelotCreeper (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom et al, Currently has a redirect in WP space so no need for an articlespace redirect. –Davey2010^Talk 00:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• International version → Director's cut#Video games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ambiguous. There's international versions of many things, not just video games. Hog Farm (talk) 19:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Ambiguous with, among other things, New International Version. Narky Blert (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This redirect may cause confusion, and it inhibits the use of Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• This was an article, but was deleted as it duplicated an existing page and was not notable enough for a separate article; there was a link to it from the Main Page in 2015. If there are other uses, disambiguate. Peter James (talk) 13:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. It doesn't seem like we're likely to resolve this issue with further relistings. As this nomination was in response to edit warring, a no consensus result here actually means that we will be going back to pointing to Treaty of Manila (1946) _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Philippine independence → Independence Day (Philippines)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect to Treaty of Manila (1946). That was the origincal redirect. The Treaty of Manila is the treaty that gave the Philippines its internationally recognized independence in 1946. Independence Day (Philippines) refers to June 12, 1898, when Philippine Revolutionaries declared the Philippines independent. They failed. The Philippines was ruled by the U.S. for nearly 50 years. In common parlance and in international law the Philippines gained its Independence in 1946. This redirect says "Philippine independence" and should point to when the country actually became independent, when it gained its sovereignty, when it fully ruled itself. The redirect originally pointed to the Treaty of Manila article but was changed several years ago, over objections, several months after the concluded discussion on the Talk page ruled generally against the change (keeping Treaty of Manila). I and other editors didn't notice. Rather than change it back and risk (another) WP:EDITWAR, I bring it here, as suggested years ago on Talk:Philippine independence.--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 13:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate. It is not for us to create fine distinctions in nomenclature between Philippine Declaration of Independence (1898) and Treaty of Manila (1946) or Independence Day (Philippines) (1946). Readers might be looking for either event. Narky Blert (talk) 00:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Philippine Declaration of Independence in the same fashion as U.S. independence redirects to United States Declaration of Independence. The independence declaration that the Independence Day (Philippines) celebrates is certainly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term. The Treaty of Manila (1946) is certainly far from people's minds when June 12, 1898 the day independence was declared is widely celebrated as opposed to the day it was granted, like July 4, 1776 for the US as opposed to September 3, 1783 when it was recognized through Treaty of Paris (1783). Both Independence Day (Philippines) and Treaty of Manila (1946) should be mentioned in a hatnote on the Philippine Declaration of Independence article.--RioHondo (talk) 08:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The difference is that the American Revolutionaries won whereas the Philippine Revolutionaries lost. In America, the declaration became reality. In America, those that declared independence achieved independence. In the Philippines, the declaration was not followed by independence but by American colonial rule. Independence did not come for the Philippines until 1946. This creates a disconnect between what is called Independence Day, which did not lead to independence, and the real independence nearly 50 years later. Naturally speaking, does "Philippine independence" refer to real independence or the day called Independence Day?--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 06:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm only saying a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC exists so a disambiguation page is unnecessary. Hatnotes can do all the work anyway. If people wanted to search the national independence holiday, the appropriate redirect is Independence Day (Philippines). But Philippine independence itself is overwhelmingly a June 12, 1898 event in people's memory, the day of the independence declaration. The Philippine Centennial redirects to the correct article being the 100 years of Philippine independence. Last year, Google search paid tribute to 121 years of Philippine independence with a doodle. Again, theres nothing that a hatnote cant do. I know the history, but we are all just following what the average reader understands as Philippine independence and their likely search term for the June 12, 1898 event. Hatnotes.--RioHondo (talk) 15:19, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CommentI'm only saying that the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is actual independence, when the Philippines began to govern itself. When you say "in people's memory", I am wondering "Which people?" Certainly not the people of America, or Europe, or Africa. A WP:GLOBAL understanding of the WP:COMMONNAME as well as the understanding of the phrase "the Philippines since independence" would naturally lead to 1946. Otherwise people not from the Philippines (and many in the Philippines) would be confused. The use of "independence day" as a name for June 12, 1898 is a term of art and an historical accident that is not understood by anyone who does not have a working knowledge of Philippine history. When people outside the Philippines are looking for information on "Philippine independence" they mean when the Philippines began its current period of self-rule, like what happened in other former colonies. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 09:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The situation is not unique to the Philippines. Countries like East Timor and Vietnam also celebrate their independence declaration and not the dates they were granted by Indonesia and France respectively. Estonia and Georgia also recognize their pre-USSR sovereignty as their independence. So when the reliable sources mention xx years of Vietnam's or Timor's or Estonia's independence, we know which dates they are referring to, like in our case, the dates they recognize and celebrate. Those are featured annually by mainstream media.--RioHondo (talk) 10:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate. This is tricky. There are actually 4 articles that can lay claim to be the target of the redirect and having 4 of these in hatnotes becomes too unwieldy. If we must have a target, my preference is for the first of these (the declaration event). —seav (talk) 03:16, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Philippine Declaration of Independence (1st event; June 12, 1898)
  2. Independence Day (Philippines) (holiday for the 1st event; every June 12th and non-working holiday)
  3. Treaty of Manila (1946) (document and 2nd event; July 4, 1946)
  4. Republic Day (Philippines) (holiday for the 2nd event; every July 4th and not a non-working holiday)
• Make this a WP:SS article. This is, has been, and will continue to be a contentious area. It needs more explanation than a disambiguation page can properly provide. Make it a summary style article summarizing several ((main article)) detail pages (there are quite a few of them -- see e.g., Talk:Republic of Zamboanga#Not a sovereign state, which I created in an edit just a bit prior to this one). Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:59, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CommentDisambiguate with a sentence or two of explanation -- I'm happy with that.--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 09:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. DAB pages cannot contain a sentence or two of explanation, per MOS:DABENTRY. @Wtmitchell and Iloilo Wanderer: What would you say to a WP:BCA? They can be useful when several articles can be put in context with brief explanations. Narky Blert (talk) 08:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, my suggestion was to make it a WP:SS article; however, a rose, by any other name, .... The term Philippine independence seems to mean and to have meant different things to different people, and separate WP articles exist which detail and expound upon those different meanings. A number of separate WP articles concern separate declarations of independence by separate revolutionary organizations. Also, the term conceals an ambiguity between declaration of independence and achievement of independence. This is too messy, as you point out, for a disambiguation page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - It's complicated. This appears, at first glance, to be something that somebody would type in expecting a general historical article. One that discusses the evolution of different intellectual streams of thought in the country, the colonialist fights, the issues in context with broader world wars, and so on? I'm iffy on having any just one single event and/or document gone to here. I find myself interested in the previous comment's point. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 16:07, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• He Hymn of Death → The Hymn of Death  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible typo. Not recently created. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Nothing obvious on DAB page He that this could refer to. Narky Blert (talk) 17:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:PANDORA. Keeping this would encourage people to create redirects where the only difference between the 2 is that the redirect does not have the first letter. For example, Oy Story → Toy Story or Hris Pratt → Chris Pratt. OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see how the existence of this particular redirect would make someone think "oh, I should create more redirects like it!" For your examples, if Oy Story and Hris Pratt help people find the articles they are looking for, then they would be useful redirects. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, implausible. Hog Farm (talk) 21:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, harmless ((R from misspelling)). The target article was at this title for over a month, which I deem a significant amount of time. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as an implausible typo. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:38, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - The article existed at this title title for a month plus, hence I will cross into keep just barely. Otherwise – "the", being so generic, has little affinity as a typo (no more than any other "the", and I do not think a similiar redirect should be created for every title containing the word—in theory). — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 14:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tavix—but more importantly, note the pageviews this redirect has received; there seems to be incoming links which we shouldn't break. ((R from misspeling)) and ((R unprintworthy)) should be added to the redirect. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 23:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per J947. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Black Monday II → 2020 stock market crash  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, clear neologism with no sources referencing this name for the incident. Only historical content was copied from the existing redirect target. —Locke Cole • t • c 02:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Article refers to it as Black Monday, and the Black Monday disambiguation page already lists it. OcelotCreeper (talk) 15:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There have been many Black Mondays as Black Monday has listed on that page. --Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 17:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Black Monday. I would have said as ((R from incomplete disambiguation)); except that Black Monday is a badly misguided WP:SIA, which lists several (but by no means all of the) things which share the characteristics "black" and "Monday" in their names. Narky Blert (talk) 00:43, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I suspected, and as is typical for SIAs: Black Monday has something like 80 links-in, most of which are plain wrong. Narky Blert (talk) 01:43, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typical link, in Brown v. Board of Education: 'Many Southern white Americans viewed Brown v. Board of Education as "a day of catastrophe—a Black Monday—a day something like Pearl Harbor."' The top entry in Black Monday is a 1209 massacre in Dublin by the Irish of 500 English settlers, and the second is a day of bad weather in 1360 which killed men and horses. The parallels are not exact. Narky Blert (talk) 02:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Black Monday. It's useful as a redirect, but too vague to be targeted. Jim Michael (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per Tenryuu.No point in having this redirect. >>BEANS X2t 06:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I don't know if we have a consensus here, but personally I'm inclined to think that this isn't right. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Y@K → Year 2000 problem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible typo. I suppose that this would originate from capitalizing the 2 for an (at) symbol, but the (at) causes the title to take on a completely different meaning. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The only way to get this would be to hold down ⇧ Shift for Y, 2, and K, which takes more effort than pressing ⇪ Caps Lock before pressing those 3 keys in sequence. --Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 17:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  I use the ⇧ Shift more commonly than the ⇪ Caps Lock. --Soumyabrata ^{wash your hands} _{to protect from coronavirus} 17:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Shift-2 on UK keyboards is ". @ is shift-'. Narky Blert (talk) 08:07, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Do you remember the redirect WW@? --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 12:53, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep QUite a plausible typo if you've already capitalized "y" and redirects are cheap. Walter Görlitz (talk) 11:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete plausible, but if someone types this and there isn't a redirect they will notice the typo and go back and correct it. We don't have similar redirects for BBC! and BBC", for example. Peter James (talk) 13:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's one letter after the mistake; that's not a lot of time to fix or even notice a typo. Also, the search bar isn't the only way you can search something; URL searches are common too. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 21:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • The number of letters after is irrelevant, try the correct URL after. Should we create soft redirects to rm.wikipedia.org (a similarly plausible typo as r and m are to the right of e and n on the keyboard)? Peter James (talk) 18:30, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • The number of letters after is relevant; it's the amount of time you have to notice your mistake. IMO Y@K is far more plausible than rm.wikipedia.org. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 05:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Walter Görlitz; it's evidently useful and evidently not harmful to the encyclopedia. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 21:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Having looked at British and American keyboards it would seem a plausible typo for the Americans, Ofcourse to the average Brit the typo makes no sense at all. –Davey2010^Talk 10:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Noo Yawk English → New York City English  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

With this particular spelling, this is an unlikely search term. I suggest deletion Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – People use "Noo Yawk" to mean "New York English".[1] --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 05:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep per Soumya-8974, but the spelling of the phrase is rather arbitrary. --Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 17:20, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Deleet. WP is not a fonetik dikshunery. Redirects like this can only be justified with evidence of use, else there's a strong suspicion of WP:MADEUP. Narky Blert (talk) 08:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With your argument, the Noo Yawk and Noo Yawk City should be deleted. Fonemik misspellings are quite common on the Internet (e.g. kool, kwik, sed, thru, wun). --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 12:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I wouldn't be opposed to adding Noo Yawk and Noo Yawk City to this discussion, or a new discussion. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:10, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 8#Noo Yawk. - Eureka Lott 21:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep per Soumyabrata, It does sound made up however the source provided above proves it was once used. There may be people out there who either type like this or used too. –Davey2010^Talk 10:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• D!NGD*NG → Vsauce#D!NG  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

D!NG was never referred to by this name, by the best of my knowledge. Stevens refers to the audience as "Ding Dongers" in this episode, but that's the closest I could find. Redirect was created by a user who was recently topic banned from creating redirects. TheAwesomeHwyh 03:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – There is D!NGD*NG on here. --Soumyabrata ^{wash your hands} _{to protect from coronavirus} 08:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • ​ I don't see that in that URL. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oh, the image hadn't loaded. Still, that image doesn't really show that this is something someone would type. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Look at the URL correctly. There is an image displaying D!NGD*NG with a yellow background. --Soumyabrata ^{wash your hands} _{to protect from coronavirus} 17:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • ​Yes... I just did. But that doesn't explain why anyone would search this. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:45, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as an unused name branding, this would be confused with other terms as listed in Ding Dong (disambiguation). They changed it to D!NG and D*NG, but the article places them next to each other. The actual channel does not call themselves DingDong with that stylization. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep both. Note that Meksiko has been turned into a disambiguation page. bibliomaniac15 19:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yurop and Meksiko[edit]

• Yurop → Europe  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Meksiko → Mexico  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Previously deleted at this bulk RFD in 2015. G4 declined because that nomination concerned only Korean-language redirects and these names are used in other languages as well. The question, then, is if these names are used in a language pertinent to the respective regions and/or are plausible misspellings in English. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:RFFL. tpi:Yurop is Tok Pisin. tpi:Meksiko / hr:Meksiko is Tok Pisin and Croatian. Narky Blert (talk) 07:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Phonemic respelling of "Europe" and "Mexico". --Soumyabrata ^{wash your hands} _{to protect from coronavirus} 08:07, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• wikt:Yurop: (humorous) Informal form of Europe, keep. Meksiko seems to be another Esperanto redirect by Soumya-8974, delete per WP:RLOE. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Regardless of any uses of these terms in other languages, they're perfectly plausible as phonetic misspellings in English. – Uanfala (talk) 12:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Disambiguation for Meksiko is definitely better: well done, 59.149.124.29 for tracking down these entries. – Uanfala (talk) 22:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Neutral on Yurop; Disambiguate Meksiko for three WP:DABMENTIONs (drafted below the redirect) and put Mexico in WP:SEEALSO, since keeping the redirect as is hides the search results for people who can spell correctly. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 22:57, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Yurop as a semi-common joke and/or reasonable phonetic misspelling. Disambiguate Meksiko per 59.149.124.29's draft. ~ mazca ^talk 12:51, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Justification provided, withdrawing discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Kirwin station → Oak Park station (CTA Blue Line)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, and nothing meaningful showed up in an internet search. Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^{[User talk:Rosguill|talk]]} 17:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Keep, citations added here. Cards84664 18:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, withdrawing. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• List of evangelion ablums → Music of Neon Genesis Evangelion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Ape Uprising (Slough Feg Ablum) → Ape Uprising!  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Twins Happy Together (Twins ablum) → Happy Together (Twins album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sicks (ablum) → Sicks (album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Doomsword (ablum) → Doomsword (album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Slade in Flame (ablum) → Slade in Flame (album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Happy Together (Twins ablum) → Happy Together (Twins album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't know how plausible this typo is, given that the B and M keys are fairly far apart on a keyboard (to be fair, this misspelling is used in some official titles, such as Ablum by Duplex!). I'm tilting towards delete unless a justification can be provided. Regards, SONIC678 14:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The transposition is between the B and L adjacent letters. It's something that I occasionally do when one hand is too fast to hit its key before the other hand hits its intended key. So it's possible to type the 'b' before the 'l' by accident. On the other hand, I really don't think we ought to be making redirects to cover every possible transposition of adjacent letters, otherwise we'd have alubm and albmu to deal with. I'd be inclined to let the search function deal with transpositions and get rid of the redirects, but it's not a big deal. --RexxS (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I must've missed it. I meant to say "B and L" keys...just typed in the wrong letter, since the L and M keys are really close to each other. Regards, SONIC678 16:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all. No need for redirects with a misspelled qualifier when the correct version exists, and pops up in the searchbox after a few letters. This is just clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 16:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete obvious error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - While these typos are certainly possible to make, still... I'm inclined to support deletion. They just don't appear to be that helpful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Deltee as unjelpful. –Davey2010^Talk 15:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Magnetic capacitivity → Gyrator–capacitor model#Magnetic capacitance  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is no such term. The redirect was deleted (as part of a move) as a result of a discussion at Talk:Gyrator–capacitor model#Magnetic capacitivity. I requested the creator to explain, but received no response. SpinningSpark 13:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The discussion linked by nom suggests a mistranslation from German or Russian, and I agree. A Google search for the unusual-looking word "capacivity" (which looks like a cross between capacitance, capacity and conductivity) left me none the wiser. A search for "magnetic capacivity" turned up stray references equating it to either permeance or permittivity (which are different things). I didn't find the 1913 Arkadiew paper cited in Gyrator–capacitor model; but did find this 1921 paper by the same author. It uses the expression magnetische Fähigkeit, which translates literally as "magnetic conductivity"; another odd-looking expression. However, this citation defines magnetische Fähigkeit as a synonym of magnetische Permeabilität, "magnetic permeability". Cutting to the chase: no WP:RS source uses the expression "magnetic capacivity", it's an obscure and unlikely search term of unclear meaning, and we would be better off without it. Narky Blert (talk) 04:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Cite Stenton ASE → Template:Cite Stenton ASE  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused cross-namespace redirect to a template with only three transclusions. Peter James (talk) 12:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Anybody who types ((cite Stenton ASE)) will use the template whether or not the identically named redirect exists. The redirect serves no purpose whatsoever. --RexxS (talk) 15:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and WP:XNR. Narky Blert (talk) 04:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete confusing cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep ass → KeePass  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I see what you've done there, but no. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Narky Blert (talk) 13:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, this is just silly. – numbermaniac 14:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - non-encyclopedic. - Ahunt (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete feels like a G1. OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I did chuckle. Still... CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- Would love to keep for being original and creative lol, Delete unfortunately per everyone above me. –Davey2010^Talk 18:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• List of of railway companies in Turkey → List of railway companies in Turkey  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• List of of churches in the Reorganized Latter Day Saints movement → List of churches in the Reorganized Latter Day Saints movement  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• List of of causes of pelvic pain → List of causes of pelvic pain  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• List of of churches in the Latter Day Saint Reorganization movement → List of churches in the Reorganized Latter Day Saints movement  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Repeated "of". Peter James (talk) 12:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all, no kind of of use. Narky Blert (talk) 13:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both of of these. The changes of of people typing the word "of" twice are low. OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per Narky and OcelotCreeper; also adding List of of churches in the Latter Day Saint Reorganization movement to this nomination. Regards, SONIC678 23:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all - Yeah, let's just be rid of these. I agree. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:55, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete these seem unnecessary. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unnecessary redirects, –Davey2010^Talk 18:58, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close , redirect was converted to an article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keeping Emulation Environments Portable → Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development#Keeping Emulation Environments Portable  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The term is not mentioned in the article and a reader would find nothing useful about it there. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was in ( seee here). CorporateM has delete it from the Article. I have now made a article from it. --Calle Cool (talk) 11:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to User:InvalidOS/A Recursive Redirect. ^{[April Fools!]} (non-admin closure) Jalen Folf (talk) 05:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This section contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

• User:InvalidOS/A Recursive Redirect → User:InvalidOS/A Recursive Redirect  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It looks like somebody wants to have fun. This is illegal.^[4-1] Invalid^OS_talk 12:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hahaha. Deryck C. 13:51, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Rename to The Divine Garlic of the Zombies of the Shark of the Fruit. OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to InvalidOS' page, and then redirect it to this one. Glades12 (talk) 17:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All who oppose, say I. That's nobody. Pianostar9 (talk) 20:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. Delete, recursive. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 18:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete WP:SNOW -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:28, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Russian World (disasmbiguation) → Russian world (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete - typo in "disambiguation". Peter James (talk) 12:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the usual reason. Narky Blert (talk) 12:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted by Widr. Seems to be a partially enacted (early?) closure, but no link or CSD was referenced. Regardless, it's red, and WP:DRV is unnecessarily bureaucratic when the outcome for these is pretty clear, so marking as closed. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 01:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Gourmand (disamabiguation) → Gourmand (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete - typo in "disambiguation". Peter James (talk) 12:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the usual reason. Narky Blert (talk) 12:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete WP:SNOW -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:28, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ibn al-Jawzi (disambigutation) → Ibn al-Jawzi  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, typo in "disambiguation". Peter James (talk) 08:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the usual reasons. Narky Blert (talk) 09:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wockeypoo → Flatulence  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I got five Google hits looking this up, one of which was to a site called "Wockeypool", and another to pronouncewiki.com. I see no reason to have a redirect for a name so osbscure Urban Dictionary knows it not. Hog Farm (talk) 04:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. WP:MADEUP word which was an article for 14 minutes in 2005 before being blanked and redirected. Narky Blert (talk) 09:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Narky. – numbermaniac 04:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was discombobulate if deleted, so defenestrate that decision and disambiguate this discussion. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 00:42, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This section contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

• WP:AFD → Wikipedia:Articles for deletion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to WP:APRIL because the connection to April Fools' Day is much more obvious than any silly deletion nonsense. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Discombobulate. Narky Blert (talk) 09:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Defenestrate. We don't need this silly redirect! Invalid^OS_talk 13:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:AfD already exists, people are more likely to search that way than all caps. OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate with every article that's ever been deleted. Hog Farm (talk) 17:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.