< August 6
August 8 >

August 7

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 7, 2023.

Surprise WikiProject redirects (A–D)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Trainwreck.
Don't let this discussion go off the rails.

Different redirects make different levels of sense. Some of them seem plausible, some of them look like they ought to go to navboxes, and others are just confusing. Renominate individually, because any blanket close over these would be either too complex to implement or not actually solve any problems at hand. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 13:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These templates redirect to a WikiProject banner, but typically navboxes (or sometimes sidebars) get the subject as the template name. (See Category:Navigational boxes by topic.) Because their targets are (in effect) a surprise, I suggest they be deleted. If a shortcut is desired for any of these, it's been standard to prefix a shortcut with "WP" to indicate a WikiProject template. I'm testing a small number of redirects for positive consensus prior to considering others. SWinxy (talk) 23:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. I doubt my vote will change the outcome but I agree with the nom. Having shortcuts is ok, but even shortcuts should follow a naming convention which makes sense. Template names like Template:COMICS can be a valid "shortcut" for a large number of templates, not the least the infobox itself. Gonnym (talk) 14:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

World War II/Infobox

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Participants did not settle on a single option out of the many proposed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not useful search terms. However, they contain useful edit history; if they are not deleted, they probably need to be moved without leaving a redirect elsewhere. Steel1943 (talk) 23:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an opinion on World War II/Infobox.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: for disucssion of Jay's move suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 13:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: WP:INVOLVED relist to close old log day. (Wow, I forgot all about this thing ... I was the nominator...)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to close the June 22 logpage. (I can't believe that this is the fourth relist in as many months!) It seems that participants either want these two redirects to be kept, moved without redirect, or histmerged into the main World War II article, but it's unclear what we should actually choose.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Duckmather (talk) 22:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Finnish redirects that turn ä into ae

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 15#Finnish redirects that turn ä into ae

Hansik

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Korean cuisine and added a hatnote pointing to the previous target. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hansik is a commonly used English transliteration of 한식, which means Korean cuisine. See for example: [1], [2], [3], etc. :3 F4U (they/it) 20:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can also see the overwhelming usage as "Korean food" in this Google scholar search :3 F4U (they/it) 20:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Erlenmeyer rule

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 15#Erlenmeyer rule

Cam The Ham

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 00:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Maria Pia of Savoy the younger

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Princess Maria Pia of Bourbon-Parma. (non-admin closure) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Princess Maria Pia of Bourbon-Parma - Presumably the intended target as this redirect was created before that article. estar8806 (talk) ★ 19:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. 2601:249:9301:D570:463:8F0D:7A59:36FC (talk) 12:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beatrice, Queen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget. Uncontroversial with no basis to oppose (unsynced R from sort name). Calling WP:SNOW here. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Queen Beatrice - Ambiguous. estar8806 (talk) ★ 19:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Draft:Maarten Rijkers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 21#Draft:Maarten Rijkers

Draft:Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Redirect exists in main namespace. estar8806 (talk) ★ 18:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's already a proper redirect under this name. Keivan.fTalk 04:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Right Honourable The Baroness Thatcher LG OM DStJ PC FRS HonFRSC

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Far too long to be plausible search terms. estar8806 (talk) ★ 18:46, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Edward, Elector Palatine

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. as an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 10:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence presented in the article, or found elsewhere, suggests that Edward was ever Elector Palatine himself. estar8806 (talk) ★ 18:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Prince henry of prussia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Prince Henry of Prussia per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) J947 † edits 08:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dabify - With the other two Princes Henry of Prussia, Prince Henry of Prussia (1862–1929) and Prince Henry of Prussia (1747–1767). estar8806 (talk) ★ 18:09, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Caroline of Nassau

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14#Caroline of Nassau

Frederick (1766-1839)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unhelpful search term as there was surely more than one person by the name of Frederick with those dates of life. estar8806 (talk) ★ 17:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Giorgio di Hannover

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:UE. Implausible and theoretically ambiguous search term. estar8806 (talk) ★ 17:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The name is in Italian (?) and the subject was not associated with Italy in any way, shape or form. If we were to create redirects for each article in all of its different languages, we would end up having thousands of redirects per page. We have to go with common names used in English sources. Keivan.fTalk 04:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Prince Maurice of Battenberg, KCVO

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14#Prince Maurice of Battenberg, KCVO

Marie of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and United Kingdom

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unlikely search term, particularly considering it should be and the United Kingdom. estar8806 (talk) ★ 17:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC) —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 17:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject is never referred to in this manner. It is not a plausible search term, cannot be used in text, and is grammatically incorrect (as nominator pointed out, "the" is missing before "United Kingdom"). Keivan.fTalk 04:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Stolen election conspiracy theories

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14#Stolen election conspiracy theories

Anti-white racism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 02:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Both deleted last November after lengthy discussion (which the user who recreated the pages apparently missed, although they specifically noted the RfD before that one in their edit summary). AFAIK nothing has changed since then to make this redirect more useful or necessary. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 17:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then what about redirecting it to Racism instead --FMSky (talk) 21:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at all the uses of the word "white" on the Racism page, and didn't see any description of anti-white racism itself as a topic, apart from a brief summary of the reverse racism article. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I dont want to assume bad faith but what im getting from this discussion is that you're denying that racism against whites even exists, is that correct? FMSky (talk) 12:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which part of the Racism article do you feel is describing the topic of anti-white racism? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 15:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I dont think there is much point discussing with someone like this any further --FMSky (talk) 16:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It was even straight up called "anti-white racism" in the hatnote of the reverse racism article until someone recently felt the need to remove it from there too: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reverse_racism&diff=prev&oldid=1169306647 --FMSky (talk) 16:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Augusta Charlotte

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Actually called "Charlotte Augusta". This is an incorrect format which I've found no usage referring to her. estar8806 (talk) ★ 15:46, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to add nothing of value.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The order of the names is wrong, so it is both an unlikely search term and not useable in text either. Keivan.fTalk 04:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Olav VI of Norway

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 13:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not his actual numeral. estar8806 (talk) ★ 15:04, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Princess Alexandra, The Honourable Lady Ogilvy, LG, GCVO, CD

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:05, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Highly unlikely search term. There is also the dispute over whether Alexandra is a "LG" or "KG" (Lady or Knight of the Garter). estar8806 (talk) ★ 15:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's an unlikely search term, but it is also highly unlikely that it can be used in a text. And yes, there is also the issue of whether she is a KG (Knight of the Garter) or LG (Lady of the Garter). Keivan.fTalk 04:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Her Royal Highness Princess Alexandra Helen Elizabeth Olga Christabel, The Honourable Lady Ogilvy, Royal Lady of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, Dame Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - In now way is this a plausible search term. estar8806 (talk) ★ 15:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Excessive. Not a plausible search term either. Keivan.fTalk 04:04, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Maria Henrietta Stuart I

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 13:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The addition of the roman numeral would make this a highly unlikely search term. estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Friedrich Ludwig, Prince of Orange

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) estar8806 (talk) ★ 15:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Sophia Dorothea's children were Princes of Prussia, not of Orange, so this makes no sense. Unless somebody else knows something I don't? estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The King of Prussia claimed the Principality of Orange from 1702 and it was used as a courtesy title for his eldest son's eldest son. Opera hat (talk) 15:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I knew they had claimed it at some point, but I thought it was far later on. I'm going to go ahead and speedy close this as withdrawn. estar8806 (talk) ★ 15:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

First Duke of Cambridge

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Duke of Cambridge#Dukes of Cambridge. (non-admin closure) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Duke of Cambridge#Dukes of Cambridge - Could realistically refer to any of the first Dukes of Cambridge from any creation, including Prince William. estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Augusta Matilda Charlotte

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Her actual name was "Charlotte Augusta Matilda" and the incorrect format returns no use at all referring to the subject. estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The order of the given names is wrong, so it cannot be used in text and is not a plausible search term either. Keivan.fTalk 03:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Regency Bill

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Regency Acts. (non-admin closure) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Regency Acts - People using this specific search term are most likely looking for the laws rather than the crisis. estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Matilda of Wales

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Caroline Matilda of Great Britain. (non-admin closure) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Caroline Matilda of Great Britain - Any results for "Matilda of Wales" I've found result in Caroline Matilda. This Maud seems to have been solely called "Maud" and never "Matilda". estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. 2601:249:9301:D570:463:8F0D:7A59:36FC (talk) 01:45, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Albert, Henry William Frederick

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If "Albert" were the surname this redirect could make sense. But it is not, so this is an implausible search term. estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. 2601:249:9301:D570:463:8F0D:7A59:36FC (talk) 01:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The whole thing is just wrong. Albert is one of the subject's given names, whereas the surname (which is rarely used for royals) is Windsor. The redirect is malformed, not useable in text, and not a plausible search term either. Keivan.fTalk 03:41, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

To do the needful

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14#To do the needful

Doing the needful

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14#Doing the needful

Crack stem

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 18#Crack stem

Christe qui lux es et dies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems strange to redirect a classical Latin hymn to the biography page of the compiler of a hymn book which includes someone else's setting of this hymn (by Johann Hermann Schein). Most information we have on wiki seems to be at Te lucis ante terminum, but a red link to encourage article creation might also be an option. Felix QW (talk) 06:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Urozhaine, Ukraine

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Urozhaine. Some participants believe there is a primary topic, however this can be a separate discussion. Jay 💬 16:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect originally went to List of villages in Ternopil Oblast, however there are multiple villages named Urozhaine are located in Ukraine, one of which is been in the news recently due to the war. I moved the redirect to Urozhaine, Ternopil Oblast to disambiguate it from the other villages, and now propose we either delete the old redirect or turn it into a disambiguation page listing all of the Ukrainian villages called Urozhaine. Physeters✉ 04:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nantucket ferry

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14#Nantucket ferry

More