The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Computer monitor. ✗plicit 00:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Visual display unit → Electronic visual display  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Computer monitor, which literally states the subject was formerly called a "visual display unit". The recent back and forth retargeting of this redirect and the reasons why are in the redirect's edit history. Steel1943 (talk) 23:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. I was the one who redirected it to Electronic visual display, but having looked into it a bit more I am now convinced that Computer monitor is the better target. In particular, there was a British vs American usage issue of which I was not aware.--Srleffler (talk) 20:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:07, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Moldavie → Moldova  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:FORRED, there is no particular affinity between Moldova and French. Languages of Moldova notes it only as a foreign language that is sometimes the first foreign language taught in schools (but by implication less often than English). Wiktionary notes that the word can mean either Moldova (the country) or Moldavia (the region of Romanina) but fr.wp has the country as primary topic, so if this isn't deleted I don't think it should be retargetted. Thryduulf (talk) 23:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Jake Gomez (Marvel Cinematic Universe) → Werewolf by Night#Television  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The character Jake Gomez did not appear in the Marvel Cinematic Universe TV special Werewolf by Night as was made to believe in several sources, particularly from this one and this initial one which spurred it into other articles. The Maya-Gomez info was traced to an unverified IMDb profile. The character didn't appear, and as such, this redirect should be deleted. All mentions of an MCU Gomez are removed at the target and the special's article. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Character does not exist (yet) in the MCU with not further indications he will appear in any other upcoming future project. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:47, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Favre. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Shree Padmakshi renuka, kawade-alibag → Padmakshi Temple, Hanamkonda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Padmakshi renuka aai → Bhadra (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Padmakshi renuka dev → Bhadraa  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Shree Padmakshi renuka → Bhadra (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Padmakshi Temple, warangal → Padmakshi Temple, Hanamkonda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Shri Padmakshi renuka → Bhadra (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Padmakshi Renuka → Shri Padmakshi renuka  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Padmakshi renuka devi → Padmakshi Temple  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Bhadraa → renuka (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I'm attempting to clean up after Aairenuka956's attempts to hijack various articles and turn them into a page about this temple. None of the resulting redirects point to any page pertaining to that temple, and there's currently no mainspace article about it either, so these should all be deleted. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support and thanks for doing this. Renuka (the goddess) has a page, but I don't see Bhadra is relevant. "Padmakshi Temple, warangal" could be kept, despite the caps, though the temple isn't (now?) in that district, but the nextdoor one. But whatever. Johnbod (talk) 19:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:CSD#R3 as implausible typos to their current target. The attempts at hijacking have all been reverted and these redirects certainly are not plausible for the current target. Even if, the draft is accepted someday, these will still be very implausible. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 09:51, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Also, a certain redirect was moved post-RfDing, now located at Bhadraa which should also be deleted, as its target Bhadra (disambiguation) does not contain anything called "Bhadraa". —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 09:51, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: I just added Padmakshi Renuka, Padmakshi renuka dev & Bhadraa (see above) to the nomination. I also modified the target of the certain nominated redirect. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 20:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Patent nonsense Firsfron of Ronchester 11:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Bʹelarusʹ → Belarus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I can't find any uses of this (unlike "Belarus'"), Google translate regards it as Russian, giving the English as "Bʹlarusʹ" so it might be some sort of slang or slurred ponunciation? Whatever, I can find no evidence this is a useful redirect on the English Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 16:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I've just seen that a few days after creating this redirect in 2018, the creator (Учхљёная) was blocked by Tavix for creating patent nonsense (they were later indeffed for other reasons) so this might be speedily deletable as G1 but I'm going to leave it here for other opinions just in case. Thryduulf (talk) 16:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 18:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Buelorussia → Belarus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is an extremely rare transliteration that seems only to be used by people from or with some connection to Israel or derivatives of this redirect. The redirect gets less than ten uses a year. Thryduulf (talk) 16:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Moldovan diaspora. Jay 💬 18:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Moldovans in Germany → Romanians in Germany  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Having "Moldovans in Germany" redirect to "Romanians in Germany" is a very bad idea. Besides the fact that "Romanians in Germany" doesn't mention mention Moldovans in the article at all, the debate over whether Moldovans are a subgroup of Romanians or a separate ethnic group seems to be a very intense one so I don't think conflating Moldovans and Romanians like this is a good idea. I'm not sure if I articulated this quite right, but hopefully I've made my case. ~Cherri of Arctic Circle System (talk) 14:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Moldovan diaspora. While I can't find substantial content on this anywhere on WP, this article at least has a mention and potential for expansion, and the current redirect is misleading. ^Complex/_Rational 15:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Moldovan diaspora, given the historical mixtures of the Moldovan population, current redirect is very inappropriate. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Siemens ELFA → Elfa  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This page does not disambiguate "Siemens ELFA". The term is mentioned 7 time in Enwiki [1] but none of those pages is a good target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Software bug#Showstopper. Jay 💬 18:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Showstopper bug → Showstopper  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This page doesn't disambiguate "showstopper bug" and the only article in Enwiki that mentions the term (Neverwinter Nights 2: "one reviewer encountered a "showstopper bug" in the initial retail version") isn't a good target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 09:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Retarget per Wotheina. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 16:30, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Software bug#Showstopper. "Showstopper bug" is a jargon quite popular in the software industry. The creator of this redirect probably meant to guide readers to the entry for software bug (Special:Diff/376464114), which was later removed in Special:Diff/1091860158. Today I added the term in the article Software bug (Special:Diff/1115028204) with an anchor to receive the redirect. As readers might search by the keyword "showstopper bug" to proactively avoid an ambiguous word "showstopper", I suggest keeping this redirect rather than deleting it. --Wotheina (talk) 14:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I concur that Software bug#Showstopper, now that section has been created, is a good target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 03:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Athletics/Alumni Center → Houston Cougars#Athletic facilities  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Too generic of a term to redirect to the "Athletics/Alumni Center" bullet mentioned at its current target section. Suggesting delete. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 14:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Far too generic a term to be able to usefully disambiguate, let alone point at a specific target. Thryduulf (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Rename This issue has already been resolved by renaming it Athletics/Alumni Center (Houston). If that doesn't work, then rename it Athletics/Alumni Center (University of Houston). This building houses many of the sports teams for the Houston Cougars. It is too important of a building to eliminate. Renaming fixes the problem. Thanks for your consideration.Spatms (talk) 17:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Spatms this discussion is not about the article or its title, and it has not been nominated for deletion. This discussion is about the redirect left behind at the former title when it was moved. Thryduulf (talk) 22:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Thryduulf: I see that the creator has moved the redirect post-RfD nomination. What next? Re tag the nominated page, tag both pages? —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 09:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @CX Zoom: generally we revert to the status quo as at the time of nomination, and I don't see an issue with doing that here. I don't have time right now to do it. Thryduulf (talk) 10:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Thryduulf and CX Zoom: It has been fixed. At this point, I'd say if Athletics/Alumni Center (Houston) needs to be nominated, it should probably be done with either a separate nomination or bundled with this one after this one is relisted (possibly relisted procedurally.) Steel1943 (talk) 15:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom as too generic. I don't see the same rationale applying for the Houston redirect for it to be nominated/bundled. Jay 💬 18:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G7'd by Victuallers. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 11:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Kathleen Hammond → Kathy Hammond  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per target article, Kathy Hammond's full first name is Kathryn, not Kathleen. There are a few Kathleen Hammonds who are at least little-n notable, like this academic and this book reviewer [2] [3], the latter of whom is who I was looking for when I came upon this redirect. Suggest deleting as misleading. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 10:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please go ahead and delete.--Ipigott (talk) 10:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Victuallers (talk) 11:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Pantheon (structure) to Pantheon#Buildings and memorials. Pantheon (structure) to Pantheon#Buildings and memorials

Pantheon (temple) to Pantheon, Rome Avoiding redirects to Disambiguation pages. Firsfron of Ronchester 05:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Pantheon (structure) → Temple  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Pantheon (temple) → Temple  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A better target might be Pantheon (religion)#Extension of the concept into structures and celebrities or disambiguation page Pantheon. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget:
  • Pantheon (structure) to Pantheon#Buildings and memorials where it could refer to almost any of the entries (retargetting to the top of the page is my second choice).
  • Pantheon (temple) to Pantheon, Rome which started life as a temple adding a hatnote to the dab. Alternatively it could go straight to the dab page. Thryduulf (talk) 08:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget Pantheon (structure) to Pantheon § Buildings and memorials^{(disambiguation page)}, same as Thryduulf, and Pantheon (temple) to Pantheon (religion) § Extension of the concept into structures and celebrities, as suggested by the nominator, since that section provides context and explanation for the topic and links the Pantheon in Rome so anyone looking for that would still find it. The article Pantheon (religion) also links to the disambiguation page at the top. Most of the buildings listed at Pantheon § Buildings and memorials aren't temples, so these redirects shouldn't point to the same place. – Scyrme (talk) 10:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget The vast majority of readers probably want the Pantheon, Rome, which gets 4,400 views a day. Either that or Pantheon#Buildings and memorials. Johnbod (talk) 14:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There are 3 targets suggested for Pantheon (temple).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget as per Thryduulf, so (temple) to the one in Rome. —Kusma (talk) 18:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget both to Pantheon as ((R from incomplete disambiguation)). I'm not sure there is a primary topic here that would outweigh sending users to the dab page. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. However added the ((R from incorrect title)) tag. Jay 💬 18:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sir Peter Brook → Peter Brook  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Never knighted. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 23:35, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - It seems as though some sources call him "Sire Peter Brook" ([4], [5]), but they may be simply incorrect. Certainly would make it seem a plausible, if incorrect, search term. A7V2 (talk) 01:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Tagged as ((R from incorrect title)) per usage cited above by A7V2. TartarTorte 13:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per TartarTorte and A7V2. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: if this is kept, there should be a hatnote to Peter Brooke (17th-century MP), who actually was knighted. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Peter Brooke: redirect to dab as nom, per Sir Peter Brooke. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I guess the question comes down to are people more likely to misspell Peter Brooke as Peter Brook or mistake Peter Brook who is a CBE for being titled as Sir Peter Brook. TartarTorte 18:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I think Peter Brooke is the best target here, mentioning both likely intended people. —Kusma (talk) 18:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as ((R from incorrect title)) per A7V2. Just based on page views, I think it's much more likely anyone using this would be seeking the current target rather than either of the entries at Peter Brooke, especially the one who actually was knighted, and those who are are served by a hatnote. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Pridnestrovnia → Transnistria  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misspelling, the title was supposed to be "Pridnestrovie" which does exist. This spelling gives 0 Google results. Super Ψ Dro 07:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Deleteper nomination. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 09:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Without prejudice to recreation when a mention is added. Jay 💬 06:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Red Tigress → Blood Heir  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Blood Heir is the first book in a series. Red Tigress is the second book. It is not mentioned anywhere in en.wp, not even in the Blood Heir. MB 03:14, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I had meant to slightly enlarge the article Blood Heir to mention that it is the first volume in a trilogy, and to mention the other two books in the trilogy. However, due in part to real life worries, I haven't done that yet. With luck, that might happen soon. Cardamon 19:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete without prejudice to recreation when a mention is added. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus / retarget to Insider threat. Even though consensus is not entirely clear, the nom's proposal seems to be the preferred option among participants late in the discussion. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Insider attack → NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan#Green-on-blue attacks  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Too specific a target for such a broad term. Suggest retarget to insider threat. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I agree the current target is much too specific, but I'm not sure of the best alternative. Inside job was my first thought (that and Insider threat should probably link to each other some how, maybe even be merged?), Mole (espionage) is possibly relevant too. Thryduulf (talk) 17:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm tempted to just redirect inside job to insider threat, as that article consists of a dicdef, one sentence that's already covered there, and an example which doesn't really need to be merged. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:12, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I've now done that redirection (and also redirected insider threat management, which was largely duplicative, to the same place). Re other suggestions, I'm fine with a disambiguation page, although I note that NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan does not use the term "insider" except in the references so would fail WP:DABMENTION as it stands. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I added a usage of the term “insider attacks” to the relevant section. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 07:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I’d probably prefer a disambiguation page that links to Insider threat and NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan#Green-on-blue attacks. I’d also consider adding Mole (espionage) and either Sabotage or Sabotage#As war tactic Blaylockjam10 (talk) 18:45, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree that disambiguation is a good solution here. Thryduulf (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support dab by Blaylockjam10--Lenticel ^(talk) 03:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to insider threat. I don't see how a mention of insider attacks at NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan#Green-on-blue attacks will qualify it as a DAB entry, unless it has come to be seen as a synonym for the singular term Insider attack. It's a broad term per nom, and the Afghanistan attacks are one example. Jay 💬 06:08, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I had seen Mole (espionage) and Sabotage#As war tactic as well, but missed commenting on them in my above comment. I don't see them as disambig candidates either, and also would not prefer them hatnoted from insider threat, but a See also entry should work. Jay 💬 04:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try at some form of consensus...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 02:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to insider threat. I agree with Jay that the other suggested pages don't seem like an appropriate destination for "insider attack", so a plain retarget makes sense. Legoktm (talk) 00:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 01:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• People Search → Search engine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Previous content was a poorly written duplicate article that included copyvios and spam. Only other creation by the creator Heavyequipment4u (talk · contribs) was a promotional userpage. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete to allow uninhibited Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Social search where the algorithm is tuned towards the person who is searching. Jay 💬 08:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)`[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:45, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to white pages Googling the phrase "people search" mainly brings up examples of online telephone directories or online background checks. Perhaps a DAB would be appropriate? This doesn't seem like an implausible search term. P.S. The lower-case version of this phrase (People search) has been SALTed. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:39, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further research, data broker is probably a more appropriate target. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:41, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 01:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The uppercased version should have targeted a search engine software or service with that name (if there is one). The lowercased version is protected (but that was more than a decade ago) but it could be a standalone article at people search or people-search, or at a minimum we could have a list of people-search engines. I don't see data broker as a target although it mentions one people search product. There are multiple such products on enwiki hence delete per Shhhnotsoloud. Jay 💬 09:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Buddhism in Mizoram → Mizoram#Buddhism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The article Buddhism in Mizoram(State) has been created, which is mistitled. I had intended to move to Buddhism in Mizoram but this is presently a redirect. Goldsztajn (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. Move the recently created mistitled article "without leaving a redirect" so that we don't have to open another RfD for that. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 10:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Legoktm (talk) 03:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• People finder → Google Person Finder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Overly generic redirect, since search results are for information brokers. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambig, including PeopleFinders.com and Katrina PeopleFinder Project, maybe a see also to Missing person as well. Thryduulf (talk) 09:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete to allow uninhibited Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambig per Thryduulf. Data broker should also be included in the DAB based on search results as mentioned by the nominator. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:42, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Attempted a dab draft at the redirect. Jay 💬 10:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambig: Per the above (though it is a little creepy that someone would search this) Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 20:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.