The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdraw. (non-admin closure) Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 13:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sonic 2K6 → Sonic the Hedgehog (2006 video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I have no idea what this means at all. From my research it could either be a non notable fan game which would be WP:FANCRUFT, or it could be a non notable fan nickname for the game. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 19:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - "2K6" is a slang way of writing "2006". This game was often referred to as Sonic 06, Sonic 2006, or Sonic 2K6 because was released in 2006 but technically had the same title as a game that came out in 1991 as well. Sergecross73 msg me 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Technically, two games titled "Sonic the Hedgehog" came out in 1991 - the well-known title for the Genesis/Mega Drive, and a game for the Master System and Game Gear. The MS/GG game is not a port, as it features different levels and music. MightyArms (talk) 10:57, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Yes, I'm not sure what that adds to this conversation, but you are correct. Sergecross73 msg me 13:36, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Unambiguous redirect and a reasonable name for the target article (commonly known as Sonic 2006 or Sonic '06) 193.37.240.164 (talk) 11:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - "2K6" is just an abbreviated form of "2006", which makes the redirect appropriate. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 06:44, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Thryduulf (talk) 13:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Rhynchotheriidae → Gomphothere  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not only is this redirect a hoax, it also does not have a reliable source to back this redirect up. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 23:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep used by a single 1953 french language research paper. See [1] (page 541). I agree that "Rhynchotheriidae" was an inappropriate WP:OR fork by the article creator, which is why I redirected it, but it is fine as a redirect. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:29, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Hemi, but also because its subfamily version, Rhynchotheriinae, is legit and in the article. See also [2] - UtherSRG (talk) 23:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Star Walkin' (League of Legends Worlds Anthem). Jay 💬 16:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Star Walkin' (song) → Lil Nas X discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Star Walkin' (League of Legends Worlds Anthem). RPI2026F1 (talk) 16:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Star Walkin' (League of Legends Worlds Anthem) seems like a non-controversial retarget TartarTorte 17:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I would like to imagine that there had to be a reason the first target was done. Maybe it was before the second article was created? RPI2026F1 (talk) 12:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Looking at it, the redirect existed a whole 3 weeks prior. RPI2026F1 (talk) 12:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom now that the specific article has been created. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sonic the Hedgehog (synd) → Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect due to the disambiguation. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 16:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete What's a "synd"? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think it's supposed to be short for "syndication", which was how these cartoons were originally released, but I'm not sure how on Earth someone would come up with that as an abbreviation. MightyArms (talk) 11:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Seems to be distinct as this specific show was the only one originally released under syndication, but searching for this term verbatim only turns up the redirect article, this discussion, and an entry on Cylist. Not sure if that is enough to make this search term plausible? 193.37.240.164 (talk) 11:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - even if all the brainstorming above was correct, "(synd)" is not correct or likely to be used disambiguation. Sergecross73 msg me 14:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to History of the Americas. Jay 💬 16:46, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Discovery of the Americas → Settlement of the Americas  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not seeking deletion, but input on what to do with this. It has some history as a disambiguation page, but has bounced around to several different targets as a redirect. Most incoming links are relevant to Columbus. Should this be a dab page? If it is to be a redirect, what article should it target? There are some related redirects pointing to History of the Americas; Discovery of America, Discoverers of the Americas, Discoverer of the americas, and Discoverer of the Americas Plantdrew (talk) 16:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to History of the Americas. The current target discusses settlement of the Americas by indigenous peoples, but I think it's at least as likely that someone searching for this is interested in the discovery of the Americas by Europeans. History of the Americas covers both options. Hut 8.5 17:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to History of the Americas, per the above statement. This way, the redirect has more potential to be correct to the potential reader. Johnson524 (Talk!) 01:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget as above per consensus at this 2020 RfD. This redirect has a long history, and it might be best to ping the main editors. (I need to go to bed!) J947 † ^edits 09:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• That's what I look like → Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog#Episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A non notable quote from the show (I assume). Not mentioned and no reliable source to warrant a mention in article. WP:QUOTECRUFT. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 16:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Generic sentence that appears nowhere on the English Wikipedia. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no reason to think someone would search for this very generic phrase in hopes of finding out more about an episode of a 90s cartoon. Sergecross73 msg me 14:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as generic phase that isn't mentioned on Wikipedia. Not a likely search term. Jontesta (talk) 23:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete page history shows this once redirected to List of Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog episodes and pointed to the specific episode this line supposedly originated from before that page was BLARed in 2020. In any case this redirect serves no purpose now. MightyArms (talk) 14:31, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:34, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Syndi-Sonic → Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unsure what this redirect is since I can’t find any results relating to this tv show. Possibly either a WP:HOAX or WP:SONICCRUFT. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 16:34, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Seems to be another reference to this show being the "syndicated" Sonic show, but also seems to be an unused neologism. Delete. 193.37.240.164 (talk) 11:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - also confused to what this is supposed to be. Should be deleted regardless of if the IP above is correct or not. Sergecross73 msg me 14:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Invulnerable Puppy → Sonic the Hedgehog (TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article. Could refer to a lot of characters such as Krypto. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 16:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Ambigious, generic search term. 2601:647:5800:4D2:B01C:780A:C66D:E31 (talk) 01:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - highly unlikely someone types this in hoping to find out more about an obscure character in a 90s cartoon. Not opposed to retargeting, but no idea what that would look like. Sergecross73 msg me 13:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague and not mentioned at target. Jontesta (talk) 23:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Untitled Sonic the Hedgehog sequel → Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

View counts have lowered and it is no longer untitled. There is also a sequel coming out soon. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Not helpful now, can always be recreated if/when it's helpful for something else. Sergecross73 msg me 02:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 14:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (mame) → Sonic the Hedgehog 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (Mame) → Sonic the Hedgehog 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This disambiguation makes no sense. I have no idea what a mame is (there is a arcade emulator called MAME but I doubt it has anything to do with the subject article. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 13:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I just learned that there is an arcade version of the game. Even then it is an unlikely search term. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 13:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Disambiguation may be possible if we try harder, so no prejudice against creating one in future. Jay 💬 14:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sonic prototype → Sonic the Hedgehog 2#Prototype versions  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Could refer to any Sonic prototype like Sonic Extreme. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 13:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or disambig. There are no prototypes listed at the obvious List of Sonic the Hedgehog video games but multiple different ones are mentioned in multiple articles, so disambiguation may be possible. While this could theoretically refer to prototypes of things other than an anthropomorphic hedgehog it wasn't until I used the search term sonic prototype -hedgehog -sega -genesis -heroes -games -nintendo -"hidden palace" that I got anything else, and even then it was non-notable things that weren't actually called "Sonic prototype" (e.g. a non-notable book about the development of Concorde, including prototypes, called Sonic Editions, so we don't need to worry about that in practice. Thryduulf (talk) 14:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - there's been many prototype Sonic games leaked over the years, so there's no one place to target this. None of the prototypes are independently notable, and I think any attempt to compile them in a centralized location on Wikipedia would become a cruft magnet because so many don't get any reliable source coverage. Sergecross73 msg me 13:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not mentioned at article, and unlikely search term. Jontesta (talk) 23:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sonic boom cd → Sonic CD  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sonic Boom CD → Sonic CD  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is not an alternative title to the game. Could be confused with Sonic Boom. Could also be WP:XY material too. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:33, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Never heard of this one.

Popcornfud (talk) 13:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - "Sonic Boom" is a song on Sonic CD, but I don't think anyone would search for that with this sort of scrambled up search term. Sergecross73 msg me 13:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I assume these redirects are meant to be about the CD album Sonic Boom, which was apparently a pre-order bonus for Sonic 3. Neither CD nor 3's articles mention the album, though. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 21:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:42, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Channel Ten Australia → Network 10  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Channel 10 Australia → Network 10  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note related nominations with identical rationales combined. Thryduulf (talk) 12:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Channel 10, a disambiguation page that lists Network 10 and TEN (TV station) for which this is a very plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 12:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Thryduulf. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 02:17, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Channel 10 Australia as redirect to Network 10 as a clear primary topic I think. Weak keep Channel Ten Australia for the same reason, though the use of "Ten" makes it slightly less obvious. The hatnote at Network 10 is sufficient I think. Second preference is to retarget to the DAB page, I don't see any reason to delete. A7V2 (talk) 07:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I don't see how this is confusing, the Network 10 article says that the subject is known as Channel 10 and it operates exclusively in Australia. It's also fair to say that it's the primary topic, the only other Australian item in Channel 10 is is TEN (TV station) and that's an affiliate of Network 10. Hut 8.5 12:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Given the relist comment below: while TEN (TV station) is a plausible target, I think the current target is the primary topic, and that's where the redirect should go. Hut 8.5 17:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see how this is confusing. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 18:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: On TEN (TV station) (an affiliate of the current target) being a plausible search term target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 12:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Channel 10 (Australia) and Channel Ten (Australia) also redirects to the same target. Bassie f (talk) 20:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as they are. I feel like a reference to "Channel 10" (or Ten) would be more likely to refer to the network. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:45, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep both as the current target, the network, is the clear primary topic. The network was renamed from Network Ten to Network 10 in 2018, but still uses the term "Network Ten" in corporate or legal situations. Happily888 (talk) 10:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Rectangular controller → Game controller  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, leaving it unclear what this redirect is meant to refer. Steel1943 (talk) 06:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could Refer to Nintendo Entertainment System#Controllers. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as ambiguous and likely to cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not mentioned and unclear. Jontesta (talk) 23:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 13:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wing grip controller → Game controller  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, leaving it unclear what this redirect is meant to refer. Steel1943 (talk) 06:34, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps could refer to the grips of the controllers but I’m not really sure. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of Nintendo controllers. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  This type of controller exists on the Xbox and PlayStation lines as well. Steel1943 (talk) 00:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, thank you, I see from the pictures. In which case delete since this term is ambiguous and there is no one article that explains or illustrates the term. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:26, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To solidify the consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as ambiguous. MB 01:51, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Screen#Media display. Legoktm (talk) 05:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Video screen → Computer monitor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Most third-party search results for this term return results for the subject Projection screen. However, some of the results were also for the redirect's current target and screens on smartphones. Probably best to delete this redirect due to its ambiguity to allow Wikipedia's search results to provide the best assistance to our readers to locate the subject which they are trying to find. Steel1943 (talk) 05:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Screen#Media display. I think it's useful enough to keep, and that should cover most or all use cases. WPscatter ^t/_c 06:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to Display device which is the target for Tv screen and many similar redirects (see [3]). Confusingly though, Television screen targets Television set (which I'm considering boldly redirecting to match Tv screen... probably could create TV screen as well). I would also not oppose retargeting to Screen#Media display so long as Display device is added to that section. Perhaps Television set and Computer monitor could be added to that section as well. A7V2 (talk) 09:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There have been no updates at Screen#Media display.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Screen#Media display. MB 01:53, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Ambiguous and sort of useless in my opinion. I'm not sure how retargeting to an entry on a DAB page would be helpful. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:30, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted a close made by Pizzaplayer219 which was done prematurely since consensus is obviously still unclear, and there's no reason for this to be closed yet. CycloneYoris ^talk! 16:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Screen#Media display. It is the best target because it covers the most bases. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of tallest buildings in Vermont. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• List of tallest buildings in Burlington, Vermont → Burlington, Vermont#Culture and landmarks  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This was merged into Burlington, Vermont in 2010 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Burlington, Vermont, but now nothing that really mentions this is on the page anymore meaning this redirect is a bit misleading. I can't find anything covering this topic in a way that is particularly satisfactory on wikipedia. TartarTorte 01:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The merge was done at Special:Diff/383660188. While normally we'd need to preserve history for attribution purposes, the merged content is quite different so I don't think there's a copyright concern there. Ovinus (talk) 02:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of tallest buildings in Vermont many of which are in Burlington. Jay 💬 02:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For the late retargeting suggestion to be evaluated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of tallest buildings in Vermont. The list there is sortable by location so its very easy to find the tallest buildings in Burlington. Thryduulf (talk) 09:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget as suggested above since lots of the buildings in the list are in Burlington. Hut 8.5 18:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 00:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Unannounced Olympiads → Olympic Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This was an article on future olympic games that did not yet have an announced host, but was BLARred in 2007 to redirect to Olympic Games. There does not seem to be a place for upcoming olympic games. TartarTorte 01:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Bids for Olympic Games - I think this is the most appropriate target for this as it has links to the bidding processes for every Olympic games, including upcoming ones. That said, this does appear a very unlikely way of searching for this, though clearly likely enough as that is what the article was created to show. See also a discussion from when it was BLARed in 2007: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Olympics/Archive 6#Unannounced Olympiads. A7V2 (talk) 04:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget or delete (I currently have no preference between the two). If kept this should be retargetted per A7V2 but I'm at present undecided whether it should be kept or deleted. Thryduulf (talk) 10:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as they do not exist yet; it would be like having a link to Unannounced ownership of Wikipedia by User:El cid, el campeador. Until the announcement comes, there is no useful content we can have on the topic. And I do not think it's a likely search term, either. Bids for Olympic Games deals with official bid process and past bids, but it does not cover bids for games which have not yet even been announced. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 20:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per El Cid, El campeador. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 21:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 02:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete since if something is unannounced, no useful information can be given on the topic, making this a very unlikely redirect to be used. 2601:647:5800:4D2:B01C:780A:C66D:E31 (talk) 01:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. No point in keeping if the content is still unannounced (i.e. non-existent). CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:38, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G5, created by sock of Awolf58. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wine in BoIivia → Bolivian wine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• BoIivian wine → Bolivian wine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Capital "I" (i) as the third letter in "Bolivia". Unlikely, unnecessary. Steel1943 (talk) 02:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a very unlikely typo. Thryduulf (talk) 09:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, very unlikely to be used. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per the above, as it is an unlikely typo to have. Johnson524 (Talk!) 01:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G5, created by sock of Awolf58. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• IsIam → Islam  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The redirect use I instead of L in Islam. Capital I looks similar to capital L. From the standpoint of a search term, this search term is quite implausible. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I think? I mean who who ever type it like this? A google search also indicates that with a capital 'i' it's an acronym. Iskandar323 (talk) 04:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. It's not a plausible search for the acronym either - that would be ISIAM but we have no content about the Indian Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics beyond unlinked passing mentions in two biographies of people who were/are the president. Thryduulf (talk) 09:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per above statements, this is a pretty unlikely typo to have. Johnson524 (Talk!) 01:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unlikely miscap and misspelling --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Euthanasia. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:06, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Mercy killing → Euthanasia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Mercy-killing → Involuntary euthanasia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Mercy kill → Coup de grâce  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I think these redirects should all point to the same page. I suggest either Euthanasia or Involuntary euthanasia. Cheers, gnu57 01:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose option one (as that is already what the nominator proposes) and option 3 (different subject altogether). Support option two, as in retargetting to Euthanasia what the original redirect was. The Banner talk 02:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget all to Euthanasia as that is what all the reliable sources I found in a couple of minutes searching clearly indicate is the meaning, some explicitly noting it as a synonym. I strongly oppose targetting Coup de grâce as that's a completely different subject. Thryduulf (talk) 09:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Euthanasia. RPI2026F1 (talk) 17:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Euthanasia. I don't think Involuntary euthanasia is as good a target, as a mercy killing may be Non-voluntary euthanasia (where the subject is not capable of consenting). Hut 8.5 17:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate all three. They're all potential targets, and I don't really think any of them is the primary topic. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• (Re)target all to Euthanasia. Could refer to any sort of euthanasia, so the best target would be the article about the general topic, where a hatnote that mentions the term exists and provides a link to animal euthanasia. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• (Re)target all to Euthanasia and hatnote Coup de grâce. I don't see how Coup de grâce is a "different subject". Oppose Involuntary euthanasia as a disambig entry as Euthanasia already covers it, per Mdewman6. Jay 💬 03:34, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Paper Mario series characters → Characters in the Mario franchise  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No such list anywhere. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:34, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• It's an erroneously "fixed" double redirect. It originally targeted Characters in the Paper Mario series, a former article, before it was BLARed in 2010. Either we revert the article/redirect setup to its pre-2010 state or delete if we don't. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 15:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 01:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete If no such list exists, what is the point of having the redirect if it will not be helpful? Johnson524 (Talk!) 01:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - it unlikely that characters from the series ever garner enough coverage to warrant such a list on Wikipedia. Sergecross73 msg me 12:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Giggle and Hoot#Hoot the Owl. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Hoot the Owl → Super Mario 64  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article. There are multiple places to redirect this such as Hoot Owl. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 13:11, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Giggle and Hoot#Hoot the Owl. Jay 💬 17:11, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 01:34, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since I used to watch Giggle and Hoot as a child, I refer and agree to this discussion. Bassie f (talk) 08:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per other comments. As far as I know the owl in Super Mario 64 is never named in game, its citation on Mario Wiki is to an official players' guide, so a very unlikely search term for Super Mario 64 regardless. WPscatter ^t/_c 16:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Giggle and Hoot#Hoot the Owl per Jay. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:06, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Previously discussed here, closed as no consensus: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 8#Hoot the Owl. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 21:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.