The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Cabayi (talk) 12:39, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ben Tennyson (article) → List of Ben 10 characters#Ben Tennyson  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Disambiguator has no more affinity for this article than any other article. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 23:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment if the lemma is to be deleted, we may need to move the editing history somewhere that remains visible, e.g. Ben Tennyson (character). Also note that a new editor has just split the list entry to Ben Tennyson. (I believe that's the only Ben Tennyson in Wikipedia.) 59.149.124.29 (talk) 00:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Ben Tennyson is a fictional character, not an article. I checked and didn't see any merging in its history, so there's no need to keep the edit history. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Tavix. Not an article, so disambiguator is highly misleading. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Sandpit (disambiguation) → Sandbox  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I cannot understand why this page redirects to the sandbox disambiguation page. This redirect page is unnecessary, as there is no mention in that disambiguation page. Better if we create the sandpit disambiguation page instead. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 21:30, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate (drafted) per nominator. Every other "Sandpit" besides the primary topic is a proper noun, so they wouldn't belong at Sandbox (disambiguation). Also adjust the dab header on Sandpit so it links to Sandbox (disambiguation) and Sandpit (disambiguation) separately (the link to Sandpit (horse) would then be unnecessary). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 23:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've copied contents from Sandpit (disambiguation) to Sandbox accordingly. On closure, someone can delete the formers contents and RD. Jimthing (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi, I think you may have misunderstood my comment. Every other "Sandpit" besides the primary topic is a proper noun, so they wouldn't belong at Sandbox (disambiguation). These should clearly be separate disambiguation pages. The hatnote at the top of the Sandpit article can then be updated to link to both disambiguation pages. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 23:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Disambiguate. Oh sorry, my bad. Yes makes sense as suggested. Jimthing (talk) 06:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambig per 59.149... Thryduulf (talk) 11:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Love May Fail (film) → The Nightingale (Hannah novel)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure how Love May Fail relates to The Nightingale. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete another repurposed after an AFC decline (Special:Diff/943792383), draft moved to main space and back, double redirect fixing ensues... This serves no purpose. -2pou (talk) 22:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Ziggy (film) → Draft:Planet of the Apes (upcoming film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure how Ziggy is related to Planet of the Apes. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this thing, I can't seem to find any evidence of a character with that name or something (not even on the Planet of the Apes wiki!). Could this be a fan's assumption about the name of a minor character? Regards, SONIC678 04:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete another totally repurposed draft (Special:Diff/949843978), which itself got redirected later.
  To editor $uperFan32: is there a reason you don't just start an entirely new draft? This makes the history of pages (not to mention leftover redirects) extremely confusing. -2pou (talk) 22:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I guess a response won't be coming... Editor was blockedshortly before these noms. -2pou (talk) 23:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Zombie Prom (film) → Draft:Red Platoon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure how Zombie Prom is related to Red Platoon. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - looks like the article was completely repurposed (not sure why) here: Special:Diff/947690926. The leftover redirect from the ensuing move serves no purpose. -2pou (talk) 22:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Once Upon a One More Time (film) → Draft:Untitled Sam Raimi Island Thriller  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure how Once Upon a One More Time is related to Sam Raimi. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete another totally repurposed draft. -2pou (talk) 22:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Hotfuss → Draft:Mean Girls (upcoming film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure how Mean Girls is related to Hotfuss. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete again repurposed -2pou (talk) 22:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (upcoming film) → Draft:Fast (upcoming film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure how Fast is related to Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as this seems to be a $uperFan32 trend of totally repurposing drafts for some reason. I've lost interest in tracking down the diffs. -2pou (talk) 22:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Happypenguin.org → Linux gaming#History  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target (any more). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Ndebele people. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• AmaNdebele → Mthwakazi  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Amandebele → Northern Ndebele people  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

They should point to the same target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget both to Ndebele people (a disambiguation page) as ((R from ambiguous term)), as it seems the term is the native name of both groups as well as the Southern Ndebele people (see wikt:ama-). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 23:25, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Cabayi (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Calubian, → Calubian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Accidentally and mistakenly created during the process of moving "Calubian, Leyte" to Calubian. This was eventually fixed through a non-controversial, technical move request. Not needed as it is an implausible search term. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: WP:UNNATURAL. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; absolutely a waste of time to nominate this redirect. Deleting this redirect does not help the encyclopedia in any meaningful way. RHARMFUL and K4 apply. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 19:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Created by mistake. Would qualify for G6 if it was unopposed. HotdogPi 20:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, this, this seems like search bar clutter, because of the superfluous comma at the end, and we don't really need to retain it since the move request was already done. Regards, SONIC678, 04:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Search bar clutter. Likely created in error, a stray comma at the end is implausible enough for me. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as per nomination and above comments. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per everyone above. Commas are not supposed to be at the end of a title. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 19:14, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Apcolypse → Apocalypse  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect contains a double misspelling ("pc" instead of "poc" and "col" instead of "cal"), making it a very unlikely search term. Not a very active user (talk) 17:25, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This may seem implausible, but Google returned over 30 thousand results. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; common misnomer. Old, helpful, and harmless. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 19:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. Very implausible redirect. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 17:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weakish keep per J947. Even though it may not sound quite like "apocalypse" in certain dialects, it still sounds close enough. This is further bolstered by the Google results, with some art pieces even having that as part of their name. Regards, SONIC678 04:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per overwhelming Google results, though I do agree this does seem implausible at first glance. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per J947 and Sonic678. Thryduulf (talk) 11:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Apocalypse. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Apocolypes → Apocalyptic literature  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect contains two misspellings ("oco" instead of "oca" and "pes" instead of "pse"), making it a very unlikely search term. Not a very active user (talk) 17:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• This mis-spelling is found, e.g. at Pinterest and Amazon. Retarget to Apocalypse. – Fayenatic London 13:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. No indication that this is a constructive redirect. ~ mazca ^talk 13:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Fidel Castro el singao → Fidel Castro  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, an internet and scholar search didn't turn up anything meaningful. Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, origin seems to be vandalism.[1] – Fayenatic London 13:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and findings above. -2pou (talk) 19:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. It's WP:SNOWING (non-admin closure) Hog Farm _Bacon 20:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Appolo 13 → Apollo 13  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Appolo 11 → Apollo 11  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Double misspelling. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Also adding the similar Appolo 11 to the discussion. Working on it...done. Regards, SONIC678 15:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep:Seems like a plausible misspelling to me... precedent is set for this sort of spelling by words such as piccolo and buffalo. Popcornfud (talk) 15:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep: I agree the spelling of foreign-language terms with double consonants may be unintuitive: accommodate and recommend are pretty often misspelt. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. What is to be gained by deleting misspelled redirects? -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Appolo (disambiguation) receives about 6.4 pageviews per day, while these redirects receive about 3.7 and 3.5, respectively. (Appolo, which receives 3.9 views/day, redirects to a language of Ghana.) Evidently people do make this misspelling. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Harmless, helpful, unambiguous and has strong pageviews. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 03:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per everyone above. Plausible and harmless. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Evoloterra → Apollo 11  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Obscure synonym. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as per Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. Unlikely but possible search term. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Space Shuttle Columbia disaster. Already addressed by Edward. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• The Columbia seven → STS-107  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should be retargeted to Space Shuttle Columbia disaster. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Uri gagarin → Yuri Gagarin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible misspelling, since the initial Y is never misspelled. Also, look at the broken caps. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I think it's entirely plausible someone could misspell the name Uri. Anyone who is unfamiliar with Russian spellings could misspell it, especially as there is also a name Uri - e.g. Uri Geller. I have no objection to it being changed to Uri Gagarin with a capital however. VenomousConcept (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Slightly weak keep this thing, as VenomousConcept brings up a good point about how it's a plausible misspelling for people unfamiliar with Russian. It's also plausible for the surname to be lowercase, like with the redirect Abraham lincoln. Regards, SONIC678 20:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as phonetically plausible: in English Uri is often pronounced the same as Yuri. – Uanfala (talk) 00:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Uanfala, phonetically plausible redirects are useful. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per those above. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 01:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Vostok 1. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• First human spaceflight → Yuri Gagarin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should be retargeted to Vostok 1. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. Yes it should. The second sentence of Vostok 1 links to Yuri Gagarin. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Coronavirus outbreaks → Coronavirus#Outbreaks  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The singular form of this redirect targets to the COVID-19 pandemic. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 12:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: To be fair, the singular form targeting the singular most relevant outbreak does make sense, and there's definitely an argument for having the plural form of outbreaks remain at the current target. There are not multiple COVID-19 pandemics; just one. With that out of the way, we typically have the plural form of a title target the singular form in most cases, but I'm tempted to soft keep given the circumstances, as the COVID-19 pandemic is never referred to as plural. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Utopes. Thryduulf (talk) 12:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.